Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Shall not be infringed . . . or even seriously thought about . . . ever
Comments
-
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.Swaye said:
How is it that a bright legal mind such as your own has been wrong multiple times in the last 20 years? Every major gun case that shows before the Supreme Court has an interpretation 180 out from your own deluded perspective? You get presented MANY quotes attributed to MANY FFs and you still persist in thinking you are correct, when ALL factual evidence says you are wrong. This isn't me wishing gun ownership to be an individual right it to be true. I do not have to wish. The facts are overwhelmingly on my side. But, I guess you have your feelings, which is nice. Good for you.HHusky said:
Really, the whole thing was to avoid the need for a standing army, and that ship has sailed. It wasn’t intended to provide an individual right to own a gun. Berger was right. The whole thing has been a fraud.Sledog said:
I means they need to be competent those days. Oh and they have to supply their own arms and gear. You know in case the government needs overthrowing.HHusky said:
Well regulated. By whom, Mall Cop?Sledog said:Dazzler can't even understand that the militia is the people not the military. But he says he's schmart!
Some nutjob with a machete or a sewed on penis isn't going to infringe on my unalienable right to life.
Will defend that ultimate unalienable right through any and all means.
Chitty chitty bang bang, motherfucker.
-
I wonder if she'll shoot up a Christian school soon.RaceBannon said:Not authoritarian
By the way she's an alki. In case you missed it she was caught drunk driving and it was swept under the rug
Explains a lot -
Maybe she should have a few before her press conferences and lighten up.RaceBannon said:Not authoritarian
By the way she's an alki. In case you missed it she was caught drunk driving and it was swept under the rug
Explains a lot -
That Declaration of Constitution stuff is awesome!PurpleThrobber said:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.Swaye said:
How is it that a bright legal mind such as your own has been wrong multiple times in the last 20 years? Every major gun case that shows before the Supreme Court has an interpretation 180 out from your own deluded perspective? You get presented MANY quotes attributed to MANY FFs and you still persist in thinking you are correct, when ALL factual evidence says you are wrong. This isn't me wishing gun ownership to be an individual right it to be true. I do not have to wish. The facts are overwhelmingly on my side. But, I guess you have your feelings, which is nice. Good for you.HHusky said:
Really, the whole thing was to avoid the need for a standing army, and that ship has sailed. It wasn’t intended to provide an individual right to own a gun. Berger was right. The whole thing has been a fraud.Sledog said:
I means they need to be competent those days. Oh and they have to supply their own arms and gear. You know in case the government needs overthrowing.HHusky said:
Well regulated. By whom, Mall Cop?Sledog said:Dazzler can't even understand that the militia is the people not the military. But he says he's schmart!
Some nutjob with a machete or a sewed on penis isn't going to infringe on my unalienable right to life.
Will defend that ultimate unalienable right through any and all means.
Chitty chitty bang bang, motherfucker.
-
You gals could have used Gouverneur Morris, who actually did say something to support your version of Founders' intent. Unforced error on your part.Swaye said:
How is it that a bright legal mind such as your own has been wrong multiple times in the last 20 years? Every major gun case that shows before the Supreme Court has an interpretation 180 out from your own deluded perspective? You get presented MANY quotes attributed to MANY FFs and you still persist in thinking you are correct, when ALL factual evidence says you are wrong. This isn't me wishing gun ownership to be an individual right it to be true. I do not have to wish. The facts are overwhelmingly on my side. But, I guess you have your feelings, which is nice. Good for you.HHusky said:
Really, the whole thing was to avoid the need for a standing army, and that ship has sailed. It wasn’t intended to provide an individual right to own a gun. Berger was right. The whole thing has been a fraud.Sledog said:
I means they need to be competent those days. Oh and they have to supply their own arms and gear. You know in case the government needs overthrowing.HHusky said:
Well regulated. By whom, Mall Cop?Sledog said:Dazzler can't even understand that the militia is the people not the military. But he says he's schmart!
But being the ignorant rabble you are, you attempt to prove your point with bunch a bunch of statements that actually prove you and the Dago judiciary (dead and living) totally wrong, as well as the words of multiple Englishmen.
But you're willing to declare victory, and as our recent elections prove, that's all that really matters.
Carry on, ladies. I know you will. -
HHusky said:
You gals could have used Gouverneur Morris, who actually did say something to support your version of Founders' intent. Unforced error on your part.Swaye said:
How is it that a bright legal mind such as your own has been wrong multiple times in the last 20 years? Every major gun case that shows before the Supreme Court has an interpretation 180 out from your own deluded perspective? You get presented MANY quotes attributed to MANY FFs and you still persist in thinking you are correct, when ALL factual evidence says you are wrong. This isn't me wishing gun ownership to be an individual right it to be true. I do not have to wish. The facts are overwhelmingly on my side. But, I guess you have your feelings, which is nice. Good for you.HHusky said:
Really, the whole thing was to avoid the need for a standing army, and that ship has sailed. It wasn’t intended to provide an individual right to own a gun. Berger was right. The whole thing has been a fraud.Sledog said:
I means they need to be competent those days. Oh and they have to supply their own arms and gear. You know in case the government needs overthrowing.HHusky said:
Well regulated. By whom, Mall Cop?Sledog said:Dazzler can't even understand that the militia is the people not the military. But he says he's schmart!
But being the ignorant rabble you are, you attempt to prove your point with bunch a bunch of statements that actually prove you and the Dago judiciary (dead and living) totally wrong, as well as the words of multiple Englishmen.
But you're willing to declare victory, and as our recent elections prove, that's all that really matters.
Carry on, ladies. I know you will.
-
-
Look at Dazzler go.HHusky said:
That Declaration of Constitution stuff is awesome!PurpleThrobber said:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.Swaye said:
How is it that a bright legal mind such as your own has been wrong multiple times in the last 20 years? Every major gun case that shows before the Supreme Court has an interpretation 180 out from your own deluded perspective? You get presented MANY quotes attributed to MANY FFs and you still persist in thinking you are correct, when ALL factual evidence says you are wrong. This isn't me wishing gun ownership to be an individual right it to be true. I do not have to wish. The facts are overwhelmingly on my side. But, I guess you have your feelings, which is nice. Good for you.HHusky said:
Really, the whole thing was to avoid the need for a standing army, and that ship has sailed. It wasn’t intended to provide an individual right to own a gun. Berger was right. The whole thing has been a fraud.Sledog said:
I means they need to be competent those days. Oh and they have to supply their own arms and gear. You know in case the government needs overthrowing.HHusky said:
Well regulated. By whom, Mall Cop?Sledog said:Dazzler can't even understand that the militia is the people not the military. But he says he's schmart!
Some nutjob with a machete or a sewed on penis isn't going to infringe on my unalienable right to life.
Will defend that ultimate unalienable right through any and all means.
Chitty chitty bang bang, motherfucker.
No shit, dumbfuck.
Fuck off.
-
"Shut up!"
"Fuck off!"
You girls really know how to win an argument. -
Superiority was established long ago.HHusky said:"Shut up!"
"Fuck off!"
You girls really know how to win an argument.
Now you get peon treatment.
Fuck off and go work on your Russian State narrative homework.
-
Those aren’t argumentative statements, faggot.HHusky said:"Shut up!"
"Fuck off!"
You girls really know how to win an argument.
-
There is no argument
The case is closed -
-
Sounds like a cry for help. Maybe alert authorities that there may be a ship cannel bridge jumper in route. Wait, on second thought..................RaceBannon said:There is no argument
The case is closed
-
I didn't hear her say homes..that is important because they can outlaw them just about everywhere but confiscation means they have to send people to your door to take your gun if you don't volunteer them. THAT is what they want.RaceBannon said:Not authoritarian
By the way she's an alki. In case you missed it she was caught drunk driving and it was swept under the rug
Explains a lot
For us to Give them up willingly like our friends down under did.
There is no way other than the military going door to door against it's own people that confiscation would happen because it will get ugly.
I have a sneaking suspicion that 87000 armed IRS agents coming to peoples homes wouldn't go over well either.
Since those documents are a big joke to you I have a little joke/ riddle for you...I know you'll love this one...HHusky said:
That Declaration of Constitution stuff is awesome!PurpleThrobber said:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.Swaye said:
How is it that a bright legal mind such as your own has been wrong multiple times in the last 20 years? Every major gun case that shows before the Supreme Court has an interpretation 180 out from your own deluded perspective? You get presented MANY quotes attributed to MANY FFs and you still persist in thinking you are correct, when ALL factual evidence says you are wrong. This isn't me wishing gun ownership to be an individual right it to be true. I do not have to wish. The facts are overwhelmingly on my side. But, I guess you have your feelings, which is nice. Good for you.HHusky said:
Really, the whole thing was to avoid the need for a standing army, and that ship has sailed. It wasn’t intended to provide an individual right to own a gun. Berger was right. The whole thing has been a fraud.Sledog said:
I means they need to be competent those days. Oh and they have to supply their own arms and gear. You know in case the government needs overthrowing.HHusky said:
Well regulated. By whom, Mall Cop?Sledog said:Dazzler can't even understand that the militia is the people not the military. But he says he's schmart!
Some nutjob with a machete or a sewed on penis isn't going to infringe on my unalienable right to life.
Will defend that ultimate unalienable right through any and all means.
Chitty chitty bang bang, motherfucker.
Your driving along and you come upon a snake that's been run over in the middle of the road and a little further down the road is an attorney that has also apparently been run over.
What's the difference? -
Go look up the first federal firearms law einsteen and see when it was written. Why nothing sooner?
-
Ban hunting rifles
Legalize heroin
Vote blue -
Still so likeable, but you're getting hysterical, Miss.thechatch said:Ban hunting rifles
Legalize heroin
Vote blue -
Continues to flail about with pithy nonsensical responses even when bludgeoned with facts. Par for the course for our resident counselor.HHusky said:
You gals could have used Gouverneur Morris, who actually did say something to support your version of Founders' intent. Unforced error on your part.Swaye said:
How is it that a bright legal mind such as your own has been wrong multiple times in the last 20 years? Every major gun case that shows before the Supreme Court has an interpretation 180 out from your own deluded perspective? You get presented MANY quotes attributed to MANY FFs and you still persist in thinking you are correct, when ALL factual evidence says you are wrong. This isn't me wishing gun ownership to be an individual right it to be true. I do not have to wish. The facts are overwhelmingly on my side. But, I guess you have your feelings, which is nice. Good for you.HHusky said:
Really, the whole thing was to avoid the need for a standing army, and that ship has sailed. It wasn’t intended to provide an individual right to own a gun. Berger was right. The whole thing has been a fraud.Sledog said:
I means they need to be competent those days. Oh and they have to supply their own arms and gear. You know in case the government needs overthrowing.HHusky said:
Well regulated. By whom, Mall Cop?Sledog said:Dazzler can't even understand that the militia is the people not the military. But he says he's schmart!
But being the ignorant rabble you are, you attempt to prove your point with bunch a bunch of statements that actually prove you and the Dago judiciary (dead and living) totally wrong, as well as the words of multiple Englishmen.
But you're willing to declare victory, and as our recent elections prove, that's all that really matters.
Carry on, ladies. I know you will. -
The former President just got indicted for something others wouldn’t touch. But Dazzler thinks you’re hysterical if you say they’re coming for your hunting rifle.
He’s gonna be that guy who says, “but I fought for Germany in WWI.” As oblivious as the day is long. And stupid too. -
It's a good thing Trump gets to prove his innocence.46XiJCAB said:The former President just got indicted for something others wouldn’t touch. But Dazzler thinks you’re hysterical if you say they’re coming for your hunting rifle.
He’s gonna be that guy who says, “but I fought for Germany in WWI.” As oblivious as the day is long. And stupid too.
-
It's Einstien you fucking idiot.HHusky said:
Has been since the interwebs opened shop in the mid 90s.
@HarveyRoad or @TierbsHsotBoobs invented it.
Fuck off.
-
Bludgeoned!Swaye said:
Continues to flail about with pithy nonsensical responses even when bludgeoned with facts. Par for the course for our resident counselor.HHusky said:
You gals could have used Gouverneur Morris, who actually did say something to support your version of Founders' intent. Unforced error on your part.Swaye said:
How is it that a bright legal mind such as your own has been wrong multiple times in the last 20 years? Every major gun case that shows before the Supreme Court has an interpretation 180 out from your own deluded perspective? You get presented MANY quotes attributed to MANY FFs and you still persist in thinking you are correct, when ALL factual evidence says you are wrong. This isn't me wishing gun ownership to be an individual right it to be true. I do not have to wish. The facts are overwhelmingly on my side. But, I guess you have your feelings, which is nice. Good for you.HHusky said:
Really, the whole thing was to avoid the need for a standing army, and that ship has sailed. It wasn’t intended to provide an individual right to own a gun. Berger was right. The whole thing has been a fraud.Sledog said:
I means they need to be competent those days. Oh and they have to supply their own arms and gear. You know in case the government needs overthrowing.HHusky said:
Well regulated. By whom, Mall Cop?Sledog said:Dazzler can't even understand that the militia is the people not the military. But he says he's schmart!
But being the ignorant rabble you are, you attempt to prove your point with bunch a bunch of statements that actually prove you and the Dago judiciary (dead and living) totally wrong, as well as the words of multiple Englishmen.
But you're willing to declare victory, and as our recent elections prove, that's all that really matters.
Carry on, ladies. I know you will.
grim -
Let me know when you win one. Best.HHusky said:"Shut up!"
"Fuck off!"
You girls really know how to win an argument. -
Notice how the retard playing lawyer here finds nothing wrong with her statement? Tell me you’re a fascist without telling me you’re a fascist.PurpleThrobber said:
It's a good thing Trump gets to prove his innocence.46XiJCAB said:The former President just got indicted for something others wouldn’t touch. But Dazzler thinks you’re hysterical if you say they’re coming for your hunting rifle.
He’s gonna be that guy who says, “but I fought for Germany in WWI.” As oblivious as the day is long. And stupid too. -
Facts only when matter when convenient, apparentlySwaye said:
Continues to flail about with pithy nonsensical responses even when bludgeoned with facts. Par for the course for our resident counselor.HHusky said:
You gals could have used Gouverneur Morris, who actually did say something to support your version of Founders' intent. Unforced error on your part.Swaye said:
How is it that a bright legal mind such as your own has been wrong multiple times in the last 20 years? Every major gun case that shows before the Supreme Court has an interpretation 180 out from your own deluded perspective? You get presented MANY quotes attributed to MANY FFs and you still persist in thinking you are correct, when ALL factual evidence says you are wrong. This isn't me wishing gun ownership to be an individual right it to be true. I do not have to wish. The facts are overwhelmingly on my side. But, I guess you have your feelings, which is nice. Good for you.HHusky said:
Really, the whole thing was to avoid the need for a standing army, and that ship has sailed. It wasn’t intended to provide an individual right to own a gun. Berger was right. The whole thing has been a fraud.Sledog said:
I means they need to be competent those days. Oh and they have to supply their own arms and gear. You know in case the government needs overthrowing.HHusky said:
Well regulated. By whom, Mall Cop?Sledog said:Dazzler can't even understand that the militia is the people not the military. But he says he's schmart!
But being the ignorant rabble you are, you attempt to prove your point with bunch a bunch of statements that actually prove you and the Dago judiciary (dead and living) totally wrong, as well as the words of multiple Englishmen.
But you're willing to declare victory, and as our recent elections prove, that's all that really matters.
Carry on, ladies. I know you will. -
Facts are also racist, like math, and being on time.Sources said:
Facts only when matter when convenient, apparentlySwaye said:
Continues to flail about with pithy nonsensical responses even when bludgeoned with facts. Par for the course for our resident counselor.HHusky said:
You gals could have used Gouverneur Morris, who actually did say something to support your version of Founders' intent. Unforced error on your part.Swaye said:
How is it that a bright legal mind such as your own has been wrong multiple times in the last 20 years? Every major gun case that shows before the Supreme Court has an interpretation 180 out from your own deluded perspective? You get presented MANY quotes attributed to MANY FFs and you still persist in thinking you are correct, when ALL factual evidence says you are wrong. This isn't me wishing gun ownership to be an individual right it to be true. I do not have to wish. The facts are overwhelmingly on my side. But, I guess you have your feelings, which is nice. Good for you.HHusky said:
Really, the whole thing was to avoid the need for a standing army, and that ship has sailed. It wasn’t intended to provide an individual right to own a gun. Berger was right. The whole thing has been a fraud.Sledog said:
I means they need to be competent those days. Oh and they have to supply their own arms and gear. You know in case the government needs overthrowing.HHusky said:
Well regulated. By whom, Mall Cop?Sledog said:Dazzler can't even understand that the militia is the people not the military. But he says he's schmart!
But being the ignorant rabble you are, you attempt to prove your point with bunch a bunch of statements that actually prove you and the Dago judiciary (dead and living) totally wrong, as well as the words of multiple Englishmen.
But you're willing to declare victory, and as our recent elections prove, that's all that really matters.
Carry on, ladies. I know you will.
