Redacted | Building 7
Comments
-
Where do the 800,000 missing/abducted children go every year?46XiJCAB said:
So where is Barbara Olson? And the molten theory only makes sense to non-conspiracy theorists.Blueduck said:
I didn't guarantee the authenticity of the video, I merely asked if it the timing was coincidence with the redacted piece.46XiJCAB said:Good grief.
The plane that hit the Pentagon was witnessed by drivers. I love the lunatic showing the grainy pick of the “scud missile” sounding so believable.
The plane turned into a molten ball as it tore through the building. Shocking there was nothing left.
To some.
Fwiw your molten ball theory doesn't cut the mustard.
The wings would have sheared And the engines would have been left outside.....or
The hole in the building does not jive with the damage that would have been caused if the engines had entered the building.
An engine was discovered but was not anywhere near the size of the reported planes engines.
You should probably do a little more research.
There is evidence that contradicts those "witness" accounts.
Why does the reporter at the scene clearly state there is no evidence a plane crashed into the pentagon.
He doesn't mention a molten ball that could have been a plane either.
You are a big boy, Im not going to answer your questions because you wont believe anything I say about it anyway.
You have to go look and find the truth for yourself..or not. -
What weapon was used?
Where was it deployed from?
Who used it?
Why did they do it? -
Common sense questions for dummies.46XiJCAB said:
There is no narrative. Just use your common sense?pawz said:
Must.46XiJCAB said:
Brush up on what it takes to demolish a building. It will keep you from poasting stupid shit like this.pawz said:
https://youtu.be/HIBG_InCKKI
*In before this is nuked by youtube
Defend.
Narrative.
What does it mean to “pull the building”?
From the moment that decision is made, how long does it take from start to finish - on average?
Please tell us all you know about what it takes to “demolish a building” as you alluded to in a previous post
https://youtu.be/-ZlmHvd_RZU -
Here's a couple more bread crumbs for inquiring minds.pawz said:
Common sense questions for dummies.46XiJCAB said:
There is no narrative. Just use your common sense?pawz said:
Must.46XiJCAB said:
Brush up on what it takes to demolish a building. It will keep you from poasting stupid shit like this.pawz said:https://youtu.be/HIBG_InCKKI
*In before this is nuked by youtube
Defend.
Narrative.
What does it mean to “pull the building”?
From the moment that decision is made, how long does it take from start to finish - on average?
Please tell us all you know about what it takes to “demolish a building” as you alluded to in a previous posthttps://youtu.be/-ZlmHvd_RZU
Caution, these are full length documentaries with experts weighing in..
https://www.bitchute.com/video/8CeRGYK20GLO/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/vBv3u4eTpt5z/
-
Holy shit, the video really does say Scud Missile.Blueduck said:Funny.... this video showing the missile hitting the pentagram is making the rounds on Bitch ute.
Coincidence?
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Ux9AD5Axk5Fq/
(Not sure if external links other than Twitter or Youtube are working.. video was posted on Bitch ute 5 hours ago)
Gotta do better than that. -
There were plenty of plane parts there. And bodiespawz said:
Exactly. Where the fuck are the engines? A ball of steel the size of a VW Beetle doesn’t just disintegrate. You would need a nuclear explosion for that.Blueduck said:
I didn't guarantee the authenticity of the video, I merely asked if it the timing was coincidence with the redacted piece.46XiJCAB said:Good grief.
The plane that hit the Pentagon was witnessed by drivers. I love the lunatic showing the grainy pick of the “scud missile” sounding so believable.
The plane turned into a molten ball as it tore through the building. Shocking there was nothing left.
To some.
Fwiw your molten ball theory doesn't cut the mustard.
The wings would have sheared And the engines would have been left outside.....or
The hole in the building does not jive with the damage that would have been caused if the engines had entered the building.
An engine was discovered but was not anywhere near the size of the reported planes engines.
You should probably do a little more research.
There is evidence that contradicts those "witness" accounts.
Further, why did the FBI go confiscate 80+ surveillance videos around the pentagon and destroy them? Then release basically a half-dozen grainy frames that don’t really show anything?
You’re really defending short-bus riders everywhere today. -
They were talking about pulling the firefighters from the building because it was too dangerous.pawz said:
Common sense questions for dummies.46XiJCAB said:
There is no narrative. Just use your common sense?pawz said:
Must.46XiJCAB said:
Brush up on what it takes to demolish a building. It will keep you from poasting stupid shit like this.pawz said:https://youtu.be/HIBG_InCKKI
*In before this is nuked by youtube
Defend.
Narrative.
What does it mean to “pull the building”?
From the moment that decision is made, how long does it take from start to finish - on average?
Please tell us all you know about what it takes to “demolish a building” as you alluded to in a previous posthttps://youtu.be/-ZlmHvd_RZU -
Pics?Goduckies said:
There were plenty of plane parts there. And bodiespawz said:
Exactly. Where the fuck are the engines? A ball of steel the size of a VW Beetle doesn’t just disintegrate. You would need a nuclear explosion for that.Blueduck said:
I didn't guarantee the authenticity of the video, I merely asked if it the timing was coincidence with the redacted piece.46XiJCAB said:Good grief.
The plane that hit the Pentagon was witnessed by drivers. I love the lunatic showing the grainy pick of the “scud missile” sounding so believable.
The plane turned into a molten ball as it tore through the building. Shocking there was nothing left.
To some.
Fwiw your molten ball theory doesn't cut the mustard.
The wings would have sheared And the engines would have been left outside.....or
The hole in the building does not jive with the damage that would have been caused if the engines had entered the building.
An engine was discovered but was not anywhere near the size of the reported planes engines.
You should probably do a little more research.
There is evidence that contradicts those "witness" accounts.
Further, why did the FBI go confiscate 80+ surveillance videos around the pentagon and destroy them? Then release basically a half-dozen grainy frames that don’t really show anything?
You’re really defending short-bus riders everywhere today.
-
