Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Shall not be infringed . . . or even seriously thought about . . . ever
Comments
-
Those aren’t argumentative statements, faggot.HHusky said:"Shut up!"
"Fuck off!"
You girls really know how to win an argument.
-
There is no argument
The case is closed -
-
Sounds like a cry for help. Maybe alert authorities that there may be a ship cannel bridge jumper in route. Wait, on second thought..................RaceBannon said:There is no argument
The case is closed
-
I didn't hear her say homes..that is important because they can outlaw them just about everywhere but confiscation means they have to send people to your door to take your gun if you don't volunteer them. THAT is what they want.RaceBannon said:Not authoritarian
By the way she's an alki. In case you missed it she was caught drunk driving and it was swept under the rug
Explains a lot
For us to Give them up willingly like our friends down under did.
There is no way other than the military going door to door against it's own people that confiscation would happen because it will get ugly.
I have a sneaking suspicion that 87000 armed IRS agents coming to peoples homes wouldn't go over well either.
Since those documents are a big joke to you I have a little joke/ riddle for you...I know you'll love this one...HHusky said:
That Declaration of Constitution stuff is awesome!PurpleThrobber said:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.Swaye said:
How is it that a bright legal mind such as your own has been wrong multiple times in the last 20 years? Every major gun case that shows before the Supreme Court has an interpretation 180 out from your own deluded perspective? You get presented MANY quotes attributed to MANY FFs and you still persist in thinking you are correct, when ALL factual evidence says you are wrong. This isn't me wishing gun ownership to be an individual right it to be true. I do not have to wish. The facts are overwhelmingly on my side. But, I guess you have your feelings, which is nice. Good for you.HHusky said:
Really, the whole thing was to avoid the need for a standing army, and that ship has sailed. It wasn’t intended to provide an individual right to own a gun. Berger was right. The whole thing has been a fraud.Sledog said:
I means they need to be competent those days. Oh and they have to supply their own arms and gear. You know in case the government needs overthrowing.HHusky said:
Well regulated. By whom, Mall Cop?Sledog said:Dazzler can't even understand that the militia is the people not the military. But he says he's schmart!
Some nutjob with a machete or a sewed on penis isn't going to infringe on my unalienable right to life.
Will defend that ultimate unalienable right through any and all means.
Chitty chitty bang bang, motherfucker.
Your driving along and you come upon a snake that's been run over in the middle of the road and a little further down the road is an attorney that has also apparently been run over.
What's the difference? -
Go look up the first federal firearms law einsteen and see when it was written. Why nothing sooner?
-
Ban hunting rifles
Legalize heroin
Vote blue -
Still so likeable, but you're getting hysterical, Miss.thechatch said:Ban hunting rifles
Legalize heroin
Vote blue
