Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Auburndawgs Preseason PAC-12 PowerRankings
Comments
-
Not necessarily.CuntWaffle said:When Sven's power rankings come out one thing will be certain...
Cal will still be to damn high!
Game. Of. The. Year.
-
Cal plays Portland State again this year?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Not necessarily.CuntWaffle said:When Sven's power rankings come out one thing will be certain...
Cal will still be to damn high!
Game. Of. The. Year.
-
No, they are keeping it local with the Big Sky this year, but earlier than that.CuntWaffle said:
Cal plays Portland State again this year?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Not necessarily.CuntWaffle said:When Sven's power rankings come out one thing will be certain...
Cal will still be to damn high!
Game. Of. The. Year. -
Disagree. I don't know how you could come to that conclusion. Oregon is substantially better than both programs. The only shot either team has is if Helfrich is a total disaster. Even if he is, there is probably enough talent to only lose 1 or 2 games unless the team quits.greenblood said:
UCLA is closer to Oregon than UW is to UCLA right now. UCLA has better overall talent and a same level head coach. Maybe unfair, but thanks to Sark's consistent level of mediocrity, UW needs to play a few games before we should automatically anoint them #2 in the PAC 12Vegasdawg said:I think a good case could be made for flip flopping UCLA and UW.
UCLA will most likely win the South, but they are slightly overrated. The national media has them as a top 5-10 team. I think 10-20 is more likely. They lost their best OL from a below average OL, Barr, Marsh, Zumwalt (Hi OBK!), and their #1 WR. They weren't a great defense last year with those guys. All 3 were picked in the NFL draft and won't be easy to replace. Mora has recruited very well, but they will be relying on some unproven guys. UW and Stanford are just as good going into the season, although it's fair to give UCLA a slight edge considering they have the best QB of the 3 teams.
Tier One: Oregon
Tier Two: UCLA, Stanford, UW
Tier Three: ASU, USC, Arizona, WSU, Oregon State
Tier Four: Utah, Colorado
Cal -
RoadDawg55 said:
Disagree. I don't know how you could come to that conclusion. Oregon is substantially better than both programs. The only shot either team has is if Helfrich is a total disaster. Even if he is, there is probably enough talent to only lose 1 or 2 games unless the team quits.greenblood said:
UCLA is closer to Oregon than UW is to UCLA right now. UCLA has better overall talent and a same level head coach. Maybe unfair, but thanks to Sark's consistent level of mediocrity, UW needs to play a few games before we should automatically anoint them #2 in the PAC 12Vegasdawg said:I think a good case could be made for flip flopping UCLA and UW.
UCLA will most likely win the South, but they are slightly overrated. The national media has them as a top 5-10 team. I think 10-20 is more likely. They lost their best OL from a below average OL, Barr, Marsh, Zumwalt (Hi OBK!), and their #1 WR. They weren't a great defense last year with those guys. All 3 were picked in the NFL draft and won't be easy to replase. Mora has recruited very well, but they will be relying on some unproven guys. UW and Stanford are just as good going into the season, although it's fair to give UCLA a slight edge considering they have the best QB of the 3 teams.
Tier One: Oregon
Tier Two: UCLA, Stanford, UW
Tier Three: ASU, USC, Arizona, WSU, Oregon State
Tier Four: Utah, Colorado
This
Cal -
PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Cougs are finishing in the top 6 of the North
-
Barely. And there are only five teams in the North division.HeretoBeatmyChest said:Cougs are finishing in the top 6 of the North
-
You think Oregon is good enough to only lose two games max if their coach is a disaster? WHAT THE FUCK? Do you think they are the greatest collection of talent of all time?RoadDawg55 said:
Disagree. I don't know how you could come to that conclusion. Oregon is substantially better than both programs. The only shot either team has is if Helfrich is a total disaster. Even if he is, there is probably enough talent to only lose 1 or 2 games unless the team quits.greenblood said:
UCLA is closer to Oregon than UW is to UCLA right now. UCLA has better overall talent and a same level head coach. Maybe unfair, but thanks to Sark's consistent level of mediocrity, UW needs to play a few games before we should automatically anoint them #2 in the PAC 12Vegasdawg said:I think a good case could be made for flip flopping UCLA and UW.
UCLA will most likely win the South, but they are slightly overrated. The national media has them as a top 5-10 team. I think 10-20 is more likely. They lost their best OL from a below average OL, Barr, Marsh, Zumwalt (Hi OBK!), and their #1 WR. They weren't a great defense last year with those guys. All 3 were picked in the NFL draft and won't be easy to replace. Mora has recruited very well, but they will be relying on some unproven guys. UW and Stanford are just as good going into the season, although it's fair to give UCLA a slight edge considering they have the best QB of the 3 teams.
Tier One: Oregon
Tier Two: UCLA, Stanford, UW
Tier Three: ASU, USC, Arizona, WSU, Oregon State
Tier Four: Utah, Colorado
Cal
I think they're good. I have them #1 in the conference. But it's damn sure possible that Helfrich sucks ass and they lose 4 games, without quitting on him. -
4 games, DNC? It's possible, but pretty unlikely. About as unlikely as WSU winning the North. I don't think it can happen unless the team quits on Helfrich. You would have to be a Gilby disaster to fuck up a team this loaded. Mariota, Marshall, Tyner, 2 very good TE's, and 4 returning starters off the OL. Losing Addison is a big blow, but they possibly have the best offense in the country. Their defense should be pretty good too, although they need to be tougher up front.dnc said:
You think Oregon is good enough to only lose two games max if their coach is a disaster? WHAT THE FUCK? Do you think they are the greatest collection of talent of all time?RoadDawg55 said:
Disagree. I don't know how you could come to that conclusion. Oregon is substantially better than both programs. The only shot either team has is if Helfrich is a total disaster. Even if he is, there is probably enough talent to only lose 1 or 2 games unless the team quits.greenblood said:
UCLA is closer to Oregon than UW is to UCLA right now. UCLA has better overall talent and a same level head coach. Maybe unfair, but thanks to Sark's consistent level of mediocrity, UW needs to play a few games before we should automatically anoint them #2 in the PAC 12Vegasdawg said:I think a good case could be made for flip flopping UCLA and UW.
UCLA will most likely win the South, but they are slightly overrated. The national media has them as a top 5-10 team. I think 10-20 is more likely. They lost their best OL from a below average OL, Barr, Marsh, Zumwalt (Hi OBK!), and their #1 WR. They weren't a great defense last year with those guys. All 3 were picked in the NFL draft and won't be easy to replace. Mora has recruited very well, but they will be relying on some unproven guys. UW and Stanford are just as good going into the season, although it's fair to give UCLA a slight edge considering they have the best QB of the 3 teams.
Tier One: Oregon
Tier Two: UCLA, Stanford, UW
Tier Three: ASU, USC, Arizona, WSU, Oregon State
Tier Four: Utah, Colorado
Cal
I think they're good. I have them #1 in the conference. But it's damn sure possible that Helfrich sucks ass and they lose 4 games, without quitting on him. -
Agreed they're really good, but a Mariota injury isn't exactly far fetched, and if he goes down even for a couple of games all bets are off, IMO.RoadDawg55 said:
4 games, DNC? It's possible, but pretty unlikely. About as unlikely as WSU winning the North. I don't think it can happen unless the team quits on Helfrich. You would have to be a Gilby disaster to fuck up a team this loaded. Mariota, Marshall, Tyner, 2 very good TE's, and 4 returning starters off the OL. Losing Addison is a big blow, but they possibly have the best offense in the country. Their defense should be pretty good too, although they need to be tougher up front.dnc said:
You think Oregon is good enough to only lose two games max if their coach is a disaster? WHAT THE FUCK? Do you think they are the greatest collection of talent of all time?RoadDawg55 said:
Disagree. I don't know how you could come to that conclusion. Oregon is substantially better than both programs. The only shot either team has is if Helfrich is a total disaster. Even if he is, there is probably enough talent to only lose 1 or 2 games unless the team quits.greenblood said:
UCLA is closer to Oregon than UW is to UCLA right now. UCLA has better overall talent and a same level head coach. Maybe unfair, but thanks to Sark's consistent level of mediocrity, UW needs to play a few games before we should automatically anoint them #2 in the PAC 12Vegasdawg said:I think a good case could be made for flip flopping UCLA and UW.
UCLA will most likely win the South, but they are slightly overrated. The national media has them as a top 5-10 team. I think 10-20 is more likely. They lost their best OL from a below average OL, Barr, Marsh, Zumwalt (Hi OBK!), and their #1 WR. They weren't a great defense last year with those guys. All 3 were picked in the NFL draft and won't be easy to replace. Mora has recruited very well, but they will be relying on some unproven guys. UW and Stanford are just as good going into the season, although it's fair to give UCLA a slight edge considering they have the best QB of the 3 teams.
Tier One: Oregon
Tier Two: UCLA, Stanford, UW
Tier Three: ASU, USC, Arizona, WSU, Oregon State
Tier Four: Utah, Colorado
Cal
I think they're good. I have them #1 in the conference. But it's damn sure possible that Helfrich sucks ass and they lose 4 games, without quitting on him.
I don't think Helfrich would have to be Gilby level disaster to fuck this team up. More like Lambo level dreck. And I think the possibility he's Lambo is still pretty decent.
But think about what you're saying. You're saying in order to lose two games the coach would have to be a disaster. That means you think any old average coach would take this team undefeated. That's fucking nuts, IMO. It's a good team that has probably top 5 talent in the country. It's most likely to lose 2 games even with above average coaching. With disaster coaching it's losing far more than 2 games.
