Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Question re: "no way Lake gets fired this year" nonsense
Comments
-
I was one of those guys that thought Willingham was going to be good for the program. I hated Sark that much.
-
Watdannarc said:I was one of those guys that thought Willingham was going to be good for the program. I hated Sark that much.
-
i posted that question on one of condooga's chat/blog sessions back in the day, he had the same response, 'thats crazy.'DerekJohnson said:
This is as wacky as the idea people had that Willingham was brought in to "clean up the program" and then another coach after that would be in charge of the actual winning.NeGgaPlEaSe said:The only way they fire Lake is IF she currently has Pete in her back pocket to clean up the mess and tide things over while they hire a competent head coach. Which I could see happening
now that dj and condooga have both said 'its crazy,' then i have to belive i was right. -
Husky football has destroyed our brainsdannarc said:I was one of those guys that thought Willingham was going to be good for the program. I hated Sark that much.
-
Self bump.Quietcowskee said:Handicapping the games at this point doesn’t factor in whether the team quits on its coach.
3-9.
-
He needs more time
-
We have no idea the damage Pete caused this program.
-
-
You never fire your coach mid season.
-
In this case, I actually wouldn’t, but a bowl game should be the minimum for returning. As long as there aren’t any huge blowouts, he’s coming back. And despite us sucking, it will be hard for a shitty PAC 12 team to do it.Kaepsknee said:You never fire your coach mid season.
