Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Sunday Article: Would 8-5 record be cause for concern?

2

Comments

  • CFetters_Nacho_Lover
    CFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 32,307 Founders Club

    " Holy s#*@ are you freaking kidding me. You are sounding like the out of touch duck fanbase. With the parity in recruiting and the rise in level of competition Anything can happen. 12-1 is as possible as 7-6. Please stop trying to get interest in your website by making crap like this up. After 3 yrs then sure but he hasn't coached a game for UW yet so give it a freaking rest."


    Doogs are still alive and kicking.

    And poasting on Facebook.
  • puppylove_sugarsteel
    puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    edited July 2014
    Been saying fans should prepare for 8-5 from the beginning, and everyone gets pms pain and says "no way". Guys from dawgman saying 10-11 wins. Sure could happen and likely will imho. But if it doesn't people better not blame Pete. He can't polish the turd Sark left him.

    I've been bitching consistently over Sark's handling of the backup QB situation for 3 years (got me banned over there). Well, look at the qb situation now. Petersen ccan't wave his magic cockwand and create a 2 deep Oline. Sark was here 5 years and has one boner-fide LT on the roster, again not Pete's fault. Not Pete's fault we won't be able to stop the run when Shelton gets a breather or god forbid hurt. Not Pete's fault we have a walk on TE starting at DT (with no backup).

    Pete gets 3-5 years to build a winner, Just like every head coach not in the SEC. I guarantee Pete will be in a rose bowl by or up to and through year 5. Cook that shit bitches. Oh, Sark would never have got us to a rose bowl.
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    8-5 would be 4-5 in conference. fuck that.
    I don't give a shit who we're starting at qb either. 10 wins overall should be the minimum expectation, especially with the experience we have on both lines
  • puppylove_sugarsteel
    puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    dhdawg said:

    8-5 would be 4-5 in conference. fuck that.
    I don't give a shit who we're starting at qb either. 10 wins overall should be the minimum expectation, especially with the experience we have on both lines

    10-win "Minimum expectation"? Let me guess you are under 25 years old? You realize we are talking football not Romarball? Since when has a new coach had a 10-win "minimum expectation"? Maybe Saban at Bammer when he 1st took over? That'd be about it dumbster, and he would have even gotten a pass.

    Can't believe these demanding, uneducated and clueless fans of the new college football "win now" generation. Watch a decade or so of college football, understand the game then come pop off about realistic expectation.

    You know who the qb is (with numbers to back it up)? The running back (with #'s to back it up)? Who is going to pick up #8 8 ' s production, most important in the redzone? What happens if Shelton goes down? Peters? Who's going to play safety? Who's going to clean up all of Nez Johnny ' s missed tackles, Feeney's boneheaded plays, Shaq ' s overpursuits? Think about shit before you spew expectations
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club
    Fucking boof puppy
  • BennyBeaver
    BennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,346



    Can't believe these demanding, uneducated and clueless fans of the new college football "win now" generation. Watch a decade or so of college football, understand the game then come pop off about realistic expectation.

    We frequently refer to these people as "Doogs."

    HTH
  • HeretoBeatmyChest
    HeretoBeatmyChest Member Posts: 4,295

    PurpleJ said:

    PurpleJ said:

    TTJ said:

    The fuck is "understandable" about losing in Tucson? If we don't blow Vanilla Vick and co. utterly off the field, I will be there to personally punt Pete in the discipline hole.

    Arizona was 26 and 22 the last two seasons according to SRS. Rich Rod didn't exactly inherit a lot (he didn't have nothing) but he's done a solid job so far. They lose 4 starters on offense and 5 on defense. They have some good incoming talent and guys who were injured or had to sit out last year. They do need to find a QB and someone to replace Carey. It may be a year before Rich Rod has a real breakout campaign. With a new QB and no Carey, our D should be able to control the game. But Rich Rod is a very good coach and Arizona will be tough at home.
    I know what I saw last year. Fuck your metrics.
    Arizona beat Oregon last year. Nothing else matters.
    They also lost at home to Wazzu.
    We weren't that far from losing to WSU at home.
    The post-game relieved look on Sark's face said it all... I'm going to fucking USC!!
    Its too bad we didn't know that the last two wins secured Sark's future and our significant upgrade at head coach. We would have been woofing it up big time.
  • PDXDuckFan
    PDXDuckFan Member Posts: 450
    TheGlove said:



    Can't believe these demanding, uneducated and clueless fans of the new college football "win now" generation. Watch a decade or so of college football, understand the game then come pop off about realistic expectation.

    We frequently refer to these people as "Doogs."

    HTH
    The irony is that the delusional Duck fans that expect 12-1 every season call those who wouldn't freak out over an 8-5 season "Quooks." It's the Dawgman verson of a 'doog,' and I find it hilarious when these same clowns call the more realistic Duck fans "Quooks." It's idiotic.

  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    edited July 2014

    TheGlove said:



    Can't believe these demanding, uneducated and clueless fans of the new college football "win now" generation. Watch a decade or so of college football, understand the game then come pop off about realistic expectation.

    We frequently refer to these people as "Doogs."

    HTH
    The irony is that the delusional Duck fans that expect 12-1 every season call those who wouldn't freak out over an 8-5 season "Quooks." It's the Dawgman verson of a 'doog,' and I find it hilarious when these same clowns call the more realistic Duck fans "Quooks." It's idiotic.

    With new digs, Nike backing, a Heisman contender at QB and the press sucking green and yellow schlong every year, you're a fucking Quook if you wouldn't freak out over an 8-5 season. That would be the end of Oregon football in this era. And ample reason to fire Helfrich. HTH.
  • HeretoBeatmyChest
    HeretoBeatmyChest Member Posts: 4,295
    edited July 2014

    TheGlove said:



    Can't believe these demanding, uneducated and clueless fans of the new college football "win now" generation. Watch a decade or so of college football, understand the game then come pop off about realistic expectation.

    We frequently refer to these people as "Doogs."

    HTH
    The irony is that the delusional Duck fans that expect 12-1 every season call those who wouldn't freak out over an 8-5 season "Quooks." It's the Dawgman verson of a 'doog,' and I find it hilarious when these same clowns call the more realistic Duck fans "Quooks." It's idiotic.

    With new digs, Nike backing, a Heisman contender at QB and the press sucking green and yellow schlong every year, you're a fucking Quook if you wouldn't freak out over an 8-5 season. That would be the end of Oregon football in this era. And ample reason to fire Helfrich. HTH.
    Who would you hire?

    The top coaches already have great gigs. There is no sure fire home run like Meyer to OSU, Saban to Alabama or Petersen to UW. Plus it would be the first time Oregon went outside the program in decades. Top schools make shitty hires all the time. Look at USC, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Alabama, UW, Miami, UCLA, Texas.

    You guys are fucked, you just haven't realized it yet. Justin Wilcox or Tim DeRuyter will be your coach in 3-4 years.
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    edited July 2014

    TheGlove said:



    Can't believe these demanding, uneducated and clueless fans of the new college football "win now" generation. Watch a decade or so of college football, understand the game then come pop off about realistic expectation.

    We frequently refer to these people as "Doogs."

    HTH
    The irony is that the delusional Duck fans that expect 12-1 every season call those who wouldn't freak out over an 8-5 season "Quooks." It's the Dawgman verson of a 'doog,' and I find it hilarious when these same clowns call the more realistic Duck fans "Quooks." It's idiotic.

    With new digs, Nike backing, a Heisman contender at QB and the press sucking green and yellow schlong every year, you're a fucking Quook if you wouldn't freak out over an 8-5 season. That would be the end of Oregon football in this era. And ample reason to fire Helfrich. HTH.
    Who would you hire?

    The top coaches already have great gigs. There is no sure fire home run like Meyer to OSU, Saban to Alabama or Petersen to UW. Plus it would be the first time Oregon went outside the program in decades. Top schools make shitty hires all the time. Look at USC, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Alabama, UW, Miami, UCLA, Texas.

    You guys are fucked, you just haven't realized it yet. Justin Wilcox or Tim DeRuyter will be your coach in 3-4 years.
    Dantonio would be great if he were available. I would have supported hiring Petersen too. But you can't compare him to Meyer and Saban, calling him a sure fire home run. That remains to be seen.
  • Fenwick
    Fenwick Member Posts: 1,174
    it is the big time for Petersen. No one knows how he will do. We'll have to wait. Also he will have to undo the Sarkisian influence on this team. Ugh.
  • unfrozencaveman
    unfrozencaveman Member Posts: 2,303

    TheGlove said:



    Can't believe these demanding, uneducated and clueless fans of the new college football "win now" generation. Watch a decade or so of college football, understand the game then come pop off about realistic expectation.

    We frequently refer to these people as "Doogs."

    HTH
    The irony is that the delusional Duck fans that expect 12-1 every season call those who wouldn't freak out over an 8-5 season "Quooks." It's the Dawgman verson of a 'doog,' and I find it hilarious when these same clowns call the more realistic Duck fans "Quooks." It's idiotic.

    With new digs, Nike backing, a Heisman contender at QB and the press sucking green and yellow schlong every year, you're a fucking Quook if you wouldn't freak out over an 8-5 season. That would be the end of Oregon football in this era. And ample reason to fire Helfrich. HTH.
    Who would you hire?

    The top coaches already have great gigs. There is no sure fire home run like Meyer to OSU, Saban to Alabama or Petersen to UW. Plus it would be the first time Oregon went outside the program in decades. Top schools make shitty hires all the time. Look at USC, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Alabama, UW, Miami, UCLA, Texas.

    You guys are fucked, you just haven't realized it yet. Justin Wilcox or Tim DeRuyter will be your coach in 3-4 years.
    Dantonio would be great if he were available. I would have supported hiring Petersen too. But you can't compare him to Meyer and Saban, calling him a sure fire home run. That remains to be seen.
    Too bad he wasn't interested. Wanted to go somewhere with tradition, he's now at the right place at the right time, the stars are aligned. Things will be back to where they were...sooner than later my quook friend
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,213

    Been saying fans should prepare for 8-5 from the beginning, and everyone gets pms pain and says "no way". Guys from dawgman saying 10-11 wins. Sure could happen and likely will imho. But if it doesn't people better not blame Pete. He can't polish the turd Sark left him.

    I've been bitching consistently over Sark's handling of the backup QB situation for 3 years (got me banned over there). Well, look at the qb situation now. Petersen ccan't wave his magic cockwand and create a 2 deep Oline. Sark was here 5 years and has one boner-fide LT on the roster, again not Pete's fault. Not Pete's fault we won't be able to stop the run when Shelton gets a breather or god forbid hurt. Not Pete's fault we have a walk on TE starting at DT (with no backup).

    Pete gets 3-5 years to build a winner, Just like every head coach not in the SEC. I guarantee Pete will be in a rose bowl by or up to and through year 5. Cook that shit bitches. Oh, Sark would never have got us to a rose bowl.


    fucking idiot
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    edited July 2014

    TheGlove said:



    Can't believe these demanding, uneducated and clueless fans of the new college football "win now" generation. Watch a decade or so of college football, understand the game then come pop off about realistic expectation.

    We frequently refer to these people as "Doogs."

    HTH
    The irony is that the delusional Duck fans that expect 12-1 every season call those who wouldn't freak out over an 8-5 season "Quooks." It's the Dawgman verson of a 'doog,' and I find it hilarious when these same clowns call the more realistic Duck fans "Quooks." It's idiotic.

    With new digs, Nike backing, a Heisman contender at QB and the press sucking green and yellow schlong every year, you're a fucking Quook if you wouldn't freak out over an 8-5 season. That would be the end of Oregon football in this era. And ample reason to fire Helfrich. HTH.
    Who would you hire?

    The top coaches already have great gigs. There is no sure fire home run like Meyer to OSU, Saban to Alabama or Petersen to UW. Plus it would be the first time Oregon went outside the program in decades. Top schools make shitty hires all the time. Look at USC, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Alabama, UW, Miami, UCLA, Texas.

    You guys are fucked, you just haven't realized it yet. Justin Wilcox or Tim DeRuyter will be your coach in 3-4 years.
    Dantonio would be great if he were available. I would have supported hiring Petersen too. But you can't compare him to Meyer and Saban, calling him a sure fire home run. That remains to be seen.
    Too bad he wasn't interested. Wanted to go somewhere with tradition, he's now at the right place at the right time, the stars are aligned. Things will be back to where they were...sooner than later my quook friend
    That's a questionable reading of events. Oregon did not look outside the box of its own program when looking for coaches, so I doubt he was even approached, my doog friend. As far as tradition is concerned....blah blah blah.
  • HeretoBeatmyChest
    HeretoBeatmyChest Member Posts: 4,295
    edited July 2014
    Fenwick said:

    it is the big time for Petersen. No one knows how he will do. We'll have to wait. Also he will have to undo the Sarkisian influence on this team. Ugh.

    It was a 9-4 team last year and top 13 in Sagarin & SRS. Nothing has to be un-done, it's more about getting them to compete at the next level. The Sarkisian "influence" = the holes at punter and safety and then OL next year.

    Sure fire home run...overzealous for sure. Sure winner is probably more apt. No way will UW be anything worse than top 20 under Petersen.
  • AZDuck
    AZDuck Member Posts: 15,381

    TheGlove said:



    Can't believe these demanding, uneducated and clueless fans of the new college football "win now" generation. Watch a decade or so of college football, understand the game then come pop off about realistic expectation.

    We frequently refer to these people as "Doogs."

    HTH
    The irony is that the delusional Duck fans that expect 12-1 every season call those who wouldn't freak out over an 8-5 season "Quooks." It's the Dawgman verson of a 'doog,' and I find it hilarious when these same clowns call the more realistic Duck fans "Quooks." It's idiotic.

    With new digs, Nike backing, a Heisman contender at QB and the press sucking green and yellow schlong every year, you're a fucking Quook if you wouldn't freak out over an 8-5 season. That would be the end of Oregon football in this era. And ample reason to fire Helfrich. HTH.
    Who would you hire?

    The top coaches already have great gigs. There is no sure fire home run like Meyer to OSU, Saban to Alabama or Petersen to UW. Plus it would be the first time Oregon went outside the program in decades. Top schools make shitty hires all the time. Look at USC, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Alabama, UW, Miami, UCLA, Texas.

    You guys are fucked, you just haven't realized it yet. Justin Wilcox or Tim DeRuyter will be your coach in 3-4 years.
    Dantonio would be great if he were available. I would have supported hiring Petersen too. But you can't compare him to Meyer and Saban, calling him a sure fire home run. That remains to be seen.
    Too bad he wasn't interested. Wanted to go somewhere with tradition, he's now at the right place at the right time, the stars are aligned. Things will be back to where they were...sooner than later my quook friend
    Doog post o' the week!
  • beelzebub
    beelzebub Member Posts: 361
    Good to see the excuses taking place with Peterson in place. If he doesnt win this year blame it on Sark hell he has a pass for 4 years till he gets all the OKG low three stars in he wants!
  • puppylove_sugarsteel
    puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133

    Been saying fans should prepare for 8-5 from the beginning, and everyone gets pms pain and says "no way". Guys from dawgman saying 10-11 wins. Sure could happen and likely will imho. But if it doesn't people better not blame Pete. He can't polish the turd Sark left him.

    I've been bitching consistently over Sark's handling of the backup QB situation for 3 years (got me banned over there). Well, look at the qb situation now. Petersen ccan't wave his magic cockwand and create a 2 deep Oline. Sark was here 5 years and has one boner-fide LT on the roster, again not Pete's fault. Not Pete's fault we won't be able to stop the run when Shelton gets a breather or god forbid hurt. Not Pete's fault we have a walk on TE starting at DT (with no backup).

    Pete gets 3-5 years to build a winner, Just like every head coach not in the SEC. I guarantee Pete will be in a rose bowl by or up to and through year 5. Cook that shit bitches. Oh, Sark would never have got us to a rose bowl.


    fucking idiot
    Truth hurts don't it bitch
  • puppylove_sugarsteel
    puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133

    dhdawg said:

    8-5 would be 4-5 in conference. fuck that.
    I don't give a shit who we're starting at qb either. 10 wins overall should be the minimum expectation, especially with the experience we have on both lines

    10-win "Minimum expectation"? Let me guess you are under 25 years old? You realize we are talking football not Romarball? Since when has a new coach had a 10-win "minimum expectation"? Maybe Saban at Bammer when he 1st took over? That'd be about it dumbster, and he would have even gotten a pass.

    Can't believe these demanding, uneducated and clueless fans of the new college football "win now" generation. Watch a decade or so of college football, understand the game then come pop off about realistic expectation.

    You know who the qb is (with numbers to back it up)? The running back (with #'s to back it up)? Who is going to pick up #8 8 ' s production, most important in the redzone? What happens if Shelton goes down? Peters? Who's going to play safety? Who's going to clean up all of Nez Johnny ' s missed tackles, Feeney's boneheaded plays, Shaq ' s overpursuits? Think about shit before you spew expectations
    PLSS in 2013: Sark will win the North.

    PLSS in 2014: Pete will be lucky to be 8-5.

    Both examples: PLSSFS not taking his meds or just shoving his meds up his discipline hole. Either way, it's interesting.
    Hey dumbass, I said we shouldn't expect more than 8-5 and that I thought we'd win 10. Don't let facts hit you in the giner. Fucking toyd!
  • HeretoBeatmyChest
    HeretoBeatmyChest Member Posts: 4,295

    PurpleJ said:

    Fucking boof puppy

    Ok how's this u sappy beaatch. We're going to go 13-0 then win the national title with a new head coach, no real experience @ QB, no proven running back, no proven TE, no depth on the dline and a new secondary. Make you feel better homer? Fuck o dear!
    Miles played a lot last year for a backup. He played the entire game at OSU, half at UCLA, 1 quarter + against BYU plus garbage time in earlier games. He's ready. The DL will have good depth thanks to Hudson, Qualls, Mathis, Farria who will spell Shelton, Kikaha, Hudson and Littleton.
  • puppylove_sugarsteel
    puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    You fuckstinks are bigger doogs than the doogs at doogman. Makes sense, most of you are f o r mer doogs from doogman. Sign out, watch a little college football , then sign back in when u r prepared to question thee Lord himself (PLSS)
  • Swaye
    Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,739 Founders Club

    You fuckstinks are bigger doogs than the doogs at doogman. Makes sense, most of you are f o r mer doogs from doogman. Sign out, watch a little college football , then sign back in when u r prepared to question thee Lord himself (PLSS)

    Judges?
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club

    PurpleJ said:

    Fucking boof puppy

    Ok how's this u sappy beaatch. We're going to go 15-0 then win the national title over the overrated Crimson Tide who don't really play anyone and had all their titles handed to them in the past with a new head coach, no real experience @ QB, no proven running back, no proven TE, no depth on the dline and a new secondary. Make you feel better homer? Fuck o dear!
    Fixed that for you
  • CFetters_Nacho_Lover
    CFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 32,307 Founders Club

    dhdawg said:

    8-5 would be 4-5 in conference. fuck that.
    I don't give a shit who we're starting at qb either. 10 wins overall should be the minimum expectation, especially with the experience we have on both lines

    10-win "Minimum expectation"? Let me guess you are under 25 years old? You realize we are talking football not Romarball? Since when has a new coach had a 10-win "minimum expectation"? Maybe Saban at Bammer when he 1st took over? That'd be about it dumbster, and he would have even gotten a pass.

    Can't believe these demanding, uneducated and clueless fans of the new college football "win now" generation. Watch a decade or so of college football, understand the game then come pop off about realistic expectation.

    You know who the qb is (with numbers to back it up)? The running back (with #'s to back it up)? Who is going to pick up #8 8 ' s production, most important in the redzone? What happens if Shelton goes down? Peters? Who's going to play safety? Who's going to clean up all of Nez Johnny ' s missed tackles, Feeney's boneheaded plays, Shaq ' s overpursuits? Think about shit before you spew expectations
    PLSS in 2013: Sark will win the North.

    PLSS in 2014: Pete will be lucky to be 8-5.

    Both examples: PLSSFS not taking his meds or just shoving his meds up his discipline hole. Either way, it's interesting.
    Hey dumbass, I said we shouldn't expect more than 8-5 and that I thought we'd win 10. Don't let facts hit you in the giner. Fucking toyd!
    So how exactly shouldn't we expect more than 8-5 yet you think we'll get 10? 'Splain that one to me after you pull your head out your discipline hole and you those facts out your sandy giner.

    Fucking boof timer.
  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320

    Been saying fans should prepare for 8-5 from the beginning, and everyone gets pms pain and says "no way". Guys from dawgman saying 10-11 wins. Sure could happen and likely will imho. But if it doesn't people better not blame Pete. He can't polish the turd Sark left him.

    I've been bitching consistently over Sark's handling of the backup QB situation for 3 years (got me banned over there). Well, look at the qb situation now. Petersen ccan't wave his magic cockwand and create a 2 deep Oline. Sark was here 5 years and has one boner-fide LT on the roster, again not Pete's fault. Not Pete's fault we won't be able to stop the run when Shelton gets a breather or god forbid hurt. Not Pete's fault we have a walk on TE starting at DT (with no backup).

    Pete gets 3-5 years to build a winner, Just like every head coach not in the SEC. I guarantee Pete will be in a rose bowl by or up to and through year 5. Cook that shit bitches. Oh, Sark would never have got us to a rose bowl.

    Doog of the day.