Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Once a Rat always a fucking RAT

2»

Comments

  • DerekJohnsonDerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 63,584 Founders Club
    Sledog said:

    RoadTrip said:
    Anyone who thinks this guy's peculiar fascination with vaccines is somehow a conservative Democrat (like his uncle actually was) is deluded.
    If he'll take your guns he's team WEF/NWO/Commie.
    He's not Team WEF. He wants to ban pharma advertising and he's worked hard to show Fauci for the criminal fraud that he is
  • DerekJohnsonDerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 63,584 Founders Club
    RoadTrip said:

    Doesn’t matter what any of the candidates think about the SCOTUS decision.

    They are running for the top executive spot.

    People forget we actually have three branches of government.

    He also recently said, if we? could reach a consensus on an assault weapons ban, he would sign it as president. Again, hard fucking NO!
    this stuff is concerning
  • SwayeSwaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,503 Founders Club
    RoadTrip said:

    Goduckies said:

    RoadTrip said:

    Doesn’t matter what any of the candidates think about the SCOTUS decision.

    They are running for the top executive spot.

    People forget we actually have three branches of government.

    He also recently said, if we? could reach a consensus on an assault weapons ban, he would sign it as president. Again, hard fucking NO!
    But he is against vaccines, so he is all good... tug logic
    Perhaps for others but not me GD. I think his positions on the 2nd Amendment and abortion are abhorrent.
    Single issue voter here. You do not support the 2nd Amendment you can go fuck yourself. RFK has some interesting positions I agree with, but you don't support the most inherent right we have, that of self defense, then you are an anti-liberty twit and I will not waste my time or my vote on you now or ever.
  • BleachedAnusDawgBleachedAnusDawg Member Posts: 11,569
    edited July 2023
    Goduckies said:

    RoadTrip said:

    Doesn’t matter what any of the candidates think about the SCOTUS decision.

    They are running for the top executive spot.

    People forget we actually have three branches of government.

    He also recently said, if we? could reach a consensus on an assault weapons ban, he would sign it as president. Again, hard fucking NO!
    But he is against vaccines, so he is all good... tug logic
    No kidding. All the stuff I see from Throbber and others about gun rights and whatnot and those same posters overlook that because this guy is antivax. If he was running pre-COVID nobody would take him seriously. Kennedy sucks.
    Bob_C said:

    RoadTrip said:
    Anyone who thinks this guy's peculiar fascination with vaccines is somehow a conservative Democrat (like his uncle actually was) is deluded.
    Totally agree that he is far from conservative.

    However, he's anti-deep state corruption, which is really the main issue we have that prevents all the other fringe issues to never get resolved correctly. Go scorched earth on the deep state and so we can have legitimate discussions on the rest down the road.
    Sounds great. Find someone who isn't a gun grabbing commie to do that. Fuck the Kennedy family.
  • BleachedAnusDawgBleachedAnusDawg Member Posts: 11,569

    Sledog said:

    RoadTrip said:
    Anyone who thinks this guy's peculiar fascination with vaccines is somehow a conservative Democrat (like his uncle actually was) is deluded.
    If he'll take your guns he's team WEF/NWO/Commie.
    He's not Team WEF. He wants to ban pharma advertising and he's worked hard to show Fauci for the criminal fraud that he is
    Great. Have him head up the FDA or something. The guy should not be anywhere near the Oval Office.
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,250 Standard Supporter
    edited July 2023

    Goduckies said:

    RoadTrip said:

    Doesn’t matter what any of the candidates think about the SCOTUS decision.

    They are running for the top executive spot.

    People forget we actually have three branches of government.

    He also recently said, if we? could reach a consensus on an assault weapons ban, he would sign it as president. Again, hard fucking NO!
    But he is against vaccines, so he is all good... tug logic
    No kidding. All the stuff I see from Throbber and others about gun rights and whatnot and those same posters overlook that because this guy is antivax. If he was running pre-COVID nobody would take him seriously. Kennedy sucks.
    Bob_C said:

    RoadTrip said:
    Anyone who thinks this guy's peculiar fascination with vaccines is somehow a conservative Democrat (like his uncle actually was) is deluded.
    Totally agree that he is far from conservative.

    However, he's anti-deep state corruption, which is really the main issue we have that prevents all the other fringe issues to never get resolved correctly. Go scorched earth on the deep state and so we can have legitimate discussions on the rest down the road.
    Sounds great. Find someone who isn't a gun grabbing commie to do that. Fuck the Kennedy family.
    Gun rights are protected by the 2nd Amendment. Shall not be abridged. RFK, Jr. may talk shit about banning weapons but ain't jack happening unless there's a Constitutional convention. Dana Carvey/Bush voice: Nah gonna happen.

    Living in the land of 100% agreement is bad statistical modeling - instead rank what's important. Couple that with the probability a candidate on any particular issue will take action on the campaign shit-talking and there you have it.

    From all appearances, RFK is taking aim at the 3 letter agencies and will execute on that talk. That scores points on the Throbber scale.

    Talking shit about banning assault weapons. Good luck. 100% talk x 0% chance of executing = no impact on candidate's score.

    Math.

  • BleachedAnusDawgBleachedAnusDawg Member Posts: 11,569

    Goduckies said:

    RoadTrip said:

    Doesn’t matter what any of the candidates think about the SCOTUS decision.

    They are running for the top executive spot.

    People forget we actually have three branches of government.

    He also recently said, if we? could reach a consensus on an assault weapons ban, he would sign it as president. Again, hard fucking NO!
    But he is against vaccines, so he is all good... tug logic
    No kidding. All the stuff I see from Throbber and others about gun rights and whatnot and those same posters overlook that because this guy is antivax. If he was running pre-COVID nobody would take him seriously. Kennedy sucks.
    Bob_C said:

    RoadTrip said:
    Anyone who thinks this guy's peculiar fascination with vaccines is somehow a conservative Democrat (like his uncle actually was) is deluded.
    Totally agree that he is far from conservative.

    However, he's anti-deep state corruption, which is really the main issue we have that prevents all the other fringe issues to never get resolved correctly. Go scorched earth on the deep state and so we can have legitimate discussions on the rest down the road.
    Sounds great. Find someone who isn't a gun grabbing commie to do that. Fuck the Kennedy family.
    Gun rights are protected by the 2nd Amendment. Shall not be abridged. RFK, Jr. may talk shit about banning weapons but ain't jack happening unless there's a Constitutional convention. Dana Carvey/Bush voice: Nah gonna happen.

    Living in the land of 100% agreement is bad statistical modeling - instead rank what's important. Couple that with the probability a candidate on any particular issue will take action on the campaign shit-talking and there you have it.

    From all appearances, RFK is taking aim at the 3 letter agencies and will execute on that talk. That scores points on the Throbber scale.

    Talking shit about banning assault weapons. Good luck. 100% talk x 0% chance of executing = no impact on candidate's score.

    Math.

    Dems can nibble around the edges and eventually the Supreme Court makeup will be different. You are dancing with the devil.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,945 Standard Supporter

    Sledog said:

    RoadTrip said:
    Anyone who thinks this guy's peculiar fascination with vaccines is somehow a conservative Democrat (like his uncle actually was) is deluded.
    If he'll take your guns he's team WEF/NWO/Commie.
    He's not Team WEF. He wants to ban pharma advertising and he's worked hard to show Fauci for the criminal fraud that he is
    He is when he aligns with their goals.
  • LoneStarDawgLoneStarDawg Member Posts: 13,345
    Dems need a redpill candidate. I’m all for both parties waking the fuck up.
Sign In or Register to comment.