Home› Tug Tavern

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Once a Rat always a fucking RAT

RoadTripRoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,822 Founders Club
in Tug Tavern
Hard no on this dildo.

· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,250 Standard Supporter
    Doesn’t matter what any of the candidates think about the SCOTUS decision.

    They are running for the top executive spot.

    People forget we actually have three branches of government.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadTripRoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,822 Founders Club
    PurpleThrobber said:

    Doesn’t matter what any of the candidates think about the SCOTUS decision.

    They are running for the top executive spot.

    People forget we actually have three branches of government.

    He also recently said, if we? could reach a consensus on an assault weapons ban, he would sign it as president. Again, hard fucking NO!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,250 Standard Supporter
    RoadTrip said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    Doesn’t matter what any of the candidates think about the SCOTUS decision.

    They are running for the top executive spot.

    People forget we actually have three branches of government.

    He also recently said, if we? could reach a consensus on an assault weapons ban, he would sign it as president. Again, hard fucking NO!
    And the SCOTUS is there to say no go on that too.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,250 Standard Supporter
    edited June 2023
    SFGbob said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    Doesn’t matter what any of the candidates think about the SCOTUS decision.

    They are running for the top executive spot.

    People forget we actually have three branches of government.

    Yeah, and he just told you what kind of judges he'd select.
    That is possible too, no doubt.

    Still better than Biden.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GoduckiesGoduckies Member Posts: 6,622
    RoadTrip said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    Doesn’t matter what any of the candidates think about the SCOTUS decision.

    They are running for the top executive spot.

    People forget we actually have three branches of government.

    He also recently said, if we? could reach a consensus on an assault weapons ban, he would sign it as president. Again, hard fucking NO!
    But he is against vaccines, so he is all good... tug logic
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GoduckiesGoduckies Member Posts: 6,622
    PurpleThrobber said:

    SFGbob said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    Doesn’t matter what any of the candidates think about the SCOTUS decision.

    They are running for the top executive spot.

    People forget we actually have three branches of government.

    Yeah, and he just told you what kind of judges he'd select.
    That is possible too, no doubt.

    Still better than Biden.

    A ham sandwich is better than Biden.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,238
    PurpleThrobber said:

    SFGbob said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    Doesn’t matter what any of the candidates think about the SCOTUS decision.

    They are running for the top executive spot.

    People forget we actually have three branches of government.

    Yeah, and he just told you what kind of judges he'd select.
    That is possible too, no doubt.

    Still better than Biden.

    Well that's a pretty fucking low bar. Why vote for someone who you know is going to select Judicial nominees that will oppose most everything I believe?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,385 Standard Supporter
    PurpleThrobber said:

    RoadTrip said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    Doesn’t matter what any of the candidates think about the SCOTUS decision.

    They are running for the top executive spot.

    People forget we actually have three branches of government.

    He also recently said, if we? could reach a consensus on an assault weapons ban, he would sign it as president. Again, hard fucking NO!
    And the SCOTUS is there to say no go on that too.

    Except we are three dem judges (appointed by the President) from losing. We are also a dem president and dem House of Representatives away from expanding the Court to a sufficient number to swing the Court into being a rubber stamp for any dem legislation.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,273
    RoadTrip said:

    Hard no on this dildo.

    Anyone who thinks this guy's peculiar fascination with vaccines is somehow a conservative Democrat (like his uncle actually was) is deluded.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • pawzpawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 20,980 Founders Club
    edited June 2023
    Bob_C said:

    creepycoug said:

    RoadTrip said:

    Hard no on this dildo.

    Anyone who thinks this guy's peculiar fascination with vaccines is somehow a conservative Democrat (like his uncle actually was) is deluded.
    Totally agree that he is far from conservative.

    However, he's anti-deep state corruption, which is really the main issue we have that prevents all the other fringe issues to never get resolved correctly. Go scorched earth on the deep state and so we can have legitimate discussions on the rest down the road.
    Exactly this.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 106,031 Founders Club
    Yep RFK is a disrupter to Biden and an enemy of the state

    I still have issues with him but I'm glad he's in the race

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,250 Standard Supporter
    RaceBannon said:

    Yep RFK is a disrupter to Biden and an enemy of the state

    I still have issues with him but I'm glad he's in the race

    Agreed. Wood strongly consider voting for him over RDS.

    Mostly to piss off 46 but taking on the deep state and the globalists would be good fun.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • thechatchthechatch Member Posts: 6,294
    I hope Biden gets the nom and RFKj runs Indy

    Bush/Perot 92
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,945 Standard Supporter
    edited June 2023
    creepycoug said:

    RoadTrip said:

    Hard no on this dildo.

    Anyone who thinks this guy's peculiar fascination with vaccines is somehow a conservative Democrat (like his uncle actually was) is deluded.
    If he'll take your guns he's team WEF/NWO/Commie.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,385 Standard Supporter
    RoadTrip said:

    Goduckies said:

    RoadTrip said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    Doesn’t matter what any of the candidates think about the SCOTUS decision.

    They are running for the top executive spot.

    People forget we actually have three branches of government.

    He also recently said, if we? could reach a consensus on an assault weapons ban, he would sign it as president. Again, hard fucking NO!
    But he is against vaccines, so he is all good... tug logic
    Perhaps for others but not me GD. I think his positions on the 2nd Amendment and abortion are abhorrent.
    Toss in his commie view of economics and the environment.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DerekJohnsonDerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 63,584 Founders Club
    PurpleThrobber said:

    SFGbob said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    Doesn’t matter what any of the candidates think about the SCOTUS decision.

    They are running for the top executive spot.

    People forget we actually have three branches of government.

    Yeah, and he just told you what kind of judges he'd select.
    That is possible too, no doubt.

    Still better than Biden.

    This is not a plausible rebuttal
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.