Gosh, I would think the left would be mad about being duped

Bendintheriver said:

2001400ex said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

It's been obvious for sometime now that the entire Russian collusion narrative was nothing more than a smear job by Hillary with an assist from the Obama Admin's FBI and DOJ. This has been obvious for some time now to anyone who doesn't have their head up their ass, and now with the Durham indictments the left won't even have the fig leaves of "but, but Krathammer!!!" and it was the GOP who paid for the Dossier and what about the polling data!!!!


Now if my party and the media I consume had spent the last 4 years lying to me, I'd be pissed. But I don't see the Dazzler being pissed. I see him hiding like a Kunt, but not pissed. It's like he enjoys being lied to. And what happened to all that OUTRAGE about colluding with the Russians? It's undeniable now that Hillary really was colluding with the Russian, and yet the Dazzler or any of the Hondo Bros seem to care.

I see you still haven't read the Mueller report. I do chuckle at how you think your news source hasn't lied to you. Irony is ironic.

You mean the report Mueller testified in front of congress that he wasn't sure what was in it? That report?

You and I remember his testimony differently. Not that this is shocking news. But here's a refresher.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/24/us/politics/mueller-testimony.html

Just so desperate to hang on to the lies, The NYT was completely invested in the lies. THey actually knew the dossier was fake and they still spent 2 years telling lies.

We all know that if Mueller had one scintilla of provable evidence he would have immediately prosecuted. That is why he was there, to overturn an election and take away half the country's vote.

Why don't you and old "Hands Up" HH go start your own website where you can ignore facts and reality while jerking each others pud.

It's amazing how you speak like you are the enlightened intelligent one. Yet you don't even have a basic understanding of civics. You realize the due process for a sitting president is to go through the house for impeachment then the Senate for conviction, right?

But yes HH and I are the ones who ignore facts and reality. I see the tug and clowns like you haven't changed.

WestlinnDuck said:

Sledog said:

Imagine the elements of the crime don't exist and the person can't be charged.......Rocket science I tell you!

Yeah, I've asked the dazzler (self-proclaimed Pump legal expert) more than a dozen times what federal crime did Trump commit that warranted a Constitutional impeachment? Nothing.

==========

The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors. ...

I'm sure he told you, you just don't want to listen. It's almost like a Senate trial is political and not an impartial jury trial. Not to mention they didn't even call witnesses in the Senate trial for Trump. Wtf?

Clinton literally coerced witnesses to lie and obstructed Justice, not to mention he lied under oath, and the political winds weren't there to convict him.

Trump on the other hand, had the most members of the same party vote to convict him.

All facts. And facts you don't want to acknowledge.