Fascism is a right wing ideology
Comments
-
Is that a Trabant?greenblood said:
And that's what kills new ideas and innovation.TheKobeStopper said:
People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.greenblood said:
Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.TheKobeStopper said:
You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.TheKobeStopper said:
I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.TheKobeStopper said:Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl

wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.
In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?
This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.
You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.
We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.
And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
Every billionaire is a policy failure.
Billionaires or the drive to be one are the reasons why we don't drive this to work.
-
As long as everyone has the exact same one, then that’s progress.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Is that a Trabant?greenblood said:
And that's what kills new ideas and innovation.TheKobeStopper said:
People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.greenblood said:
Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.TheKobeStopper said:
You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.TheKobeStopper said:
I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.TheKobeStopper said:Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl

wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.
In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?
This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.
You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.
We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.
And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
Every billionaire is a policy failure.
Billionaires or the drive to be one are the reasons why we don't drive this to work.
-
What do you drive them on?greenblood said:
And that's what kills new ideas and innovation.TheKobeStopper said:
People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.greenblood said:
Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.TheKobeStopper said:
You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.TheKobeStopper said:
I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.TheKobeStopper said:Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl

wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.
In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?
This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.
You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.
We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.
And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
Every billionaire is a policy failure.
Billionaires or the drive to be one are the reasons why we don't drive this to work.
-
Obama’s roads
-
How do you pay your rent?TheKobeStopper said:
What do you drive them on?greenblood said:
And that's what kills new ideas and innovation.TheKobeStopper said:
People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.greenblood said:
Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.TheKobeStopper said:
You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.TheKobeStopper said:
I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.TheKobeStopper said:Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl

wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.
In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?
This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.
You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.
We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.
And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
Every billionaire is a policy failure.
Billionaires or the drive to be one are the reasons why we don't drive this to work.
-
LebamDawg said:
Bernie 5 years ago said every millionaire was a failure - then changed to billionaire when he became a millionaire.TheKobeStopper said:
People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.greenblood said:
Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.TheKobeStopper said:
You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.TheKobeStopper said:
I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.TheKobeStopper said:Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl

wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.
In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?
This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.
You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.
We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.
And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
Every billionaire is a policy failure.
it is a game of waiting I guess
“Bernie said this”UW_Doog_Bot said:TheKobeStopper said:
I mean, we both know he didn’t. Not sure what the point of this lie is.LebamDawg said:
Bernie 5 years ago said every millionaire was a failure - then changed to billionaire when he became a millionaire.TheKobeStopper said:
People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.greenblood said:
Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.TheKobeStopper said:
You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.TheKobeStopper said:
I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.TheKobeStopper said:Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl

wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.
In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?
This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.
You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.
We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.
And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
Every billionaire is a policy failure.
it is a game of waiting I guess
-bunch of tweets where Bernie doesn’t say it-
I’ve been bludgeoned. -
Bernie is a Commie son, find another hero.TheKobeStopper said:LebamDawg said:
Bernie 5 years ago said every millionaire was a failure - then changed to billionaire when he became a millionaire.TheKobeStopper said:
People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.greenblood said:
Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.TheKobeStopper said:
You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.TheKobeStopper said:
I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.TheKobeStopper said:Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl

wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.
In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?
This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.
You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.
We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.
And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
Every billionaire is a policy failure.
it is a game of waiting I guess
“Bernie said this”UW_Doog_Bot said:TheKobeStopper said:
I mean, we both know he didn’t. Not sure what the point of this lie is.LebamDawg said:
Bernie 5 years ago said every millionaire was a failure - then changed to billionaire when he became a millionaire.TheKobeStopper said:
People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.greenblood said:
Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.TheKobeStopper said:
You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.TheKobeStopper said:
I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.TheKobeStopper said:Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl

wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.
In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?
This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.
You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.
We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.
And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
Every billionaire is a policy failure.
it is a game of waiting I guess
-bunch of tweets where Bernie doesn’t say it-
I’ve been bludgeoned. -
We know you've been bludgeoned. No other possible way you get that stupid.TheKobeStopper said:LebamDawg said:
Bernie 5 years ago said every millionaire was a failure - then changed to billionaire when he became a millionaire.TheKobeStopper said:
People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.greenblood said:
Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.TheKobeStopper said:
You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.TheKobeStopper said:
I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.TheKobeStopper said:Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl

wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.
In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?
This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.
You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.
We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.
And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
Every billionaire is a policy failure.
it is a game of waiting I guess
“Bernie said this”UW_Doog_Bot said:TheKobeStopper said:
I mean, we both know he didn’t. Not sure what the point of this lie is.LebamDawg said:
Bernie 5 years ago said every millionaire was a failure - then changed to billionaire when he became a millionaire.TheKobeStopper said:
People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.greenblood said:
Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.TheKobeStopper said:
You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.TheKobeStopper said:
I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.TheKobeStopper said:Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl

wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.
In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?
This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.
You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.
We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.
And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
Every billionaire is a policy failure.
it is a game of waiting I guess
-bunch of tweets where Bernie doesn’t say it-
I’ve been bludgeoned. -
ISWYDT. Bravo.hardhat said:
How do you pay your rent?TheKobeStopper said:
What do you drive them on?greenblood said:
And that's what kills new ideas and innovation.TheKobeStopper said:
People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.greenblood said:
Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.TheKobeStopper said:
You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.TheKobeStopper said:
I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.TheKobeStopper said:Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl

wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.
In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?
This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.
You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.
We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.
And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
Every billionaire is a policy failure.
Billionaires or the drive to be one are the reasons why we don't drive this to work.
-
It's a capybaraGrundleStiltzkin said:
Is that a Trabant?greenblood said:
And that's what kills new ideas and innovation.TheKobeStopper said:
People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.greenblood said:
Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.TheKobeStopper said:
You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.TheKobeStopper said:
I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.TheKobeStopper said:Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl

wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.
In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?
This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.
You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.
We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.
And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
Every billionaire is a policy failure.
Billionaires or the drive to be one are the reasons why we don't drive this to work.







