Makes sense why Race blows him.

RaceBannon said:

EverettChris said:

HHusky said:

EverettChris said:

HHusky said:

EverettChris said:

HHusky said:

EverettChris said:

HHusky said:

EverettChris said:

46XiJCAB said:

pawz said:

Bob_C said:

46XiJCAB said:

Sledog said:

46XiJCAB said:

Sledog said:

46XiJCAB said:

Sledog said:

46XiJCAB said:

Sledog said:

46XiJCAB said:

SFGbob said:

RaceBannon said:

Meltdown in progress

Nobody likes DeSantis

Sad

I neither like nor trust any politician. It just so happens that Trump is a particularly untrustworthy individual.

Trump’s lawyers told him to give up the docs or face legal troubles. He listened to non-lawyers instead.

Now he’s a victim.

So says Trump.

Presidential records act. He can take whatever the hell he wants. Joe could not, Pence could not. Hillary could not. Those were federal felonies. They haven't raided Obama and Clinton.

Two tiered tin pot dictator justice system.

You’re actually wrong but you keep repeating it. When Trump said the documents are “mine” he lied. Those docs belong to us.

Thus the NA has every right to ask for their return. His lawyers told him to return them. What part of that do you not comprehend? He gambled and list. Now he gets to play the victim.

Prove it.

Have you ever read the types of records former Presidents are allowed to keep?

Anything they want. The president is the sole arbiter of what is and isn't classified. Can declass anything they want.

You need to read up on the PRA. Trump had over 300 classified docs. Maybe he “declassified” them in his mind. A former POTUS can’t keep anything he wants. You’re mistaken.

His lawyers told him to cooperate with the NARA’s request to return docs belonging to us. He listened to sycophants and dummies.

Guess what’s happens if a former POTUS or Pol for that matter returns docs requested by NARA? Nothing. See Mike Pence.

Absolute bullshit. No intent is required with classified information like most crimes. We'll see how that plays out won't we. You proved exactly nothing.

You should be arguing with Trump’s former lawyers. And then go read the 1978 PRA so you understand what records are owned by the public and which are Trump’s. And how they’re required to be stored.

Have you read it?

What is clearly unread is the SCOTUS decision on the PRA, as it related to Clinton, clarifying POTUS can basically do what he wants.

TDS is a hellofa drug.

You don’t even understand what’s at question here. Clinton’s sock drawer tapes had nothing to do with national defense docs.

This guy has no clue what he’s talking about but they are exactly the same thing in terms of presidential documents. The ones indicted should be Joe Biden and Mike Pence for having any classified documents. They had zero legal standing to have any outside of a SCIF and Biden had them all over the eastern seaboard for years, yet no indictments at all.

Another raving and incoherent guy who Trump ruined seems all-in on selective political prosecutions, as are read in the posts from this guy all over this place. I lurked for awhile btw.

Mall Cop, Jr.?

Oh well, fresh nuts.

Huh? Tell me what legal justification there is for Joe Biden and Mike Pence to have any classified documents in their possessions, with some of Biden's dating back to his Senate days allegedly and certainly his VP tenure. Biden's documents stored at five locations that are known including his garage that his son had access to anytime he felt like it.

No justification at all. That's why they gave them back and cooperated to find any others.

Why did they have them in the first place, and how do you know they gave them all back. Biden's attorneys went through his and "gave them all back" if you're a moron who believes that an also that nobody else made copies for distribution.

The things crazies "just know" without any evidence could fill volumes. But I notice you've dropped Mike Pence as a suspect in the "distribution".

Biden and Pence both had legal access to these materials at one time. It's not mysterious to anyone who has ever moved an office how they could have retained possession unknowingly.

You're even dumber "in person." How do you know Joe "unknowingly" took them? Fact is he illegally had them along with Pence and who knows how many he made copies of to sell off for his bribe money. You really are a gullible and dishonest person.

But you seem to be more reticent about Mike Pence.

I see I was right. You just know stuff--no evidence required. Why doesn't Biden just prove the negative of your fantasies, right?

And you probably believe you're a conservative too.

We know some of Biden's moved locations. I also asked why he and Pence are not prosecuted.

Biden is more pertinent to today's conversation because he had his Wingman Garland have the leading opposition candidate unnecessarily raided for the same things Joe knew he had illegally in his possession at the time of the raid. The timeline doesn't lie and Biden initially lied about the timing in terms of the raid on Trump's personal residence. Straight up Nazi tactics.

I know you can't connect dots but this is no different to what's happening to Bolosaro in Brazil by the authoritarian Left or any authoritarian Leftist government in modern history.

It's so obvious it's laughable that you even try to defend it, but then again, reading your act, you're just a clown here to troll and are very limited in any actual knowledge or logic.

Guess H isn't as clever as he thought

Big shock

Bob_C said:

Sledog said:

EverettChris said:

HHusky said:

EverettChris said:

HHusky said:

EverettChris said:

46XiJCAB said:

pawz said:

Bob_C said:

46XiJCAB said:

Sledog said:

46XiJCAB said:

Sledog said:

46XiJCAB said:

Sledog said:

46XiJCAB said:

Sledog said:

46XiJCAB said:

SFGbob said:

RaceBannon said:

Meltdown in progress

Nobody likes DeSantis

Sad

I neither like nor trust any politician. It just so happens that Trump is a particularly untrustworthy individual.

Trump’s lawyers told him to give up the docs or face legal troubles. He listened to non-lawyers instead.

Now he’s a victim.

So says Trump.

Presidential records act. He can take whatever the hell he wants. Joe could not, Pence could not. Hillary could not. Those were federal felonies. They haven't raided Obama and Clinton.

Two tiered tin pot dictator justice system.

You’re actually wrong but you keep repeating it. When Trump said the documents are “mine” he lied. Those docs belong to us.

Thus the NA has every right to ask for their return. His lawyers told him to return them. What part of that do you not comprehend? He gambled and list. Now he gets to play the victim.

Prove it.

Have you ever read the types of records former Presidents are allowed to keep?

Anything they want. The president is the sole arbiter of what is and isn't classified. Can declass anything they want.

You need to read up on the PRA. Trump had over 300 classified docs. Maybe he “declassified” them in his mind. A former POTUS can’t keep anything he wants. You’re mistaken.

His lawyers told him to cooperate with the NARA’s request to return docs belonging to us. He listened to sycophants and dummies.

Guess what’s happens if a former POTUS or Pol for that matter returns docs requested by NARA? Nothing. See Mike Pence.

Absolute bullshit. No intent is required with classified information like most crimes. We'll see how that plays out won't we. You proved exactly nothing.

You should be arguing with Trump’s former lawyers. And then go read the 1978 PRA so you understand what records are owned by the public and which are Trump’s. And how they’re required to be stored.

Have you read it?

What is clearly unread is the SCOTUS decision on the PRA, as it related to Clinton, clarifying POTUS can basically do what he wants.

TDS is a hellofa drug.

You don’t even understand what’s at question here. Clinton’s sock drawer tapes had nothing to do with national defense docs.

This guy has no clue what he’s talking about but they are exactly the same thing in terms of presidential documents. The ones indicted should be Joe Biden and Mike Pence for having any classified documents. They had zero legal standing to have any outside of a SCIF and Biden had them all over the eastern seaboard for years, yet no indictments at all.

Another raving and incoherent guy who Trump ruined seems all-in on selective political prosecutions, as are read in the posts from this guy all over this place. I lurked for awhile btw.

Mall Cop, Jr.?

Oh well, fresh nuts.

Huh? Tell me what legal justification there is for Joe Biden and Mike Pence to have any classified documents in their possessions, with some of Biden's dating back to his Senate days allegedly and certainly his VP tenure. Biden's documents stored at five locations that are known including his garage that his son had access to anytime he felt like it.

No justification at all. That's why they gave them back and cooperated to find any others.

Biden's personal attorneys supposedly went through his and without any supervision and "gave them all back" if you're a moron who believes that and also that nobody made copies for distribution. An FBI raid of all of his homes is a minumum expection for an honest DOJ and without any warning.

BTW, did the attorneys have the proper security clearance to find the classified documents after the FBI and National Archives allowed them to lie about when they knew about it, which was in reality before Trump was raided?

Trump was raided to cover Biden. It's a lot like J6 fake InSUrEcTioN to cover the actual insurrection of certifying a fraudulent election. It's all coordinated with the MSM etc. and they jam the news cycles to keep as quiet as possible about criminal Joe and his crack head son.

That's my hypothesis also. I think they are lying about the dates that Biden's documents were "discovered".

HHusky said:

EverettChris said:

HHusky said:

EverettChris said:

HHusky said:

EverettChris said:

HHusky said:

EverettChris said:

HHusky said:

EverettChris said:

46XiJCAB said:

pawz said:

Bob_C said:

46XiJCAB said:

Sledog said:

46XiJCAB said:

Sledog said:

46XiJCAB said:

Sledog said:

46XiJCAB said:

Sledog said:

46XiJCAB said:

SFGbob said:

RaceBannon said:

Meltdown in progress

Nobody likes DeSantis

Sad

I neither like nor trust any politician. It just so happens that Trump is a particularly untrustworthy individual.

Trump’s lawyers told him to give up the docs or face legal troubles. He listened to non-lawyers instead.

Now he’s a victim.

So says Trump.

Presidential records act. He can take whatever the hell he wants. Joe could not, Pence could not. Hillary could not. Those were federal felonies. They haven't raided Obama and Clinton.

Two tiered tin pot dictator justice system.

You’re actually wrong but you keep repeating it. When Trump said the documents are “mine” he lied. Those docs belong to us.

Thus the NA has every right to ask for their return. His lawyers told him to return them. What part of that do you not comprehend? He gambled and list. Now he gets to play the victim.

Prove it.

Have you ever read the types of records former Presidents are allowed to keep?

Anything they want. The president is the sole arbiter of what is and isn't classified. Can declass anything they want.

You need to read up on the PRA. Trump had over 300 classified docs. Maybe he “declassified” them in his mind. A former POTUS can’t keep anything he wants. You’re mistaken.

His lawyers told him to cooperate with the NARA’s request to return docs belonging to us. He listened to sycophants and dummies.

Guess what’s happens if a former POTUS or Pol for that matter returns docs requested by NARA? Nothing. See Mike Pence.

Absolute bullshit. No intent is required with classified information like most crimes. We'll see how that plays out won't we. You proved exactly nothing.

You should be arguing with Trump’s former lawyers. And then go read the 1978 PRA so you understand what records are owned by the public and which are Trump’s. And how they’re required to be stored.

Have you read it?

What is clearly unread is the SCOTUS decision on the PRA, as it related to Clinton, clarifying POTUS can basically do what he wants.

TDS is a hellofa drug.

You don’t even understand what’s at question here. Clinton’s sock drawer tapes had nothing to do with national defense docs.

This guy has no clue what he’s talking about but they are exactly the same thing in terms of presidential documents. The ones indicted should be Joe Biden and Mike Pence for having any classified documents. They had zero legal standing to have any outside of a SCIF and Biden had them all over the eastern seaboard for years, yet no indictments at all.

Another raving and incoherent guy who Trump ruined seems all-in on selective political prosecutions, as are read in the posts from this guy all over this place. I lurked for awhile btw.

Mall Cop, Jr.?

Oh well, fresh nuts.

Huh? Tell me what legal justification there is for Joe Biden and Mike Pence to have any classified documents in their possessions, with some of Biden's dating back to his Senate days allegedly and certainly his VP tenure. Biden's documents stored at five locations that are known including his garage that his son had access to anytime he felt like it.

No justification at all. That's why they gave them back and cooperated to find any others.

Why did they have them in the first place, and how do you know they gave them all back. Biden's attorneys went through his and "gave them all back" if you're a moron who believes that an also that nobody else made copies for distribution.

The things crazies "just know" without any evidence could fill volumes. But I notice you've dropped Mike Pence as a suspect in the "distribution".

Biden and Pence both had legal access to these materials at one time. It's not mysterious to anyone who has ever moved an office how they could have retained possession unknowingly.

You're even dumber "in person." How do you know Joe "unknowingly" took them? Fact is he illegally had them along with Pence and who knows how many he made copies of to sell off for his bribe money. You really are a gullible and dishonest person.

But you seem to be more reticent about Mike Pence.

I see I was right. You just know stuff--no evidence required. Why doesn't Biden just prove the negative of your fantasies, right?

And you probably believe you're a conservative too.

We know some of Biden's moved locations. I also asked why he and Pence are not prosecuted.

Biden is more pertinent to today's conversation because he had his Wingman Garland have the leading opposition candidate unnecessarily raided for the same things Joe knew he had illegally in his possession at the time of the raid. The timeline doesn't lie and Biden initially lied about the timing in terms of the raid on Trump's personal residence. Straight up Nazi tactics.

I know you can't connect dots but this is no different to what's happening to Bolosaro in Brazil by the authoritarian Left or any authoritarian Leftist government in modern history.

It's so obvious it's laughable that you even try to defend it, but then again, reading your act, you're just a clown here to troll and are very limited in any actual knowledge or logic.

Not prosecuted has to do with intent.

Daddy intentionally and knowingly kept documents, retained them, lied about them, moved them, hid them, defied subpoenas concerning them, etc. That's not even debatable, because (Lordy!) there are tapes. Not remotely similar to the cases of Pence or Biden.

Anyone who calls executing a lawful search warrant "Nazi tactics" isn't bringing anything extra to the TugCon dumbfuckery.

EverettChris said:

RaceBannon said:

EverettChris said:

HHusky said:

EverettChris said:

HHusky said:

EverettChris said:

HHusky said:

EverettChris said:

HHusky said:

EverettChris said:

46XiJCAB said:

pawz said:

Bob_C said:

46XiJCAB said:

Sledog said:

46XiJCAB said:

Sledog said:

46XiJCAB said:

Sledog said:

46XiJCAB said:

Sledog said:

46XiJCAB said:

SFGbob said:

RaceBannon said:

Meltdown in progress

Nobody likes DeSantis

Sad

I neither like nor trust any politician. It just so happens that Trump is a particularly untrustworthy individual.

Trump’s lawyers told him to give up the docs or face legal troubles. He listened to non-lawyers instead.

Now he’s a victim.

So says Trump.

Presidential records act. He can take whatever the hell he wants. Joe could not, Pence could not. Hillary could not. Those were federal felonies. They haven't raided Obama and Clinton.

Two tiered tin pot dictator justice system.

You’re actually wrong but you keep repeating it. When Trump said the documents are “mine” he lied. Those docs belong to us.

Thus the NA has every right to ask for their return. His lawyers told him to return them. What part of that do you not comprehend? He gambled and list. Now he gets to play the victim.

Prove it.

Have you ever read the types of records former Presidents are allowed to keep?

Anything they want. The president is the sole arbiter of what is and isn't classified. Can declass anything they want.

You need to read up on the PRA. Trump had over 300 classified docs. Maybe he “declassified” them in his mind. A former POTUS can’t keep anything he wants. You’re mistaken.

His lawyers told him to cooperate with the NARA’s request to return docs belonging to us. He listened to sycophants and dummies.

Guess what’s happens if a former POTUS or Pol for that matter returns docs requested by NARA? Nothing. See Mike Pence.

Absolute bullshit. No intent is required with classified information like most crimes. We'll see how that plays out won't we. You proved exactly nothing.

You should be arguing with Trump’s former lawyers. And then go read the 1978 PRA so you understand what records are owned by the public and which are Trump’s. And how they’re required to be stored.

Have you read it?

What is clearly unread is the SCOTUS decision on the PRA, as it related to Clinton, clarifying POTUS can basically do what he wants.

TDS is a hellofa drug.

You don’t even understand what’s at question here. Clinton’s sock drawer tapes had nothing to do with national defense docs.

This guy has no clue what he’s talking about but they are exactly the same thing in terms of presidential documents. The ones indicted should be Joe Biden and Mike Pence for having any classified documents. They had zero legal standing to have any outside of a SCIF and Biden had them all over the eastern seaboard for years, yet no indictments at all.

Another raving and incoherent guy who Trump ruined seems all-in on selective political prosecutions, as are read in the posts from this guy all over this place. I lurked for awhile btw.

Mall Cop, Jr.?

Oh well, fresh nuts.

Huh? Tell me what legal justification there is for Joe Biden and Mike Pence to have any classified documents in their possessions, with some of Biden's dating back to his Senate days allegedly and certainly his VP tenure. Biden's documents stored at five locations that are known including his garage that his son had access to anytime he felt like it.

No justification at all. That's why they gave them back and cooperated to find any others.

Why did they have them in the first place, and how do you know they gave them all back. Biden's attorneys went through his and "gave them all back" if you're a moron who believes that an also that nobody else made copies for distribution.

The things crazies "just know" without any evidence could fill volumes. But I notice you've dropped Mike Pence as a suspect in the "distribution".

Biden and Pence both had legal access to these materials at one time. It's not mysterious to anyone who has ever moved an office how they could have retained possession unknowingly.

You're even dumber "in person." How do you know Joe "unknowingly" took them? Fact is he illegally had them along with Pence and who knows how many he made copies of to sell off for his bribe money. You really are a gullible and dishonest person.

But you seem to be more reticent about Mike Pence.

I see I was right. You just know stuff--no evidence required. Why doesn't Biden just prove the negative of your fantasies, right?

And you probably believe you're a conservative too.

We know some of Biden's moved locations. I also asked why he and Pence are not prosecuted.

Biden is more pertinent to today's conversation because he had his Wingman Garland have the leading opposition candidate unnecessarily raided for the same things Joe knew he had illegally in his possession at the time of the raid. The timeline doesn't lie and Biden initially lied about the timing in terms of the raid on Trump's personal residence. Straight up Nazi tactics.

I know you can't connect dots but this is no different to what's happening to Bolosaro in Brazil by the authoritarian Left or any authoritarian Leftist government in modern history.

It's so obvious it's laughable that you even try to defend it, but then again, reading your act, you're just a clown here to troll and are very limited in any actual knowledge or logic.

Guess H isn't as clever as he thought

Big shock

so I'll just enjoy watching it all burn down

Bob_C said:

RaceBannon said:

Bob_C said:

Sledog said:

EverettChris said:

HHusky said:

EverettChris said:

HHusky said:

EverettChris said:

46XiJCAB said:

pawz said:

Bob_C said:

46XiJCAB said:

Sledog said:

46XiJCAB said:

Sledog said:

46XiJCAB said:

Sledog said:

46XiJCAB said:

Sledog said:

46XiJCAB said:

SFGbob said:

RaceBannon said:

Meltdown in progress

Nobody likes DeSantis

Sad

I neither like nor trust any politician. It just so happens that Trump is a particularly untrustworthy individual.

Trump’s lawyers told him to give up the docs or face legal troubles. He listened to non-lawyers instead.

Now he’s a victim.

So says Trump.

Presidential records act. He can take whatever the hell he wants. Joe could not, Pence could not. Hillary could not. Those were federal felonies. They haven't raided Obama and Clinton.

Two tiered tin pot dictator justice system.

You’re actually wrong but you keep repeating it. When Trump said the documents are “mine” he lied. Those docs belong to us.

Thus the NA has every right to ask for their return. His lawyers told him to return them. What part of that do you not comprehend? He gambled and list. Now he gets to play the victim.

Prove it.

Have you ever read the types of records former Presidents are allowed to keep?

Anything they want. The president is the sole arbiter of what is and isn't classified. Can declass anything they want.

You need to read up on the PRA. Trump had over 300 classified docs. Maybe he “declassified” them in his mind. A former POTUS can’t keep anything he wants. You’re mistaken.

His lawyers told him to cooperate with the NARA’s request to return docs belonging to us. He listened to sycophants and dummies.

Guess what’s happens if a former POTUS or Pol for that matter returns docs requested by NARA? Nothing. See Mike Pence.

Absolute bullshit. No intent is required with classified information like most crimes. We'll see how that plays out won't we. You proved exactly nothing.

You should be arguing with Trump’s former lawyers. And then go read the 1978 PRA so you understand what records are owned by the public and which are Trump’s. And how they’re required to be stored.

Have you read it?

What is clearly unread is the SCOTUS decision on the PRA, as it related to Clinton, clarifying POTUS can basically do what he wants.

TDS is a hellofa drug.

You don’t even understand what’s at question here. Clinton’s sock drawer tapes had nothing to do with national defense docs.

This guy has no clue what he’s talking about but they are exactly the same thing in terms of presidential documents. The ones indicted should be Joe Biden and Mike Pence for having any classified documents. They had zero legal standing to have any outside of a SCIF and Biden had them all over the eastern seaboard for years, yet no indictments at all.

Another raving and incoherent guy who Trump ruined seems all-in on selective political prosecutions, as are read in the posts from this guy all over this place. I lurked for awhile btw.

Mall Cop, Jr.?

Oh well, fresh nuts.

Huh? Tell me what legal justification there is for Joe Biden and Mike Pence to have any classified documents in their possessions, with some of Biden's dating back to his Senate days allegedly and certainly his VP tenure. Biden's documents stored at five locations that are known including his garage that his son had access to anytime he felt like it.

No justification at all. That's why they gave them back and cooperated to find any others.

Biden's personal attorneys supposedly went through his and without any supervision and "gave them all back" if you're a moron who believes that and also that nobody made copies for distribution. An FBI raid of all of his homes is a minumum expection for an honest DOJ and without any warning.

BTW, did the attorneys have the proper security clearance to find the classified documents after the FBI and National Archives allowed them to lie about when they knew about it, which was in reality before Trump was raided?

Trump was raided to cover Biden. It's a lot like J6 fake InSUrEcTioN to cover the actual insurrection of certifying a fraudulent election. It's all coordinated with the MSM etc. and they jam the news cycles to keep as quiet as possible about criminal Joe and his crack head son.

That's my hypothesis also. I think they are lying about the dates that Biden's documents were "discovered".

The fact that it's dates plural destroys the whole cooperated fully lie

Lots of leaks coming out of Trump's special counsel.