S&P+ Has...

Canadawg

UW winning rather easily

Tequilla

Disagree

dnc

UW has been making S&P+ look bad all year.

1to392831weretaken

dnc said:

UW has been making S&P+ football look bad all year.

Canadawg

dnc said:

UW has been making S&P+ look bad all year.

It's tough doing so little with so much

chuck

So...lead pipe cinch, take out a second mortgage and risk it all type of science supporting this bet, right? I'm really asking. I hate money and would love to lose some.

RoadDawg55

chuck said:

So...lead pipe cinch, take out a second mortgage and risk it all type of science supporting this bet, right? I'm really asking. I hate money and would love to lose some.

I’m such a Doog that I’m still expecting us to actually look good one week. Kinda like the 2002 Oregon State game.

chuck

RoadDawg55 said:

chuck said:

So...lead pipe cinch, take out a second mortgage and risk it all type of science supporting this bet, right? I'm really asking. I hate money and would love to lose some.

I’m such a Doog that I’m still expecting us to actually look good one week. Kinda like the 2002 Oregon State game.

That was a career game for at least two huskies...ET and Mateaki. Tank was dominant too.

I do the same. I kept eagerly anticipating someone busting a big play against Arizona. By the time it finally happened I remembered that I wanted UW to lose that game.

Canadawg

Stanford has had a weird year. Lost to a Kansas school and Wazzu but beat USC (when USC still believed) and Duck.

My guess is UW wins because somehow Stanford has a worse rush attack (95 YPG) than we? (107 YPG) do and our pass defence is probably the only functional part of the team.

BleachedAnusDawg

Canadawg said:

Stanford has had a weird year. Lost to a Kansas school and Wazzu but beat USC (when USC still believed) and Duck.

My guess is UW wins because somehow Stanford has a worse rush attack (95 YPG) than we? (107 YPG) do and our pass defence is probably the only functional part of the team.

Stanford running attack is only bad because it hasn't played us yet.

Canadawg

BleachedAnusDawg said:

Canadawg said:

Stanford has had a weird year. Lost to a Kansas school and Wazzu but beat USC (when USC still believed) and Duck.

My guess is UW wins because somehow Stanford has a worse rush attack (95 YPG) than we? (107 YPG) do and our pass defence is probably the only functional part of the team.

Stanford running attack is only bad because it hasn't played us yet.

Haha I thought of that but still

1to392831weretaken

Canadawg said:

Stanford has had a weird year. Lost to a Kansas school and Wazzu but beat USC (when USC still believed) and Duck.

Didn't Oregon come back and win that game?

Canadawg

1to392831weretaken said:

Canadawg said:

Stanford has had a weird year. Lost to a Kansas school and Wazzu but beat USC (when USC still believed) and Duck.

Didn't Oregon come back and win that game?

WoolleyDoog

Stanford has the worst rush offense and defense in the Pac-12, which would usually point towards being a good matchup for UW but I remember the same thing in 2019 with a much better UW squad and then getting gashed on both sides by Stanford. Same thing may have happened in 2020. McKee is also mobile enough to fuck up UW's stupid scheme, extend plays and kill them on third down like almost every Pac-12 QB can except Washington

Canadawg

2019 they had like 3 3rd string lineman a tight end and a WR as their Oline and they dominated the UW dline

LebamDawg

We will have a rough time handling the Tree with only 9 on defense

I don't count the 2 safeties that do not appear on camera until the play is over

chuck

LebamDawg said:

We will have a rough time handling the Tree with only 9 on defense

I don't count the 2 safeties that do not appear on camera until the play is over

They brought the safeties up more against Arizona. They didn't have an impact. So far none of them are very good at anything.

The amount of player improvement that has not been going on is really the biggest thing that stands out on this team. I thought the good S&C would at least carry over. Everyone looks weaker than ever though. Nobody goes down violently or falls backward against this defense. Gordon and McDuffie are the only two that I can remember making a clean, form tackle where the runner doesn't twist or slide off and at least fall forward. Most of the time the safeties are just getting trucked and praying the guy trips and goes down.

RaceBannon

chuck said:

LebamDawg said:

We will have a rough time handling the Tree with only 9 on defense

I don't count the 2 safeties that do not appear on camera until the play is over

They brought the safeties up more against Arizona. They didn't have an impact. So far none of them are very good at anything.

The amount of player improvement that has not been going on is really the biggest thing that stands out on this team. I thought the good S&C would at least carry over. Everyone looks weaker than ever though. Nobody goes down violently or falls backward against this defense. Gordon and McDuffie are the only two that I can remember making a clean, form tackle where the runner doesn't twist or slide off and at least fall forward. Most of the time the safeties are just getting trucked and praying the guy trips and goes down.

The #1 indicator of a bad program imo

Guys are not working harder than ever

DerekJohnson

chuck said:

RoadDawg55 said:

chuck said:

So...lead pipe cinch, take out a second mortgage and risk it all type of science supporting this bet, right? I'm really asking. I hate money and would love to lose some.

I’m such a Doog that I’m still expecting us to actually look good one week. Kinda like the 2002 Oregon State game.

That was a career game for at least two huskies...ET and Mateaki. Tank was dominant too.

I do the same. I kept eagerly anticipating someone busting a big play against Arizona. By the time it finally happened I remembered that I wanted UW to lose that game.

Earlier this year someone ran a poll about Huskies who didn't meet expectations. I totally forgot about Tank Johnson. Early on I honestly thought he was going to be a NFL first rounder.

dnc

DerekJohnson said:

chuck said:

RoadDawg55 said:

chuck said:

So...lead pipe cinch, take out a second mortgage and risk it all type of science supporting this bet, right? I'm really asking. I hate money and would love to lose some.

I’m such a Doog that I’m still expecting us to actually look good one week. Kinda like the 2002 Oregon State game.

That was a career game for at least two huskies...ET and Mateaki. Tank was dominant too.

I do the same. I kept eagerly anticipating someone busting a big play against Arizona. By the time it finally happened I remembered that I wanted UW to lose that game.

Earlier this year someone ran a poll about Huskies who didn't meet expectations. I totally forgot about Tank Johnson. Early on I honestly thought he was going to be a NFL first rounder.

Still went mid round two

FireCohen

dnc said:

DerekJohnson said:

chuck said:

RoadDawg55 said:

chuck said:

So...lead pipe cinch, take out a second mortgage and risk it all type of science supporting this bet, right? I'm really asking. I hate money and would love to lose some.

I’m such a Doog that I’m still expecting us to actually look good one week. Kinda like the 2002 Oregon State game.

That was a career game for at least two huskies...ET and Mateaki. Tank was dominant too.

I do the same. I kept eagerly anticipating someone busting a big play against Arizona. By the time it finally happened I remembered that I wanted UW to lose that game.

Earlier this year someone ran a poll about Huskies who didn't meet expectations. I totally forgot about Tank Johnson. Early on I honestly thought he was going to be a NFL first rounder.

Still went mid round two

Dude was pretty good in the nfl, then he decided to play gangsta