Obviously disqualified himself. Yet probably better politically to just to let him get his ass kicked in the general.
Obviously disqualified himself. Yet probably better politically to just to let him get his ass kicked in the general. Link to a conviction?
Obviously disqualified himself. Yet probably better politically to just to let him get his ass kicked in the general. Link to a conviction? You could actually read the 14th amendment. Conceivably.It's not that long.
Obviously disqualified himself. Yet probably better politically to just to let him get his ass kicked in the general. Link to a conviction? You could actually read the 14th amendment. Conceivably.It's not that long. So no conviction
Obviously disqualified himself. Yet probably better politically to just to let him get his ass kicked in the general. Link to a conviction? You could actually read the 14th amendment. Conceivably.It's not that long. So no conviction not yetnot requiredyou should get out more
Section 3No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.So about that conviction you don't have.....Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack
Section 3No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.So about that conviction you don't have.....Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack Imagine believing your own eyes.No conviction required, as you’ve proven.
Section 3No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.So about that conviction you don't have.....Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack Imagine believing your own eyes.No conviction required, as you’ve proven. Should be an easy case to bring and win then.
Section 3No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.So about that conviction you don't have.....Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack Imagine believing your own eyes.No conviction required, as you’ve proven. Should be an easy case to bring and win then. He'll be celebrating with his Piss Boy until everything gets turned over by the SCOTUS. Schumer will be calling on Antifa to murder them.
Section 3No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.So about that conviction you don't have.....Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack Imagine believing your own eyes.No conviction required, as you’ve proven. Should be an easy case to bring and win then. He'll be celebrating with his Piss Boy until everything gets turned over by the SCOTUS. Schumer will be calling on Antifa to murder them. It’s just a pretty obvious case for a strict constructionist. Still probably better for Daddy to get his ass kicked, as usual. Politically speaking, I mean.
Section 3No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.So about that conviction you don't have.....Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack Imagine believing your own eyes.No conviction required, as you’ve proven. Should be an easy case to bring and win then. He'll be celebrating with his Piss Boy until everything gets turned over by the SCOTUS. Schumer will be calling on Antifa to murder them. It’s just a pretty obvious case for a strict constructionist. Still probably better for Daddy to get his ass kicked, as usual. Politically speaking, I mean. So obvious you can't prove itSAD
Section 3No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.So about that conviction you don't have.....Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack Imagine believing your own eyes.No conviction required, as you’ve proven. Should be an easy case to bring and win then. He'll be celebrating with his Piss Boy until everything gets turned over by the SCOTUS. Schumer will be calling on Antifa to murder them. It’s just a pretty obvious case for a strict constructionist. Still probably better for Daddy to get his ass kicked, as usual. Politically speaking, I mean. So obvious you can't prove itSAD You'd think a lawyer would understand insurrection is a crime, with elements, that have to be demonstrated, in a court, so that a jury, uh, could, ya know, issue a conviction.
Section 3No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.So about that conviction you don't have.....Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack Imagine believing your own eyes.No conviction required, as you’ve proven. Should be an easy case to bring and win then. He'll be celebrating with his Piss Boy until everything gets turned over by the SCOTUS. Schumer will be calling on Antifa to murder them. It’s just a pretty obvious case for a strict constructionist. Still probably better for Daddy to get his ass kicked, as usual. Politically speaking, I mean. So obvious you can't prove itSAD You'd think a lawyer would understand insurrection is a crime, with elements, that have to be demonstrated, in a court, so that a jury, uh, could, ya know, issue a conviction. Here's a clue: word search "conviction" in the 14th Amendment.Now tie yourself in knots.As usual.
