S&P+ Has...
Comments
-
Disagree
-
UW has been making S&P+ look bad all year.
-
dnc said:
UW has been making
S&P+football look bad all year. -
It's tough doing so little with so muchdnc said:UW has been making S&P+ look bad all year.
-
So...lead pipe cinch, take out a second mortgage and risk it all type of science supporting this bet, right? I'm really asking. I hate money and would love to lose some.
-
I’m such a Doog that I’m still expecting us to actually look good one week. Kinda like the 2002 Oregon State game.chuck said:So...lead pipe cinch, take out a second mortgage and risk it all type of science supporting this bet, right? I'm really asking. I hate money and would love to lose some.
-
That was a career game for at least two huskies...ET and Mateaki. Tank was dominant too.RoadDawg55 said:
I’m such a Doog that I’m still expecting us to actually look good one week. Kinda like the 2002 Oregon State game.chuck said:So...lead pipe cinch, take out a second mortgage and risk it all type of science supporting this bet, right? I'm really asking. I hate money and would love to lose some.
I do the same. I kept eagerly anticipating someone busting a big play against Arizona. By the time it finally happened I remembered that I wanted UW to lose that game.
-
Stanford has had a weird year. Lost to a Kansas school and Wazzu but beat USC (when USC still believed) and Duck.
My guess is UW wins because somehow Stanford has a worse rush attack (95 YPG) than we? (107 YPG) do and our pass defence is probably the only functional part of the team.
-
Stanford running attack is only bad because it hasn't played us yet.Canadawg said:Stanford has had a weird year. Lost to a Kansas school and Wazzu but beat USC (when USC still believed) and Duck.
My guess is UW wins because somehow Stanford has a worse rush attack (95 YPG) than we? (107 YPG) do and our pass defence is probably the only functional part of the team. -
Haha I thought of that but stillBleachedAnusDawg said:
Stanford running attack is only bad because it hasn't played us yet.Canadawg said:Stanford has had a weird year. Lost to a Kansas school and Wazzu but beat USC (when USC still believed) and Duck.
My guess is UW wins because somehow Stanford has a worse rush attack (95 YPG) than we? (107 YPG) do and our pass defence is probably the only functional part of the team. -
Didn't Oregon come back and win that game?Canadawg said:Stanford has had a weird year. Lost to a Kansas school and Wazzu but beat USC (when USC still believed) and Duck.
-
1to392831weretaken said:
Didn't Oregon come back and win that game?Canadawg said:Stanford has had a weird year. Lost to a Kansas school and Wazzu but beat USC (when USC still believed) and Duck.
-
Stanford has the worst rush offense and defense in the Pac-12, which would usually point towards being a good matchup for UW but I remember the same thing in 2019 with a much better UW squad and then getting gashed on both sides by Stanford. Same thing may have happened in 2020. McKee is also mobile enough to fuck up UW's stupid scheme, extend plays and kill them on third down like almost every Pac-12 QB can except Washington
-
2019 they had like 3 3rd string lineman a tight end and a WR as their Oline and they dominated the UW dline
-
We will have a rough time handling the Tree with only 9 on defense
I don't count the 2 safeties that do not appear on camera until the play is over -
They brought the safeties up more against Arizona. They didn't have an impact. So far none of them are very good at anything.LebamDawg said:We will have a rough time handling the Tree with only 9 on defense
I don't count the 2 safeties that do not appear on camera until the play is over
The amount of player improvement that has not been going on is really the biggest thing that stands out on this team. I thought the good S&C would at least carry over. Everyone looks weaker than ever though. Nobody goes down violently or falls backward against this defense. Gordon and McDuffie are the only two that I can remember making a clean, form tackle where the runner doesn't twist or slide off and at least fall forward. Most of the time the safeties are just getting trucked and praying the guy trips and goes down. -
The #1 indicator of a bad program imochuck said:
They brought the safeties up more against Arizona. They didn't have an impact. So far none of them are very good at anything.LebamDawg said:We will have a rough time handling the Tree with only 9 on defense
I don't count the 2 safeties that do not appear on camera until the play is over
The amount of player improvement that has not been going on is really the biggest thing that stands out on this team. I thought the good S&C would at least carry over. Everyone looks weaker than ever though. Nobody goes down violently or falls backward against this defense. Gordon and McDuffie are the only two that I can remember making a clean, form tackle where the runner doesn't twist or slide off and at least fall forward. Most of the time the safeties are just getting trucked and praying the guy trips and goes down.
Guys are not working harder than ever -
Earlier this year someone ran a poll about Huskies who didn't meet expectations. I totally forgot about Tank Johnson. Early on I honestly thought he was going to be a NFL first rounder.chuck said:
That was a career game for at least two huskies...ET and Mateaki. Tank was dominant too.RoadDawg55 said:
I’m such a Doog that I’m still expecting us to actually look good one week. Kinda like the 2002 Oregon State game.chuck said:So...lead pipe cinch, take out a second mortgage and risk it all type of science supporting this bet, right? I'm really asking. I hate money and would love to lose some.
I do the same. I kept eagerly anticipating someone busting a big play against Arizona. By the time it finally happened I remembered that I wanted UW to lose that game. -
Still went mid round twoDerekJohnson said:
Earlier this year someone ran a poll about Huskies who didn't meet expectations. I totally forgot about Tank Johnson. Early on I honestly thought he was going to be a NFL first rounder.chuck said:
That was a career game for at least two huskies...ET and Mateaki. Tank was dominant too.RoadDawg55 said:
I’m such a Doog that I’m still expecting us to actually look good one week. Kinda like the 2002 Oregon State game.chuck said:So...lead pipe cinch, take out a second mortgage and risk it all type of science supporting this bet, right? I'm really asking. I hate money and would love to lose some.
I do the same. I kept eagerly anticipating someone busting a big play against Arizona. By the time it finally happened I remembered that I wanted UW to lose that game. -
Dude was pretty good in the nfl, then he decided to play gangstadnc said:
Still went mid round twoDerekJohnson said:
Earlier this year someone ran a poll about Huskies who didn't meet expectations. I totally forgot about Tank Johnson. Early on I honestly thought he was going to be a NFL first rounder.chuck said:
That was a career game for at least two huskies...ET and Mateaki. Tank was dominant too.RoadDawg55 said:
I’m such a Doog that I’m still expecting us to actually look good one week. Kinda like the 2002 Oregon State game.chuck said:So...lead pipe cinch, take out a second mortgage and risk it all type of science supporting this bet, right? I'm really asking. I hate money and would love to lose some.
I do the same. I kept eagerly anticipating someone busting a big play against Arizona. By the time it finally happened I remembered that I wanted UW to lose that game. -
Met his dad at a spring gameFireCohen said:
Dude was pretty good in the nfl, then he decided to play gangstadnc said:
Still went mid round twoDerekJohnson said:
Earlier this year someone ran a poll about Huskies who didn't meet expectations. I totally forgot about Tank Johnson. Early on I honestly thought he was going to be a NFL first rounder.chuck said:
That was a career game for at least two huskies...ET and Mateaki. Tank was dominant too.RoadDawg55 said:
I’m such a Doog that I’m still expecting us to actually look good one week. Kinda like the 2002 Oregon State game.chuck said:So...lead pipe cinch, take out a second mortgage and risk it all type of science supporting this bet, right? I'm really asking. I hate money and would love to lose some.
I do the same. I kept eagerly anticipating someone busting a big play against Arizona. By the time it finally happened I remembered that I wanted UW to lose that game.
He said Rick saved his kid with the offer
Csb -
His name is TankFireCohen said:
Dude was pretty good in the nfl, then he decided to play gangstadnc said:
Still went mid round twoDerekJohnson said:
Earlier this year someone ran a poll about Huskies who didn't meet expectations. I totally forgot about Tank Johnson. Early on I honestly thought he was going to be a NFL first rounder.chuck said:
That was a career game for at least two huskies...ET and Mateaki. Tank was dominant too.RoadDawg55 said:
I’m such a Doog that I’m still expecting us to actually look good one week. Kinda like the 2002 Oregon State game.chuck said:So...lead pipe cinch, take out a second mortgage and risk it all type of science supporting this bet, right? I'm really asking. I hate money and would love to lose some.
I do the same. I kept eagerly anticipating someone busting a big play against Arizona. By the time it finally happened I remembered that I wanted UW to lose that game.
hth -
Something tells me Tank wasn't playing gangsta, he was actually gangsta.dnc said:
His name is TankFireCohen said:
Dude was pretty good in the nfl, then he decided to play gangstadnc said:
Still went mid round twoDerekJohnson said:
Earlier this year someone ran a poll about Huskies who didn't meet expectations. I totally forgot about Tank Johnson. Early on I honestly thought he was going to be a NFL first rounder.chuck said:
That was a career game for at least two huskies...ET and Mateaki. Tank was dominant too.RoadDawg55 said:
I’m such a Doog that I’m still expecting us to actually look good one week. Kinda like the 2002 Oregon State game.chuck said:So...lead pipe cinch, take out a second mortgage and risk it all type of science supporting this bet, right? I'm really asking. I hate money and would love to lose some.
I do the same. I kept eagerly anticipating someone busting a big play against Arizona. By the time it finally happened I remembered that I wanted UW to lose that game.
hth -
And we need to recruit more gangstersBleachedAnusDawg said:
Something tells me Tank wasn't playing gangsta, he was actually gangsta.dnc said:
His name is TankFireCohen said:
Dude was pretty good in the nfl, then he decided to play gangstadnc said:
Still went mid round twoDerekJohnson said:
Earlier this year someone ran a poll about Huskies who didn't meet expectations. I totally forgot about Tank Johnson. Early on I honestly thought he was going to be a NFL first rounder.chuck said:
That was a career game for at least two huskies...ET and Mateaki. Tank was dominant too.RoadDawg55 said:
I’m such a Doog that I’m still expecting us to actually look good one week. Kinda like the 2002 Oregon State game.chuck said:So...lead pipe cinch, take out a second mortgage and risk it all type of science supporting this bet, right? I'm really asking. I hate money and would love to lose some.
I do the same. I kept eagerly anticipating someone busting a big play against Arizona. By the time it finally happened I remembered that I wanted UW to lose that game.
hth
-
I named the dog in my profile pic Tank after Tank Johnson.DerekJohnson said:
Earlier this year someone ran a poll about Huskies who didn't meet expectations. I totally forgot about Tank Johnson. Early on I honestly thought he was going to be a NFL first rounder.chuck said:
That was a career game for at least two huskies...ET and Mateaki. Tank was dominant too.RoadDawg55 said:
I’m such a Doog that I’m still expecting us to actually look good one week. Kinda like the 2002 Oregon State game.chuck said:So...lead pipe cinch, take out a second mortgage and risk it all type of science supporting this bet, right? I'm really asking. I hate money and would love to lose some.
I do the same. I kept eagerly anticipating someone busting a big play against Arizona. By the time it finally happened I remembered that I wanted UW to lose that game.
He also was giant, long haired, slow and drooled a lot. So I think I nailed it. -
Yeah his reputation at UW was that he took plays off and that hurt him in the draft. He tested like a freak at the underwear Olympics. He was definitely a high end talent that didn't maximize it, but was still good.DerekJohnson said:
Earlier this year someone ran a poll about Huskies who didn't meet expectations. I totally forgot about Tank Johnson. Early on I honestly thought he was going to be a NFL first rounder.chuck said:
That was a career game for at least two huskies...ET and Mateaki. Tank was dominant too.RoadDawg55 said:
I’m such a Doog that I’m still expecting us to actually look good one week. Kinda like the 2002 Oregon State game.chuck said:So...lead pipe cinch, take out a second mortgage and risk it all type of science supporting this bet, right? I'm really asking. I hate money and would love to lose some.
I do the same. I kept eagerly anticipating someone busting a big play against Arizona. By the time it finally happened I remembered that I wanted UW to lose that game. -
Expect TE to be featured in our passing attack this week as Jimmy has a gigantic ego and will attempt to show Shaw that he isn't the only coach who knows how to use TEs. Given that our TEs are actually good (when they play and when we throw to them), this will likely have a good result.
-
The Huskies are much more used to an empty stadium now so Stanford loses that edge
-
Morris is terrified of the middle in front of the safeties now. Last year when many of us thought he might be pretty good, that's where he had the most success finding open guys, especially Otton. I dont see the TE production coming back until/unless he finally gets replaced.DoogieMcDoogerson said:Expect TE to be featured in our passing attack this week as Jimmy has a gigantic ego and will attempt to show Shaw that he isn't the only coach who knows how to use TEs. Given that our TEs are actually good (when they play and when we throw to them), this will likely have a good result.
-
Tank has even said that …RaceBannon said:
Met his dad at a spring gameFireCohen said:
Dude was pretty good in the nfl, then he decided to play gangstadnc said:
Still went mid round twoDerekJohnson said:
Earlier this year someone ran a poll about Huskies who didn't meet expectations. I totally forgot about Tank Johnson. Early on I honestly thought he was going to be a NFL first rounder.chuck said:
That was a career game for at least two huskies...ET and Mateaki. Tank was dominant too.RoadDawg55 said:
I’m such a Doog that I’m still expecting us to actually look good one week. Kinda like the 2002 Oregon State game.chuck said:So...lead pipe cinch, take out a second mortgage and risk it all type of science supporting this bet, right? I'm really asking. I hate money and would love to lose some.
I do the same. I kept eagerly anticipating someone busting a big play against Arizona. By the time it finally happened I remembered that I wanted UW to lose that game.
He said Rick saved his kid with the offer
Csb
And that was before he put his foot across my throat
