Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
90-11
Comments
-
AGAINST PAC 12 teams!Canadawg said:
I don't think you are factoring in the defensive difference. 2016 was a top 5 defense. That's otherworldly compared to last year.haie said:
Besides Penix over Browning...Canadawg said:
Put it this way. Besides for Penix is there any substantial part of last year's team that was better?haie said:
It's hard to say. 2016 team barely beat Arizona and sucked in every big moment outside of Pettis bailing them out in Salt Lake City.RoadDawg55 said:
2016 team destroys last year’s. It would likely be bad. As good as last year’s offense was, the secondary would get absolutely shredded by Ross and Pettis. Last year’s team would have to score 40+ to beat 2016 and that wouldn’t happen.Canadawg said:
Dumbass takegmo said:
You could argue DeBoner just had a better season in Year 1 than Peterman ever did at UW (2016 Semi's curb stomping up for debate)... no argument Year 1 was better than the other 5 seasons of Peterman.dannarc said:Peterman was 90-11 at Boise too or some shit....
2016 point differential was +24/game and lost to one of Saban's best teams in the playoff and they had a good offense with an elite defense
Last year was a fun Big 12 team that had a +14/game point differential against an easier schedule and didn't punk Oregon by 50
2016s team would beat last year's team 9/10 times
Overall, they were better. With Mathis and Victor out, I don't know.
2016 had better defense all the way through except maybe Edge. Offense was on par but had MMFG and a lesser QB
I'm saying it's a debate. It's not a sure thing.
2016 at their peak was better. But they lost every challenging moment and without Mathis and Victor, it's a discussion.
2022 UW has a better win without question.
As far as wins I guess the Texass win was nice but 2016 has 2 blow out wins against top 10 ranked PAC teams so thats not definitely a better win -
Come on Texass would have gone 9-3 in the PAC last year and only if they dodged one of the good teams. The wins against the Oregon schools were potentially more impressive in hindsight. Just my dumbass takeIce_Holmvik said:
AGAINST PAC 12 teams!Canadawg said:
I don't think you are factoring in the defensive difference. 2016 was a top 5 defense. That's otherworldly compared to last year.haie said:
Besides Penix over Browning...Canadawg said:
Put it this way. Besides for Penix is there any substantial part of last year's team that was better?haie said:
It's hard to say. 2016 team barely beat Arizona and sucked in every big moment outside of Pettis bailing them out in Salt Lake City.RoadDawg55 said:
2016 team destroys last year’s. It would likely be bad. As good as last year’s offense was, the secondary would get absolutely shredded by Ross and Pettis. Last year’s team would have to score 40+ to beat 2016 and that wouldn’t happen.Canadawg said:
Dumbass takegmo said:
You could argue DeBoner just had a better season in Year 1 than Peterman ever did at UW (2016 Semi's curb stomping up for debate)... no argument Year 1 was better than the other 5 seasons of Peterman.dannarc said:Peterman was 90-11 at Boise too or some shit....
2016 point differential was +24/game and lost to one of Saban's best teams in the playoff and they had a good offense with an elite defense
Last year was a fun Big 12 team that had a +14/game point differential against an easier schedule and didn't punk Oregon by 50
2016s team would beat last year's team 9/10 times
Overall, they were better. With Mathis and Victor out, I don't know.
2016 had better defense all the way through except maybe Edge. Offense was on par but had MMFG and a lesser QB
I'm saying it's a debate. It's not a sure thing.
2016 at their peak was better. But they lost every challenging moment and without Mathis and Victor, it's a discussion.
2022 UW has a better win without question.
As far as wins I guess the Texass win was nice but 2016 has 2 blow out wins against top 10 ranked PAC teams so thats not definitely a better win -
UT wins with bijon in the game because the ratard would run the same play over and over and that D wouldn’t have stopped it.chuck said:
How about this dumbass take?Canadawg said:
Dumbass takegmo said:
You could argue DeBoner just had a better season in Year 1 than Peterman ever did at UW (2016 Semi's curb stomping up for debate)... no argument Year 1 was better than the other 5 seasons of Peterman.dannarc said:Peterman was 90-11 at Boise too or some shit....
2016 point differential was +24/game and lost to one of Saban's best teams in the playoff and they had a good offense with an elite defense
Last year was a fun Big 12 team that had a +14/game point differential against an easier schedule and didn't punk Oregon by 50
2016s team would beat last year's team 9/10 times
UW beat the Horns, who had a Kwat defense full of coveted recruits and a retard calling the plays for a super talented offense. Was there that much difference?
DATOTD. -
Disagreedirtysouwfdawg said:
UT wins with bijon in the game because the ratard would run the same play over and over and that D wouldn’t have stopped it.chuck said:
How about this dumbass take?Canadawg said:
Dumbass takegmo said:
You could argue DeBoner just had a better season in Year 1 than Peterman ever did at UW (2016 Semi's curb stomping up for debate)... no argument Year 1 was better than the other 5 seasons of Peterman.dannarc said:Peterman was 90-11 at Boise too or some shit....
2016 point differential was +24/game and lost to one of Saban's best teams in the playoff and they had a good offense with an elite defense
Last year was a fun Big 12 team that had a +14/game point differential against an easier schedule and didn't punk Oregon by 50
2016s team would beat last year's team 9/10 times
UW beat the Horns, who had a Kwat defense full of coveted recruits and a retard calling the plays for a super talented offense. Was there that much difference?
DATOTD.
This is Sark coaching the O. He would've abandoned the run in the 2nd quarter and lost the game that way -
Funny how DeBoer's players were all willing to play. It's almost like some guys know their coach is a clown fuck and won't put their career on the line for that.whatshouldicareabout said:
Disagreedirtysouwfdawg said:
UT wins with bijon in the game because the ratard would run the same play over and over and that D wouldn’t have stopped it.chuck said:
How about this dumbass take?Canadawg said:
Dumbass takegmo said:
You could argue DeBoner just had a better season in Year 1 than Peterman ever did at UW (2016 Semi's curb stomping up for debate)... no argument Year 1 was better than the other 5 seasons of Peterman.dannarc said:Peterman was 90-11 at Boise too or some shit....
2016 point differential was +24/game and lost to one of Saban's best teams in the playoff and they had a good offense with an elite defense
Last year was a fun Big 12 team that had a +14/game point differential against an easier schedule and didn't punk Oregon by 50
2016s team would beat last year's team 9/10 times
UW beat the Horns, who had a Kwat defense full of coveted recruits and a retard calling the plays for a super talented offense. Was there that much difference?
DATOTD.
This is Sark coaching the O. He would've abandoned the run in the 2nd quarter and lost the game that way -
Sure, i'd always rather get into the playoffs even though "we" would have gotten ass blasted by Georgia.Canadawg said:
Fair. Wouldn't you have rather not lost to ASU and instead Beat SC in the CCG and lost to Georgia in the playoff last year?gmo said:My original dumbass take was not one on "who would win" or "which roster was better", but that you could argue that DeBoner had the better season. Year 1 of a pretty good mess inherited roster wise following Jimmy Sewage Lagoon.
-
Really curious what you are considering 2022's best win. At Oregon I guess?haie said:
Besides Penix over Browning...Canadawg said:
Put it this way. Besides for Penix is there any substantial part of last year's team that was better?haie said:
It's hard to say. 2016 team barely beat Arizona and sucked in every big moment outside of Pettis bailing them out in Salt Lake City.RoadDawg55 said:
2016 team destroys last year’s. It would likely be bad. As good as last year’s offense was, the secondary would get absolutely shredded by Ross and Pettis. Last year’s team would have to score 40+ to beat 2016 and that wouldn’t happen.Canadawg said:
Dumbass takegmo said:
You could argue DeBoner just had a better season in Year 1 than Peterman ever did at UW (2016 Semi's curb stomping up for debate)... no argument Year 1 was better than the other 5 seasons of Peterman.dannarc said:Peterman was 90-11 at Boise too or some shit....
2016 point differential was +24/game and lost to one of Saban's best teams in the playoff and they had a good offense with an elite defense
Last year was a fun Big 12 team that had a +14/game point differential against an easier schedule and didn't punk Oregon by 50
2016s team would beat last year's team 9/10 times
Overall, they were better. With Mathis and Victor out, I don't know.
2016 had better defense all the way through except maybe Edge. Offense was on par but had MMFG and a lesser QB
I'm saying it's a debate. It's not a sure thing.
2016 at their peak was better. But they lost every challenging moment and without Mathis and Victor, it's a discussion.
2022 UW has a better win without question.
Is squeaking out a win at the team who finished #15 better than beating the brakes off the team that finished #12 at home?
There's an argument but it's not close to "without question". -
#6 on the road and ended a 20+ home game winning streak.dnc said:
Really curious what you are considering 2022's best win. At Oregon I guess?haie said:
Besides Penix over Browning...Canadawg said:
Put it this way. Besides for Penix is there any substantial part of last year's team that was better?haie said:
It's hard to say. 2016 team barely beat Arizona and sucked in every big moment outside of Pettis bailing them out in Salt Lake City.RoadDawg55 said:
2016 team destroys last year’s. It would likely be bad. As good as last year’s offense was, the secondary would get absolutely shredded by Ross and Pettis. Last year’s team would have to score 40+ to beat 2016 and that wouldn’t happen.Canadawg said:
Dumbass takegmo said:
You could argue DeBoner just had a better season in Year 1 than Peterman ever did at UW (2016 Semi's curb stomping up for debate)... no argument Year 1 was better than the other 5 seasons of Peterman.dannarc said:Peterman was 90-11 at Boise too or some shit....
2016 point differential was +24/game and lost to one of Saban's best teams in the playoff and they had a good offense with an elite defense
Last year was a fun Big 12 team that had a +14/game point differential against an easier schedule and didn't punk Oregon by 50
2016s team would beat last year's team 9/10 times
Overall, they were better. With Mathis and Victor out, I don't know.
2016 had better defense all the way through except maybe Edge. Offense was on par but had MMFG and a lesser QB
I'm saying it's a debate. It's not a sure thing.
2016 at their peak was better. But they lost every challenging moment and without Mathis and Victor, it's a discussion.
2022 UW has a better win without question.
Is squeaking out a win at the team who finished #15 better than beating the brakes off the team that finished #12 at home?
There's an argument but it's not close to "without question".
I don't think it can be argued.
Stanford finishing #12 is kind of a joke. Get SC with Max Brown, get destroyed by WSU and then scored 5 points against Colorado. There weren't even a contender in the North, let alone the conference that year they just beat a bunch of shitty teams and won a limp dick bowl against Carolina. Reminds me of another team.
Hell, beating Oregon State last year was more impressive. And I was at the Stanford game and dooged as hard as anyone because we were finally BACK. -
If we're going by ranking at the time (which is fucking stupid) 44-6 over #7 easily beats 37-34 over #6. EASILY.haie said:
#6 on the road and ended a 20+ home game winning streak.dnc said:
Really curious what you are considering 2022's best win. At Oregon I guess?haie said:
Besides Penix over Browning...Canadawg said:
Put it this way. Besides for Penix is there any substantial part of last year's team that was better?haie said:
It's hard to say. 2016 team barely beat Arizona and sucked in every big moment outside of Pettis bailing them out in Salt Lake City.RoadDawg55 said:
2016 team destroys last year’s. It would likely be bad. As good as last year’s offense was, the secondary would get absolutely shredded by Ross and Pettis. Last year’s team would have to score 40+ to beat 2016 and that wouldn’t happen.Canadawg said:
Dumbass takegmo said:
You could argue DeBoner just had a better season in Year 1 than Peterman ever did at UW (2016 Semi's curb stomping up for debate)... no argument Year 1 was better than the other 5 seasons of Peterman.dannarc said:Peterman was 90-11 at Boise too or some shit....
2016 point differential was +24/game and lost to one of Saban's best teams in the playoff and they had a good offense with an elite defense
Last year was a fun Big 12 team that had a +14/game point differential against an easier schedule and didn't punk Oregon by 50
2016s team would beat last year's team 9/10 times
Overall, they were better. With Mathis and Victor out, I don't know.
2016 had better defense all the way through except maybe Edge. Offense was on par but had MMFG and a lesser QB
I'm saying it's a debate. It's not a sure thing.
2016 at their peak was better. But they lost every challenging moment and without Mathis and Victor, it's a discussion.
2022 UW has a better win without question.
Is squeaking out a win at the team who finished #15 better than beating the brakes off the team that finished #12 at home?
There's an argument but it's not close to "without question".
I don't think it can be argued.
Stanford finishing #12 is kind of a joke. Get SC with Max Brown, get destroyed by WSU and then scored 5 points against Colorado. There weren't even a contender in the North, let alone the conference that year they just beat a bunch of shitty teams and won a limp dick bowl against Carolina. Reminds me of another team.
Hell, beating Oregon State last year was more impressive. And I was at the Stanford game and dooged as hard as anyone because we were finally BACK.
And no, beating Oregon State last year was not more impressive than beating Stanford in 2016. Stanford was still a machine in 2016. -
Stanford was only ranked like that because of their previous year. They weren't even a divisional contender. They got destroyed by every team that was good in the conference besides the SC which didn't feature Darnold. WSU throttled them the same way, in Palo Alto. 5 points against Colorado. JC.dnc said:
If we're going by ranking at the time (which is fucking stupid) 44-6 over #7 easily beats 37-34 over #6. EASILY.haie said:
#6 on the road and ended a 20+ home game winning streak.dnc said:
Really curious what you are considering 2022's best win. At Oregon I guess?haie said:
Besides Penix over Browning...Canadawg said:
Put it this way. Besides for Penix is there any substantial part of last year's team that was better?haie said:
It's hard to say. 2016 team barely beat Arizona and sucked in every big moment outside of Pettis bailing them out in Salt Lake City.RoadDawg55 said:
2016 team destroys last year’s. It would likely be bad. As good as last year’s offense was, the secondary would get absolutely shredded by Ross and Pettis. Last year’s team would have to score 40+ to beat 2016 and that wouldn’t happen.Canadawg said:
Dumbass takegmo said:
You could argue DeBoner just had a better season in Year 1 than Peterman ever did at UW (2016 Semi's curb stomping up for debate)... no argument Year 1 was better than the other 5 seasons of Peterman.dannarc said:Peterman was 90-11 at Boise too or some shit....
2016 point differential was +24/game and lost to one of Saban's best teams in the playoff and they had a good offense with an elite defense
Last year was a fun Big 12 team that had a +14/game point differential against an easier schedule and didn't punk Oregon by 50
2016s team would beat last year's team 9/10 times
Overall, they were better. With Mathis and Victor out, I don't know.
2016 had better defense all the way through except maybe Edge. Offense was on par but had MMFG and a lesser QB
I'm saying it's a debate. It's not a sure thing.
2016 at their peak was better. But they lost every challenging moment and without Mathis and Victor, it's a discussion.
2022 UW has a better win without question.
Is squeaking out a win at the team who finished #15 better than beating the brakes off the team that finished #12 at home?
There's an argument but it's not close to "without question".
I don't think it can be argued.
Stanford finishing #12 is kind of a joke. Get SC with Max Brown, get destroyed by WSU and then scored 5 points against Colorado. There weren't even a contender in the North, let alone the conference that year they just beat a bunch of shitty teams and won a limp dick bowl against Carolina. Reminds me of another team.
Hell, beating Oregon State last year was more impressive. And I was at the Stanford game and dooged as hard as anyone because we were finally BACK.
And no, beating Oregon State last year was not more impressive than beating Stanford in 2016. Stanford was still a machine in 2016.
It was a great moment for Washington, no question.
