Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Shall not be infringed . . . or even seriously thought about . . . ever
Comments
-
Continues to flail about with pithy nonsensical responses even when bludgeoned with facts. Par for the course for our resident counselor.HHusky said:
You gals could have used Gouverneur Morris, who actually did say something to support your version of Founders' intent. Unforced error on your part.Swaye said:
How is it that a bright legal mind such as your own has been wrong multiple times in the last 20 years? Every major gun case that shows before the Supreme Court has an interpretation 180 out from your own deluded perspective? You get presented MANY quotes attributed to MANY FFs and you still persist in thinking you are correct, when ALL factual evidence says you are wrong. This isn't me wishing gun ownership to be an individual right it to be true. I do not have to wish. The facts are overwhelmingly on my side. But, I guess you have your feelings, which is nice. Good for you.HHusky said:
Really, the whole thing was to avoid the need for a standing army, and that ship has sailed. It wasn’t intended to provide an individual right to own a gun. Berger was right. The whole thing has been a fraud.Sledog said:
I means they need to be competent those days. Oh and they have to supply their own arms and gear. You know in case the government needs overthrowing.HHusky said:
Well regulated. By whom, Mall Cop?Sledog said:Dazzler can't even understand that the militia is the people not the military. But he says he's schmart!
But being the ignorant rabble you are, you attempt to prove your point with bunch a bunch of statements that actually prove you and the Dago judiciary (dead and living) totally wrong, as well as the words of multiple Englishmen.
But you're willing to declare victory, and as our recent elections prove, that's all that really matters.
Carry on, ladies. I know you will. -
The former President just got indicted for something others wouldn’t touch. But Dazzler thinks you’re hysterical if you say they’re coming for your hunting rifle.
He’s gonna be that guy who says, “but I fought for Germany in WWI.” As oblivious as the day is long. And stupid too. -
It's a good thing Trump gets to prove his innocence.46XiJCAB said:The former President just got indicted for something others wouldn’t touch. But Dazzler thinks you’re hysterical if you say they’re coming for your hunting rifle.
He’s gonna be that guy who says, “but I fought for Germany in WWI.” As oblivious as the day is long. And stupid too.
-
It's Einstien you fucking idiot.HHusky said:
Has been since the interwebs opened shop in the mid 90s.
@HarveyRoad or @TierbsHsotBoobs invented it.
Fuck off.
-
Bludgeoned!Swaye said:
Continues to flail about with pithy nonsensical responses even when bludgeoned with facts. Par for the course for our resident counselor.HHusky said:
You gals could have used Gouverneur Morris, who actually did say something to support your version of Founders' intent. Unforced error on your part.Swaye said:
How is it that a bright legal mind such as your own has been wrong multiple times in the last 20 years? Every major gun case that shows before the Supreme Court has an interpretation 180 out from your own deluded perspective? You get presented MANY quotes attributed to MANY FFs and you still persist in thinking you are correct, when ALL factual evidence says you are wrong. This isn't me wishing gun ownership to be an individual right it to be true. I do not have to wish. The facts are overwhelmingly on my side. But, I guess you have your feelings, which is nice. Good for you.HHusky said:
Really, the whole thing was to avoid the need for a standing army, and that ship has sailed. It wasn’t intended to provide an individual right to own a gun. Berger was right. The whole thing has been a fraud.Sledog said:
I means they need to be competent those days. Oh and they have to supply their own arms and gear. You know in case the government needs overthrowing.HHusky said:
Well regulated. By whom, Mall Cop?Sledog said:Dazzler can't even understand that the militia is the people not the military. But he says he's schmart!
But being the ignorant rabble you are, you attempt to prove your point with bunch a bunch of statements that actually prove you and the Dago judiciary (dead and living) totally wrong, as well as the words of multiple Englishmen.
But you're willing to declare victory, and as our recent elections prove, that's all that really matters.
Carry on, ladies. I know you will.
grim -
Let me know when you win one. Best.HHusky said:"Shut up!"
"Fuck off!"
You girls really know how to win an argument. -
Notice how the retard playing lawyer here finds nothing wrong with her statement? Tell me you’re a fascist without telling me you’re a fascist.PurpleThrobber said:
It's a good thing Trump gets to prove his innocence.46XiJCAB said:The former President just got indicted for something others wouldn’t touch. But Dazzler thinks you’re hysterical if you say they’re coming for your hunting rifle.
He’s gonna be that guy who says, “but I fought for Germany in WWI.” As oblivious as the day is long. And stupid too. -
Facts only when matter when convenient, apparentlySwaye said:
Continues to flail about with pithy nonsensical responses even when bludgeoned with facts. Par for the course for our resident counselor.HHusky said:
You gals could have used Gouverneur Morris, who actually did say something to support your version of Founders' intent. Unforced error on your part.Swaye said:
How is it that a bright legal mind such as your own has been wrong multiple times in the last 20 years? Every major gun case that shows before the Supreme Court has an interpretation 180 out from your own deluded perspective? You get presented MANY quotes attributed to MANY FFs and you still persist in thinking you are correct, when ALL factual evidence says you are wrong. This isn't me wishing gun ownership to be an individual right it to be true. I do not have to wish. The facts are overwhelmingly on my side. But, I guess you have your feelings, which is nice. Good for you.HHusky said:
Really, the whole thing was to avoid the need for a standing army, and that ship has sailed. It wasn’t intended to provide an individual right to own a gun. Berger was right. The whole thing has been a fraud.Sledog said:
I means they need to be competent those days. Oh and they have to supply their own arms and gear. You know in case the government needs overthrowing.HHusky said:
Well regulated. By whom, Mall Cop?Sledog said:Dazzler can't even understand that the militia is the people not the military. But he says he's schmart!
But being the ignorant rabble you are, you attempt to prove your point with bunch a bunch of statements that actually prove you and the Dago judiciary (dead and living) totally wrong, as well as the words of multiple Englishmen.
But you're willing to declare victory, and as our recent elections prove, that's all that really matters.
Carry on, ladies. I know you will. -
Facts are also racist, like math, and being on time.Sources said:
Facts only when matter when convenient, apparentlySwaye said:
Continues to flail about with pithy nonsensical responses even when bludgeoned with facts. Par for the course for our resident counselor.HHusky said:
You gals could have used Gouverneur Morris, who actually did say something to support your version of Founders' intent. Unforced error on your part.Swaye said:
How is it that a bright legal mind such as your own has been wrong multiple times in the last 20 years? Every major gun case that shows before the Supreme Court has an interpretation 180 out from your own deluded perspective? You get presented MANY quotes attributed to MANY FFs and you still persist in thinking you are correct, when ALL factual evidence says you are wrong. This isn't me wishing gun ownership to be an individual right it to be true. I do not have to wish. The facts are overwhelmingly on my side. But, I guess you have your feelings, which is nice. Good for you.HHusky said:
Really, the whole thing was to avoid the need for a standing army, and that ship has sailed. It wasn’t intended to provide an individual right to own a gun. Berger was right. The whole thing has been a fraud.Sledog said:
I means they need to be competent those days. Oh and they have to supply their own arms and gear. You know in case the government needs overthrowing.HHusky said:
Well regulated. By whom, Mall Cop?Sledog said:Dazzler can't even understand that the militia is the people not the military. But he says he's schmart!
But being the ignorant rabble you are, you attempt to prove your point with bunch a bunch of statements that actually prove you and the Dago judiciary (dead and living) totally wrong, as well as the words of multiple Englishmen.
But you're willing to declare victory, and as our recent elections prove, that's all that really matters.
Carry on, ladies. I know you will.
