Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Once a Rat always a fucking RAT
Comments
-
He's not Team WEF. He wants to ban pharma advertising and he's worked hard to show Fauci for the criminal fraud that he isSledog said:
If he'll take your guns he's team WEF/NWO/Commie.creepycoug said:
Anyone who thinks this guy's peculiar fascination with vaccines is somehow a conservative Democrat (like his uncle actually was) is deluded.RoadTrip said: -
this stuff is concerningRoadTrip said:
He also recently said, if we? could reach a consensus on an assault weapons ban, he would sign it as president. Again, hard fucking NO!PurpleThrobber said:Doesn’t matter what any of the candidates think about the SCOTUS decision.
They are running for the top executive spot.
People forget we actually have three branches of government. -
Single issue voter here. You do not support the 2nd Amendment you can go fuck yourself. RFK has some interesting positions I agree with, but you don't support the most inherent right we have, that of self defense, then you are an anti-liberty twit and I will not waste my time or my vote on you now or ever.RoadTrip said:
Perhaps for others but not me GD. I think his positions on the 2nd Amendment and abortion are abhorrent.Goduckies said:
But he is against vaccines, so he is all good... tug logicRoadTrip said:
He also recently said, if we? could reach a consensus on an assault weapons ban, he would sign it as president. Again, hard fucking NO!PurpleThrobber said:Doesn’t matter what any of the candidates think about the SCOTUS decision.
They are running for the top executive spot.
People forget we actually have three branches of government. -
No kidding. All the stuff I see from Throbber and others about gun rights and whatnot and those same posters overlook that because this guy is antivax. If he was running pre-COVID nobody would take him seriously. Kennedy sucks.Goduckies said:
But he is against vaccines, so he is all good... tug logicRoadTrip said:
He also recently said, if we? could reach a consensus on an assault weapons ban, he would sign it as president. Again, hard fucking NO!PurpleThrobber said:Doesn’t matter what any of the candidates think about the SCOTUS decision.
They are running for the top executive spot.
People forget we actually have three branches of government.
Sounds great. Find someone who isn't a gun grabbing commie to do that. Fuck the Kennedy family.Bob_C said:
Totally agree that he is far from conservative.creepycoug said:
Anyone who thinks this guy's peculiar fascination with vaccines is somehow a conservative Democrat (like his uncle actually was) is deluded.RoadTrip said:
However, he's anti-deep state corruption, which is really the main issue we have that prevents all the other fringe issues to never get resolved correctly. Go scorched earth on the deep state and so we can have legitimate discussions on the rest down the road. -
Great. Have him head up the FDA or something. The guy should not be anywhere near the Oval Office.DerekJohnson said:
He's not Team WEF. He wants to ban pharma advertising and he's worked hard to show Fauci for the criminal fraud that he isSledog said:
If he'll take your guns he's team WEF/NWO/Commie.creepycoug said:
Anyone who thinks this guy's peculiar fascination with vaccines is somehow a conservative Democrat (like his uncle actually was) is deluded.RoadTrip said: -
Gun rights are protected by the 2nd Amendment. Shall not be abridged. RFK, Jr. may talk shit about banning weapons but ain't jack happening unless there's a Constitutional convention. Dana Carvey/Bush voice: Nah gonna happen.BleachedAnusDawg said:
No kidding. All the stuff I see from Throbber and others about gun rights and whatnot and those same posters overlook that because this guy is antivax. If he was running pre-COVID nobody would take him seriously. Kennedy sucks.Goduckies said:
But he is against vaccines, so he is all good... tug logicRoadTrip said:
He also recently said, if we? could reach a consensus on an assault weapons ban, he would sign it as president. Again, hard fucking NO!PurpleThrobber said:Doesn’t matter what any of the candidates think about the SCOTUS decision.
They are running for the top executive spot.
People forget we actually have three branches of government.
Sounds great. Find someone who isn't a gun grabbing commie to do that. Fuck the Kennedy family.Bob_C said:
Totally agree that he is far from conservative.creepycoug said:
Anyone who thinks this guy's peculiar fascination with vaccines is somehow a conservative Democrat (like his uncle actually was) is deluded.RoadTrip said:
However, he's anti-deep state corruption, which is really the main issue we have that prevents all the other fringe issues to never get resolved correctly. Go scorched earth on the deep state and so we can have legitimate discussions on the rest down the road.
Living in the land of 100% agreement is bad statistical modeling - instead rank what's important. Couple that with the probability a candidate on any particular issue will take action on the campaign shit-talking and there you have it.
From all appearances, RFK is taking aim at the 3 letter agencies and will execute on that talk. That scores points on the Throbber scale.
Talking shit about banning assault weapons. Good luck. 100% talk x 0% chance of executing = no impact on candidate's score.
Math.
-
Dems can nibble around the edges and eventually the Supreme Court makeup will be different. You are dancing with the devil.PurpleThrobber said:
Gun rights are protected by the 2nd Amendment. Shall not be abridged. RFK, Jr. may talk shit about banning weapons but ain't jack happening unless there's a Constitutional convention. Dana Carvey/Bush voice: Nah gonna happen.BleachedAnusDawg said:
No kidding. All the stuff I see from Throbber and others about gun rights and whatnot and those same posters overlook that because this guy is antivax. If he was running pre-COVID nobody would take him seriously. Kennedy sucks.Goduckies said:
But he is against vaccines, so he is all good... tug logicRoadTrip said:
He also recently said, if we? could reach a consensus on an assault weapons ban, he would sign it as president. Again, hard fucking NO!PurpleThrobber said:Doesn’t matter what any of the candidates think about the SCOTUS decision.
They are running for the top executive spot.
People forget we actually have three branches of government.
Sounds great. Find someone who isn't a gun grabbing commie to do that. Fuck the Kennedy family.Bob_C said:
Totally agree that he is far from conservative.creepycoug said:
Anyone who thinks this guy's peculiar fascination with vaccines is somehow a conservative Democrat (like his uncle actually was) is deluded.RoadTrip said:
However, he's anti-deep state corruption, which is really the main issue we have that prevents all the other fringe issues to never get resolved correctly. Go scorched earth on the deep state and so we can have legitimate discussions on the rest down the road.
Living in the land of 100% agreement is bad statistical modeling - instead rank what's important. Couple that with the probability a candidate on any particular issue will take action on the campaign shit-talking and there you have it.
From all appearances, RFK is taking aim at the 3 letter agencies and will execute on that talk. That scores points on the Throbber scale.
Talking shit about banning assault weapons. Good luck. 100% talk x 0% chance of executing = no impact on candidate's score.
Math. -
He is when he aligns with their goals.DerekJohnson said:
He's not Team WEF. He wants to ban pharma advertising and he's worked hard to show Fauci for the criminal fraud that he isSledog said:
If he'll take your guns he's team WEF/NWO/Commie.creepycoug said:
Anyone who thinks this guy's peculiar fascination with vaccines is somehow a conservative Democrat (like his uncle actually was) is deluded.RoadTrip said: -
Dems need a redpill candidate. I’m all for both parties waking the fuck up.
