Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Fascism is a right wing ideology

123468

Comments

  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter


    Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl



    wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.

    Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.
    I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.
    Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.

    In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
    You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?

    Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?

    This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.

    You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.

    We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.

    And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
    Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.
    People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.

    Every billionaire is a policy failure.
    And that's what kills new ideas and innovation.

    Billionaires or the drive to be one are the reasons why we don't drive this to work.


    Is that a Trabant?
  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,257 Founders Club


    Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl



    wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.

    Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.
    I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.
    Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.

    In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
    You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?

    Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?

    This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.

    You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.

    We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.

    And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
    Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.
    People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.

    Every billionaire is a policy failure.
    And that's what kills new ideas and innovation.

    Billionaires or the drive to be one are the reasons why we don't drive this to work.


    Is that a Trabant?
    As long as everyone has the exact same one, then that’s progress.
  • TheKobeStopper
    TheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959


    Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl



    wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.

    Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.
    I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.
    Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.

    In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
    You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?

    Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?

    This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.

    You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.

    We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.

    And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
    Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.
    People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.

    Every billionaire is a policy failure.
    And that's what kills new ideas and innovation.

    Billionaires or the drive to be one are the reasons why we don't drive this to work.


    What do you drive them on?
  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,257 Founders Club
    Obama’s roads
  • hardhat
    hardhat Member Posts: 8,344


    Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl



    wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.

    Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.
    I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.
    Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.

    In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
    You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?

    Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?

    This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.

    You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.

    We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.

    And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
    Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.
    People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.

    Every billionaire is a policy failure.
    And that's what kills new ideas and innovation.

    Billionaires or the drive to be one are the reasons why we don't drive this to work.


    What do you drive them on?
    How do you pay your rent?
  • TheKobeStopper
    TheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    LebamDawg said:


    Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl



    wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.

    Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.
    I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.
    Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.

    In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
    You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?

    Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?

    This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.

    You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.

    We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.

    And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
    Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.
    People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.

    Every billionaire is a policy failure.
    Bernie 5 years ago said every millionaire was a failure - then changed to billionaire when he became a millionaire.
    it is a game of waiting I guess

    LebamDawg said:


    Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl



    wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.

    Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.
    I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.
    Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.

    In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
    You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?

    Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?

    This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.

    You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.

    We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.

    And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
    Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.
    People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.

    Every billionaire is a policy failure.
    Bernie 5 years ago said every millionaire was a failure - then changed to billionaire when he became a millionaire.
    it is a game of waiting I guess
    I mean, we both know he didn’t. Not sure what the point of this lie is.

    “Bernie said this”

    -bunch of tweets where Bernie doesn’t say it-

    I’ve been bludgeoned.
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967

    LebamDawg said:


    Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl



    wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.

    Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.
    I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.
    Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.

    In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
    You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?

    Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?

    This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.

    You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.

    We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.

    And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
    Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.
    People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.

    Every billionaire is a policy failure.
    Bernie 5 years ago said every millionaire was a failure - then changed to billionaire when he became a millionaire.
    it is a game of waiting I guess

    LebamDawg said:


    Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl



    wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.

    Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.
    I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.
    Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.

    In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
    You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?

    Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?

    This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.

    You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.

    We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.

    And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
    Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.
    People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.

    Every billionaire is a policy failure.
    Bernie 5 years ago said every millionaire was a failure - then changed to billionaire when he became a millionaire.
    it is a game of waiting I guess
    I mean, we both know he didn’t. Not sure what the point of this lie is.

    “Bernie said this”

    -bunch of tweets where Bernie doesn’t say it-

    I’ve been bludgeoned.
    Bernie is a Commie son, find another hero.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,593 Standard Supporter

    LebamDawg said:


    Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl



    wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.

    Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.
    I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.
    Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.

    In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
    You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?

    Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?

    This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.

    You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.

    We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.

    And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
    Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.
    People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.

    Every billionaire is a policy failure.
    Bernie 5 years ago said every millionaire was a failure - then changed to billionaire when he became a millionaire.
    it is a game of waiting I guess

    LebamDawg said:


    Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl



    wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.

    Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.
    I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.
    Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.

    In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
    You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?

    Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?

    This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.

    You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.

    We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.

    And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
    Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.
    People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.

    Every billionaire is a policy failure.
    Bernie 5 years ago said every millionaire was a failure - then changed to billionaire when he became a millionaire.
    it is a game of waiting I guess
    I mean, we both know he didn’t. Not sure what the point of this lie is.

    “Bernie said this”

    -bunch of tweets where Bernie doesn’t say it-

    I’ve been bludgeoned.
    We know you've been bludgeoned. No other possible way you get that stupid.
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,515 Founders Club
    hardhat said:


    Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl



    wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.

    Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.
    I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.
    Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.

    In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
    You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?

    Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?

    This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.

    You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.

    We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.

    And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
    Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.
    People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.

    Every billionaire is a policy failure.
    And that's what kills new ideas and innovation.

    Billionaires or the drive to be one are the reasons why we don't drive this to work.


    What do you drive them on?
    How do you pay your rent?
    ISWYDT. Bravo.
  • Swaye
    Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,741 Founders Club


    Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl



    wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.

    Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.
    I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.
    Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.

    In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
    You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?

    Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?

    This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.

    You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.

    We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.

    And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
    Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.
    People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.

    Every billionaire is a policy failure.
    And that's what kills new ideas and innovation.

    Billionaires or the drive to be one are the reasons why we don't drive this to work.


    Is that a Trabant?
    It's a capybara