Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Once a Rat always a fucking RAT

Comments

  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,103
    Doesn’t matter what any of the candidates think about the SCOTUS decision.

    They are running for the top executive spot.

    People forget we actually have three branches of government.

  • RoadTrip
    RoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,171 Founders Club

    Doesn’t matter what any of the candidates think about the SCOTUS decision.

    They are running for the top executive spot.

    People forget we actually have three branches of government.

    He also recently said, if we? could reach a consensus on an assault weapons ban, he would sign it as president. Again, hard fucking NO!
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,103
    RoadTrip said:

    Doesn’t matter what any of the candidates think about the SCOTUS decision.

    They are running for the top executive spot.

    People forget we actually have three branches of government.

    He also recently said, if we? could reach a consensus on an assault weapons ban, he would sign it as president. Again, hard fucking NO!
    And the SCOTUS is there to say no go on that too.

  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,103
    edited June 2023
    SFGbob said:

    Doesn’t matter what any of the candidates think about the SCOTUS decision.

    They are running for the top executive spot.

    People forget we actually have three branches of government.

    Yeah, and he just told you what kind of judges he'd select.
    That is possible too, no doubt.

    Still better than Biden.

  • Goduckies
    Goduckies Member Posts: 7,989 Standard Supporter
    RoadTrip said:

    Doesn’t matter what any of the candidates think about the SCOTUS decision.

    They are running for the top executive spot.

    People forget we actually have three branches of government.

    He also recently said, if we? could reach a consensus on an assault weapons ban, he would sign it as president. Again, hard fucking NO!
    But he is against vaccines, so he is all good... tug logic
  • Goduckies
    Goduckies Member Posts: 7,989 Standard Supporter

    SFGbob said:

    Doesn’t matter what any of the candidates think about the SCOTUS decision.

    They are running for the top executive spot.

    People forget we actually have three branches of government.

    Yeah, and he just told you what kind of judges he'd select.
    That is possible too, no doubt.

    Still better than Biden.

    A ham sandwich is better than Biden.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    SFGbob said:

    Doesn’t matter what any of the candidates think about the SCOTUS decision.

    They are running for the top executive spot.

    People forget we actually have three branches of government.

    Yeah, and he just told you what kind of judges he'd select.
    That is possible too, no doubt.

    Still better than Biden.

    Well that's a pretty fucking low bar. Why vote for someone who you know is going to select Judicial nominees that will oppose most everything I believe?
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,613 Standard Supporter

    RoadTrip said:

    Doesn’t matter what any of the candidates think about the SCOTUS decision.

    They are running for the top executive spot.

    People forget we actually have three branches of government.

    He also recently said, if we? could reach a consensus on an assault weapons ban, he would sign it as president. Again, hard fucking NO!
    And the SCOTUS is there to say no go on that too.

    Except we are three dem judges (appointed by the President) from losing. We are also a dem president and dem House of Representatives away from expanding the Court to a sufficient number to swing the Court into being a rubber stamp for any dem legislation.
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,066
    RoadTrip said:
    Anyone who thinks this guy's peculiar fascination with vaccines is somehow a conservative Democrat (like his uncle actually was) is deluded.
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,470 Founders Club
    edited June 2023
    Bob_C said:

    RoadTrip said:
    Anyone who thinks this guy's peculiar fascination with vaccines is somehow a conservative Democrat (like his uncle actually was) is deluded.
    Totally agree that he is far from conservative.

    However, he's anti-deep state corruption, which is really the main issue we have that prevents all the other fringe issues to never get resolved correctly. Go scorched earth on the deep state and so we can have legitimate discussions on the rest down the road.
    Exactly this.

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,079 Founders Club
    Yep RFK is a disrupter to Biden and an enemy of the state

    I still have issues with him but I'm glad he's in the race

  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,103

    Yep RFK is a disrupter to Biden and an enemy of the state

    I still have issues with him but I'm glad he's in the race

    Agreed. Wood strongly consider voting for him over RDS.

    Mostly to piss off 46 but taking on the deep state and the globalists would be good fun.

  • thechatch
    thechatch Member Posts: 7,263 Standard Supporter
    I hope Biden gets the nom and RFKj runs Indy

    Bush/Perot 92
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,823 Standard Supporter
    edited June 2023

    RoadTrip said:
    Anyone who thinks this guy's peculiar fascination with vaccines is somehow a conservative Democrat (like his uncle actually was) is deluded.
    If he'll take your guns he's team WEF/NWO/Commie.
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,613 Standard Supporter
    RoadTrip said:

    Goduckies said:

    RoadTrip said:

    Doesn’t matter what any of the candidates think about the SCOTUS decision.

    They are running for the top executive spot.

    People forget we actually have three branches of government.

    He also recently said, if we? could reach a consensus on an assault weapons ban, he would sign it as president. Again, hard fucking NO!
    But he is against vaccines, so he is all good... tug logic
    Perhaps for others but not me GD. I think his positions on the 2nd Amendment and abortion are abhorrent.
    Toss in his commie view of economics and the environment.
  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 68,485 Founders Club

    SFGbob said:

    Doesn’t matter what any of the candidates think about the SCOTUS decision.

    They are running for the top executive spot.

    People forget we actually have three branches of government.

    Yeah, and he just told you what kind of judges he'd select.
    That is possible too, no doubt.

    Still better than Biden.

    This is not a plausible rebuttal
  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 68,485 Founders Club
    Sledog said:

    RoadTrip said:
    Anyone who thinks this guy's peculiar fascination with vaccines is somehow a conservative Democrat (like his uncle actually was) is deluded.
    If he'll take your guns he's team WEF/NWO/Commie.
    He's not Team WEF. He wants to ban pharma advertising and he's worked hard to show Fauci for the criminal fraud that he is
  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 68,485 Founders Club
    RoadTrip said:

    Doesn’t matter what any of the candidates think about the SCOTUS decision.

    They are running for the top executive spot.

    People forget we actually have three branches of government.

    He also recently said, if we? could reach a consensus on an assault weapons ban, he would sign it as president. Again, hard fucking NO!
    this stuff is concerning
  • Swaye
    Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,739 Founders Club
    RoadTrip said:

    Goduckies said:

    RoadTrip said:

    Doesn’t matter what any of the candidates think about the SCOTUS decision.

    They are running for the top executive spot.

    People forget we actually have three branches of government.

    He also recently said, if we? could reach a consensus on an assault weapons ban, he would sign it as president. Again, hard fucking NO!
    But he is against vaccines, so he is all good... tug logic
    Perhaps for others but not me GD. I think his positions on the 2nd Amendment and abortion are abhorrent.
    Single issue voter here. You do not support the 2nd Amendment you can go fuck yourself. RFK has some interesting positions I agree with, but you don't support the most inherent right we have, that of self defense, then you are an anti-liberty twit and I will not waste my time or my vote on you now or ever.
  • BleachedAnusDawg
    BleachedAnusDawg Member Posts: 13,293 Standard Supporter
    edited July 2023
    Goduckies said:

    RoadTrip said:

    Doesn’t matter what any of the candidates think about the SCOTUS decision.

    They are running for the top executive spot.

    People forget we actually have three branches of government.

    He also recently said, if we? could reach a consensus on an assault weapons ban, he would sign it as president. Again, hard fucking NO!
    But he is against vaccines, so he is all good... tug logic
    No kidding. All the stuff I see from Throbber and others about gun rights and whatnot and those same posters overlook that because this guy is antivax. If he was running pre-COVID nobody would take him seriously. Kennedy sucks.
    Bob_C said:

    RoadTrip said:
    Anyone who thinks this guy's peculiar fascination with vaccines is somehow a conservative Democrat (like his uncle actually was) is deluded.
    Totally agree that he is far from conservative.

    However, he's anti-deep state corruption, which is really the main issue we have that prevents all the other fringe issues to never get resolved correctly. Go scorched earth on the deep state and so we can have legitimate discussions on the rest down the road.
    Sounds great. Find someone who isn't a gun grabbing commie to do that. Fuck the Kennedy family.
  • BleachedAnusDawg
    BleachedAnusDawg Member Posts: 13,293 Standard Supporter

    Sledog said:

    RoadTrip said:
    Anyone who thinks this guy's peculiar fascination with vaccines is somehow a conservative Democrat (like his uncle actually was) is deluded.
    If he'll take your guns he's team WEF/NWO/Commie.
    He's not Team WEF. He wants to ban pharma advertising and he's worked hard to show Fauci for the criminal fraud that he is
    Great. Have him head up the FDA or something. The guy should not be anywhere near the Oval Office.
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,103
    edited July 2023

    Goduckies said:

    RoadTrip said:

    Doesn’t matter what any of the candidates think about the SCOTUS decision.

    They are running for the top executive spot.

    People forget we actually have three branches of government.

    He also recently said, if we? could reach a consensus on an assault weapons ban, he would sign it as president. Again, hard fucking NO!
    But he is against vaccines, so he is all good... tug logic
    No kidding. All the stuff I see from Throbber and others about gun rights and whatnot and those same posters overlook that because this guy is antivax. If he was running pre-COVID nobody would take him seriously. Kennedy sucks.
    Bob_C said:

    RoadTrip said:
    Anyone who thinks this guy's peculiar fascination with vaccines is somehow a conservative Democrat (like his uncle actually was) is deluded.
    Totally agree that he is far from conservative.

    However, he's anti-deep state corruption, which is really the main issue we have that prevents all the other fringe issues to never get resolved correctly. Go scorched earth on the deep state and so we can have legitimate discussions on the rest down the road.
    Sounds great. Find someone who isn't a gun grabbing commie to do that. Fuck the Kennedy family.
    Gun rights are protected by the 2nd Amendment. Shall not be abridged. RFK, Jr. may talk shit about banning weapons but ain't jack happening unless there's a Constitutional convention. Dana Carvey/Bush voice: Nah gonna happen.

    Living in the land of 100% agreement is bad statistical modeling - instead rank what's important. Couple that with the probability a candidate on any particular issue will take action on the campaign shit-talking and there you have it.

    From all appearances, RFK is taking aim at the 3 letter agencies and will execute on that talk. That scores points on the Throbber scale.

    Talking shit about banning assault weapons. Good luck. 100% talk x 0% chance of executing = no impact on candidate's score.

    Math.

  • BleachedAnusDawg
    BleachedAnusDawg Member Posts: 13,293 Standard Supporter

    Goduckies said:

    RoadTrip said:

    Doesn’t matter what any of the candidates think about the SCOTUS decision.

    They are running for the top executive spot.

    People forget we actually have three branches of government.

    He also recently said, if we? could reach a consensus on an assault weapons ban, he would sign it as president. Again, hard fucking NO!
    But he is against vaccines, so he is all good... tug logic
    No kidding. All the stuff I see from Throbber and others about gun rights and whatnot and those same posters overlook that because this guy is antivax. If he was running pre-COVID nobody would take him seriously. Kennedy sucks.
    Bob_C said:

    RoadTrip said:
    Anyone who thinks this guy's peculiar fascination with vaccines is somehow a conservative Democrat (like his uncle actually was) is deluded.
    Totally agree that he is far from conservative.

    However, he's anti-deep state corruption, which is really the main issue we have that prevents all the other fringe issues to never get resolved correctly. Go scorched earth on the deep state and so we can have legitimate discussions on the rest down the road.
    Sounds great. Find someone who isn't a gun grabbing commie to do that. Fuck the Kennedy family.
    Gun rights are protected by the 2nd Amendment. Shall not be abridged. RFK, Jr. may talk shit about banning weapons but ain't jack happening unless there's a Constitutional convention. Dana Carvey/Bush voice: Nah gonna happen.

    Living in the land of 100% agreement is bad statistical modeling - instead rank what's important. Couple that with the probability a candidate on any particular issue will take action on the campaign shit-talking and there you have it.

    From all appearances, RFK is taking aim at the 3 letter agencies and will execute on that talk. That scores points on the Throbber scale.

    Talking shit about banning assault weapons. Good luck. 100% talk x 0% chance of executing = no impact on candidate's score.

    Math.

    Dems can nibble around the edges and eventually the Supreme Court makeup will be different. You are dancing with the devil.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,823 Standard Supporter

    Sledog said:

    RoadTrip said:
    Anyone who thinks this guy's peculiar fascination with vaccines is somehow a conservative Democrat (like his uncle actually was) is deluded.
    If he'll take your guns he's team WEF/NWO/Commie.
    He's not Team WEF. He wants to ban pharma advertising and he's worked hard to show Fauci for the criminal fraud that he is
    He is when he aligns with their goals.
  • LoneStarDawg
    LoneStarDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,681 Founders Club
    Dems need a redpill candidate. I’m all for both parties waking the fuck up.