Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Shall not be infringed . . . or even seriously thought about . . . ever

12346»

Comments

  • pawzpawz Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 20,580 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    "Shut up!"

    "Fuck off!"

    You girls really know how to win an argument.

    Those aren’t argumentative statements, faggot.


  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,378 Founders Club
    There is no argument

    The case is closed
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,620
    pawz said:

    HHusky said:

    "Shut up!"

    "Fuck off!"

    You girls really know how to win an argument.

    Those aren’t argumentative statements, faggot.


    Okay, Einstein.
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    HHusky said:

    pawz said:

    HHusky said:

    "Shut up!"

    "Fuck off!"

    You girls really know how to win an argument.

    Those aren’t argumentative statements, faggot.


    Okay, Einstein.
    I don't argue with cats and dogs either. That would be insane.

    Fuck off
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967

    There is no argument

    The case is closed

    Sounds like a cry for help. Maybe alert authorities that there may be a ship cannel bridge jumper in route. Wait, on second thought..................
  • BlueduckBlueduck Member Posts: 1,403

    Not authoritarian




    By the way she's an alki. In case you missed it she was caught drunk driving and it was swept under the rug

    Explains a lot
    I didn't hear her say homes..that is important because they can outlaw them just about everywhere but confiscation means they have to send people to your door to take your gun if you don't volunteer them. THAT is what they want.
    For us to Give them up willingly like our friends down under did.

    There is no way other than the military going door to door against it's own people that confiscation would happen because it will get ugly.

    I have a sneaking suspicion that 87000 armed IRS agents coming to peoples homes wouldn't go over well either.
    HHusky said:

    Swaye said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    Dazzler can't even understand that the militia is the people not the military. But he says he's schmart!

    Well regulated. By whom, Mall Cop?
    I means they need to be competent those days. Oh and they have to supply their own arms and gear. You know in case the government needs overthrowing.
    Really, the whole thing was to avoid the need for a standing army, and that ship has sailed. It wasn’t intended to provide an individual right to own a gun. Berger was right. The whole thing has been a fraud.
    How is it that a bright legal mind such as your own has been wrong multiple times in the last 20 years? Every major gun case that shows before the Supreme Court has an interpretation 180 out from your own deluded perspective? You get presented MANY quotes attributed to MANY FFs and you still persist in thinking you are correct, when ALL factual evidence says you are wrong. This isn't me wishing gun ownership to be an individual right it to be true. I do not have to wish. The facts are overwhelmingly on my side. But, I guess you have your feelings, which is nice. Good for you.
    We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

    Some nutjob with a machete or a sewed on penis isn't going to infringe on my unalienable right to life.

    Will defend that ultimate unalienable right through any and all means.

    Chitty chitty bang bang, motherfucker.



    That Declaration of Constitution stuff is awesome!

    Since those documents are a big joke to you I have a little joke/ riddle for you...I know you'll love this one...

    Your driving along and you come upon a snake that's been run over in the middle of the road and a little further down the road is an attorney that has also apparently been run over.

    What's the difference?
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,575 Standard Supporter
    Go look up the first federal firearms law einsteen and see when it was written. Why nothing sooner?
  • thechatchthechatch Member Posts: 6,146
    Ban hunting rifles
    Legalize heroin
    Vote blue
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,620
    thechatch said:

    Ban hunting rifles
    Legalize heroin
    Vote blue

    Still so likeable, but you're getting hysterical, Miss.
  • thechatchthechatch Member Posts: 6,146
    HHusky said:

    thechatch said:

    Ban hunting rifles
    Legalize heroin
    Vote blue

    Still so likeable, but you're getting hysterical, Miss.
    I know.

    They’re not your policies…

    Just the people you vote for and defend as through y’all are kin.
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    The former President just got indicted for something others wouldn’t touch. But Dazzler thinks you’re hysterical if you say they’re coming for your hunting rifle.

    He’s gonna be that guy who says, “but I fought for Germany in WWI.” As oblivious as the day is long. And stupid too.
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 43,903 Standard Supporter
    46XiJCAB said:

    The former President just got indicted for something others wouldn’t touch. But Dazzler thinks you’re hysterical if you say they’re coming for your hunting rifle.

    He’s gonna be that guy who says, “but I fought for Germany in WWI.” As oblivious as the day is long. And stupid too.

    It's a good thing Trump gets to prove his innocence.

  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 43,903 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    pawz said:

    HHusky said:

    "Shut up!"

    "Fuck off!"

    You girls really know how to win an argument.

    Those aren’t argumentative statements, faggot.


    Okay, Einstein.
    It's Einstien you fucking idiot.

    Has been since the interwebs opened shop in the mid 90s.

    @HarveyRoad or @TierbsHsotBoobs invented it.

    Fuck off.

  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,620
    Swaye said:

    HHusky said:

    Swaye said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    Dazzler can't even understand that the militia is the people not the military. But he says he's schmart!

    Well regulated. By whom, Mall Cop?
    I means they need to be competent those days. Oh and they have to supply their own arms and gear. You know in case the government needs overthrowing.
    Really, the whole thing was to avoid the need for a standing army, and that ship has sailed. It wasn’t intended to provide an individual right to own a gun. Berger was right. The whole thing has been a fraud.
    How is it that a bright legal mind such as your own has been wrong multiple times in the last 20 years? Every major gun case that shows before the Supreme Court has an interpretation 180 out from your own deluded perspective? You get presented MANY quotes attributed to MANY FFs and you still persist in thinking you are correct, when ALL factual evidence says you are wrong. This isn't me wishing gun ownership to be an individual right it to be true. I do not have to wish. The facts are overwhelmingly on my side. But, I guess you have your feelings, which is nice. Good for you.
    You gals could have used Gouverneur Morris, who actually did say something to support your version of Founders' intent. Unforced error on your part.

    But being the ignorant rabble you are, you attempt to prove your point with bunch a bunch of statements that actually prove you and the Dago judiciary (dead and living) totally wrong, as well as the words of multiple Englishmen.

    But you're willing to declare victory, and as our recent elections prove, that's all that really matters.

    Carry on, ladies. I know you will.
    Continues to flail about with pithy nonsensical responses even when bludgeoned with facts. Par for the course for our resident counselor.
    Bludgeoned!

    grim
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,939 Standard Supporter
    edited March 2023
    HHusky said:

    "Shut up!"

    "Fuck off!"

    You girls really know how to win an argument.

    Let me know when you win one. Best.
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967

    46XiJCAB said:

    The former President just got indicted for something others wouldn’t touch. But Dazzler thinks you’re hysterical if you say they’re coming for your hunting rifle.

    He’s gonna be that guy who says, “but I fought for Germany in WWI.” As oblivious as the day is long. And stupid too.

    It's a good thing Trump gets to prove his innocence.

    Notice how the retard playing lawyer here finds nothing wrong with her statement? Tell me you’re a fascist without telling me you’re a fascist.
  • SourcesSources Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 3,980 Founders Club
    Swaye said:

    HHusky said:

    Swaye said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    Dazzler can't even understand that the militia is the people not the military. But he says he's schmart!

    Well regulated. By whom, Mall Cop?
    I means they need to be competent those days. Oh and they have to supply their own arms and gear. You know in case the government needs overthrowing.
    Really, the whole thing was to avoid the need for a standing army, and that ship has sailed. It wasn’t intended to provide an individual right to own a gun. Berger was right. The whole thing has been a fraud.
    How is it that a bright legal mind such as your own has been wrong multiple times in the last 20 years? Every major gun case that shows before the Supreme Court has an interpretation 180 out from your own deluded perspective? You get presented MANY quotes attributed to MANY FFs and you still persist in thinking you are correct, when ALL factual evidence says you are wrong. This isn't me wishing gun ownership to be an individual right it to be true. I do not have to wish. The facts are overwhelmingly on my side. But, I guess you have your feelings, which is nice. Good for you.
    You gals could have used Gouverneur Morris, who actually did say something to support your version of Founders' intent. Unforced error on your part.

    But being the ignorant rabble you are, you attempt to prove your point with bunch a bunch of statements that actually prove you and the Dago judiciary (dead and living) totally wrong, as well as the words of multiple Englishmen.

    But you're willing to declare victory, and as our recent elections prove, that's all that really matters.

    Carry on, ladies. I know you will.
    Continues to flail about with pithy nonsensical responses even when bludgeoned with facts. Par for the course for our resident counselor.
    Facts only when matter when convenient, apparently
  • SwayeSwaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,395 Founders Club
    Sources said:

    Swaye said:

    HHusky said:

    Swaye said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    Dazzler can't even understand that the militia is the people not the military. But he says he's schmart!

    Well regulated. By whom, Mall Cop?
    I means they need to be competent those days. Oh and they have to supply their own arms and gear. You know in case the government needs overthrowing.
    Really, the whole thing was to avoid the need for a standing army, and that ship has sailed. It wasn’t intended to provide an individual right to own a gun. Berger was right. The whole thing has been a fraud.
    How is it that a bright legal mind such as your own has been wrong multiple times in the last 20 years? Every major gun case that shows before the Supreme Court has an interpretation 180 out from your own deluded perspective? You get presented MANY quotes attributed to MANY FFs and you still persist in thinking you are correct, when ALL factual evidence says you are wrong. This isn't me wishing gun ownership to be an individual right it to be true. I do not have to wish. The facts are overwhelmingly on my side. But, I guess you have your feelings, which is nice. Good for you.
    You gals could have used Gouverneur Morris, who actually did say something to support your version of Founders' intent. Unforced error on your part.

    But being the ignorant rabble you are, you attempt to prove your point with bunch a bunch of statements that actually prove you and the Dago judiciary (dead and living) totally wrong, as well as the words of multiple Englishmen.

    But you're willing to declare victory, and as our recent elections prove, that's all that really matters.

    Carry on, ladies. I know you will.
    Continues to flail about with pithy nonsensical responses even when bludgeoned with facts. Par for the course for our resident counselor.
    Facts only when matter when convenient, apparently
    Facts are also racist, like math, and being on time.
Sign In or Register to comment.