Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
90-11
Comments
-
2016 team destroys last year’s. It would likely be bad. As good as last year’s offense was, the secondary would get absolutely shredded by Ross and Pettis. Last year’s team would have to score 40+ to beat 2016 and that wouldn’t happen.Canadawg said:
Dumbass takegmo said:
You could argue DeBoner just had a better season in Year 1 than Peterman ever did at UW (2016 Semi's curb stomping up for debate)... no argument Year 1 was better than the other 5 seasons of Peterman.dannarc said:Peterman was 90-11 at Boise too or some shit....
2016 point differential was +24/game and lost to one of Saban's best teams in the playoff and they had a good offense with an elite defense
Last year was a fun Big 12 team that had a +14/game point differential against an easier schedule and didn't punk Oregon by 50
2016s team would beat last year's team 9/10 times -
gmo said:
saying you could argue it makes it a dumbass take? Never took you as a douche. Guess I was wrong.Canadawg said:
Dumbass takegmo said:
You could argue DeBoner just had a better season in Year 1 than Peterman ever did at UW (2016 Semi's curb stomping up for debate)... no argument Year 1 was better than the other 5 seasons of Peterman.dannarc said:Peterman was 90-11 at Boise too or some shit....
2016 point differential was +24/game and lost to one of Saban's best teams in the playoff and they had a good offense with an elite defense
Last year was a fun Big 12 team that had a +14/game point differential against an easier schedule and didn't punk Oregon by 50
2016s team would beat last year's team 9/10 timesdannarc said:
Tough day at work?Canadawg said:
Dumbass takegmo said:
You could argue DeBoner just had a better season in Year 1 than Peterman ever did at UW (2016 Semi's curb stomping up for debate)... no argument Year 1 was better than the other 5 seasons of Peterman.dannarc said:Peterman was 90-11 at Boise too or some shit....
2016 point differential was +24/game and lost to one of Saban's best teams in the playoff and they had a good offense with an elite defense
Last year was a fun Big 12 team that had a +14/game point differential against an easier schedule and didn't punk Oregon by 50
2016s team would beat last year's team 9/10 times
-
It's hard to say. 2016 team barely beat Arizona and sucked in every big moment outside of Pettis bailing them out in Salt Lake City.RoadDawg55 said:
2016 team destroys last year’s. It would likely be bad. As good as last year’s offense was, the secondary would get absolutely shredded by Ross and Pettis. Last year’s team would have to score 40+ to beat 2016 and that wouldn’t happen.Canadawg said:
Dumbass takegmo said:
You could argue DeBoner just had a better season in Year 1 than Peterman ever did at UW (2016 Semi's curb stomping up for debate)... no argument Year 1 was better than the other 5 seasons of Peterman.dannarc said:Peterman was 90-11 at Boise too or some shit....
2016 point differential was +24/game and lost to one of Saban's best teams in the playoff and they had a good offense with an elite defense
Last year was a fun Big 12 team that had a +14/game point differential against an easier schedule and didn't punk Oregon by 50
2016s team would beat last year's team 9/10 times
Overall, they were better. With Mathis and Victor out, I don't know. -
Put it this way. Besides for Penix is there any substantial part of last year's team that was better?haie said:
It's hard to say. 2016 team barely beat Arizona and sucked in every big moment outside of Pettis bailing them out in Salt Lake City.RoadDawg55 said:
2016 team destroys last year’s. It would likely be bad. As good as last year’s offense was, the secondary would get absolutely shredded by Ross and Pettis. Last year’s team would have to score 40+ to beat 2016 and that wouldn’t happen.Canadawg said:
Dumbass takegmo said:
You could argue DeBoner just had a better season in Year 1 than Peterman ever did at UW (2016 Semi's curb stomping up for debate)... no argument Year 1 was better than the other 5 seasons of Peterman.dannarc said:Peterman was 90-11 at Boise too or some shit....
2016 point differential was +24/game and lost to one of Saban's best teams in the playoff and they had a good offense with an elite defense
Last year was a fun Big 12 team that had a +14/game point differential against an easier schedule and didn't punk Oregon by 50
2016s team would beat last year's team 9/10 times
Overall, they were better. With Mathis and Victor out, I don't know.
2016 had better defense all the way through except maybe Edge. Offense was on par but had MMFG and a lesser QB -
Besides Penix over Browning...Canadawg said:
Put it this way. Besides for Penix is there any substantial part of last year's team that was better?haie said:
It's hard to say. 2016 team barely beat Arizona and sucked in every big moment outside of Pettis bailing them out in Salt Lake City.RoadDawg55 said:
2016 team destroys last year’s. It would likely be bad. As good as last year’s offense was, the secondary would get absolutely shredded by Ross and Pettis. Last year’s team would have to score 40+ to beat 2016 and that wouldn’t happen.Canadawg said:
Dumbass takegmo said:
You could argue DeBoner just had a better season in Year 1 than Peterman ever did at UW (2016 Semi's curb stomping up for debate)... no argument Year 1 was better than the other 5 seasons of Peterman.dannarc said:Peterman was 90-11 at Boise too or some shit....
2016 point differential was +24/game and lost to one of Saban's best teams in the playoff and they had a good offense with an elite defense
Last year was a fun Big 12 team that had a +14/game point differential against an easier schedule and didn't punk Oregon by 50
2016s team would beat last year's team 9/10 times
Overall, they were better. With Mathis and Victor out, I don't know.
2016 had better defense all the way through except maybe Edge. Offense was on par but had MMFG and a lesser QB
I'm saying it's a debate. It's not a sure thing.
2016 at their peak was better. But they lost every challenging moment and without Mathis and Victor, it's a discussion.
2022 UW has a better win without question. -
I don't think you are factoring in the defensive difference. 2016 was a top 5 defense. That's otherworldly compared to last year.haie said:
Besides Penix over Browning...Canadawg said:
Put it this way. Besides for Penix is there any substantial part of last year's team that was better?haie said:
It's hard to say. 2016 team barely beat Arizona and sucked in every big moment outside of Pettis bailing them out in Salt Lake City.RoadDawg55 said:
2016 team destroys last year’s. It would likely be bad. As good as last year’s offense was, the secondary would get absolutely shredded by Ross and Pettis. Last year’s team would have to score 40+ to beat 2016 and that wouldn’t happen.Canadawg said:
Dumbass takegmo said:
You could argue DeBoner just had a better season in Year 1 than Peterman ever did at UW (2016 Semi's curb stomping up for debate)... no argument Year 1 was better than the other 5 seasons of Peterman.dannarc said:Peterman was 90-11 at Boise too or some shit....
2016 point differential was +24/game and lost to one of Saban's best teams in the playoff and they had a good offense with an elite defense
Last year was a fun Big 12 team that had a +14/game point differential against an easier schedule and didn't punk Oregon by 50
2016s team would beat last year's team 9/10 times
Overall, they were better. With Mathis and Victor out, I don't know.
2016 had better defense all the way through except maybe Edge. Offense was on par but had MMFG and a lesser QB
I'm saying it's a debate. It's not a sure thing.
2016 at their peak was better. But they lost every challenging moment and without Mathis and Victor, it's a discussion.
2022 UW has a better win without question.
As far as wins I guess the Texass win was nice but 2016 has 2 blow out wins against top 10 ranked PAC teams so thats not definitely a better win -
My original dumbass take was not one on "who would win" or "which roster was better", but that you could argue that DeBoner had the better season. Year 1 of a pretty good mess inherited roster wise following Jimmy Sewage Lagoon.
-
Fair. Wouldn't you have rather not lost to ASU and instead Beat SC in the CCG and lost to Georgia in the playoff last year?gmo said:My original dumbass take was not one on "who would win" or "which roster was better", but that you could argue that DeBoner had the better season. Year 1 of a pretty good mess inherited roster wise following Jimmy Sewage Lagoon.
-
That makes for a fun “where would that hypothetical outcome be seeded”.Canadawg said:
Fair. Wouldn't you have rather not lost to ASU and instead Beat SC in the CCG and lost to Georgia in the playoff last year?gmo said:My original dumbass take was not one on "who would win" or "which roster was better", but that you could argue that DeBoner had the better season. Year 1 of a pretty good mess inherited roster wise following Jimmy Sewage Lagoon.
I would say #3 in front of TCU. -
haie said:
Besides Penix over Browning...Canadawg said:
Put it this way. Besides for Penix is there any substantial part of last year's team that was better?haie said:
It's hard to say. 2016 team barely beat Arizona and sucked in every big moment outside of Pettis bailing them out in Salt Lake City.RoadDawg55 said:
2016 team destroys last year’s. It would likely be bad. As good as last year’s offense was, the secondary would get absolutely shredded by Ross and Pettis. Last year’s team would have to score 40+ to beat 2016 and that wouldn’t happen.Canadawg said:
Dumbass takegmo said:
You could argue DeBoner just had a better season in Year 1 than Peterman ever did at UW (2016 Semi's curb stomping up for debate)... no argument Year 1 was better than the other 5 seasons of Peterman.dannarc said:Peterman was 90-11 at Boise too or some shit....
2016 point differential was +24/game and lost to one of Saban's best teams in the playoff and they had a good offense with an elite defense
Last year was a fun Big 12 team that had a +14/game point differential against an easier schedule and didn't punk Oregon by 50
2016s team would beat last year's team 9/10 times
Overall, they were better. With Mathis and Victor out, I don't know.
2016 had better defense all the way through except maybe Edge. Offense was on par but had MMFG and a lesser QB
I'm saying it's a debate. It's not a sure thing.
2016 at their peak was better. But they lost every challenging moment and without Mathis and Victor, it's a discussion.
2022 UW has a better win without question.
One thing not being considered is how tight the 2016 team played (credit Petersen) VS how loose Deboers team played. Talent wise 2016 wins but on the field I believe Deboers squad wins by culture alone. Just ask Evan Weaver about that.
