New Hype Video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X2nlNc6lcpIComments
-
Stopped watching after four seconds.
-
Why do you hate Keith Jackson?TierbsHsotBoobs said:Stopped watching after four seconds.
-
Huh?BlowItUp said:
Why do you hate Keith Jackson?TierbsHsotBoobs said:Stopped watching after four seconds.
I saw black and white film and lost interest.
The past is for Doogs. -
"Solid wall of purple"
I like it. Might be a good name for our defense this year. -
One of the better videos I've seen ...
BRB, got to change the sweatpants -
There was never and there will never be a time where we go undefeated every year, our coaches don't make mistakes and our kids play perfectly. There was never and there will never be a time when we go 10 years without blowing a bunch of games we shouldn't or getting close to a new level and don't quite get there.
However, that's not why I enjoy Husky football. I like it because it's a meaningful tradition for me and my family and the reason I hated Gilby/Ty/Sark was because they weren't living up to the standards for what we can be as a program. Rick wasn't in '01 and '02 either and Lambo had about 2 games his whole career where he looked like he could coach (as a HC).
Finally, we have a coach that comes here with the kind of pedigree everyone around here thought we should be able to hire in the first fucking place... I'm fucking excited.
The point of hating Ty/Gilby/Sark etc. wasn't saying anything but perfection should get a coach fired -- it was saying they don't mean the standards for fucking WASHINGTON (hi Aubs!) football.
How serious do we really need to be about this? Fuck Sark. He's gone and probably has a pretty bad suite of STDs to go along with his coke habit. He's where he belongs (well, obviously he belongs at a Chili's in Reseda weighing in at a busty 255 telling waitresses about his new gig as the OC for San Diego State, but whatever, that's quibbling) and fuck him.
I didn't become jaded because of Sark, I wanted him fucking gone so we could get a decent coach. We got one. We're about to start the season and I'm pumped.
Bring all the black and white footage and crisp fall afternoons on you want. Being a Doog is saying you wish Sark luck and that we should be thankful for his service. Being a Doog is embracing mediocrity and low standards.
Being a Doog is not looking at our 1990 team and thinking they didn't set a standard for us. Fuck that shit man.
If we're going to bash our 1990 team's Rose Bowl performance, I'm fucking OUT. -
Crisped.Dennis_DeYoung said:Fuck Sark. He's gone and probably has a pretty bad suite of STDs to go along with his coke habit. He's where he belongs (well, obviously he belongs at a Chili's in Reseda weighing in at a busty 255 telling waitresses about his new gig as the OC for San Diego State, but whatever, that's quibbling) and fuck him.
-
So. Awesome.
Dooging it up right now. Loved how they tied the past Rose Bowl success in with this current team. Rick said it best -- that's where we belong.
Fuck I want to run outside and tackle the first person I see. -
I like the ambition, but how about Peterman and company win something then pop off?Gladstone said:So. Awesome.
Dooging it up right now. Loved how they tied the past Rose Bowl success in with this current team. Rick said it best -- that's where we belong.
Fuck I want to run outside and tackle the first person I see.
Sark liked to tie himself to the Rose Bowl teams of the past too. -
10+ wins or Woodward fires him on the 50 yard line of the Apple Cup. Nothing changes. It's OK to get excited, boobs. We haven't had a real reason to be pumped up in over a decade.
-
92-12 is different than being able to say "man" and "cool" frequently.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I like the ambition, but how about Peterman and company win something then pop off?
Sark liked to tie himself to the Rose Bowl teams of the past too.
Petermen passes any reasonable test. Don't you want to be reasonable??!?!!11!?/@? -
Anybody that thinks that you're going to win at the highest levels every year has never played sports in their life. Winning is hard. The margin that separates winning and losing is often very, very small.
The reason I fell in love with Washington and why Saturday afternoons during the Fall mean so much to me is because of what it represents. It represents tradition. It represents work. It represents effort. It represents doing your best and giving your all. It represents playing for the person next to you as much and more than playing for yourself. And when all of those things are done right, it represents excellence at the highest level.
This is a world class institution located in one of the best cities in the world. We (the University, its alumni, and supporters) should never accept that we're not good enough. The only limit on how good we can be is ourselves and what we consider to be acceptable or not.
If we go 8-4 each year and are representative of what want, then I'm ok with that if that's the best that we can do. But if we go 8-4, we should have a burning drive to want to be better than 8-4 the next year.
And if there's anything about the last 10+ years it has been that those that have been guiding the University of Washington football program have not possessed the kind of drive and determination to be anything less than accepting of being mediocre (or worse).
I know that this is cliche, but the role of a football coach at a University isn't just to win football games, it's also to prepare his players for life after college. The great coaches are the ones where you look at his players 20 years after they graduate and they are successful regardless of whether they played professionally. For the first time since Don James, we have a coach leading this program that I honestly feel is 100% behind the success of our players both on and off the field. -
I'm excited for Peterman too, but if you're just here to suck his cock before he proves it at UW you're just another Doog.Dennis_DeYoung said:
92-12 is different than being able to say "man" and "cool" frequently.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I like the ambition, but how about Peterman and company win something then pop off?
Sark liked to tie himself to the Rose Bowl teams of the past too.
Petermen passes any reasonable test. Don't you want to be reasonable??!?!!11!?/@? -
pressing.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I'm excited for Peterman too, but if you're just here to suck his cock before he proves it at UW you're just another Doog.Dennis_DeYoung said:
92-12 is different than being able to say "man" and "cool" frequently.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I like the ambition, but how about Peterman and company win something then pop off?
Sark liked to tie himself to the Rose Bowl teams of the past too.
Petermen passes any reasonable test. Don't you want to be reasonable??!?!!11!?/@?
-
I am, in fact, here to suck his cock. I thought he would be here by now. Shit.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I'm excited for Peterman too, but if you're just here to suck his cock before he proves it at UW you're just another Doog.Dennis_DeYoung said:
92-12 is different than being able to say "man" and "cool" frequently.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I like the ambition, but how about Peterman and company win something then pop off?
Sark liked to tie himself to the Rose Bowl teams of the past too.
Petermen passes any reasonable test. Don't you want to be reasonable??!?!!11!?/@?
Fucking Craigslist bullshit.
-
Or remembering why we endured the first 0-12.BlowItUp said:
pressing.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I'm excited for Peterman too, but if you're just here to suck his cock before he proves it at UW you're just another Doog.Dennis_DeYoung said:
92-12 is different than being able to say "man" and "cool" frequently.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I like the ambition, but how about Peterman and company win something then pop off?
Sark liked to tie himself to the Rose Bowl teams of the past too.
Petermen passes any reasonable test. Don't you want to be reasonable??!?!!11!?/@? -
Doog post o' the week!Tequilla said:blah blah blah
But hey, Jay Roberts, Trevin Moore, and Michael Kay Green all wanted to upvote your poast, but doing so would violate the terms of their parole.
Let's be real - coaches coach and kids either learn or they don't. At the D-1 level, you're going to make some moral compromises, which everyone will forget if you W, JW.
-
I'm sure you aren't comparing Pete to Ty, so I wont twist your words.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Or remembering why we endured the first 0-12.BlowItUp said:
pressing.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I'm excited for Peterman too, but if you're just here to suck his cock before he proves it at UW you're just another Doog.Dennis_DeYoung said:
92-12 is different than being able to say "man" and "cool" frequently.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I like the ambition, but how about Peterman and company win something then pop off?
Sark liked to tie himself to the Rose Bowl teams of the past too.
Petermen passes any reasonable test. Don't you want to be reasonable??!?!!11!?/@? -
Of course not.BlowItUp said:
I'm sure you aren't comparing Pete to Ty, so I wont twist your words.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Or remembering why we endured the first 0-12.BlowItUp said:
pressing.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I'm excited for Peterman too, but if you're just here to suck his cock before he proves it at UW you're just another Doog.Dennis_DeYoung said:
92-12 is different than being able to say "man" and "cool" frequently.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I like the ambition, but how about Peterman and company win something then pop off?
Sark liked to tie himself to the Rose Bowl teams of the past too.
Petermen passes any reasonable test. Don't you want to be reasonable??!?!!11!?/@?
I'm just remembering the sense of entitlement and Doog loyalty that led to 0-12. Ty was a symptom of a much bigger disease. -
@TierbsHsotBoobs - lighten up man. If you remember why Owen Twelve happened it sure as shit wasn't because we'd just hired Urban Meyer and had a roster filled with talented people.
Also, I'm going to admit I'm confused by "first" Owen Twelve - because it seems to me that we've only had one. And if you're referencing Owen's twin brother Juan Anten, then fine... we got that because Gilby's manboobs swallowed the program.
Firing Neu, hiring Gilby and Ty then fixing that with hiring Sark is like drinking a shot of fireball to impress a chick, following that up with hole punching your own dick twice then doing another shot of fireball.
Peterman is nothing like any of those guys. I'm here to suck his cock literally, but not figuratively. Obviously he still has to do it, but count me as a person enjoying thinking about the future for the first time since Jan 2 '01.
If he doesn't do it, then he's gotta go like anyone else, but geez man -- let's fucking enjoy sanguinity. -
Sounds like you and your two dads had some crisp fall days at husky stadium. Walking to the stadium in a sea of purple and stuff.Dennis_DeYoung said:There was never and there will never be a time where we go undefeated every year, our coaches don't make mistakes and our kids play perfectly. There was never and there will never be a time when we go 10 years without blowing a bunch of games we shouldn't or getting close to a new level and don't quite get there.
However, that's not why I enjoy Husky football. I like it because it's a meaningful tradition for me and my family and the reason I hated Gilby/Ty/Sark was because they weren't living up to the standards for what we can be as a program. Rick wasn't in '01 and '02 either and Lambo had about 2 games his whole career where he looked like he could coach (as a HC).
Finally, we have a coach that comes here with the kind of pedigree everyone around here thought we should be able to hire in the first fucking place... I'm fucking excited.
The point of hating Ty/Gilby/Sark etc. wasn't saying anything but perfection should get a coach fired -- it was saying they don't mean the standards for fucking WASHINGTON (hi Aubs!) football.
How serious do we really need to be about this? Fuck Sark. He's gone and probably has a pretty bad suite of STDs to go along with his coke habit. He's where he belongs (well, obviously he belongs at a Chili's in Reseda weighing in at a busty 255 telling waitresses about his new gig as the OC for San Diego State, but whatever, that's quibbling) and fuck him.
I didn't become jaded because of Sark, I wanted him fucking gone so we could get a decent coach. We got one. We're about to start the season and I'm pumped.
Bring all the black and white footage and crisp fall afternoons on you want. Being a Doog is saying you wish Sark luck and that we should be thankful for his service. Being a Doog is embracing mediocrity and low standards.
Being a Doog is not looking at our 1990 team and thinking they didn't set a standard for us. Fuck that shit man.
If we're going to bash our 1990 team's Rose Bowl performance, I'm fucking OUT. -
Mom must be working late for you to be so brazen and leave the basement.Gladstone said:So. Awesome.
Dooging it up right now. Loved how they tied the past Rose Bowl success in with this current team. Rick said it best -- that's where we belong.
Fuck I want to run outside and tackle the first person I see. -
I'm crying right now because 30 years ago, me and my dads wearing purple were walking through the crowd and awaiting on a savior like Chris Peenersen so we could all suck his cock no questions asked. That's why this is so special.MikeDamone said:
Sounds like you and your two dads had some crisp fall days at husky stadium. Walking to the stadium in a sea of purple and stuff. -
Your worst effort. I will mainly focus on the bolded part. That is such cliché, doogish thinking. It's a fine goal for a coach, but it's impossible. Don James had plenty of players that struggled in life after leaving UW. Peterman will too. I guess Urban Meyer isn't a great coach either if we use your criteria. I don't and never will give a fuck about the players. I feel bad when I read about the ones who struggle in life, but that's basic humanity that I feel towards almost anyone. I just want to see the program I love win.Tequilla said:Anybody that thinks that you're going to win at the highest levels every year has never played sports in their life. Winning is hard. The margin that separates winning and losing is often very, very small.
The reason I fell in love with Washington and why Saturday afternoons during the Fall mean so much to me is because of what it represents. It represents tradition. It represents work. It represents effort. It represents doing your best and giving your all. It represents playing for the person next to you as much and more than playing for yourself. And when all of those things are done right, it represents excellence at the highest level.
This is a world class institution located in one of the best cities in the world. We (the University, its alumni, and supporters) should never accept that we're not good enough. The only limit on how good we can be is ourselves and what we consider to be acceptable or not.
If we go 8-4 each year and are representative of what want, then I'm ok with that if that's the best that we can do. But if we go 8-4, we should have a burning drive to want to be better than 8-4 the next year.
And if there's anything about the last 10+ years it has been that those that have been guiding the University of Washington football program have not possessed the kind of drive and determination to be anything less than accepting of being mediocre (or worse).
I know that this is cliche, but the role of a football coach at a University isn't just to win football games, it's also to prepare his players for life after college. The great coaches are the ones where you look at his players 20 years after they graduate and they are successful regardless of whether they played professionally. For the first time since Don James, we have a coach leading this program that I honestly feel is 100% behind the success of our players both on and off the field.
Also, 8-4 isn't good. It's fine if it happens once every 4 years as long as a Rose Bowl and another 10+ win season is mixed in. I don't care if we have a team full of choir boys who are great representatives of the university. 8-4 is shit and should never be accepted. -
Clearly the point that I was trying to make didn't come through well.
I'm not saying I'd be happy with 8-4 every year. But down years do happen. And if they do happen, then I want them to happen because we got the most out of team and that was the result. If that's the result, I want everybody to go back to the drawing board, the weight room, etc. and figure out how to make sure that 8-4 doesn't happen again.
And of course, there's always going to be situations where things don't work out, etc. down the road. However, there's countless examples of how great coaches make great impressions on kids and turn a life around. Maybe that makes me a sap, but that's one of the great things about college sports that I enjoy and makes me feel so strongly against the BS that people like Ed O'Bannon are trying to tear down.
Clearly a coach like Urban Meyer is a great coach. I obviously wouldn't hate him as the HC of the UW. However, at the same time, I feel like he's a professional coach coaching in college where winning is first, second, and third in importance. And winning is clearly important and not trying to belittle that fact.
However, I'm also not going to sit here and say that if you told me that we had a team full of Stringfellow's and Miles beating the shit out of people after the Super Bowl on the roster and the punishments were cursory to the point that there weren't any ramifications, then I'm not going to act like I'd be jumping up and down.
The strongest connections with teams are when the talent and results match the likability of the team. I'm not naive to think that the roster if full of choir boys. But at the same time, it makes it easier to root for guys like Ben Riva when they say that they are able to work in the offseason, etc and still be a good athlete. -
I'm glad I'm wearing gym shorts this morning. Gym shorts >>>>>> sweat pants for many angles of attack.
-
Tequilla said:
Anybody that thinks that you're going to win at the highest levels every year has never played sports in their life. Winning is hard. The margin that separates winning and losing is often very, very small.
#WeAreAlwaysARowingSchool -
My mom worked with a guy who tutored UW jocks on the side and I remember hearing about how much better/pleasant/studious the players were to deal with around 2005 than a few years before. In the fall of 2000, I remember walking on that path between Kane Hall and the Quad, and there were always all these thuggish looking players at this one particular corner. Every. Morning. I didn't like it much (especially when they hit on this blonde I wanted to bang...FMB rejection, sad story - faggy sad faceRoadDawg55 said:
Your worst effort. I will mainly focus on the bolded part. That is such cliché, doogish thinking. It's a fine goal for a coach, but it's impossible. Don James had plenty of players that struggled in life after leaving UW. Peterman will too. I guess Urban Meyer isn't a great coach either if we use your criteria. I don't and never will give a fuck about the players. I feel bad when I read about the ones who struggle in life, but that's basic humanity that I feel towards almost anyone. I just want to see the program I love win.Tequilla said:Anybody that thinks that you're going to win at the highest levels every year has never played sports in their life. Winning is hard. The margin that separates winning and losing is often very, very small.
The reason I fell in love with Washington and why Saturday afternoons during the Fall mean so much to me is because of what it represents. It represents tradition. It represents work. It represents effort. It represents doing your best and giving your all. It represents playing for the person next to you as much and more than playing for yourself. And when all of those things are done right, it represents excellence at the highest level.
This is a world class institution located in one of the best cities in the world. We (the University, its alumni, and supporters) should never accept that we're not good enough. The only limit on how good we can be is ourselves and what we consider to be acceptable or not.
If we go 8-4 each year and are representative of what want, then I'm ok with that if that's the best that we can do. But if we go 8-4, we should have a burning drive to want to be better than 8-4 the next year.
And if there's anything about the last 10+ years it has been that those that have been guiding the University of Washington football program have not possessed the kind of drive and determination to be anything less than accepting of being mediocre (or worse).
I know that this is cliche, but the role of a football coach at a University isn't just to win football games, it's also to prepare his players for life after college. The great coaches are the ones where you look at his players 20 years after they graduate and they are successful regardless of whether they played professionally. For the first time since Don James, we have a coach leading this program that I honestly feel is 100% behind the success of our players both on and off the field.
Also, 8-4 isn't good. It's fine if it happens once every 4 years as long as a Rose Bowl and another 10+ win season is mixed in. I don't care if we have a team full of choir boys who are great representatives of the university. 8-4 is shit and should never be accepted.
), but then again, the team went 11-1 and had a weak argument for the national championship. Ideally, yeah, most/all of the players would take school seriously, have good standardized test scores, have real majors, get good grades, and volunteer at the Gospel Mission on Sunday and win, then graduate. That's pretty much impossible.
I got really frustrated and jaded during all the losing and pretty much have a win at most/all costs attitude now. I'd prefer a good graduation rate and low amounts of crime, meatheads beating up people at frat parties, doing other moronic stuff etc., but never in exchange for wins. -
I don't think it's a world class institution. Nation class, yes.
-
I remember a lot of guys on that 2000 era team that were really good guys ... there were also more than a few idiots as well.
Back then, I didn't think less of the team or how much I wanted it to win because of the bad guys. There was a member of the 2000 team that came up from behind me on the basketball court and punched me in the back of the head. There were more than a few meatheads. But at the same time, there were a handful of other guys on that team that I got along with very well and it was a lot easier to root for those guys to have success.
Take a guy like Jameis Winston. He's clearly a talented player and we all wouldn't have a problem if he was the QB of the UW from a talent standpoint. Now, he's got his off the field issues and comes across as something between a meathead and an idiot at times. Would I not root for the UW if he was the QB? Of course not. But at the same time, I'm not going to sing his praises as the greatest thing since sliced bread either.
Same thing with Cyler Miles. He's probably the best QB on the roster, he's done some stupid things, paid for them, and earned his right back on the team. I hold no ill will to him. But at the same time, I'm not going to sit there and embrace him as this great kid that is doing everything the right way. I don't care who you are, beating up women isn't something that you just make a "mistake" at.
