Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Democrats File MORE LAWSUITS To REMOVE Trump From 2024 Ballot, They Are CHEATING To Win 2024

DerekJohnson
DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 69,848 Founders Club
in Tug Tavern
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RguWRkNL7VU
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«134

Comments

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,360
    Obviously disqualified himself. Yet probably better politically to just to let him get his ass kicked in the general.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,606 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    Obviously disqualified himself. Yet probably better politically to just to let him get his ass kicked in the general.

    Link to a conviction?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,360
    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    Obviously disqualified himself. Yet probably better politically to just to let him get his ass kicked in the general.

    Link to a conviction?
    You could actually read the 14th amendment. Conceivably.

    It's not that long.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,606 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    Obviously disqualified himself. Yet probably better politically to just to let him get his ass kicked in the general.

    Link to a conviction?
    You could actually read the 14th amendment. Conceivably.

    It's not that long.
    So no conviction
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,360
    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    Obviously disqualified himself. Yet probably better politically to just to let him get his ass kicked in the general.

    Link to a conviction?
    You could actually read the 14th amendment. Conceivably.

    It's not that long.
    So no conviction
    not yet

    not required

    you should get out more
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,606 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    Obviously disqualified himself. Yet probably better politically to just to let him get his ass kicked in the general.

    Link to a conviction?
    You could actually read the 14th amendment. Conceivably.

    It's not that long.
    So no conviction
    not yet

    not required

    you should get out more
    Wrong
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,360
    RaceBannon said:

    Section 3
    No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.


    So about that conviction you don't have.....

    Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack

    Imagine believing your own eyes.

    No conviction required, as you’ve proven.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,289 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Section 3
    No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.


    So about that conviction you don't have.....

    Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack

    Imagine believing your own eyes.

    No conviction required, as you’ve proven.
    Should be an easy case to bring and win then.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,360
    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Section 3
    No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.


    So about that conviction you don't have.....

    Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack

    Imagine believing your own eyes.

    No conviction required, as you’ve proven.
    Should be an easy case to bring and win then.
    We’ll see, won’t we?

    Anyone else miss the days when self-described “conservatives” weren’t morons?

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter