If you don’t think AI will kill us all
Comments
-
Good luck being represented by the robots.WestlinnDuck said:
Lot's of lawyers are involved in rote business. You should get out more.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
No one wants to do business with an AIWestlinnDuck said:
Nope. Basic research, wills and trusts, corporate and business org docs, writing an appellate brief, filing a motion in most cases are pretty basic and repetitive. Please write a preliminary injunction to be filed in Washington federal district court to halt the Washington new anti-gun legislation. You will still need lawyers to supervise, organize, review and argue but a lot of paralegals will be toast along with rank and file attorneys who were doing the above mentioned work.PostGameOrangeSlices said:AI has a long way to go before it can be a fucking lawyer. Get a grip
This is the part you gloss over.
Sure, paralegals could get replaced. Lawyers arent.
Im sure the judge and jury will love it!! -
-
If you could read and understand basic concepts then you wouldn't need to be phucking strawman ass.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Good luck being represented by the robots.WestlinnDuck said:
Lot's of lawyers are involved in rote business. You should get out more.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
No one wants to do business with an AIWestlinnDuck said:
Nope. Basic research, wills and trusts, corporate and business org docs, writing an appellate brief, filing a motion in most cases are pretty basic and repetitive. Please write a preliminary injunction to be filed in Washington federal district court to halt the Washington new anti-gun legislation. You will still need lawyers to supervise, organize, review and argue but a lot of paralegals will be toast along with rank and file attorneys who were doing the above mentioned work.PostGameOrangeSlices said:AI has a long way to go before it can be a fucking lawyer. Get a grip
This is the part you gloss over.
Sure, paralegals could get replaced. Lawyers arent.
Im sure the judge and jury will love it!! -
AI is not going to take over as much as you thinkWestlinnDuck said:
If you could read and understand basic concepts then you wouldn't need to be phucking strawman ass.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Good luck being represented by the robots.WestlinnDuck said:
Lot's of lawyers are involved in rote business. You should get out more.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
No one wants to do business with an AIWestlinnDuck said:
Nope. Basic research, wills and trusts, corporate and business org docs, writing an appellate brief, filing a motion in most cases are pretty basic and repetitive. Please write a preliminary injunction to be filed in Washington federal district court to halt the Washington new anti-gun legislation. You will still need lawyers to supervise, organize, review and argue but a lot of paralegals will be toast along with rank and file attorneys who were doing the above mentioned work.PostGameOrangeSlices said:AI has a long way to go before it can be a fucking lawyer. Get a grip
This is the part you gloss over.
Sure, paralegals could get replaced. Lawyers arent.
Im sure the judge and jury will love it!!
-
Just like expanding government overreach, I believe tech and AI more likely to organically outgrow itself than not.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
AI is not going to take over as much as you thinkWestlinnDuck said:
If you could read and understand basic concepts then you wouldn't need to be phucking strawman ass.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Good luck being represented by the robots.WestlinnDuck said:
Lot's of lawyers are involved in rote business. You should get out more.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
No one wants to do business with an AIWestlinnDuck said:
Nope. Basic research, wills and trusts, corporate and business org docs, writing an appellate brief, filing a motion in most cases are pretty basic and repetitive. Please write a preliminary injunction to be filed in Washington federal district court to halt the Washington new anti-gun legislation. You will still need lawyers to supervise, organize, review and argue but a lot of paralegals will be toast along with rank and file attorneys who were doing the above mentioned work.PostGameOrangeSlices said:AI has a long way to go before it can be a fucking lawyer. Get a grip
This is the part you gloss over.
Sure, paralegals could get replaced. Lawyers arent.
Im sure the judge and jury will love it!!
I'm not a skynet doomsdayer, but it's a concern worth having.
Also, maybe the genx, boomers (maybe some early millennials) will struggle doing business with robots, but I can see the iPad VR babies accepting it as the norm.
Again, not a doomsday guy, but based off the trajectory I've witnessed in my lifetime, it's easier to imagine the Matrix than some harmonious AI enriched human utopia. -
Will there be a book cooking function?PurpleThrobber said:
Low level repetitive processes will go first. Paralegal stuff.haie said:It's coming for every white collar job that is not related to tech.
Lawyers, Loan officers, etc are fucked. Within a decade if not 5 years.
Same will be true in accounting. Bookkeepers will go bye bye.
The 5 year window is about right. It won’t take 10 years. The pace at which things are moving is crazy.
In things like legal and finance, higher level professionals will use AI as a supplement to their work. Those that don’t will get toasted. -
Can I ask why to your last point?Doogles said:
Just like expanding government overreach, I believe tech and AI more likely to organically outgrow itself than not.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
AI is not going to take over as much as you thinkWestlinnDuck said:
If you could read and understand basic concepts then you wouldn't need to be phucking strawman ass.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Good luck being represented by the robots.WestlinnDuck said:
Lot's of lawyers are involved in rote business. You should get out more.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
No one wants to do business with an AIWestlinnDuck said:
Nope. Basic research, wills and trusts, corporate and business org docs, writing an appellate brief, filing a motion in most cases are pretty basic and repetitive. Please write a preliminary injunction to be filed in Washington federal district court to halt the Washington new anti-gun legislation. You will still need lawyers to supervise, organize, review and argue but a lot of paralegals will be toast along with rank and file attorneys who were doing the above mentioned work.PostGameOrangeSlices said:AI has a long way to go before it can be a fucking lawyer. Get a grip
This is the part you gloss over.
Sure, paralegals could get replaced. Lawyers arent.
Im sure the judge and jury will love it!!
I'm not a skynet doomsdayer, but it's a concern worth having.
Also, maybe the genx, boomers (maybe some early millennials) will struggle doing business with robots, but I can see the iPad VR babies accepting it as the norm.
Again, not a doomsday guy, but based off the trajectory I've witnessed in my lifetime, it's easier to imagine the Matrix than some harmonious AI enriched human utopia.
The world is night and day better than it was 100 years ago. -
Couldn't be worse than what the Dazzlers clients must suffer!PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Good luck being represented by the robots.WestlinnDuck said:
Lot's of lawyers are involved in rote business. You should get out more.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
No one wants to do business with an AIWestlinnDuck said:
Nope. Basic research, wills and trusts, corporate and business org docs, writing an appellate brief, filing a motion in most cases are pretty basic and repetitive. Please write a preliminary injunction to be filed in Washington federal district court to halt the Washington new anti-gun legislation. You will still need lawyers to supervise, organize, review and argue but a lot of paralegals will be toast along with rank and file attorneys who were doing the above mentioned work.PostGameOrangeSlices said:AI has a long way to go before it can be a fucking lawyer. Get a grip
This is the part you gloss over.
Sure, paralegals could get replaced. Lawyers arent.
Im sure the judge and jury will love it!! -
He is a public defender.Sledog said:
Couldn't be worse than what the Dazzlers clients must suffer!PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Good luck being represented by the robots.WestlinnDuck said:
Lot's of lawyers are involved in rote business. You should get out more.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
No one wants to do business with an AIWestlinnDuck said:
Nope. Basic research, wills and trusts, corporate and business org docs, writing an appellate brief, filing a motion in most cases are pretty basic and repetitive. Please write a preliminary injunction to be filed in Washington federal district court to halt the Washington new anti-gun legislation. You will still need lawyers to supervise, organize, review and argue but a lot of paralegals will be toast along with rank and file attorneys who were doing the above mentioned work.PostGameOrangeSlices said:AI has a long way to go before it can be a fucking lawyer. Get a grip
This is the part you gloss over.
Sure, paralegals could get replaced. Lawyers arent.
Im sure the judge and jury will love it!!
They don't have a choice. -
Wrong. It will become the go-to excuse for every dishonest public figure in the world, replacing what today liars call a "glitch" when they are caught red-handed doing illegal shit.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
AI is not going to take over as much as you thinkWestlinnDuck said:
If you could read and understand basic concepts then you wouldn't need to be phucking strawman ass.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Good luck being represented by the robots.WestlinnDuck said:
Lot's of lawyers are involved in rote business. You should get out more.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
No one wants to do business with an AIWestlinnDuck said:
Nope. Basic research, wills and trusts, corporate and business org docs, writing an appellate brief, filing a motion in most cases are pretty basic and repetitive. Please write a preliminary injunction to be filed in Washington federal district court to halt the Washington new anti-gun legislation. You will still need lawyers to supervise, organize, review and argue but a lot of paralegals will be toast along with rank and file attorneys who were doing the above mentioned work.PostGameOrangeSlices said:AI has a long way to go before it can be a fucking lawyer. Get a grip
."
This is the part you gloss over.
Sure, paralegals could get replaced. Lawyers arent.
Im sure the judge and jury will love it!!
If only Inslee and Durkin had AI to blame, they wouldn't be settling lawsuits for public disclosure violations and destroying evidence. -
Wait till bad actors harness AI. There will be all types of new scams. Job loss will be significant. IBM is pausing 7800 jobs that could be replaced by AI overtime.
-
You forgot one thing: the government. They'll regulate the fuck out of it.haie said:It's coming for every white collar job that is not related to tech.
Lawyers, Loan officers, etc are fucked. Within a decade if not 5 years.
They love to list lawyers on this list, but what they really mean is paralegal and low-level associate volume work. The judgment isn't there yet for a real lawyer. Accountants? Much more vulnerable. Traders and Finance Bros? Already happening. Fake conservative debaters on anonymous internet message boards? Already happening. And as I said long ago, coders are also on the hook. The AI can or will be able to code better than people.
It technically has the ability to replace everybody. It won't. We're freaking out again like it's Y2K, which turned out to be a nothing sandwich.
Can't stop progress. The benies will outweigh the costs. May as well sit back and enjoy it and let @oregonblitzkrieg rant about it wherever he ran off to. Maybe this is the beginning of a technological evolutionary pivot Marx envisioned as giving birth to his socialist paradise where scarcity is eliminated. @UW_Doog_Bot ?
-
I'm hearing it might be able to one day replace the guys directing traffic for the guys who lay down flooring.RaceBannon said:They will have to dumb down AI to replace lawyers
What benefits to humans does replacing everyone bring?
Isn't the logical step to kill all the unnecessary people? Are any people necessary?
Just what I'm hearing. -
Agree. There's no stopping it. And the benies are potentially huge. I already have a loved one who benefits critically from AI as it exists today. The fuck am I going to support slowing it down. Bring it on. If I have to learn to do something else, so be it.haie said:
Yeah my previous comment was a bit hyperbolic.PurpleThrobber said:
Low level repetitive processes will go first. Paralegal stuff.haie said:It's coming for every white collar job that is not related to tech.
Lawyers, Loan officers, etc are fucked. Within a decade if not 5 years.
Same will be true in accounting. Bookkeepers will go bye bye.
The 5 year window is about right. It won’t take 10 years. The pace at which things are moving is crazy.
In things like legal and finance, higher level professionals will use AI as a supplement to their work. Those that don’t will get toasted.
This will just further emphasize the need to solve problems, fast, and the turn key positions in most fields will be what is replaced.
Many people will love the tools long term.
Still something that society will need to deal with, in one form or another. -
Creep gets it.creepycoug said:
You forgot one thing: the government. They'll regulate the fuck out of it.haie said:It's coming for every white collar job that is not related to tech.
Lawyers, Loan officers, etc are fucked. Within a decade if not 5 years.
They love to list lawyers on this list, but what they really mean is paralegal and low-level associate volume work. The judgment isn't there yet for a real lawyer. Accountants? Much more vulnerable. Traders and Finance Bros? Already happening. Fake conservative debaters on anonymous internet message boards? Already happening. And as I said long ago, coders are also on the hook. The AI can or will be able to code better than people.
It technically has the ability to replace everybody. It won't. We're freaking out again like it's Y2K, which turned out to be a nothing sandwich.
Can't stop progress. The benies will outweigh the costs. May as well sit back and enjoy it and let @oregonblitzkrieg rant about it wherever he ran off to. Maybe this is the beginning of a technological evolutionary pivot Marx envisioned as giving birth to his socialist paradise where scarcity is eliminated. @UW_Doog_Bot ?
Im also not convinced that the AI is sophisticated as it's being claimed to be
I use ChatGPT for some things at work, as should anyone with half a brain. It has obvious limitations.
It's a useful tool. But it's more like a calculator than it is a human brain -
What aren't you an expert on?PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Creep gets it.creepycoug said:
You forgot one thing: the government. They'll regulate the fuck out of it.haie said:It's coming for every white collar job that is not related to tech.
Lawyers, Loan officers, etc are fucked. Within a decade if not 5 years.
They love to list lawyers on this list, but what they really mean is paralegal and low-level associate volume work. The judgment isn't there yet for a real lawyer. Accountants? Much more vulnerable. Traders and Finance Bros? Already happening. Fake conservative debaters on anonymous internet message boards? Already happening. And as I said long ago, coders are also on the hook. The AI can or will be able to code better than people.
It technically has the ability to replace everybody. It won't. We're freaking out again like it's Y2K, which turned out to be a nothing sandwich.
Can't stop progress. The benies will outweigh the costs. May as well sit back and enjoy it and let @oregonblitzkrieg rant about it wherever he ran off to. Maybe this is the beginning of a technological evolutionary pivot Marx envisioned as giving birth to his socialist paradise where scarcity is eliminated. @UW_Doog_Bot ?
Im also not convinced that the AI is sophisticated as it's being claimed to be
I use ChatGPT for some things at work, as should anyone with half a brain. It has obvious limitations.
It's a useful tool. But it's more like a calculator than it is a human brain -
Im not an expert on anythingBob_C said:
What aren't you an expert on?PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Creep gets it.creepycoug said:
You forgot one thing: the government. They'll regulate the fuck out of it.haie said:It's coming for every white collar job that is not related to tech.
Lawyers, Loan officers, etc are fucked. Within a decade if not 5 years.
They love to list lawyers on this list, but what they really mean is paralegal and low-level associate volume work. The judgment isn't there yet for a real lawyer. Accountants? Much more vulnerable. Traders and Finance Bros? Already happening. Fake conservative debaters on anonymous internet message boards? Already happening. And as I said long ago, coders are also on the hook. The AI can or will be able to code better than people.
It technically has the ability to replace everybody. It won't. We're freaking out again like it's Y2K, which turned out to be a nothing sandwich.
Can't stop progress. The benies will outweigh the costs. May as well sit back and enjoy it and let @oregonblitzkrieg rant about it wherever he ran off to. Maybe this is the beginning of a technological evolutionary pivot Marx envisioned as giving birth to his socialist paradise where scarcity is eliminated. @UW_Doog_Bot ?
Im also not convinced that the AI is sophisticated as it's being claimed to be
I use ChatGPT for some things at work, as should anyone with half a brain. It has obvious limitations.
It's a useful tool. But it's more like a calculator than it is a human brain
This is a general bored on a football forum
Hth -
Wait????jecornel said:Wait till bad actors harness AI. There will be all types of new scams. Job loss will be significant. IBM is pausing 7800 jobs that could be replaced by AI overtime.
What planet are you currently inhabiting jimmy cornel? -
It would have to be way more advanced than than the lawyer AIcreepycoug said:
I'm hearing it might be able to one day replace the guys directing traffic for the guys who lay down flooring.RaceBannon said:They will have to dumb down AI to replace lawyers
What benefits to humans does replacing everyone bring?
Isn't the logical step to kill all the unnecessary people? Are any people necessary?
Just what I'm hearing. -
Thud.RaceBannon said:
It would have to be way more advanced than than the lawyer AIcreepycoug said:
I'm hearing it might be able to one day replace the guys directing traffic for the guys who lay down flooring.RaceBannon said:They will have to dumb down AI to replace lawyers
What benefits to humans does replacing everyone bring?
Isn't the logical step to kill all the unnecessary people? Are any people necessary?
Just what I'm hearing.
Replaced is replaced.
We may finally be witnessing the decline of Racebannon. Real Race would never reach for that one. -
Imagine wanting to replace everyone and not realizing the next logical step
Pretty fucking stupid -
The flooring AI knows this
The first thing flooring AI wants to do is kill all the lawyers -
You and Marx are in agreement. I always knew you were still a dirty hippy commie.RaceBannon said:Imagine wanting to replace everyone and not realizing the next logical step
Pretty fucking stupid -
The reason apocalyptic AI stories resonate is because it's likely
When superior intelligence meets inferior its always bad for inferior
And yes I'm saying the Spaniards were superior in intelligence and force
Like aliens would be
Independence Day is more likely than rainbows and unicorns if aliens arrive -
Of course.RaceBannon said:The reason apocalyptic AI stories resonate is because it's likely
When superior intelligence meets inferior its always bad for inferior
And yes I'm saying the Spaniards were superior in intelligence
As the senator (or whomever) once said, if it's going to happen, may as well sit back and enjoy it.
It's going to be like the Jetsons around here. AI will hold your beer, and get you a cold one before you even knew you wanted one. -
Aztecs and Mayans needed more tim
-
I’ve been demoing some software packages lately. Hadn't looked at anything for about a year. Got led down the ChatGP rabbit hole in the process.
Incredible how far things have come in a short time. Watched a session where a senior accounting person essentially turned the ChatBot into a first year staff person in about a hour. The learning curve on these machines is amazing and they don't have a know it all attitude like the Millenials/GenZers.
@creepycoug is correct - the low level grunts in any profession are going to get picked off first. If I was a bookkeeper or paralegal, I'd learn how to drive an excavator or build an OnlyFans page. They are toast. And toast like 5 years or less toast. Their only saving grace is partners in law and accounting firms are old and slow to change their ways so there will be a few stragglers. But once the upper level folks start bragging to one another about how much money they are saving, it's over.
Hell, I'm old enough to remember when financial statements were typed up by the secretary - and there were shitloads of secretaries who didn't know shit about accounting, they just knew how to type. Legal matters were conducted by dictaphone and yellow pad. There was no such thing as word processing or spreadsheets.
More senior people will just have their underlings deal with the AIBots and then ride off into the sunset.
The people who should be shitting bricks are the ones in their late 30s/early 40's who've already paid their dues with grunt work but aren't quite old enough to think about retiring. They'll be next on the chopping block. Once the bots perfect the low level shit, their learning will logically move up to the next level of work.
(It was Bobby Knight who coined the 'lay back and enjoy it' phrase, BTW).
-
And Jesus.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Aztecs and Mayans needed more tim
-
Kukulkan > Jesus rather easily...say 34-17?creepycoug said:
And Jesus.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Aztecs and Mayans needed more tim
Smallpox, on the other hand... -
I'm wondering if the diseases actually came from my Vikings who beat Spain to America rather easily. They visited around the time that the plague had come to Europe from China