Are we Recruiting again? Fischer of Men Recruiting Thread - (Thread links)
Comments
-
My question is why did no one want him with those stats? All I have seen this coaching staff do is bring in G5 talent that no P5 schools were afterbananasnblondes said:I know we're piling on the shitty recruiting right now, but this grad transfer from UAB was actually fucking good in 2019 and 2020. Was all conference both those years and had some pretty decent numbers. Was apparently hurt for most of last year.
I'm not opposed to bringing him in for 1 year as a grad transfer.
Edit: 103 tackles, 16 tfl, 9 sacks in 2019, which is the last time he played a full season. Was on at least one pre season AA list going into 2020.
The bitching about recruiting is warranted, but a bit of a stretch for this kid. -
Our recruiting is not W O O F, it's just O O F
At least I am past the anger, frustration, what, why stage of grief and at acceptance along with finding it so bad/sad that it's now funny as I wonder when it hits bottom. -
I’m guessing injuries. Who cares? If he’s legit like 2019, great. If he’s not, he’s gone after the year. How would anyone know what schools were after him?sonics1993 said:
My question is why did no one want him with those stats? All I have seen this coaching staff do is bring in G5 talent that no P5 schools were afterbananasnblondes said:I know we're piling on the shitty recruiting right now, but this grad transfer from UAB was actually fucking good in 2019 and 2020. Was all conference both those years and had some pretty decent numbers. Was apparently hurt for most of last year.
I'm not opposed to bringing him in for 1 year as a grad transfer.
Edit: 103 tackles, 16 tfl, 9 sacks in 2019, which is the last time he played a full season. Was on at least one pre season AA list going into 2020.
The bitching about recruiting is warranted, but a bit of a stretch for this kid. -
Yeah, there is literally no downside to taking this kid. He'll either be a solid contributer or a backup for one year. Of the transfers we've taken, this is one of the better ones (on paper).RoadDawg55 said:
I’m guessing injuries. Who cares? If he’s legit like 2019, great. If he’s not, he’s gone after the year. How would anyone know what schools were after him?sonics1993 said:
My question is why did no one want him with those stats? All I have seen this coaching staff do is bring in G5 talent that no P5 schools were afterbananasnblondes said:I know we're piling on the shitty recruiting right now, but this grad transfer from UAB was actually fucking good in 2019 and 2020. Was all conference both those years and had some pretty decent numbers. Was apparently hurt for most of last year.
I'm not opposed to bringing him in for 1 year as a grad transfer.
Edit: 103 tackles, 16 tfl, 9 sacks in 2019, which is the last time he played a full season. Was on at least one pre season AA list going into 2020.
The bitching about recruiting is warranted, but a bit of a stretch for this kid. -
Moll developed into one of the best defensive players in C-USA while helping the Blazers secure two conference championships (2018, 2020) and another division title (2019). He was UAB's leading tackler in 2019 (104 tackles) and 2020 (59 tackles), earning spots on the Conference USA First Team both seasons. After the 2020 season, Phil Steele named him as an All-America Honorable Mention.
It’s at UAB, but they won, their defense was statistically top 25ish, he made a big impact when healthy. I’m with you Bananas, there is nothing to criticize. At minimum, he’s great depth as long as he’s healthy. I watched his YouTube highlights and he looked quick and he was physical. Hopefully his ankle isn’t too fucked up and he can get back to pre injury form. -
Yes because we are counting on this guy to be the savior. There is no way that an All Conference player from the fun belt that has started since his freshman year can be a worthy contributor in the mighty PAC 12.Tequilla said:Pulling kids from the Fun Belt … that’s the ticket
We should just gift Bruener and Tuputala the starting roles and not make them compete against guys that have played a lot of football and had success. Bright was a solid pick up.
Danny Heimuli is looking like a probable bust. Still early, but other guys the same age and/or younger are ahead of him.
Tuputala has good size, can run, and is physical, but he has never seemed very instinctual when I’ve watched him, albeit in limited time. Eddy is going to be out for awhile and it will probably be a lost year for him when he returns. Competition and depth matters. Special teams matter. Experience matters.
You are trying way too hard. You went from being one of the doogiest posters on this board (Emmert, lukewarm support of Sark even in year 5) to whatever the fuck you do now. Any complaint about this guy is simply complaining to complain. Sure, I would rather have an All SEC LB, but that guy isn’t available. I think a reason this guy didn’t get a ton of attention is that he still isn’t healthy.
The program has some issues, but we got rid of a shitty coach and hired a guy that has improved every program he’s been a part of and has won. Pete won with Cohen’s worthless ass around and DeBoer should too. He will figure it out and doesn’t seem like the type to sit back and hope for results.
He hasn’t won at the highest level and there is risk to the hire (same for 90% of new coaching hires), but give the guy a chance. The players and recruits seem to like him so with winning, recruiting will improve. -
That’s a poor effort by you Roadie … and you have a history of poor efforts
I was so supportive of Sark in Year 5 that I effectively was censored by the Lemon Party trio for calling for Sark to be fired
My defense of Emmert simply came down to the fact that the politics in firing Tyrone after 2007 was very very ugly and bad business for the University President -
I don’t but okay. I was on dogman until after signing day in 2013. You were supporting Sark and I remember arguing with you about it in chat. Sometime mid 2013 during the season you did come here.Tequilla said:That’s a poor effort by you Roadie … and you have a history of poor efforts
I was so supportive of Sark in Year 5 that I effectively was censored by the Lemon Party trio for calling for Sark to be fired
My defense of Emmert simply came down to the fact that the politics in firing Tyrone after 2007 was very very ugly and bad business for the University President
You’ve been better and haven’t been a cunt that wants to fuck me lately, but your take here is stupid. You need some sizzle eh Teq? I’m glad we didn’t hire Matt Campbell simply because you wanted him. He’s a fucking loser that has never beat Iowa and had one good season.
Give the recruiting time. We aren’t competing with Bama. Utah just won this conference and makes the PAC 12 championship seemingly every year. If we won the conference this year, you are taking such a hard stance that you would be worried about 2025 because our recruiting class isn’t ranked high.
After the horrible takes for years on here (that you will distance yourself from) and the Clemson of the West bullshit, sit back and enjoy having a hopefully competent offense and a defense that actually hits and plays aggressive. -
You forgot to include our academic prowessRoadDawg55 said:
I don’t but okay. I was on dogman until after signing day in 2013. You were supporting Sark and I remember arguing with you about it in chat. Sometime mid 2013 during the season you did come here.Tequilla said:That’s a poor effort by you Roadie … and you have a history of poor efforts
I was so supportive of Sark in Year 5 that I effectively was censored by the Lemon Party trio for calling for Sark to be fired
My defense of Emmert simply came down to the fact that the politics in firing Tyrone after 2007 was very very ugly and bad business for the University President
You’ve been better and haven’t been a cunt that wants to fuck me lately, but your take here is stupid. You need some sizzle eh Teq? I’m glad we didn’t hire Matt Campbell simply because you wanted him. He’s a fucking loser that has never beat Iowa and had one good season.
Give the recruiting time. We aren’t competing with Bama. Utah just won this conference and makes the PAC 12 championship seemingly every year. If we won the conference this year, you are taking such a hard stance that you would be worried about 2025 because our recruiting class isn’t ranked high.
After the horrible takes for years on here (that you will distance yourself from) and the Clemson of the West bullshit, sit back and enjoy having a hopefully competent offense and a defense that actually hits and plays aggressive. -
sonics1993 said:
You forgot to include ourRoadDawg55 said:
I don’t but okay. I was on dogman until after signing day in 2013. You were supporting Sark and I remember arguing with you about it in chat. Sometime mid 2013 during the season you did come here.Tequilla said:That’s a poor effort by you Roadie … and you have a history of poor efforts
I was so supportive of Sark in Year 5 that I effectively was censored by the Lemon Party trio for calling for Sark to be fired
My defense of Emmert simply came down to the fact that the politics in firing Tyrone after 2007 was very very ugly and bad business for the University President
You’ve been better and haven’t been a cunt that wants to fuck me lately, but your take here is stupid. You need some sizzle eh Teq? I’m glad we didn’t hire Matt Campbell simply because you wanted him. He’s a fucking loser that has never beat Iowa and had one good season.
Give the recruiting time. We aren’t competing with Bama. Utah just won this conference and makes the PAC 12 championship seemingly every year. If we won the conference this year, you are taking such a hard stance that you would be worried about 2025 because our recruiting class isn’t ranked high.
After the horrible takes for years on here (that you will distance yourself from) and the Clemson of the West bullshit, sit back and enjoy having a hopefully competent offense and a defense that actually hits and plays aggressive.academicacademia prowess -
There’s some real fucktarded shit in here …RoadDawg55 said:
I don’t but okay. I was on dogman until after signing day in 2013. You were supporting Sark and I remember arguing with you about it in chat. Sometime mid 2013 during the season you did come here.Tequilla said:That’s a poor effort by you Roadie … and you have a history of poor efforts
I was so supportive of Sark in Year 5 that I effectively was censored by the Lemon Party trio for calling for Sark to be fired
My defense of Emmert simply came down to the fact that the politics in firing Tyrone after 2007 was very very ugly and bad business for the University President
You’ve been better and haven’t been a cunt that wants to fuck me lately, but your take here is stupid. You need some sizzle eh Teq? I’m glad we didn’t hire Matt Campbell simply because you wanted him. He’s a fucking loser that has never beat Iowa and had one good season.
Give the recruiting time. We aren’t competing with Bama. Utah just won this conference and makes the PAC 12 championship seemingly every year. If we won the conference this year, you are taking such a hard stance that you would be worried about 2025 because our recruiting class isn’t ranked high.
After the horrible takes for years on here (that you will distance yourself from) and the Clemson of the West bullshit, sit back and enjoy having a hopefully competent offense and a defense that actually hits and plays aggressive.
But not wanting Campbell because I was a big believer in him is some messed up shit. The Iowa stuff would be a bit of a red flag but we’re talking about Iowa St … they’ve never been this good ever -
Tequilla said:
That’s a poor effort by you Roadie … and you have a history of poor efforts
I was so supportive of Sark in Year 5 that I effectively was censored by the Lemon Party trio for calling for Sark to be fired
My defense of Emmert simply came down to the fact that the politics in firing Tyrone after 2007 was very very ugly and bad business for the University President
-
It’s not because of you. He’s a loser tho snd he proved it last year.Tequilla said:
There’s some real fucktarded shit in here …RoadDawg55 said:
I don’t but okay. I was on dogman until after signing day in 2013. You were supporting Sark and I remember arguing with you about it in chat. Sometime mid 2013 during the season you did come here.Tequilla said:That’s a poor effort by you Roadie … and you have a history of poor efforts
I was so supportive of Sark in Year 5 that I effectively was censored by the Lemon Party trio for calling for Sark to be fired
My defense of Emmert simply came down to the fact that the politics in firing Tyrone after 2007 was very very ugly and bad business for the University President
You’ve been better and haven’t been a cunt that wants to fuck me lately, but your take here is stupid. You need some sizzle eh Teq? I’m glad we didn’t hire Matt Campbell simply because you wanted him. He’s a fucking loser that has never beat Iowa and had one good season.
Give the recruiting time. We aren’t competing with Bama. Utah just won this conference and makes the PAC 12 championship seemingly every year. If we won the conference this year, you are taking such a hard stance that you would be worried about 2025 because our recruiting class isn’t ranked high.
After the horrible takes for years on here (that you will distance yourself from) and the Clemson of the West bullshit, sit back and enjoy having a hopefully competent offense and a defense that actually hits and plays aggressive.
But not wanting Campbell because I was a big believer in him is some messed up shit. The Iowa stuff would be a bit of a red flag but we’re talking about Iowa St … they’ve never been this good ever -
I marked this one of tequlla's "Not your best effort(s)" because it sucked and then read a few of his other takes.Tequilla said:That’s a poor effort by you Roadie … and you have a history of poor efforts
I was so supportive of Sark in Year 5 that I effectively was censored by the Lemon Party trio for calling for Sark to be fired
My defense of Emmert simply came down to the fact that the politics in firing Tyrone after 2007 was very very ugly and bad business for the University President
Lets just day it does suck and could possibly be his best effort. -
Big 12 with a down Texas sucks and he's had one good season there. Leach had the cuouwgs in contention like 4 years in a row so you can stop that dumb ass angle any time now.Tequilla said:
There’s some real fucktarded shit in here …RoadDawg55 said:
I don’t but okay. I was on dogman until after signing day in 2013. You were supporting Sark and I remember arguing with you about it in chat. Sometime mid 2013 during the season you did come here.Tequilla said:That’s a poor effort by you Roadie … and you have a history of poor efforts
I was so supportive of Sark in Year 5 that I effectively was censored by the Lemon Party trio for calling for Sark to be fired
My defense of Emmert simply came down to the fact that the politics in firing Tyrone after 2007 was very very ugly and bad business for the University President
You’ve been better and haven’t been a cunt that wants to fuck me lately, but your take here is stupid. You need some sizzle eh Teq? I’m glad we didn’t hire Matt Campbell simply because you wanted him. He’s a fucking loser that has never beat Iowa and had one good season.
Give the recruiting time. We aren’t competing with Bama. Utah just won this conference and makes the PAC 12 championship seemingly every year. If we won the conference this year, you are taking such a hard stance that you would be worried about 2025 because our recruiting class isn’t ranked high.
After the horrible takes for years on here (that you will distance yourself from) and the Clemson of the West bullshit, sit back and enjoy having a hopefully competent offense and a defense that actually hits and plays aggressive.
But not wanting Campbell because I was a big believer in him is some messed up shit. The Iowa stuff would be a bit of a red flag but we’re talking about Iowa St … they’ve never been this good ever
Without looking it up I'd guess you're impressed with him because he beat shitty ass tcu a few times.
Bottom line is 7 or 8 million for Campbell when he wants to stay in try hard land anyways is fucktarded. -
The Big12 is more than Texas and has been for a while … continue on with your ignorancehaie said:
Big 12 with a down Texas sucks and he's had one good season there. Leach had the cuouwgs in contention like 4 years in a row so you can stop that dumb ass angle any time now.Tequilla said:
There’s some real fucktarded shit in here …RoadDawg55 said:
I don’t but okay. I was on dogman until after signing day in 2013. You were supporting Sark and I remember arguing with you about it in chat. Sometime mid 2013 during the season you did come here.Tequilla said:That’s a poor effort by you Roadie … and you have a history of poor efforts
I was so supportive of Sark in Year 5 that I effectively was censored by the Lemon Party trio for calling for Sark to be fired
My defense of Emmert simply came down to the fact that the politics in firing Tyrone after 2007 was very very ugly and bad business for the University President
You’ve been better and haven’t been a cunt that wants to fuck me lately, but your take here is stupid. You need some sizzle eh Teq? I’m glad we didn’t hire Matt Campbell simply because you wanted him. He’s a fucking loser that has never beat Iowa and had one good season.
Give the recruiting time. We aren’t competing with Bama. Utah just won this conference and makes the PAC 12 championship seemingly every year. If we won the conference this year, you are taking such a hard stance that you would be worried about 2025 because our recruiting class isn’t ranked high.
After the horrible takes for years on here (that you will distance yourself from) and the Clemson of the West bullshit, sit back and enjoy having a hopefully competent offense and a defense that actually hits and plays aggressive.
But not wanting Campbell because I was a big believer in him is some messed up shit. The Iowa stuff would be a bit of a red flag but we’re talking about Iowa St … they’ve never been this good ever
Without looking it up I'd guess you're impressed with him because he beat shitty ass tcu a few times.
Bottom line is 7 or 8 million for Campbell when he wants to stay in try hard land anyways is fucktarded. -
Do you really think Matt Campbell would be killing it in recruiting for UW?Tequilla said:
The Big12 is more than Texas and has been for a while … continue on with your ignorancehaie said:
Big 12 with a down Texas sucks and he's had one good season there. Leach had the cuouwgs in contention like 4 years in a row so you can stop that dumb ass angle any time now.Tequilla said:
There’s some real fucktarded shit in here …RoadDawg55 said:
I don’t but okay. I was on dogman until after signing day in 2013. You were supporting Sark and I remember arguing with you about it in chat. Sometime mid 2013 during the season you did come here.Tequilla said:That’s a poor effort by you Roadie … and you have a history of poor efforts
I was so supportive of Sark in Year 5 that I effectively was censored by the Lemon Party trio for calling for Sark to be fired
My defense of Emmert simply came down to the fact that the politics in firing Tyrone after 2007 was very very ugly and bad business for the University President
You’ve been better and haven’t been a cunt that wants to fuck me lately, but your take here is stupid. You need some sizzle eh Teq? I’m glad we didn’t hire Matt Campbell simply because you wanted him. He’s a fucking loser that has never beat Iowa and had one good season.
Give the recruiting time. We aren’t competing with Bama. Utah just won this conference and makes the PAC 12 championship seemingly every year. If we won the conference this year, you are taking such a hard stance that you would be worried about 2025 because our recruiting class isn’t ranked high.
After the horrible takes for years on here (that you will distance yourself from) and the Clemson of the West bullshit, sit back and enjoy having a hopefully competent offense and a defense that actually hits and plays aggressive.
But not wanting Campbell because I was a big believer in him is some messed up shit. The Iowa stuff would be a bit of a red flag but we’re talking about Iowa St … they’ve never been this good ever
Without looking it up I'd guess you're impressed with him because he beat shitty ass tcu a few times.
Bottom line is 7 or 8 million for Campbell when he wants to stay in try hard land anyways is fucktarded. -
Killing it? NoRoadDawg55 said:
Do you really think Matt Campbell would be killing it in recruiting for UW?Tequilla said:
The Big12 is more than Texas and has been for a while … continue on with your ignorancehaie said:
Big 12 with a down Texas sucks and he's had one good season there. Leach had the cuouwgs in contention like 4 years in a row so you can stop that dumb ass angle any time now.Tequilla said:
There’s some real fucktarded shit in here …RoadDawg55 said:
I don’t but okay. I was on dogman until after signing day in 2013. You were supporting Sark and I remember arguing with you about it in chat. Sometime mid 2013 during the season you did come here.Tequilla said:That’s a poor effort by you Roadie … and you have a history of poor efforts
I was so supportive of Sark in Year 5 that I effectively was censored by the Lemon Party trio for calling for Sark to be fired
My defense of Emmert simply came down to the fact that the politics in firing Tyrone after 2007 was very very ugly and bad business for the University President
You’ve been better and haven’t been a cunt that wants to fuck me lately, but your take here is stupid. You need some sizzle eh Teq? I’m glad we didn’t hire Matt Campbell simply because you wanted him. He’s a fucking loser that has never beat Iowa and had one good season.
Give the recruiting time. We aren’t competing with Bama. Utah just won this conference and makes the PAC 12 championship seemingly every year. If we won the conference this year, you are taking such a hard stance that you would be worried about 2025 because our recruiting class isn’t ranked high.
After the horrible takes for years on here (that you will distance yourself from) and the Clemson of the West bullshit, sit back and enjoy having a hopefully competent offense and a defense that actually hits and plays aggressive.
But not wanting Campbell because I was a big believer in him is some messed up shit. The Iowa stuff would be a bit of a red flag but we’re talking about Iowa St … they’ve never been this good ever
Without looking it up I'd guess you're impressed with him because he beat shitty ass tcu a few times.
Bottom line is 7 or 8 million for Campbell when he wants to stay in try hard land anyways is fucktarded.
But I do think his name recognition would have led to better momentum than what we’ve seen to date on the whole -
lol no it's not.Tequilla said:
The Big12 is more than Texas and has been for a while … continue on with your ignorancehaie said:
Big 12 with a down Texas sucks and he's had one good season there. Leach had the cuouwgs in contention like 4 years in a row so you can stop that dumb ass angle any time now.Tequilla said:
There’s some real fucktarded shit in here …RoadDawg55 said:
I don’t but okay. I was on dogman until after signing day in 2013. You were supporting Sark and I remember arguing with you about it in chat. Sometime mid 2013 during the season you did come here.Tequilla said:That’s a poor effort by you Roadie … and you have a history of poor efforts
I was so supportive of Sark in Year 5 that I effectively was censored by the Lemon Party trio for calling for Sark to be fired
My defense of Emmert simply came down to the fact that the politics in firing Tyrone after 2007 was very very ugly and bad business for the University President
You’ve been better and haven’t been a cunt that wants to fuck me lately, but your take here is stupid. You need some sizzle eh Teq? I’m glad we didn’t hire Matt Campbell simply because you wanted him. He’s a fucking loser that has never beat Iowa and had one good season.
Give the recruiting time. We aren’t competing with Bama. Utah just won this conference and makes the PAC 12 championship seemingly every year. If we won the conference this year, you are taking such a hard stance that you would be worried about 2025 because our recruiting class isn’t ranked high.
After the horrible takes for years on here (that you will distance yourself from) and the Clemson of the West bullshit, sit back and enjoy having a hopefully competent offense and a defense that actually hits and plays aggressive.
But not wanting Campbell because I was a big believer in him is some messed up shit. The Iowa stuff would be a bit of a red flag but we’re talking about Iowa St … they’ve never been this good ever
Without looking it up I'd guess you're impressed with him because he beat shitty ass tcu a few times.
Bottom line is 7 or 8 million for Campbell when he wants to stay in try hard land anyways is fucktarded. -
This is silly. Uw would still be limp dicked in going afterTequilla said:
Killing it? NoRoadDawg55 said:
Do you really think Matt Campbell would be killing it in recruiting for UW?Tequilla said:
The Big12 is more than Texas and has been for a while … continue on with your ignorancehaie said:
Big 12 with a down Texas sucks and he's had one good season there. Leach had the cuouwgs in contention like 4 years in a row so you can stop that dumb ass angle any time now.Tequilla said:
There’s some real fucktarded shit in here …RoadDawg55 said:
I don’t but okay. I was on dogman until after signing day in 2013. You were supporting Sark and I remember arguing with you about it in chat. Sometime mid 2013 during the season you did come here.Tequilla said:That’s a poor effort by you Roadie … and you have a history of poor efforts
I was so supportive of Sark in Year 5 that I effectively was censored by the Lemon Party trio for calling for Sark to be fired
My defense of Emmert simply came down to the fact that the politics in firing Tyrone after 2007 was very very ugly and bad business for the University President
You’ve been better and haven’t been a cunt that wants to fuck me lately, but your take here is stupid. You need some sizzle eh Teq? I’m glad we didn’t hire Matt Campbell simply because you wanted him. He’s a fucking loser that has never beat Iowa and had one good season.
Give the recruiting time. We aren’t competing with Bama. Utah just won this conference and makes the PAC 12 championship seemingly every year. If we won the conference this year, you are taking such a hard stance that you would be worried about 2025 because our recruiting class isn’t ranked high.
After the horrible takes for years on here (that you will distance yourself from) and the Clemson of the West bullshit, sit back and enjoy having a hopefully competent offense and a defense that actually hits and plays aggressive.
But not wanting Campbell because I was a big believer in him is some messed up shit. The Iowa stuff would be a bit of a red flag but we’re talking about Iowa St … they’ve never been this good ever
Without looking it up I'd guess you're impressed with him because he beat shitty ass tcu a few times.
Bottom line is 7 or 8 million for Campbell when he wants to stay in try hard land anyways is fucktarded.
But I do think his name recognition would have led to better momentum than what we’ve seen to date on the whole
The more talented recruits that are looking at getting paid.
DeBoer is known for developing a passing game and he is still getting killed recruiting qb’s and wr’s vs shittier programs as far as recruiting is concerned. Recruiting right now is more of a reflection of the athletic dept than it is on the coaching staff. Campbell would have similar problems right now as the athletic dept looks on the paying of players with disdain.
DeBoer as a coach running the program is not the problem. He may suck, he may not, but he has a track record of getting results so the hire logically makes sense. -
Yep.AtomicDawg said:
This is silly. Uw would still be limp dicked in going afterTequilla said:
Killing it? NoRoadDawg55 said:
Do you really think Matt Campbell would be killing it in recruiting for UW?Tequilla said:
The Big12 is more than Texas and has been for a while … continue on with your ignorancehaie said:
Big 12 with a down Texas sucks and he's had one good season there. Leach had the cuouwgs in contention like 4 years in a row so you can stop that dumb ass angle any time now.Tequilla said:
There’s some real fucktarded shit in here …RoadDawg55 said:
I don’t but okay. I was on dogman until after signing day in 2013. You were supporting Sark and I remember arguing with you about it in chat. Sometime mid 2013 during the season you did come here.Tequilla said:That’s a poor effort by you Roadie … and you have a history of poor efforts
I was so supportive of Sark in Year 5 that I effectively was censored by the Lemon Party trio for calling for Sark to be fired
My defense of Emmert simply came down to the fact that the politics in firing Tyrone after 2007 was very very ugly and bad business for the University President
You’ve been better and haven’t been a cunt that wants to fuck me lately, but your take here is stupid. You need some sizzle eh Teq? I’m glad we didn’t hire Matt Campbell simply because you wanted him. He’s a fucking loser that has never beat Iowa and had one good season.
Give the recruiting time. We aren’t competing with Bama. Utah just won this conference and makes the PAC 12 championship seemingly every year. If we won the conference this year, you are taking such a hard stance that you would be worried about 2025 because our recruiting class isn’t ranked high.
After the horrible takes for years on here (that you will distance yourself from) and the Clemson of the West bullshit, sit back and enjoy having a hopefully competent offense and a defense that actually hits and plays aggressive.
But not wanting Campbell because I was a big believer in him is some messed up shit. The Iowa stuff would be a bit of a red flag but we’re talking about Iowa St … they’ve never been this good ever
Without looking it up I'd guess you're impressed with him because he beat shitty ass tcu a few times.
Bottom line is 7 or 8 million for Campbell when he wants to stay in try hard land anyways is fucktarded.
But I do think his name recognition would have led to better momentum than what we’ve seen to date on the whole
The more talented recruits that are looking at getting paid.
DeBoer is known for developing a passing game and he is still getting killed recruiting qb’s and wr’s vs shittier programs as far as recruiting is concerned. Recruiting right now is more of a reflection of the athletic dept than it is on the coaching staff. Campbell would have similar problems right now as the athletic dept looks on the paying of players with disdain.
DeBoer as a coach running the program is not the problem. He may suck, he may not, but he has a track record of getting results so the hire logically makes sense.
I liked DeBoer better than Campbell by a pretty wide margin. He knows how to run an offense and thats what the kids like to see. Name recognition will come. He has west coast recruiting ties and surely brought several years worth of prospect lists with him.
Campbell was a marginal improvement in terms of name recognition. ISU doesnt go toe to toe with blue bloods for many recruits. He would've cost twice as much, had no higher of a ceiling and I don't know of any reason to assume his floor would be higher. -
Matt Campbell is a limp dick. Nobody wanted him. He stayed in Ames because he is either a) a coward or b) has no further ambition.Tequilla said:
Killing it? NoRoadDawg55 said:
Do you really think Matt Campbell would be killing it in recruiting for UW?Tequilla said:
The Big12 is more than Texas and has been for a while … continue on with your ignorancehaie said:
Big 12 with a down Texas sucks and he's had one good season there. Leach had the cuouwgs in contention like 4 years in a row so you can stop that dumb ass angle any time now.Tequilla said:
There’s some real fucktarded shit in here …RoadDawg55 said:
I don’t but okay. I was on dogman until after signing day in 2013. You were supporting Sark and I remember arguing with you about it in chat. Sometime mid 2013 during the season you did come here.Tequilla said:That’s a poor effort by you Roadie … and you have a history of poor efforts
I was so supportive of Sark in Year 5 that I effectively was censored by the Lemon Party trio for calling for Sark to be fired
My defense of Emmert simply came down to the fact that the politics in firing Tyrone after 2007 was very very ugly and bad business for the University President
You’ve been better and haven’t been a cunt that wants to fuck me lately, but your take here is stupid. You need some sizzle eh Teq? I’m glad we didn’t hire Matt Campbell simply because you wanted him. He’s a fucking loser that has never beat Iowa and had one good season.
Give the recruiting time. We aren’t competing with Bama. Utah just won this conference and makes the PAC 12 championship seemingly every year. If we won the conference this year, you are taking such a hard stance that you would be worried about 2025 because our recruiting class isn’t ranked high.
After the horrible takes for years on here (that you will distance yourself from) and the Clemson of the West bullshit, sit back and enjoy having a hopefully competent offense and a defense that actually hits and plays aggressive.
But not wanting Campbell because I was a big believer in him is some messed up shit. The Iowa stuff would be a bit of a red flag but we’re talking about Iowa St … they’ve never been this good ever
Without looking it up I'd guess you're impressed with him because he beat shitty ass tcu a few times.
Bottom line is 7 or 8 million for Campbell when he wants to stay in try hard land anyways is fucktarded.
But I do think his name recognition would have led to better momentum than what we’ve seen to date on the whole -
More offers:
Some 2024 mixed in.
-
Interesting. I'm hearing no one else wanted him so he must be lying.ROOFDOOGINS said: -
We are out of it for Collins Acheampong. He canceled his official visit and will be visiting Miami instead. Hopefully we Can land Spencer Shannon or our Tight End class might be a disappointment.
https://247sports.com/player/collins-acheampong-46117602/
https://247sports.com/player/spencer-shannon-46125794/ -
“I loved the coaches at Washington but I just didn’t see myself there,” Acheampong said. “Texas and Florida recently offered me and both are elite football schools that I've been following for a long time. "ROOFDOOGINS said:We are out of it for Collins Acheampong. He canceled his official visit and will be visiting Miami instead. Hopefully we Can land Spencer Shannon or our Tight End class might be a disappointment.
https://247sports.com/player/collins-acheampong-46117602/
https://247sports.com/player/spencer-shannon-46125794/
Ouch -
I like the Bison in this one
-
This kids film actually looks ridiculously good. Interesting that he and that Aiden Chiles kid are visiting on the same weekend.RaceBannon said:I like the Bison in this one
-
I got UW for this kidRaceBannon said:I like the Bison in this one
