S&P+ Has...
Comments
-
Didn't Oregon come back and win that game?Canadawg said:Stanford has had a weird year. Lost to a Kansas school and Wazzu but beat USC (when USC still believed) and Duck.
-
1to392831weretaken said:
Didn't Oregon come back and win that game?Canadawg said:Stanford has had a weird year. Lost to a Kansas school and Wazzu but beat USC (when USC still believed) and Duck.
-
Stanford has the worst rush offense and defense in the Pac-12, which would usually point towards being a good matchup for UW but I remember the same thing in 2019 with a much better UW squad and then getting gashed on both sides by Stanford. Same thing may have happened in 2020. McKee is also mobile enough to fuck up UW's stupid scheme, extend plays and kill them on third down like almost every Pac-12 QB can except Washington
-
2019 they had like 3 3rd string lineman a tight end and a WR as their Oline and they dominated the UW dline
-
We will have a rough time handling the Tree with only 9 on defense
I don't count the 2 safeties that do not appear on camera until the play is over -
They brought the safeties up more against Arizona. They didn't have an impact. So far none of them are very good at anything.LebamDawg said:We will have a rough time handling the Tree with only 9 on defense
I don't count the 2 safeties that do not appear on camera until the play is over
The amount of player improvement that has not been going on is really the biggest thing that stands out on this team. I thought the good S&C would at least carry over. Everyone looks weaker than ever though. Nobody goes down violently or falls backward against this defense. Gordon and McDuffie are the only two that I can remember making a clean, form tackle where the runner doesn't twist or slide off and at least fall forward. Most of the time the safeties are just getting trucked and praying the guy trips and goes down. -
The #1 indicator of a bad program imochuck said:
They brought the safeties up more against Arizona. They didn't have an impact. So far none of them are very good at anything.LebamDawg said:We will have a rough time handling the Tree with only 9 on defense
I don't count the 2 safeties that do not appear on camera until the play is over
The amount of player improvement that has not been going on is really the biggest thing that stands out on this team. I thought the good S&C would at least carry over. Everyone looks weaker than ever though. Nobody goes down violently or falls backward against this defense. Gordon and McDuffie are the only two that I can remember making a clean, form tackle where the runner doesn't twist or slide off and at least fall forward. Most of the time the safeties are just getting trucked and praying the guy trips and goes down.
Guys are not working harder than ever -
Earlier this year someone ran a poll about Huskies who didn't meet expectations. I totally forgot about Tank Johnson. Early on I honestly thought he was going to be a NFL first rounder.chuck said:
That was a career game for at least two huskies...ET and Mateaki. Tank was dominant too.RoadDawg55 said:
I’m such a Doog that I’m still expecting us to actually look good one week. Kinda like the 2002 Oregon State game.chuck said:So...lead pipe cinch, take out a second mortgage and risk it all type of science supporting this bet, right? I'm really asking. I hate money and would love to lose some.
I do the same. I kept eagerly anticipating someone busting a big play against Arizona. By the time it finally happened I remembered that I wanted UW to lose that game. -
Still went mid round twoDerekJohnson said:
Earlier this year someone ran a poll about Huskies who didn't meet expectations. I totally forgot about Tank Johnson. Early on I honestly thought he was going to be a NFL first rounder.chuck said:
That was a career game for at least two huskies...ET and Mateaki. Tank was dominant too.RoadDawg55 said:
I’m such a Doog that I’m still expecting us to actually look good one week. Kinda like the 2002 Oregon State game.chuck said:So...lead pipe cinch, take out a second mortgage and risk it all type of science supporting this bet, right? I'm really asking. I hate money and would love to lose some.
I do the same. I kept eagerly anticipating someone busting a big play against Arizona. By the time it finally happened I remembered that I wanted UW to lose that game. -
Dude was pretty good in the nfl, then he decided to play gangstadnc said:
Still went mid round twoDerekJohnson said:
Earlier this year someone ran a poll about Huskies who didn't meet expectations. I totally forgot about Tank Johnson. Early on I honestly thought he was going to be a NFL first rounder.chuck said:
That was a career game for at least two huskies...ET and Mateaki. Tank was dominant too.RoadDawg55 said:
I’m such a Doog that I’m still expecting us to actually look good one week. Kinda like the 2002 Oregon State game.chuck said:So...lead pipe cinch, take out a second mortgage and risk it all type of science supporting this bet, right? I'm really asking. I hate money and would love to lose some.
I do the same. I kept eagerly anticipating someone busting a big play against Arizona. By the time it finally happened I remembered that I wanted UW to lose that game.
