Are we Recruiting again? Fischer of Men Recruiting Thread - (Thread links)
Comments
-
My question is why did no one want him with those stats? All I have seen this coaching staff do is bring in G5 talent that no P5 schools were afterbananasnblondes said:I know we're piling on the shitty recruiting right now, but this grad transfer from UAB was actually fucking good in 2019 and 2020. Was all conference both those years and had some pretty decent numbers. Was apparently hurt for most of last year.
I'm not opposed to bringing him in for 1 year as a grad transfer.
Edit: 103 tackles, 16 tfl, 9 sacks in 2019, which is the last time he played a full season. Was on at least one pre season AA list going into 2020.
The bitching about recruiting is warranted, but a bit of a stretch for this kid. -
Our recruiting is not W O O F, it's just O O F
At least I am past the anger, frustration, what, why stage of grief and at acceptance along with finding it so bad/sad that it's now funny as I wonder when it hits bottom. -
I’m guessing injuries. Who cares? If he’s legit like 2019, great. If he’s not, he’s gone after the year. How would anyone know what schools were after him?sonics1993 said:
My question is why did no one want him with those stats? All I have seen this coaching staff do is bring in G5 talent that no P5 schools were afterbananasnblondes said:I know we're piling on the shitty recruiting right now, but this grad transfer from UAB was actually fucking good in 2019 and 2020. Was all conference both those years and had some pretty decent numbers. Was apparently hurt for most of last year.
I'm not opposed to bringing him in for 1 year as a grad transfer.
Edit: 103 tackles, 16 tfl, 9 sacks in 2019, which is the last time he played a full season. Was on at least one pre season AA list going into 2020.
The bitching about recruiting is warranted, but a bit of a stretch for this kid. -
Yeah, there is literally no downside to taking this kid. He'll either be a solid contributer or a backup for one year. Of the transfers we've taken, this is one of the better ones (on paper).RoadDawg55 said:
I’m guessing injuries. Who cares? If he’s legit like 2019, great. If he’s not, he’s gone after the year. How would anyone know what schools were after him?sonics1993 said:
My question is why did no one want him with those stats? All I have seen this coaching staff do is bring in G5 talent that no P5 schools were afterbananasnblondes said:I know we're piling on the shitty recruiting right now, but this grad transfer from UAB was actually fucking good in 2019 and 2020. Was all conference both those years and had some pretty decent numbers. Was apparently hurt for most of last year.
I'm not opposed to bringing him in for 1 year as a grad transfer.
Edit: 103 tackles, 16 tfl, 9 sacks in 2019, which is the last time he played a full season. Was on at least one pre season AA list going into 2020.
The bitching about recruiting is warranted, but a bit of a stretch for this kid. -
Moll developed into one of the best defensive players in C-USA while helping the Blazers secure two conference championships (2018, 2020) and another division title (2019). He was UAB's leading tackler in 2019 (104 tackles) and 2020 (59 tackles), earning spots on the Conference USA First Team both seasons. After the 2020 season, Phil Steele named him as an All-America Honorable Mention.
It’s at UAB, but they won, their defense was statistically top 25ish, he made a big impact when healthy. I’m with you Bananas, there is nothing to criticize. At minimum, he’s great depth as long as he’s healthy. I watched his YouTube highlights and he looked quick and he was physical. Hopefully his ankle isn’t too fucked up and he can get back to pre injury form. -
Yes because we are counting on this guy to be the savior. There is no way that an All Conference player from the fun belt that has started since his freshman year can be a worthy contributor in the mighty PAC 12.Tequilla said:Pulling kids from the Fun Belt … that’s the ticket
We should just gift Bruener and Tuputala the starting roles and not make them compete against guys that have played a lot of football and had success. Bright was a solid pick up.
Danny Heimuli is looking like a probable bust. Still early, but other guys the same age and/or younger are ahead of him.
Tuputala has good size, can run, and is physical, but he has never seemed very instinctual when I’ve watched him, albeit in limited time. Eddy is going to be out for awhile and it will probably be a lost year for him when he returns. Competition and depth matters. Special teams matter. Experience matters.
You are trying way too hard. You went from being one of the doogiest posters on this board (Emmert, lukewarm support of Sark even in year 5) to whatever the fuck you do now. Any complaint about this guy is simply complaining to complain. Sure, I would rather have an All SEC LB, but that guy isn’t available. I think a reason this guy didn’t get a ton of attention is that he still isn’t healthy.
The program has some issues, but we got rid of a shitty coach and hired a guy that has improved every program he’s been a part of and has won. Pete won with Cohen’s worthless ass around and DeBoer should too. He will figure it out and doesn’t seem like the type to sit back and hope for results.
He hasn’t won at the highest level and there is risk to the hire (same for 90% of new coaching hires), but give the guy a chance. The players and recruits seem to like him so with winning, recruiting will improve. -
That’s a poor effort by you Roadie … and you have a history of poor efforts
I was so supportive of Sark in Year 5 that I effectively was censored by the Lemon Party trio for calling for Sark to be fired
My defense of Emmert simply came down to the fact that the politics in firing Tyrone after 2007 was very very ugly and bad business for the University President -
I don’t but okay. I was on dogman until after signing day in 2013. You were supporting Sark and I remember arguing with you about it in chat. Sometime mid 2013 during the season you did come here.Tequilla said:That’s a poor effort by you Roadie … and you have a history of poor efforts
I was so supportive of Sark in Year 5 that I effectively was censored by the Lemon Party trio for calling for Sark to be fired
My defense of Emmert simply came down to the fact that the politics in firing Tyrone after 2007 was very very ugly and bad business for the University President
You’ve been better and haven’t been a cunt that wants to fuck me lately, but your take here is stupid. You need some sizzle eh Teq? I’m glad we didn’t hire Matt Campbell simply because you wanted him. He’s a fucking loser that has never beat Iowa and had one good season.
Give the recruiting time. We aren’t competing with Bama. Utah just won this conference and makes the PAC 12 championship seemingly every year. If we won the conference this year, you are taking such a hard stance that you would be worried about 2025 because our recruiting class isn’t ranked high.
After the horrible takes for years on here (that you will distance yourself from) and the Clemson of the West bullshit, sit back and enjoy having a hopefully competent offense and a defense that actually hits and plays aggressive. -
You forgot to include our academic prowessRoadDawg55 said:
I don’t but okay. I was on dogman until after signing day in 2013. You were supporting Sark and I remember arguing with you about it in chat. Sometime mid 2013 during the season you did come here.Tequilla said:That’s a poor effort by you Roadie … and you have a history of poor efforts
I was so supportive of Sark in Year 5 that I effectively was censored by the Lemon Party trio for calling for Sark to be fired
My defense of Emmert simply came down to the fact that the politics in firing Tyrone after 2007 was very very ugly and bad business for the University President
You’ve been better and haven’t been a cunt that wants to fuck me lately, but your take here is stupid. You need some sizzle eh Teq? I’m glad we didn’t hire Matt Campbell simply because you wanted him. He’s a fucking loser that has never beat Iowa and had one good season.
Give the recruiting time. We aren’t competing with Bama. Utah just won this conference and makes the PAC 12 championship seemingly every year. If we won the conference this year, you are taking such a hard stance that you would be worried about 2025 because our recruiting class isn’t ranked high.
After the horrible takes for years on here (that you will distance yourself from) and the Clemson of the West bullshit, sit back and enjoy having a hopefully competent offense and a defense that actually hits and plays aggressive. -
sonics1993 said:
You forgot to include ourRoadDawg55 said:
I don’t but okay. I was on dogman until after signing day in 2013. You were supporting Sark and I remember arguing with you about it in chat. Sometime mid 2013 during the season you did come here.Tequilla said:That’s a poor effort by you Roadie … and you have a history of poor efforts
I was so supportive of Sark in Year 5 that I effectively was censored by the Lemon Party trio for calling for Sark to be fired
My defense of Emmert simply came down to the fact that the politics in firing Tyrone after 2007 was very very ugly and bad business for the University President
You’ve been better and haven’t been a cunt that wants to fuck me lately, but your take here is stupid. You need some sizzle eh Teq? I’m glad we didn’t hire Matt Campbell simply because you wanted him. He’s a fucking loser that has never beat Iowa and had one good season.
Give the recruiting time. We aren’t competing with Bama. Utah just won this conference and makes the PAC 12 championship seemingly every year. If we won the conference this year, you are taking such a hard stance that you would be worried about 2025 because our recruiting class isn’t ranked high.
After the horrible takes for years on here (that you will distance yourself from) and the Clemson of the West bullshit, sit back and enjoy having a hopefully competent offense and a defense that actually hits and plays aggressive.academicacademia prowess
