Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Fascism is a right wing ideology
Comments
-
it is amazing zero homeless people die from Covid. Are they at 100% vaxx rate?Bendintheriver said:
I am amazed at how many leftists I hear calling to let the un-vaccinated die without any healthcare. They are saying this shit in public!Sledog said:Current regime is NAZI. They've turned the government and all its power on anyone opposing them along with their partners in media, big tech and big industry all in lock step oppressing all dissent, speech and even basic necessities all while attacking them physically with their brown shirts IE: ANTIFA and BLM.
Fuck off Nazi boy toy!
The lack of humanity on the left for those that disagree with them politically is astounding and begs the comparison to some of the heartless regimes in history.
Good job, homeless people. Way to fall in line.
-
Kobe, when do the struggle session start on the way to your socialist utopia? Are you a college grad Kobe? You’ll get your turn if so.TheKobeStopper said:
You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.TheKobeStopper said:
I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.TheKobeStopper said:Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl
wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.
In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?
This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.
You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.
We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.
And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic. -
Bernie the Commie being a millionaire is concrete proof that he’s a liar and Kobe is a GD fool for believing anything that grifter says. Kobe talks about Trump while Bernie feeds at the gov’t trough and grows somehow richer on a Senators salary.LebamDawg said:
Bernie 5 years ago said every millionaire was a failure - then changed to billionaire when he became a millionaire.TheKobeStopper said:
People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.greenblood said:
Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.TheKobeStopper said:
You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.TheKobeStopper said:
I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.TheKobeStopper said:Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl
wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.
In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?
This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.
You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.
We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.
And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
Every billionaire is a policy failure.
it is a game of waiting I guess -
Don't worry the little gold stars of David or something similar is next. Nazi's Nazi. Right TKS?Bendintheriver said:
I am amazed at how many leftists I hear calling to let the un-vaccinated die without any healthcare. They are saying this shit in public!Sledog said:Current regime is NAZI. They've turned the government and all its power on anyone opposing them along with their partners in media, big tech and big industry all in lock step oppressing all dissent, speech and even basic necessities all while attacking them physically with their brown shirts IE: ANTIFA and BLM.
Fuck off Nazi boy toy!
The lack of humanity on the left for those that disagree with them politically is astounding and begs the comparison to some of the heartless regimes in history. -
Kobe, was Che’ a good guy? Did he really help the people of Cuba?
-
TheKobeStopper said:
I mean, we both know he didn’t. Not sure what the point of this lie is.LebamDawg said:
Bernie 5 years ago said every millionaire was a failure - then changed to billionaire when he became a millionaire.TheKobeStopper said:
People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.greenblood said:
Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.TheKobeStopper said:
You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.TheKobeStopper said:
I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.TheKobeStopper said:Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl
wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.
In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?
This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.
You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.
We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.
And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
Every billionaire is a policy failure.
it is a game of waiting I guess
-
Wait so Kobe lied and people died?
-
Swaye said:
My favorite part of the Pump and Dump is watching @UW_Doog_Bot absolutely bludgeon HHusky and Kobe with knowledge every time they engage. It's Globetrotters vs. Generals level decimation. Really hilarious to watch.
-
Of course the slobberer doesn't understand basic economics. When you base your economics on the labor theory of value then you have built your house on a foundation of sand. Labor value is not determined by how hard you work, but on what the market (supply and demand) determines the value of your labor to be. At the basic level, if a farmer trades a pig to a shoemaker for shoes for the family, then wealth is created. That is both parties are better off after the trade than before. Leftards "feel" that the US economy is a zero sum game. But then ask any leftard to explain how Steve Jobs has stolen money from the underclass and they can't because Apple didn't steal anything. Wealth was created. Just like Seattle is far wealthier than Portland. Just look at Microsoft and Amazon. Just like South Korea is wealthier than North Korea. Or Chile and Cuba.Bob_C said:
Clearly you are still under the myth of zero sum economics. Government regulation is what super charges the disparities you are against, easy to absorb for giants, impossible for small competitors. Bad monetary policy prevents giants from collapsing when the market dictates that they should.TheKobeStopper said:
People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.greenblood said:
Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.TheKobeStopper said:
You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.TheKobeStopper said:
I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.TheKobeStopper said:Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl
wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.
In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?
This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.
You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.
We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.
And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
Every billionaire is a policy failure.
You see the problems, but dont understand the causes.
-
Microsoft has made billions
How much have companies and individuals made using Microsoft products. Time is money.
The answer is a lot
Again being old as dirt I remember when the fax machine became common. A revolutionary business tool. Barely got in before the email, internet, and software revolution
One man or woman can do the work of 10 same as it has always been with industrial revolutions yet the population is bigger than ever and there is more wealth than ever
The best chance for the most people remains capitalism. Preferably without retard socialists mucking it up -
This is why economics as a curriculum has been eliminated from public schooling. Meanwhile we aren't not teaching CRT and gender studies.hardhat said:
If leftists understood economics, they wouldn't be leftists.TheKobeStopper said:
You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.TheKobeStopper said:
I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.TheKobeStopper said:Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl
wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.
In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?
This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.
You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.
We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.
And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic. -
Bernie was always a millionaire. If he wasn’t before his book deal then he has no business running a budget committee. It’s not that hard to be a millionaire, almost impossible on a government salary.UW_Doog_Bot said:TheKobeStopper said:
I mean, we both know he didn’t. Not sure what the point of this lie is.LebamDawg said:
Bernie 5 years ago said every millionaire was a failure - then changed to billionaire when he became a millionaire.TheKobeStopper said:
People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.greenblood said:
Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.TheKobeStopper said:
You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.TheKobeStopper said:
I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.TheKobeStopper said:Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl
wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.
In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?
This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.
You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.
We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.
And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
Every billionaire is a policy failure.
it is a game of waiting I guess -
Such an obvious point, but the slobberer clings to the North Korean economic model. No private ownership of the land means no agricultural production. But who needs or wants food for their family?RaceBannon said:Microsoft has made billions
How much have companies and individuals made using Microsoft products. Time is money.
The answer is a lot
Again being old as dirt I remember when the fax machine became common. A revolutionary business tool. Barely got in before the email, internet, and software revolution
One man or woman can do the work of 10 same as it has always been with industrial revolutions yet the population is bigger than ever and there is more wealth than ever
The best chance for the most people remains capitalism. Preferably without retard socialists mucking it up -
Would you really have faith in an economics class taught by the current crop of public school teachers? They'd do as good a job with that as they now do with nearly all subjects.UW_Doog_Bot said:
This is why economics as a curriculum has been eliminated from public schooling. Meanwhile we aren't not teaching CRT and gender studies.hardhat said:
If leftists understood economics, they wouldn't be leftists.TheKobeStopper said:
You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.TheKobeStopper said:
I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.TheKobeStopper said:Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl
wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.
In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?
This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.
You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.
We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.
And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic. -
Personal finance and or basic accounting are better thing to teach in schools, tons of practicality.SFGbob said:
Would you really have faith in an economics class taught by the current crop of public school teachers? They'd do as good a job with that as they now do with nearly all subjects.UW_Doog_Bot said:
This is why economics as a curriculum has been eliminated from public schooling. Meanwhile we aren't not teaching CRT and gender studies.hardhat said:
If leftists understood economics, they wouldn't be leftists.TheKobeStopper said:
You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.TheKobeStopper said:
I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.TheKobeStopper said:Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl
wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.
In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?
This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.
You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.
We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.
And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
Basic probabilities and statistical analysis is widely not understood either.
Economics is very theoretical in many senses, as we’ve seen from this thread easy to misinterpret or construe with insanity. -
Disagree, supply and demand aren't theoretical but the basics for understanding how capitalism works. Facebook and Google are now monopolies and should be broken up. Competition is good for the economy and freedom and liberty. I agree that finance and basic accounting should be taught in the public schools. All Americans should understand an income statement, a balance sheet and cash flow. Our current MSM is the most poorly educated media in our country's history. There isn't one leftard on the Pump that I would describe as truly educated in the basics of science, math, history and economics. Anyone voting for the dementia patient and supporting Fow Chee is not only not educated but what they think they know is wrong.Bob_C said:
Personal finance and or basic accounting are better thing to teach in schools, tons of practicality.SFGbob said:
Would you really have faith in an economics class taught by the current crop of public school teachers? They'd do as good a job with that as they now do with nearly all subjects.UW_Doog_Bot said:
This is why economics as a curriculum has been eliminated from public schooling. Meanwhile we aren't not teaching CRT and gender studies.hardhat said:
If leftists understood economics, they wouldn't be leftists.TheKobeStopper said:
You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.TheKobeStopper said:
I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.TheKobeStopper said:Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl
wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.
In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?
This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.
You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.
We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.
And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
Basic probabilities and statistical analysis is widely not understood either.
Economics is very theoretical in many senses, as we’ve seen from this thread easy to misinterpret or construe with insanity. -
Ftr I had an excellent Econ teacher at public. That was all he did. It's what grounded my interest and ability in the subject going forward. It was still only a semester senior year though and this was 20 yrs ago.SFGbob said:
Would you really have faith in an economics class taught by the current crop of public school teachers? They'd do as good a job with that as they now do with nearly all subjects.UW_Doog_Bot said:
This is why economics as a curriculum has been eliminated from public schooling. Meanwhile we aren't not teaching CRT and gender studies.hardhat said:
If leftists understood economics, they wouldn't be leftists.TheKobeStopper said:
You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.TheKobeStopper said:
I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.TheKobeStopper said:Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl
wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.
In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?
This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.
You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.
We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.
And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
It's better than hiring ethnic studies majors to teach CRT even if done poorly. -
This, classical economics is pretty easy, straightforward, and barebones but super important.WestlinnDuck said:
Disagree, supply and demand aren't theoretical but the basics for understanding how capitalism works. Facebook and Google are now monopolies and should be broken up. Competition is good for the economy and freedom and liberty. I agree that finance and basic accounting should be taught in the public schools. All Americans should understand an income statement, a balance sheet and cash flow. Our current MSM is the most poorly educated media in our country's history. There isn't one leftard on the Pump that I would describe as truly educated in the basics of science, math, history and economics. Anyone voting for the dementia patient and supporting Fow Chee is not only not educated but what they think they know is wrong.Bob_C said:
Personal finance and or basic accounting are better thing to teach in schools, tons of practicality.SFGbob said:
Would you really have faith in an economics class taught by the current crop of public school teachers? They'd do as good a job with that as they now do with nearly all subjects.UW_Doog_Bot said:
This is why economics as a curriculum has been eliminated from public schooling. Meanwhile we aren't not teaching CRT and gender studies.hardhat said:
If leftists understood economics, they wouldn't be leftists.TheKobeStopper said:
You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.TheKobeStopper said:
I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.TheKobeStopper said:Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl
wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.
In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?
This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.
You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.
We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.
And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
Basic probabilities and statistical analysis is widely not understood either.
Economics is very theoretical in many senses, as we’ve seen from this thread easy to misinterpret or construe with insanity.
Look no further than our resident leftists to see how an ignorance of basic concepts can be abused by those seeking power. -
Exactly, the basics get you in the door. Same with math and science. You don't need to have three years of geometry. You just need to be able to add, subtract, understand percentages and multiplication/division and basic algebra.UW_Doog_Bot said:
This, classical economics is pretty easy, straightforward, and barebones but super important.WestlinnDuck said:
Disagree, supply and demand aren't theoretical but the basics for understanding how capitalism works. Facebook and Google are now monopolies and should be broken up. Competition is good for the economy and freedom and liberty. I agree that finance and basic accounting should be taught in the public schools. All Americans should understand an income statement, a balance sheet and cash flow. Our current MSM is the most poorly educated media in our country's history. There isn't one leftard on the Pump that I would describe as truly educated in the basics of science, math, history and economics. Anyone voting for the dementia patient and supporting Fow Chee is not only not educated but what they think they know is wrong.Bob_C said:
Personal finance and or basic accounting are better thing to teach in schools, tons of practicality.SFGbob said:
Would you really have faith in an economics class taught by the current crop of public school teachers? They'd do as good a job with that as they now do with nearly all subjects.UW_Doog_Bot said:
This is why economics as a curriculum has been eliminated from public schooling. Meanwhile we aren't not teaching CRT and gender studies.hardhat said:
If leftists understood economics, they wouldn't be leftists.TheKobeStopper said:
You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.TheKobeStopper said:
I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.TheKobeStopper said:Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl
wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.
In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?
This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.
You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.
We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.
And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
Basic probabilities and statistical analysis is widely not understood either.
Economics is very theoretical in many senses, as we’ve seen from this thread easy to misinterpret or construe with insanity.
Look no further than our resident leftists to see how an ignorance of basic concepts can be abused by those seeking power. -
And that's what kills new ideas and innovation.TheKobeStopper said:
People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.greenblood said:
Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.TheKobeStopper said:
You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.TheKobeStopper said:
I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.TheKobeStopper said:Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl
wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.
In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?
This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.
You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.
We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.
And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
Every billionaire is a policy failure.
Billionaires or the drive to be one are the reasons why we don't drive this to work.
-
Is that a Trabant?greenblood said:
And that's what kills new ideas and innovation.TheKobeStopper said:
People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.greenblood said:
Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.TheKobeStopper said:
You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.TheKobeStopper said:
I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.TheKobeStopper said:Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl
wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.
In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?
This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.
You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.
We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.
And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
Every billionaire is a policy failure.
Billionaires or the drive to be one are the reasons why we don't drive this to work. -
As long as everyone has the exact same one, then that’s progress.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Is that a Trabant?greenblood said:
And that's what kills new ideas and innovation.TheKobeStopper said:
People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.greenblood said:
Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.TheKobeStopper said:
You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.TheKobeStopper said:
I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.TheKobeStopper said:Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl
wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.
In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?
This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.
You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.
We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.
And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
Every billionaire is a policy failure.
Billionaires or the drive to be one are the reasons why we don't drive this to work. -
What do you drive them on?greenblood said:
And that's what kills new ideas and innovation.TheKobeStopper said:
People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.greenblood said:
Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.TheKobeStopper said:
You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.TheKobeStopper said:
I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.TheKobeStopper said:Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl
wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.
In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?
This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.
You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.
We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.
And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
Every billionaire is a policy failure.
Billionaires or the drive to be one are the reasons why we don't drive this to work. -
Obama’s roads
-
How do you pay your rent?TheKobeStopper said:
What do you drive them on?greenblood said:
And that's what kills new ideas and innovation.TheKobeStopper said:
People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.greenblood said:
Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.TheKobeStopper said:
You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.TheKobeStopper said:
I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.TheKobeStopper said:Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl
wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.
In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?
This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.
You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.
We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.
And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
Every billionaire is a policy failure.
Billionaires or the drive to be one are the reasons why we don't drive this to work. -
LebamDawg said:
Bernie 5 years ago said every millionaire was a failure - then changed to billionaire when he became a millionaire.TheKobeStopper said:
People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.greenblood said:
Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.TheKobeStopper said:
You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.TheKobeStopper said:
I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.TheKobeStopper said:Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl
wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.
In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?
This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.
You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.
We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.
And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
Every billionaire is a policy failure.
it is a game of waiting I guess
“Bernie said this”UW_Doog_Bot said:TheKobeStopper said:
I mean, we both know he didn’t. Not sure what the point of this lie is.LebamDawg said:
Bernie 5 years ago said every millionaire was a failure - then changed to billionaire when he became a millionaire.TheKobeStopper said:
People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.greenblood said:
Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.TheKobeStopper said:
You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.TheKobeStopper said:
I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.TheKobeStopper said:Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl
wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.
In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?
This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.
You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.
We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.
And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
Every billionaire is a policy failure.
it is a game of waiting I guess
-bunch of tweets where Bernie doesn’t say it-
I’ve been bludgeoned. -
Bernie is a Commie son, find another hero.TheKobeStopper said:LebamDawg said:
Bernie 5 years ago said every millionaire was a failure - then changed to billionaire when he became a millionaire.TheKobeStopper said:
People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.greenblood said:
Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.TheKobeStopper said:
You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.TheKobeStopper said:
I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.TheKobeStopper said:Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl
wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.
In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?
This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.
You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.
We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.
And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
Every billionaire is a policy failure.
it is a game of waiting I guess
“Bernie said this”UW_Doog_Bot said:TheKobeStopper said:
I mean, we both know he didn’t. Not sure what the point of this lie is.LebamDawg said:
Bernie 5 years ago said every millionaire was a failure - then changed to billionaire when he became a millionaire.TheKobeStopper said:
People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.greenblood said:
Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.TheKobeStopper said:
You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.TheKobeStopper said:
I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.TheKobeStopper said:Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl
wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.
In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?
This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.
You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.
We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.
And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
Every billionaire is a policy failure.
it is a game of waiting I guess
-bunch of tweets where Bernie doesn’t say it-
I’ve been bludgeoned. -
We know you've been bludgeoned. No other possible way you get that stupid.TheKobeStopper said:LebamDawg said:
Bernie 5 years ago said every millionaire was a failure - then changed to billionaire when he became a millionaire.TheKobeStopper said:
People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.greenblood said:
Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.TheKobeStopper said:
You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.TheKobeStopper said:
I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.TheKobeStopper said:Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl
wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.
In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?
This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.
You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.
We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.
And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
Every billionaire is a policy failure.
it is a game of waiting I guess
“Bernie said this”UW_Doog_Bot said:TheKobeStopper said:
I mean, we both know he didn’t. Not sure what the point of this lie is.LebamDawg said:
Bernie 5 years ago said every millionaire was a failure - then changed to billionaire when he became a millionaire.TheKobeStopper said:
People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.greenblood said:
Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.TheKobeStopper said:
You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.TheKobeStopper said:
I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.TheKobeStopper said:Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl
wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.
In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?
This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.
You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.
We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.
And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
Every billionaire is a policy failure.
it is a game of waiting I guess
-bunch of tweets where Bernie doesn’t say it-
I’ve been bludgeoned. -
ISWYDT. Bravo.hardhat said:
How do you pay your rent?TheKobeStopper said:
What do you drive them on?greenblood said:
And that's what kills new ideas and innovation.TheKobeStopper said:
People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.greenblood said:
Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.TheKobeStopper said:
You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.TheKobeStopper said:
I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.TheKobeStopper said:Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl
wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.
In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?
This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.
You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.
We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.
And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
Every billionaire is a policy failure.
Billionaires or the drive to be one are the reasons why we don't drive this to work. -
It's a capybaraGrundleStiltzkin said:
Is that a Trabant?greenblood said:
And that's what kills new ideas and innovation.TheKobeStopper said:
People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.greenblood said:
Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.TheKobeStopper said:
You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.TheKobeStopper said:
I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.TheKobeStopper said:Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl
wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.
In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?
This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.
You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.
We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.
And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
Every billionaire is a policy failure.
Billionaires or the drive to be one are the reasons why we don't drive this to work.
