Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Fascism is a right wing ideology

UW_Doog_Bot
UW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 18,180 Founders Club
in Tug Tavern
Except that it's spawned directly from Marxism and socialism and is only "right" from communism.

https://youtu.be/l3FiBPxGxyk

Tldw that guy Mussolini had some stuff to say about it.

@TheKobeStopper will continue to lie and not address this thread. There's a reason Leftists are obsessed with labeling everyone else fascists.
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«13

Comments

  • TheKobeStopper
    TheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl



    wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Bendintheriver
    Bendintheriver Member Posts: 7,041 Standard Supporter
    edited October 2021
    Jeezus. Please tell me you aren't a result of public education.

    Mein Kampf is your bible. It is exactly what you progressives want. Everyone thinking, acting, saying and believing exactly what you want them to do. In the meantime, your government controls all and rewards only those that believe what it does.

    You suck. If you were to see me face to face and try to force me to do what fascists like you want me to do I would kick your ever loving ass from here to China.

    The shit you and your non-gender snowflakes preach is worthy of a beat down. It is time for Americans to fight back.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TheKobeStopper
    TheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    Bendintheriver said:

    Jeezus. Please tell me you aren't a result of public education.

    Mein Kampf is your bible. It is exactly what you progressives want. Everyone thinking, acting, saying and believing exactly what you want them to do. In the meantime, your government controls all and rewards only those that believe what it does.

    You suck. If you were to see me face to face and try to force me to do what fascists like you want me to do I would kick your ever loving ass from here to China.

    The shit you and your non-gender snowflakes preach is worthy of a beat down. It is time for Americans to fight back.

    Which 7-11 should we meet at?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TheKobeStopper
    TheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    TheKobeStopper said:

    Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl



    wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.

    Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.
    I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,709 Founders Club
    TheKobeStopper said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    Jeezus. Please tell me you aren't a result of public education.

    Mein Kampf is your bible. It is exactly what you progressives want. Everyone thinking, acting, saying and believing exactly what you want them to do. In the meantime, your government controls all and rewards only those that believe what it does.

    You suck. If you were to see me face to face and try to force me to do what fascists like you want me to do I would kick your ever loving ass from here to China.

    The shit you and your non-gender snowflakes preach is worthy of a beat down. It is time for Americans to fight back.

    Which 7-11 should we meet at?
    Vantage
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TheKobeStopper
    TheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    TheKobeStopper said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    TheKobeStopper said:

    Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl



    wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.

    Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.
    I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.
    Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.

    In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
    You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?

    Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?

    This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.

    You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.

    We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.

    And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TheKobeStopper
    TheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    TheKobeStopper said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    TheKobeStopper said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    TheKobeStopper said:

    Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl



    wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.

    Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.
    I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.
    Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.

    In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
    You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?

    Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?

    This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.

    You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.

    We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.

    And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
    It's cute that you think this. The history of the West vs. The Soviet block(or any other Marxist system) is pretty telling as to which system allows for the common idiot to accumulate capital.
    Capitalism worked and it has been a giant leap forward for civilization. That doesn’t make any of what I said less true.

    Socialism and communism, whether true or in name only, has failed. That doesn’t make a single word of what I just said less true.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,560
    TheKobeStopper said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    TheKobeStopper said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    TheKobeStopper said:

    Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl



    wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.

    Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.
    I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.
    Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.

    In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
    You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?

    Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?

    This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.

    You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.

    We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.

    And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
    Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TheKobeStopper
    TheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    Bob_C said:

    TheKobeStopper said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    TheKobeStopper said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    TheKobeStopper said:

    Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl



    wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.

    Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.
    I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.
    Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.

    In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
    You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?

    Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?

    This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.

    You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.

    We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.

    And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
    We should give more money and more power to the state it sounds like.
    This is preferable than more money and more power to the capitalists who are showing you, right now, they’ll just use it to control the state.

    We have a democracy, that gives the people power. The state doesn’t run independently. But you won’t vote for the people trying to prevent the capitalists from controlling our government. Because, SOMEHOW, both are communism.

    The state and capital merging, that’s a communism.

    AOC and Bernie trying to prevent it, that’s a communism.

    It’s bizarre.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TheKobeStopper
    TheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    greenblood said:


    TheKobeStopper said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    TheKobeStopper said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    TheKobeStopper said:

    Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl



    wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.

    Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.
    I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.
    Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.

    In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
    You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?

    Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?

    This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.

    You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.

    We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.

    And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
    Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.
    People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.

    Every billionaire is a policy failure.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,616 Standard Supporter
    TheKobeStopper said:

    greenblood said:


    TheKobeStopper said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    TheKobeStopper said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    TheKobeStopper said:

    Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl



    wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.

    Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.
    I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.
    Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.

    In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
    You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?

    Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?

    This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.

    You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.

    We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.

    And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
    Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.
    People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.

    Every billionaire is a policy failure.
    Putin, Xi, Castro and Chavez are/were billionaires. Value added like Steve Jobs? Phuck off you uneducated moron.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,709 Founders Club
    TheKobeStopper said:

    greenblood said:


    TheKobeStopper said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    TheKobeStopper said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    TheKobeStopper said:

    Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl



    wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.

    Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.
    I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.
    Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.

    In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
    You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?

    Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?

    This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.

    You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.

    We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.

    And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
    Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.
    People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.

    Every billionaire is a policy failure.
    Clearly you are still under the myth of zero sum economics. Government regulation is what super charges the disparities you are against, easy to absorb for giants, impossible for small competitors. Bad monetary policy prevents giants from collapsing when the market dictates that they should.

    You see the problems, but dont understand the causes.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TheKobeStopper
    TheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    WestlinnDuck said:

    TheKobeStopper said:

    greenblood said:


    TheKobeStopper said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    TheKobeStopper said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    TheKobeStopper said:

    Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl



    wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.

    Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.
    I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.
    Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.

    In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
    You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?

    Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?

    This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.

    You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.

    We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.

    And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
    Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.
    People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.

    Every billionaire is a policy failure.
    Putin, Xi, Castro and Chavez are/were billionaires. Value added like Steve Jobs? Phuck off you uneducated moron.
    Known communist Vladimir Putin???????

    It’s literally “whatever I don’t like is communism”. Sad!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TheKobeStopper
    TheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    LebamDawg said:

    TheKobeStopper said:

    greenblood said:


    TheKobeStopper said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    TheKobeStopper said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    TheKobeStopper said:

    Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl



    wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.

    Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.
    I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.
    Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.

    In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital, and a limited state.
    You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?

    Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?

    This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.

    You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.

    We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.

    And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.
    Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.
    People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.

    Every billionaire is a policy failure.
    Bernie 5 years ago said every millionaire was a failure - then changed to billionaire when he became a millionaire.
    it is a game of waiting I guess
    I mean, we both know he didn’t. Not sure what the point of this lie is.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,825 Standard Supporter
    Current regime is NAZI. They've turned the government and all its power on anyone opposing them along with their partners in media, big tech and big industry all in lock step oppressing all dissent, speech and even basic necessities all while attacking them physically with their brown shirts IE: ANTIFA and BLM.

    Fuck off Nazi boy toy!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Bendintheriver
    Bendintheriver Member Posts: 7,041 Standard Supporter
    Sledog said:

    Current regime is NAZI. They've turned the government and all its power on anyone opposing them along with their partners in media, big tech and big industry all in lock step oppressing all dissent, speech and even basic necessities all while attacking them physically with their brown shirts IE: ANTIFA and BLM.

    Fuck off Nazi boy toy!

    I am amazed at how many leftists I hear calling to let the un-vaccinated die without any healthcare. They are saying this shit in public!

    The lack of humanity on the left for those that disagree with them politically is astounding and begs the comparison to some of the heartless regimes in history.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BleachedAnusDawg
    BleachedAnusDawg Member Posts: 13,293 Standard Supporter
    TheKobeStopper said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    TheKobeStopper said:

    Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl



    wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.

    Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.
    I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.
    Ignorant loser.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,084 Founders Club
    Bendintheriver said:

    Sledog said:

    Current regime is NAZI. They've turned the government and all its power on anyone opposing them along with their partners in media, big tech and big industry all in lock step oppressing all dissent, speech and even basic necessities all while attacking them physically with their brown shirts IE: ANTIFA and BLM.

    Fuck off Nazi boy toy!

    I am amazed at how many leftists I hear calling to let the un-vaccinated die without any healthcare. They are saying this shit in public!

    The lack of humanity on the left for those that disagree with them politically is astounding and begs the comparison to some of the heartless regimes in history.
    We should put them in charge of all healthcare
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter