Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
90-11
Comments
-
Right back at ya, bored monitor?RaceBannon said:
Fuck off46XiJCAB said:
More solid contributions for Race the Legend.RaceBannon said:
Noc about your retarded takes46XiJCAB said:
Cool story bro.haie said:
"Petersen was the 2nd best coach at UW!" Is the biggest jerkoff comatose quook fantasy. Two UW coaches have won a Natty.Baseman said:
Peterman was a Quitter.YellowSnow said:
Peterman could have won a Rose Bowl if he came to UW in 2009.dannarc said:Peterman was 90-11 at Boise too or some shit....
Of course Petersen armed them with that by quiet quitting and not shoving it up Cristobal's ass.
He brought your program back from the dead.
90-11 will only enter Peterman territory if he makes a playoff game in the 4 team era.
He had better get busy cause it won't be this year.
UGA
Bama
tOSU
SC
Cook it, Slackjaw.
BTW, that's 1.5 Natties.
There's a place here for that
JFC, old man. -
Toothpaste caps aren't going to screw themselves on.46XiJCAB said:
Poor Haie.haie said:
Hey Quook. UW won 9 games and then Petersen won 8, 7 games the next two years with that talent.46XiJCAB said:
Cool story bro.haie said:
"Petersen was the 2nd best coach at UW!" Is the biggest jerkoff comatose quook fantasy. Two UW coaches have won a Natty.Baseman said:
Peterman was a Quitter.YellowSnow said:
Peterman could have won a Rose Bowl if he came to UW in 2009.dannarc said:Peterman was 90-11 at Boise too or some shit....
Of course Petersen armed them with that by quiet quitting and not shoving it up Cristobal's ass.
He brought your program back from the dead.
90-11 will only enter Peterman territory if he makes a playoff game in the 4 team era.
He had better get busy cause it won't be this year.
UGA
Bama
tOSU
SC
Cook it, Slackjaw.
BTW, that's 1.5 Natties.
Time to get back to your Hazel Dell factory job.
Fuck off.
Peterman won a PAC CCG and went to the playoffs with Brownstain at QB.
90-11 couldn't even make the PAC CCG with Penix at QB and the talent Peterman left him.
You're such a Dumbfuck.
Have another brew. -
White flag.haie said:
Toothpaste caps aren't going to screw themselves on.46XiJCAB said:
Poor Haie.haie said:
Hey Quook. UW won 9 games and then Petersen won 8, 7 games the next two years with that talent.46XiJCAB said:
Cool story bro.haie said:
"Petersen was the 2nd best coach at UW!" Is the biggest jerkoff comatose quook fantasy. Two UW coaches have won a Natty.Baseman said:
Peterman was a Quitter.YellowSnow said:
Peterman could have won a Rose Bowl if he came to UW in 2009.dannarc said:Peterman was 90-11 at Boise too or some shit....
Of course Petersen armed them with that by quiet quitting and not shoving it up Cristobal's ass.
He brought your program back from the dead.
90-11 will only enter Peterman territory if he makes a playoff game in the 4 team era.
He had better get busy cause it won't be this year.
UGA
Bama
tOSU
SC
Cook it, Slackjaw.
BTW, that's 1.5 Natties.
Time to get back to your Hazel Dell factory job.
Fuck off.
Peterman won a PAC CCG and went to the playoffs with Brownstain at QB.
90-11 couldn't even make the PAC CCG with Penix at QB and the talent Peterman left him.
You're such a Dumbfuck.
Have another brew. -
Agree. It's time to retreat back to Fishduck.46XiJCAB said:
White flag.haie said:
Toothpaste caps aren't going to screw themselves on.46XiJCAB said:
Poor Haie.haie said:
Hey Quook. UW won 9 games and then Petersen won 8, 7 games the next two years with that talent.46XiJCAB said:
Cool story bro.haie said:
"Petersen was the 2nd best coach at UW!" Is the biggest jerkoff comatose quook fantasy. Two UW coaches have won a Natty.Baseman said:
Peterman was a Quitter.YellowSnow said:
Peterman could have won a Rose Bowl if he came to UW in 2009.dannarc said:Peterman was 90-11 at Boise too or some shit....
Of course Petersen armed them with that by quiet quitting and not shoving it up Cristobal's ass.
He brought your program back from the dead.
90-11 will only enter Peterman territory if he makes a playoff game in the 4 team era.
He had better get busy cause it won't be this year.
UGA
Bama
tOSU
SC
Cook it, Slackjaw.
BTW, that's 1.5 Natties.
Time to get back to your Hazel Dell factory job.
Fuck off.
Peterman won a PAC CCG and went to the playoffs with Brownstain at QB.
90-11 couldn't even make the PAC CCG with Penix at QB and the talent Peterman left him.
You're such a Dumbfuck.
Have another brew. -
Steam officially spent.haie said:
Agree. It's time to retreat back to Fishduck.46XiJCAB said:
White flag.haie said:
Toothpaste caps aren't going to screw themselves on.46XiJCAB said:
Poor Haie.haie said:
Hey Quook. UW won 9 games and then Petersen won 8, 7 games the next two years with that talent.46XiJCAB said:
Cool story bro.haie said:
"Petersen was the 2nd best coach at UW!" Is the biggest jerkoff comatose quook fantasy. Two UW coaches have won a Natty.Baseman said:
Peterman was a Quitter.YellowSnow said:
Peterman could have won a Rose Bowl if he came to UW in 2009.dannarc said:Peterman was 90-11 at Boise too or some shit....
Of course Petersen armed them with that by quiet quitting and not shoving it up Cristobal's ass.
He brought your program back from the dead.
90-11 will only enter Peterman territory if he makes a playoff game in the 4 team era.
He had better get busy cause it won't be this year.
UGA
Bama
tOSU
SC
Cook it, Slackjaw.
BTW, that's 1.5 Natties.
Time to get back to your Hazel Dell factory job.
Fuck off.
Peterman won a PAC CCG and went to the playoffs with Brownstain at QB.
90-11 couldn't even make the PAC CCG with Penix at QB and the talent Peterman left him.
You're such a Dumbfuck.
Have another brew.
Haie is done. -
I'm done.46XiJCAB said:
Steam officially spent.haie said:
Agree. It's time to retreat back to Fishduck.46XiJCAB said:
White flag.haie said:
Toothpaste caps aren't going to screw themselves on.46XiJCAB said:
Poor Haie.haie said:
Hey Quook. UW won 9 games and then Petersen won 8, 7 games the next two years with that talent.46XiJCAB said:
Cool story bro.haie said:
"Petersen was the 2nd best coach at UW!" Is the biggest jerkoff comatose quook fantasy. Two UW coaches have won a Natty.Baseman said:
Peterman was a Quitter.YellowSnow said:
Peterman could have won a Rose Bowl if he came to UW in 2009.dannarc said:Peterman was 90-11 at Boise too or some shit....
Of course Petersen armed them with that by quiet quitting and not shoving it up Cristobal's ass.
He brought your program back from the dead.
90-11 will only enter Peterman territory if he makes a playoff game in the 4 team era.
He had better get busy cause it won't be this year.
UGA
Bama
tOSU
SC
Cook it, Slackjaw.
BTW, that's 1.5 Natties.
Time to get back to your Hazel Dell factory job.
Fuck off.
Peterman won a PAC CCG and went to the playoffs with Brownstain at QB.
90-11 couldn't even make the PAC CCG with Penix at QB and the talent Peterman left him.
You're such a Dumbfuck.
Have another brew.
Haie is done. -
Dumbass takegmo said:
You could argue DeBoner just had a better season in Year 1 than Peterman ever did at UW (2016 Semi's curb stomping up for debate)... no argument Year 1 was better than the other 5 seasons of Peterman.dannarc said:Peterman was 90-11 at Boise too or some shit....
2016 point differential was +24/game and lost to one of Saban's best teams in the playoff and they had a good offense with an elite defense
Last year was a fun Big 12 team that had a +14/game point differential against an easier schedule and didn't punk Oregon by 50
2016s team would beat last year's team 9/10 times
-
saying you could argue it makes it a dumbass take? Never took you as a douche. Guess I was wrong.Canadawg said:
Dumbass takegmo said:
You could argue DeBoner just had a better season in Year 1 than Peterman ever did at UW (2016 Semi's curb stomping up for debate)... no argument Year 1 was better than the other 5 seasons of Peterman.dannarc said:Peterman was 90-11 at Boise too or some shit....
2016 point differential was +24/game and lost to one of Saban's best teams in the playoff and they had a good offense with an elite defense
Last year was a fun Big 12 team that had a +14/game point differential against an easier schedule and didn't punk Oregon by 50
2016s team would beat last year's team 9/10 times -
Tough day at work?Canadawg said:
Dumbass takegmo said:
You could argue DeBoner just had a better season in Year 1 than Peterman ever did at UW (2016 Semi's curb stomping up for debate)... no argument Year 1 was better than the other 5 seasons of Peterman.dannarc said:Peterman was 90-11 at Boise too or some shit....
2016 point differential was +24/game and lost to one of Saban's best teams in the playoff and they had a good offense with an elite defense
Last year was a fun Big 12 team that had a +14/game point differential against an easier schedule and didn't punk Oregon by 50
2016s team would beat last year's team 9/10 times -
How about this dumbass take?Canadawg said:
Dumbass takegmo said:
You could argue DeBoner just had a better season in Year 1 than Peterman ever did at UW (2016 Semi's curb stomping up for debate)... no argument Year 1 was better than the other 5 seasons of Peterman.dannarc said:Peterman was 90-11 at Boise too or some shit....
2016 point differential was +24/game and lost to one of Saban's best teams in the playoff and they had a good offense with an elite defense
Last year was a fun Big 12 team that had a +14/game point differential against an easier schedule and didn't punk Oregon by 50
2016s team would beat last year's team 9/10 times
UW beat the Horns, who had a Kwat defense full of coveted recruits and a retard calling the plays for a super talented offense. Was there that much difference? -
2016 team destroys last year’s. It would likely be bad. As good as last year’s offense was, the secondary would get absolutely shredded by Ross and Pettis. Last year’s team would have to score 40+ to beat 2016 and that wouldn’t happen.Canadawg said:
Dumbass takegmo said:
You could argue DeBoner just had a better season in Year 1 than Peterman ever did at UW (2016 Semi's curb stomping up for debate)... no argument Year 1 was better than the other 5 seasons of Peterman.dannarc said:Peterman was 90-11 at Boise too or some shit....
2016 point differential was +24/game and lost to one of Saban's best teams in the playoff and they had a good offense with an elite defense
Last year was a fun Big 12 team that had a +14/game point differential against an easier schedule and didn't punk Oregon by 50
2016s team would beat last year's team 9/10 times -
gmo said:
saying you could argue it makes it a dumbass take? Never took you as a douche. Guess I was wrong.Canadawg said:
Dumbass takegmo said:
You could argue DeBoner just had a better season in Year 1 than Peterman ever did at UW (2016 Semi's curb stomping up for debate)... no argument Year 1 was better than the other 5 seasons of Peterman.dannarc said:Peterman was 90-11 at Boise too or some shit....
2016 point differential was +24/game and lost to one of Saban's best teams in the playoff and they had a good offense with an elite defense
Last year was a fun Big 12 team that had a +14/game point differential against an easier schedule and didn't punk Oregon by 50
2016s team would beat last year's team 9/10 timesdannarc said:
Tough day at work?Canadawg said:
Dumbass takegmo said:
You could argue DeBoner just had a better season in Year 1 than Peterman ever did at UW (2016 Semi's curb stomping up for debate)... no argument Year 1 was better than the other 5 seasons of Peterman.dannarc said:Peterman was 90-11 at Boise too or some shit....
2016 point differential was +24/game and lost to one of Saban's best teams in the playoff and they had a good offense with an elite defense
Last year was a fun Big 12 team that had a +14/game point differential against an easier schedule and didn't punk Oregon by 50
2016s team would beat last year's team 9/10 times
-
It's hard to say. 2016 team barely beat Arizona and sucked in every big moment outside of Pettis bailing them out in Salt Lake City.RoadDawg55 said:
2016 team destroys last year’s. It would likely be bad. As good as last year’s offense was, the secondary would get absolutely shredded by Ross and Pettis. Last year’s team would have to score 40+ to beat 2016 and that wouldn’t happen.Canadawg said:
Dumbass takegmo said:
You could argue DeBoner just had a better season in Year 1 than Peterman ever did at UW (2016 Semi's curb stomping up for debate)... no argument Year 1 was better than the other 5 seasons of Peterman.dannarc said:Peterman was 90-11 at Boise too or some shit....
2016 point differential was +24/game and lost to one of Saban's best teams in the playoff and they had a good offense with an elite defense
Last year was a fun Big 12 team that had a +14/game point differential against an easier schedule and didn't punk Oregon by 50
2016s team would beat last year's team 9/10 times
Overall, they were better. With Mathis and Victor out, I don't know. -
Put it this way. Besides for Penix is there any substantial part of last year's team that was better?haie said:
It's hard to say. 2016 team barely beat Arizona and sucked in every big moment outside of Pettis bailing them out in Salt Lake City.RoadDawg55 said:
2016 team destroys last year’s. It would likely be bad. As good as last year’s offense was, the secondary would get absolutely shredded by Ross and Pettis. Last year’s team would have to score 40+ to beat 2016 and that wouldn’t happen.Canadawg said:
Dumbass takegmo said:
You could argue DeBoner just had a better season in Year 1 than Peterman ever did at UW (2016 Semi's curb stomping up for debate)... no argument Year 1 was better than the other 5 seasons of Peterman.dannarc said:Peterman was 90-11 at Boise too or some shit....
2016 point differential was +24/game and lost to one of Saban's best teams in the playoff and they had a good offense with an elite defense
Last year was a fun Big 12 team that had a +14/game point differential against an easier schedule and didn't punk Oregon by 50
2016s team would beat last year's team 9/10 times
Overall, they were better. With Mathis and Victor out, I don't know.
2016 had better defense all the way through except maybe Edge. Offense was on par but had MMFG and a lesser QB -
Besides Penix over Browning...Canadawg said:
Put it this way. Besides for Penix is there any substantial part of last year's team that was better?haie said:
It's hard to say. 2016 team barely beat Arizona and sucked in every big moment outside of Pettis bailing them out in Salt Lake City.RoadDawg55 said:
2016 team destroys last year’s. It would likely be bad. As good as last year’s offense was, the secondary would get absolutely shredded by Ross and Pettis. Last year’s team would have to score 40+ to beat 2016 and that wouldn’t happen.Canadawg said:
Dumbass takegmo said:
You could argue DeBoner just had a better season in Year 1 than Peterman ever did at UW (2016 Semi's curb stomping up for debate)... no argument Year 1 was better than the other 5 seasons of Peterman.dannarc said:Peterman was 90-11 at Boise too or some shit....
2016 point differential was +24/game and lost to one of Saban's best teams in the playoff and they had a good offense with an elite defense
Last year was a fun Big 12 team that had a +14/game point differential against an easier schedule and didn't punk Oregon by 50
2016s team would beat last year's team 9/10 times
Overall, they were better. With Mathis and Victor out, I don't know.
2016 had better defense all the way through except maybe Edge. Offense was on par but had MMFG and a lesser QB
I'm saying it's a debate. It's not a sure thing.
2016 at their peak was better. But they lost every challenging moment and without Mathis and Victor, it's a discussion.
2022 UW has a better win without question. -
I don't think you are factoring in the defensive difference. 2016 was a top 5 defense. That's otherworldly compared to last year.haie said:
Besides Penix over Browning...Canadawg said:
Put it this way. Besides for Penix is there any substantial part of last year's team that was better?haie said:
It's hard to say. 2016 team barely beat Arizona and sucked in every big moment outside of Pettis bailing them out in Salt Lake City.RoadDawg55 said:
2016 team destroys last year’s. It would likely be bad. As good as last year’s offense was, the secondary would get absolutely shredded by Ross and Pettis. Last year’s team would have to score 40+ to beat 2016 and that wouldn’t happen.Canadawg said:
Dumbass takegmo said:
You could argue DeBoner just had a better season in Year 1 than Peterman ever did at UW (2016 Semi's curb stomping up for debate)... no argument Year 1 was better than the other 5 seasons of Peterman.dannarc said:Peterman was 90-11 at Boise too or some shit....
2016 point differential was +24/game and lost to one of Saban's best teams in the playoff and they had a good offense with an elite defense
Last year was a fun Big 12 team that had a +14/game point differential against an easier schedule and didn't punk Oregon by 50
2016s team would beat last year's team 9/10 times
Overall, they were better. With Mathis and Victor out, I don't know.
2016 had better defense all the way through except maybe Edge. Offense was on par but had MMFG and a lesser QB
I'm saying it's a debate. It's not a sure thing.
2016 at their peak was better. But they lost every challenging moment and without Mathis and Victor, it's a discussion.
2022 UW has a better win without question.
As far as wins I guess the Texass win was nice but 2016 has 2 blow out wins against top 10 ranked PAC teams so thats not definitely a better win -
My original dumbass take was not one on "who would win" or "which roster was better", but that you could argue that DeBoner had the better season. Year 1 of a pretty good mess inherited roster wise following Jimmy Sewage Lagoon.
-
Fair. Wouldn't you have rather not lost to ASU and instead Beat SC in the CCG and lost to Georgia in the playoff last year?gmo said:My original dumbass take was not one on "who would win" or "which roster was better", but that you could argue that DeBoner had the better season. Year 1 of a pretty good mess inherited roster wise following Jimmy Sewage Lagoon.
-
That makes for a fun “where would that hypothetical outcome be seeded”.Canadawg said:
Fair. Wouldn't you have rather not lost to ASU and instead Beat SC in the CCG and lost to Georgia in the playoff last year?gmo said:My original dumbass take was not one on "who would win" or "which roster was better", but that you could argue that DeBoner had the better season. Year 1 of a pretty good mess inherited roster wise following Jimmy Sewage Lagoon.
I would say #3 in front of TCU. -
haie said:
Besides Penix over Browning...Canadawg said:
Put it this way. Besides for Penix is there any substantial part of last year's team that was better?haie said:
It's hard to say. 2016 team barely beat Arizona and sucked in every big moment outside of Pettis bailing them out in Salt Lake City.RoadDawg55 said:
2016 team destroys last year’s. It would likely be bad. As good as last year’s offense was, the secondary would get absolutely shredded by Ross and Pettis. Last year’s team would have to score 40+ to beat 2016 and that wouldn’t happen.Canadawg said:
Dumbass takegmo said:
You could argue DeBoner just had a better season in Year 1 than Peterman ever did at UW (2016 Semi's curb stomping up for debate)... no argument Year 1 was better than the other 5 seasons of Peterman.dannarc said:Peterman was 90-11 at Boise too or some shit....
2016 point differential was +24/game and lost to one of Saban's best teams in the playoff and they had a good offense with an elite defense
Last year was a fun Big 12 team that had a +14/game point differential against an easier schedule and didn't punk Oregon by 50
2016s team would beat last year's team 9/10 times
Overall, they were better. With Mathis and Victor out, I don't know.
2016 had better defense all the way through except maybe Edge. Offense was on par but had MMFG and a lesser QB
I'm saying it's a debate. It's not a sure thing.
2016 at their peak was better. But they lost every challenging moment and without Mathis and Victor, it's a discussion.
2022 UW has a better win without question.
One thing not being considered is how tight the 2016 team played (credit Petersen) VS how loose Deboers team played. Talent wise 2016 wins but on the field I believe Deboers squad wins by culture alone. Just ask Evan Weaver about that. -
AGAINST PAC 12 teams!Canadawg said:
I don't think you are factoring in the defensive difference. 2016 was a top 5 defense. That's otherworldly compared to last year.haie said:
Besides Penix over Browning...Canadawg said:
Put it this way. Besides for Penix is there any substantial part of last year's team that was better?haie said:
It's hard to say. 2016 team barely beat Arizona and sucked in every big moment outside of Pettis bailing them out in Salt Lake City.RoadDawg55 said:
2016 team destroys last year’s. It would likely be bad. As good as last year’s offense was, the secondary would get absolutely shredded by Ross and Pettis. Last year’s team would have to score 40+ to beat 2016 and that wouldn’t happen.Canadawg said:
Dumbass takegmo said:
You could argue DeBoner just had a better season in Year 1 than Peterman ever did at UW (2016 Semi's curb stomping up for debate)... no argument Year 1 was better than the other 5 seasons of Peterman.dannarc said:Peterman was 90-11 at Boise too or some shit....
2016 point differential was +24/game and lost to one of Saban's best teams in the playoff and they had a good offense with an elite defense
Last year was a fun Big 12 team that had a +14/game point differential against an easier schedule and didn't punk Oregon by 50
2016s team would beat last year's team 9/10 times
Overall, they were better. With Mathis and Victor out, I don't know.
2016 had better defense all the way through except maybe Edge. Offense was on par but had MMFG and a lesser QB
I'm saying it's a debate. It's not a sure thing.
2016 at their peak was better. But they lost every challenging moment and without Mathis and Victor, it's a discussion.
2022 UW has a better win without question.
As far as wins I guess the Texass win was nice but 2016 has 2 blow out wins against top 10 ranked PAC teams so thats not definitely a better win -
Come on Texass would have gone 9-3 in the PAC last year and only if they dodged one of the good teams. The wins against the Oregon schools were potentially more impressive in hindsight. Just my dumbass takeIce_Holmvik said:
AGAINST PAC 12 teams!Canadawg said:
I don't think you are factoring in the defensive difference. 2016 was a top 5 defense. That's otherworldly compared to last year.haie said:
Besides Penix over Browning...Canadawg said:
Put it this way. Besides for Penix is there any substantial part of last year's team that was better?haie said:
It's hard to say. 2016 team barely beat Arizona and sucked in every big moment outside of Pettis bailing them out in Salt Lake City.RoadDawg55 said:
2016 team destroys last year’s. It would likely be bad. As good as last year’s offense was, the secondary would get absolutely shredded by Ross and Pettis. Last year’s team would have to score 40+ to beat 2016 and that wouldn’t happen.Canadawg said:
Dumbass takegmo said:
You could argue DeBoner just had a better season in Year 1 than Peterman ever did at UW (2016 Semi's curb stomping up for debate)... no argument Year 1 was better than the other 5 seasons of Peterman.dannarc said:Peterman was 90-11 at Boise too or some shit....
2016 point differential was +24/game and lost to one of Saban's best teams in the playoff and they had a good offense with an elite defense
Last year was a fun Big 12 team that had a +14/game point differential against an easier schedule and didn't punk Oregon by 50
2016s team would beat last year's team 9/10 times
Overall, they were better. With Mathis and Victor out, I don't know.
2016 had better defense all the way through except maybe Edge. Offense was on par but had MMFG and a lesser QB
I'm saying it's a debate. It's not a sure thing.
2016 at their peak was better. But they lost every challenging moment and without Mathis and Victor, it's a discussion.
2022 UW has a better win without question.
As far as wins I guess the Texass win was nice but 2016 has 2 blow out wins against top 10 ranked PAC teams so thats not definitely a better win -
UT wins with bijon in the game because the ratard would run the same play over and over and that D wouldn’t have stopped it.chuck said:
How about this dumbass take?Canadawg said:
Dumbass takegmo said:
You could argue DeBoner just had a better season in Year 1 than Peterman ever did at UW (2016 Semi's curb stomping up for debate)... no argument Year 1 was better than the other 5 seasons of Peterman.dannarc said:Peterman was 90-11 at Boise too or some shit....
2016 point differential was +24/game and lost to one of Saban's best teams in the playoff and they had a good offense with an elite defense
Last year was a fun Big 12 team that had a +14/game point differential against an easier schedule and didn't punk Oregon by 50
2016s team would beat last year's team 9/10 times
UW beat the Horns, who had a Kwat defense full of coveted recruits and a retard calling the plays for a super talented offense. Was there that much difference?
DATOTD. -
Disagreedirtysouwfdawg said:
UT wins with bijon in the game because the ratard would run the same play over and over and that D wouldn’t have stopped it.chuck said:
How about this dumbass take?Canadawg said:
Dumbass takegmo said:
You could argue DeBoner just had a better season in Year 1 than Peterman ever did at UW (2016 Semi's curb stomping up for debate)... no argument Year 1 was better than the other 5 seasons of Peterman.dannarc said:Peterman was 90-11 at Boise too or some shit....
2016 point differential was +24/game and lost to one of Saban's best teams in the playoff and they had a good offense with an elite defense
Last year was a fun Big 12 team that had a +14/game point differential against an easier schedule and didn't punk Oregon by 50
2016s team would beat last year's team 9/10 times
UW beat the Horns, who had a Kwat defense full of coveted recruits and a retard calling the plays for a super talented offense. Was there that much difference?
DATOTD.
This is Sark coaching the O. He would've abandoned the run in the 2nd quarter and lost the game that way -
Funny how DeBoer's players were all willing to play. It's almost like some guys know their coach is a clown fuck and won't put their career on the line for that.whatshouldicareabout said:
Disagreedirtysouwfdawg said:
UT wins with bijon in the game because the ratard would run the same play over and over and that D wouldn’t have stopped it.chuck said:
How about this dumbass take?Canadawg said:
Dumbass takegmo said:
You could argue DeBoner just had a better season in Year 1 than Peterman ever did at UW (2016 Semi's curb stomping up for debate)... no argument Year 1 was better than the other 5 seasons of Peterman.dannarc said:Peterman was 90-11 at Boise too or some shit....
2016 point differential was +24/game and lost to one of Saban's best teams in the playoff and they had a good offense with an elite defense
Last year was a fun Big 12 team that had a +14/game point differential against an easier schedule and didn't punk Oregon by 50
2016s team would beat last year's team 9/10 times
UW beat the Horns, who had a Kwat defense full of coveted recruits and a retard calling the plays for a super talented offense. Was there that much difference?
DATOTD.
This is Sark coaching the O. He would've abandoned the run in the 2nd quarter and lost the game that way -
Sure, i'd always rather get into the playoffs even though "we" would have gotten ass blasted by Georgia.Canadawg said:
Fair. Wouldn't you have rather not lost to ASU and instead Beat SC in the CCG and lost to Georgia in the playoff last year?gmo said:My original dumbass take was not one on "who would win" or "which roster was better", but that you could argue that DeBoner had the better season. Year 1 of a pretty good mess inherited roster wise following Jimmy Sewage Lagoon.
-
Really curious what you are considering 2022's best win. At Oregon I guess?haie said:
Besides Penix over Browning...Canadawg said:
Put it this way. Besides for Penix is there any substantial part of last year's team that was better?haie said:
It's hard to say. 2016 team barely beat Arizona and sucked in every big moment outside of Pettis bailing them out in Salt Lake City.RoadDawg55 said:
2016 team destroys last year’s. It would likely be bad. As good as last year’s offense was, the secondary would get absolutely shredded by Ross and Pettis. Last year’s team would have to score 40+ to beat 2016 and that wouldn’t happen.Canadawg said:
Dumbass takegmo said:
You could argue DeBoner just had a better season in Year 1 than Peterman ever did at UW (2016 Semi's curb stomping up for debate)... no argument Year 1 was better than the other 5 seasons of Peterman.dannarc said:Peterman was 90-11 at Boise too or some shit....
2016 point differential was +24/game and lost to one of Saban's best teams in the playoff and they had a good offense with an elite defense
Last year was a fun Big 12 team that had a +14/game point differential against an easier schedule and didn't punk Oregon by 50
2016s team would beat last year's team 9/10 times
Overall, they were better. With Mathis and Victor out, I don't know.
2016 had better defense all the way through except maybe Edge. Offense was on par but had MMFG and a lesser QB
I'm saying it's a debate. It's not a sure thing.
2016 at their peak was better. But they lost every challenging moment and without Mathis and Victor, it's a discussion.
2022 UW has a better win without question.
Is squeaking out a win at the team who finished #15 better than beating the brakes off the team that finished #12 at home?
There's an argument but it's not close to "without question". -
#6 on the road and ended a 20+ home game winning streak.dnc said:
Really curious what you are considering 2022's best win. At Oregon I guess?haie said:
Besides Penix over Browning...Canadawg said:
Put it this way. Besides for Penix is there any substantial part of last year's team that was better?haie said:
It's hard to say. 2016 team barely beat Arizona and sucked in every big moment outside of Pettis bailing them out in Salt Lake City.RoadDawg55 said:
2016 team destroys last year’s. It would likely be bad. As good as last year’s offense was, the secondary would get absolutely shredded by Ross and Pettis. Last year’s team would have to score 40+ to beat 2016 and that wouldn’t happen.Canadawg said:
Dumbass takegmo said:
You could argue DeBoner just had a better season in Year 1 than Peterman ever did at UW (2016 Semi's curb stomping up for debate)... no argument Year 1 was better than the other 5 seasons of Peterman.dannarc said:Peterman was 90-11 at Boise too or some shit....
2016 point differential was +24/game and lost to one of Saban's best teams in the playoff and they had a good offense with an elite defense
Last year was a fun Big 12 team that had a +14/game point differential against an easier schedule and didn't punk Oregon by 50
2016s team would beat last year's team 9/10 times
Overall, they were better. With Mathis and Victor out, I don't know.
2016 had better defense all the way through except maybe Edge. Offense was on par but had MMFG and a lesser QB
I'm saying it's a debate. It's not a sure thing.
2016 at their peak was better. But they lost every challenging moment and without Mathis and Victor, it's a discussion.
2022 UW has a better win without question.
Is squeaking out a win at the team who finished #15 better than beating the brakes off the team that finished #12 at home?
There's an argument but it's not close to "without question".
I don't think it can be argued.
Stanford finishing #12 is kind of a joke. Get SC with Max Brown, get destroyed by WSU and then scored 5 points against Colorado. There weren't even a contender in the North, let alone the conference that year they just beat a bunch of shitty teams and won a limp dick bowl against Carolina. Reminds me of another team.
Hell, beating Oregon State last year was more impressive. And I was at the Stanford game and dooged as hard as anyone because we were finally BACK. -
If we're going by ranking at the time (which is fucking stupid) 44-6 over #7 easily beats 37-34 over #6. EASILY.haie said:
#6 on the road and ended a 20+ home game winning streak.dnc said:
Really curious what you are considering 2022's best win. At Oregon I guess?haie said:
Besides Penix over Browning...Canadawg said:
Put it this way. Besides for Penix is there any substantial part of last year's team that was better?haie said:
It's hard to say. 2016 team barely beat Arizona and sucked in every big moment outside of Pettis bailing them out in Salt Lake City.RoadDawg55 said:
2016 team destroys last year’s. It would likely be bad. As good as last year’s offense was, the secondary would get absolutely shredded by Ross and Pettis. Last year’s team would have to score 40+ to beat 2016 and that wouldn’t happen.Canadawg said:
Dumbass takegmo said:
You could argue DeBoner just had a better season in Year 1 than Peterman ever did at UW (2016 Semi's curb stomping up for debate)... no argument Year 1 was better than the other 5 seasons of Peterman.dannarc said:Peterman was 90-11 at Boise too or some shit....
2016 point differential was +24/game and lost to one of Saban's best teams in the playoff and they had a good offense with an elite defense
Last year was a fun Big 12 team that had a +14/game point differential against an easier schedule and didn't punk Oregon by 50
2016s team would beat last year's team 9/10 times
Overall, they were better. With Mathis and Victor out, I don't know.
2016 had better defense all the way through except maybe Edge. Offense was on par but had MMFG and a lesser QB
I'm saying it's a debate. It's not a sure thing.
2016 at their peak was better. But they lost every challenging moment and without Mathis and Victor, it's a discussion.
2022 UW has a better win without question.
Is squeaking out a win at the team who finished #15 better than beating the brakes off the team that finished #12 at home?
There's an argument but it's not close to "without question".
I don't think it can be argued.
Stanford finishing #12 is kind of a joke. Get SC with Max Brown, get destroyed by WSU and then scored 5 points against Colorado. There weren't even a contender in the North, let alone the conference that year they just beat a bunch of shitty teams and won a limp dick bowl against Carolina. Reminds me of another team.
Hell, beating Oregon State last year was more impressive. And I was at the Stanford game and dooged as hard as anyone because we were finally BACK.
And no, beating Oregon State last year was not more impressive than beating Stanford in 2016. Stanford was still a machine in 2016. -
Stanford was only ranked like that because of their previous year. They weren't even a divisional contender. They got destroyed by every team that was good in the conference besides the SC which didn't feature Darnold. WSU throttled them the same way, in Palo Alto. 5 points against Colorado. JC.dnc said:
If we're going by ranking at the time (which is fucking stupid) 44-6 over #7 easily beats 37-34 over #6. EASILY.haie said:
#6 on the road and ended a 20+ home game winning streak.dnc said:
Really curious what you are considering 2022's best win. At Oregon I guess?haie said:
Besides Penix over Browning...Canadawg said:
Put it this way. Besides for Penix is there any substantial part of last year's team that was better?haie said:
It's hard to say. 2016 team barely beat Arizona and sucked in every big moment outside of Pettis bailing them out in Salt Lake City.RoadDawg55 said:
2016 team destroys last year’s. It would likely be bad. As good as last year’s offense was, the secondary would get absolutely shredded by Ross and Pettis. Last year’s team would have to score 40+ to beat 2016 and that wouldn’t happen.Canadawg said:
Dumbass takegmo said:
You could argue DeBoner just had a better season in Year 1 than Peterman ever did at UW (2016 Semi's curb stomping up for debate)... no argument Year 1 was better than the other 5 seasons of Peterman.dannarc said:Peterman was 90-11 at Boise too or some shit....
2016 point differential was +24/game and lost to one of Saban's best teams in the playoff and they had a good offense with an elite defense
Last year was a fun Big 12 team that had a +14/game point differential against an easier schedule and didn't punk Oregon by 50
2016s team would beat last year's team 9/10 times
Overall, they were better. With Mathis and Victor out, I don't know.
2016 had better defense all the way through except maybe Edge. Offense was on par but had MMFG and a lesser QB
I'm saying it's a debate. It's not a sure thing.
2016 at their peak was better. But they lost every challenging moment and without Mathis and Victor, it's a discussion.
2022 UW has a better win without question.
Is squeaking out a win at the team who finished #15 better than beating the brakes off the team that finished #12 at home?
There's an argument but it's not close to "without question".
I don't think it can be argued.
Stanford finishing #12 is kind of a joke. Get SC with Max Brown, get destroyed by WSU and then scored 5 points against Colorado. There weren't even a contender in the North, let alone the conference that year they just beat a bunch of shitty teams and won a limp dick bowl against Carolina. Reminds me of another team.
Hell, beating Oregon State last year was more impressive. And I was at the Stanford game and dooged as hard as anyone because we were finally BACK.
And no, beating Oregon State last year was not more impressive than beating Stanford in 2016. Stanford was still a machine in 2016.
It was a great moment for Washington, no question.
