Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Redacted | Building 7
Comments
-
Imagine knowing how much bullshit our government pulls to orchestrate wars and then refuse to ask questions about what got us? into a 5T nation building sand storm for 20 years
-
The woman in the video called it a scud missile, I didn't...go argue with her.46XiJCAB said:
Educated yourself on the trajectory of a scud missile and their history of not being accurate.Blueduck said:
Where do the 800,000 missing/abducted children go every year?46XiJCAB said:
So where is Barbara Olson? And the molten theory only makes sense to non-conspiracy theorists.Blueduck said:
I didn't guarantee the authenticity of the video, I merely asked if it the timing was coincidence with the redacted piece.46XiJCAB said:Good grief.
The plane that hit the Pentagon was witnessed by drivers. I love the lunatic showing the grainy pick of the “scud missile” sounding so believable.
The plane turned into a molten ball as it tore through the building. Shocking there was nothing left.
To some.
Fwiw your molten ball theory doesn't cut the mustard.
The wings would have sheared And the engines would have been left outside.....or
The hole in the building does not jive with the damage that would have been caused if the engines had entered the building.
An engine was discovered but was not anywhere near the size of the reported planes engines.
You should probably do a little more research.
There is evidence that contradicts those "witness" accounts.
Why does the reporter at the scene clearly state there is no evidence a plane crashed into the pentagon.
He doesn't mention a molten ball that could have been a plane either.
You are a big boy, Im not going to answer your questions because you wont believe anything I say about it anyway.
You have to go look and find the truth for yourself..or not.
But sure, they fired one at ground level and scored a direct hit on the Pentagon.
Conspiracy nuts can create the narrative evidence to fit their insane theories.
A witness saw the plane clip a light pole on the freeway.
-
Me46XiJCAB said:Who could have guessed Pawz is a conspiracy nut?
-
Exactly. EXACTLY.46XiJCAB said:
I can’t help it if you want to believe nutcases.Blueduck said:
Where do the 800,000 missing/abducted children go every year?46XiJCAB said:
So where is Barbara Olson? And the molten theory only makes sense to non-conspiracy theorists.Blueduck said:
I didn't guarantee the authenticity of the video, I merely asked if it the timing was coincidence with the redacted piece.46XiJCAB said:Good grief.
The plane that hit the Pentagon was witnessed by drivers. I love the lunatic showing the grainy pick of the “scud missile” sounding so believable.
The plane turned into a molten ball as it tore through the building. Shocking there was nothing left.
To some.
Fwiw your molten ball theory doesn't cut the mustard.
The wings would have sheared And the engines would have been left outside.....or
The hole in the building does not jive with the damage that would have been caused if the engines had entered the building.
An engine was discovered but was not anywhere near the size of the reported planes engines.
You should probably do a little more research.
There is evidence that contradicts those "witness" accounts.
Why does the reporter at the scene clearly state there is no evidence a plane crashed into the pentagon.
He doesn't mention a molten ball that could have been a plane either.
You are a big boy, Im not going to answer your questions because you wont believe anything I say about it anyway.
You have to go look and find the truth for yourself..or not.
Here’s the truth. And AA was hijacked.
3 months. Just for shit and giggles catch a docu on what it takes to prepare a high rise for demo.pawz said:
Common sense questions for dummies.46XiJCAB said:
There is no narrative. Just use your common sense?pawz said:
Must.46XiJCAB said:
Brush up on what it takes to demolish a building. It will keep you from poasting stupid shit like this.pawz said:
https://youtu.be/HIBG_InCKKI
*In before this is nuked by youtube
Defend.
Narrative.
What does it mean to “pull the building”?
From the moment that decision is made, how long does it take from start to finish - on average?
Please tell us all you know about what it takes to “demolish a building” as you alluded to in a previous post
https://youtu.be/-ZlmHvd_RZU
Did any of you ever watch what it took to bring the Kingdome down?
Good.
Fucking
Grief.
You have the man who owned the WTC on camera a week after the event admitting “we decided to pull the building”.
Then you have your own fucking eyeballs watching a perfect textbook implosion.
If it takes 3 fucking months, then it was planned. Period. End of story.
What more do you need Liz Cheney?
-
I’m just trying to help you debunk this BS.Blueduck said:
The woman in the video called it a scud missile, I didn't...go argue with her.46XiJCAB said:
Educated yourself on the trajectory of a scud missile and their history of not being accurate.Blueduck said:
Where do the 800,000 missing/abducted children go every year?46XiJCAB said:
So where is Barbara Olson? And the molten theory only makes sense to non-conspiracy theorists.Blueduck said:
I didn't guarantee the authenticity of the video, I merely asked if it the timing was coincidence with the redacted piece.46XiJCAB said:Good grief.
The plane that hit the Pentagon was witnessed by drivers. I love the lunatic showing the grainy pick of the “scud missile” sounding so believable.
The plane turned into a molten ball as it tore through the building. Shocking there was nothing left.
To some.
Fwiw your molten ball theory doesn't cut the mustard.
The wings would have sheared And the engines would have been left outside.....or
The hole in the building does not jive with the damage that would have been caused if the engines had entered the building.
An engine was discovered but was not anywhere near the size of the reported planes engines.
You should probably do a little more research.
There is evidence that contradicts those "witness" accounts.
Why does the reporter at the scene clearly state there is no evidence a plane crashed into the pentagon.
He doesn't mention a molten ball that could have been a plane either.
You are a big boy, Im not going to answer your questions because you wont believe anything I say about it anyway.
You have to go look and find the truth for yourself..or not.
But sure, they fired one at ground level and scored a direct hit on the Pentagon.
Conspiracy nuts can create the narrative evidence to fit their insane theories.
A witness saw the plane clip a light pole on the freeway. -
Dear lord you really believe it was demolished.pawz said:
Exactly. EXACTLY.46XiJCAB said:
I can’t help it if you want to believe nutcases.Blueduck said:
Where do the 800,000 missing/abducted children go every year?46XiJCAB said:
So where is Barbara Olson? And the molten theory only makes sense to non-conspiracy theorists.Blueduck said:
I didn't guarantee the authenticity of the video, I merely asked if it the timing was coincidence with the redacted piece.46XiJCAB said:Good grief.
The plane that hit the Pentagon was witnessed by drivers. I love the lunatic showing the grainy pick of the “scud missile” sounding so believable.
The plane turned into a molten ball as it tore through the building. Shocking there was nothing left.
To some.
Fwiw your molten ball theory doesn't cut the mustard.
The wings would have sheared And the engines would have been left outside.....or
The hole in the building does not jive with the damage that would have been caused if the engines had entered the building.
An engine was discovered but was not anywhere near the size of the reported planes engines.
You should probably do a little more research.
There is evidence that contradicts those "witness" accounts.
Why does the reporter at the scene clearly state there is no evidence a plane crashed into the pentagon.
He doesn't mention a molten ball that could have been a plane either.
You are a big boy, Im not going to answer your questions because you wont believe anything I say about it anyway.
You have to go look and find the truth for yourself..or not.
Here’s the truth. And AA was hijacked.
3 months. Just for shit and giggles catch a docu on what it takes to prepare a high rise for demo.pawz said:
Common sense questions for dummies.46XiJCAB said:
There is no narrative. Just use your common sense?pawz said:
Must.46XiJCAB said:
Brush up on what it takes to demolish a building. It will keep you from poasting stupid shit like this.pawz said:https://youtu.be/HIBG_InCKKI
*In before this is nuked by youtube
Defend.
Narrative.
What does it mean to “pull the building”?
From the moment that decision is made, how long does it take from start to finish - on average?
Please tell us all you know about what it takes to “demolish a building” as you alluded to in a previous posthttps://youtu.be/-ZlmHvd_RZU
Did any of you ever watch what it took to bring the Kingdome down?
Good.
Fucking
Grief.
You have the man who owned the WTC on camera a week after the event admitting “we decided to pull the building”.
Then you have your own fucking eyeballs watching a perfect textbook implosion.
If it takes 3 fucking months, then it was planned. Period. End of story.
What more do you need Liz Cheney?
I’m sorry. -
46Q on a Sunday is something to behold. He's gotta get back to his Vancouver company giving him 0.01% responsibility at 4am tomorrow so he's gotta get all his "haymakers" in now.
Incredible chit. -
Fuck off, Liz.46XiJCAB said:
Dear lord you really believe it was demolished.pawz said:
Exactly. EXACTLY.46XiJCAB said:
I can’t help it if you want to believe nutcases.Blueduck said:
Where do the 800,000 missing/abducted children go every year?46XiJCAB said:
So where is Barbara Olson? And the molten theory only makes sense to non-conspiracy theorists.Blueduck said:
I didn't guarantee the authenticity of the video, I merely asked if it the timing was coincidence with the redacted piece.46XiJCAB said:Good grief.
The plane that hit the Pentagon was witnessed by drivers. I love the lunatic showing the grainy pick of the “scud missile” sounding so believable.
The plane turned into a molten ball as it tore through the building. Shocking there was nothing left.
To some.
Fwiw your molten ball theory doesn't cut the mustard.
The wings would have sheared And the engines would have been left outside.....or
The hole in the building does not jive with the damage that would have been caused if the engines had entered the building.
An engine was discovered but was not anywhere near the size of the reported planes engines.
You should probably do a little more research.
There is evidence that contradicts those "witness" accounts.
Why does the reporter at the scene clearly state there is no evidence a plane crashed into the pentagon.
He doesn't mention a molten ball that could have been a plane either.
You are a big boy, Im not going to answer your questions because you wont believe anything I say about it anyway.
You have to go look and find the truth for yourself..or not.
Here’s the truth. And AA was hijacked.
3 months. Just for shit and giggles catch a docu on what it takes to prepare a high rise for demo.pawz said:
Common sense questions for dummies.46XiJCAB said:
There is no narrative. Just use your common sense?pawz said:
Must.46XiJCAB said:
Brush up on what it takes to demolish a building. It will keep you from poasting stupid shit like this.pawz said:https://youtu.be/HIBG_InCKKI
*In before this is nuked by youtube
Defend.
Narrative.
What does it mean to “pull the building”?
From the moment that decision is made, how long does it take from start to finish - on average?
Please tell us all you know about what it takes to “demolish a building” as you alluded to in a previous posthttps://youtu.be/-ZlmHvd_RZU
Did any of you ever watch what it took to bring the Kingdome down?
Good.
Fucking
Grief.
You have the man who owned the WTC on camera a week after the event admitting “we decided to pull the building”.
Then you have your own fucking eyeballs watching a perfect textbook implosion.
If it takes 3 fucking months, then it was planned. Period. End of story.
What more do you need Liz Cheney?
I’m sorry.
Maybe it’s tim for you to move to Delta Park where your dumb ass belongs.
-
You know you must be a dumb fuck when Mello is cheering you on.haie said:46Q on a Sunday is something to behold. He's gotta get back to his Vancouver company giving him 0.01% responsibility at 4am tomorrow so he's gotta get all his "haymakers" in now.
Incredible chit.
Delta Park. Belongs.
