Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Maximum Carnage Week Game Thread
Comments
-
Trump thoughTurdBomber said: -
-
-
-
178 hospital workers file class action suit against Houston hospital system. Film at elevenGrundleStiltzkin said: -
Lockdowns mean one thing and one thing only: Your government thinks you're too stupid to follow simple hygiene protocols while engaging in socially responsible behavior and you cannot be trusted with your own life.hardhat said:
Of course the thumb-sucking CoronaBros endorse them. Complete dependency defines those basement-dwelling mama's boys. -
Is Jon Rahm dead yet?
-
Dibs on his clubsBob_C said:Is Jon Rahm dead yet?
-
-
Imagine the brainwashing it takes to have one case as the threshold to impose lockdowns.hardhat said: -
-
@LoneStar5gCog LOVES the Wuhan Lab Leak lie, fucker believes the Covid 5g terrorists are going to get away with murder. That's not going to happen though. Those that forcibly brought 5g to the world will be answering for their crimes at Nuremburg Part 2, and are going to hang until dead, be shot by firing squad, or guillotined.
-
-
Where can I get a Sam Darnold Jersey?
-
-
Well, the pharmaceuticals are laughing all the way to the bank.
https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210608/No-point-vaccinating-those-whoe28099ve-had-COVID-19-Findings-of-Cleveland-Clinic-study.aspxScientists from the Cleveland Clinic, USA, have recently evaluated the effectiveness of coronavirus disease 2019 COVID-19) vaccination among individuals with or without a history of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection.
The study findings reveal that individuals with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection do not get additional benefits from vaccination, indicating that COVID-19 vaccines should be prioritized to individuals without prior infection. The study is currently available on the medRxiv* preprint server (not peer-reviewed).
...
Importantly, not a single incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection was observed in previously infected participants with or without vaccination.
Lockdowns hurt herd immunity.
Not without disclaimers:A practical and useful message would be to consider symptomatic COVID-19 to be as good as having received a vaccine, and that people who have had COVID-19 confirmed by a reliable laboratory test do not need the vaccine.
The study concludes, "individuals who have laboratory-confirmed symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection are unlikely to benefit from COVID-19 vaccination, and vaccines can be safely prioritized to those who have not been infected before."
In contrast, individuals without prior SARS-CoV-2 infection can get the maximum benefits from vaccination. Thus, based on the study findings, COVID-19 vaccines should be prioritized to naïve individuals without a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
*Important Notice
medRxiv publishes preliminary scientific reports that are not peer-reviewed and, therefore, should not be regarded as conclusive, guide clinical practice/health-related behavior, or treated as established information.
This shit is over. Fuck the fear mongerers. -
Follow the fucking science.
Brilliant. -
But, But, But the Indian variant is coming!!!huskyhooligan said:Well, the pharmaceuticals are laughing all the way to the bank.
https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210608/No-point-vaccinating-those-whoe28099ve-had-COVID-19-Findings-of-Cleveland-Clinic-study.aspxScientists from the Cleveland Clinic, USA, have recently evaluated the effectiveness of coronavirus disease 2019 COVID-19) vaccination among individuals with or without a history of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection.
The study findings reveal that individuals with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection do not get additional benefits from vaccination, indicating that COVID-19 vaccines should be prioritized to individuals without prior infection. The study is currently available on the medRxiv* preprint server (not peer-reviewed).
...
Importantly, not a single incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection was observed in previously infected participants with or without vaccination.
Lockdowns hurt herd immunity.
Not without disclaimers:A practical and useful message would be to consider symptomatic COVID-19 to be as good as having received a vaccine, and that people who have had COVID-19 confirmed by a reliable laboratory test do not need the vaccine.
The study concludes, "individuals who have laboratory-confirmed symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection are unlikely to benefit from COVID-19 vaccination, and vaccines can be safely prioritized to those who have not been infected before."
In contrast, individuals without prior SARS-CoV-2 infection can get the maximum benefits from vaccination. Thus, based on the study findings, COVID-19 vaccines should be prioritized to naïve individuals without a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
*Important Notice
medRxiv publishes preliminary scientific reports that are not peer-reviewed and, therefore, should not be regarded as conclusive, guide clinical practice/health-related behavior, or treated as established information.
This shit is over. Fuck the fear mongerers. -
theknowledge said:
But, But, But the Indian variant is coming!!!huskyhooligan said:Well, the pharmaceuticals are laughing all the way to the bank.
https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210608/No-point-vaccinating-those-whoe28099ve-had-COVID-19-Findings-of-Cleveland-Clinic-study.aspxScientists from the Cleveland Clinic, USA, have recently evaluated the effectiveness of coronavirus disease 2019 COVID-19) vaccination among individuals with or without a history of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection.
The study findings reveal that individuals with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection do not get additional benefits from vaccination, indicating that COVID-19 vaccines should be prioritized to individuals without prior infection. The study is currently available on the medRxiv* preprint server (not peer-reviewed).
...
Importantly, not a single incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection was observed in previously infected participants with or without vaccination.
Lockdowns hurt herd immunity.
Not without disclaimers:A practical and useful message would be to consider symptomatic COVID-19 to be as good as having received a vaccine, and that people who have had COVID-19 confirmed by a reliable laboratory test do not need the vaccine.
The study concludes, "individuals who have laboratory-confirmed symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection are unlikely to benefit from COVID-19 vaccination, and vaccines can be safely prioritized to those who have not been infected before."
In contrast, individuals without prior SARS-CoV-2 infection can get the maximum benefits from vaccination. Thus, based on the study findings, COVID-19 vaccines should be prioritized to naïve individuals without a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
*Important Notice
medRxiv publishes preliminary scientific reports that are not peer-reviewed and, therefore, should not be regarded as conclusive, guide clinical practice/health-related behavior, or treated as established information.
This shit is over. Fuck the fear mongerers. -
Mean tweet imo
-
DELTA DELTA DELTAoregonblitzkrieg said:theknowledge said:
But, But, But the Indian variant is coming!!!huskyhooligan said:Well, the pharmaceuticals are laughing all the way to the bank.
https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210608/No-point-vaccinating-those-whoe28099ve-had-COVID-19-Findings-of-Cleveland-Clinic-study.aspxScientists from the Cleveland Clinic, USA, have recently evaluated the effectiveness of coronavirus disease 2019 COVID-19) vaccination among individuals with or without a history of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection.
The study findings reveal that individuals with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection do not get additional benefits from vaccination, indicating that COVID-19 vaccines should be prioritized to individuals without prior infection. The study is currently available on the medRxiv* preprint server (not peer-reviewed).
...
Importantly, not a single incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection was observed in previously infected participants with or without vaccination.
Lockdowns hurt herd immunity.
Not without disclaimers:A practical and useful message would be to consider symptomatic COVID-19 to be as good as having received a vaccine, and that people who have had COVID-19 confirmed by a reliable laboratory test do not need the vaccine.
The study concludes, "individuals who have laboratory-confirmed symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection are unlikely to benefit from COVID-19 vaccination, and vaccines can be safely prioritized to those who have not been infected before."
In contrast, individuals without prior SARS-CoV-2 infection can get the maximum benefits from vaccination. Thus, based on the study findings, COVID-19 vaccines should be prioritized to naïve individuals without a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
*Important Notice
medRxiv publishes preliminary scientific reports that are not peer-reviewed and, therefore, should not be regarded as conclusive, guide clinical practice/health-related behavior, or treated as established information.
This shit is over. Fuck the fear mongerers.
-
-
And you have a 1.3% chance of dying from it IF:theknowledge said:
But, But, But the Indian variant is coming!!!huskyhooligan said:Well, the pharmaceuticals are laughing all the way to the bank.
https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210608/No-point-vaccinating-those-whoe28099ve-had-COVID-19-Findings-of-Cleveland-Clinic-study.aspxScientists from the Cleveland Clinic, USA, have recently evaluated the effectiveness of coronavirus disease 2019 COVID-19) vaccination among individuals with or without a history of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection.
The study findings reveal that individuals with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection do not get additional benefits from vaccination, indicating that COVID-19 vaccines should be prioritized to individuals without prior infection. The study is currently available on the medRxiv* preprint server (not peer-reviewed).
...
Importantly, not a single incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection was observed in previously infected participants with or without vaccination.
Lockdowns hurt herd immunity.
Not without disclaimers:A practical and useful message would be to consider symptomatic COVID-19 to be as good as having received a vaccine, and that people who have had COVID-19 confirmed by a reliable laboratory test do not need the vaccine.
The study concludes, "individuals who have laboratory-confirmed symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection are unlikely to benefit from COVID-19 vaccination, and vaccines can be safely prioritized to those who have not been infected before."
In contrast, individuals without prior SARS-CoV-2 infection can get the maximum benefits from vaccination. Thus, based on the study findings, COVID-19 vaccines should be prioritized to naïve individuals without a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
*Important Notice
medRxiv publishes preliminary scientific reports that are not peer-reviewed and, therefore, should not be regarded as conclusive, guide clinical practice/health-related behavior, or treated as established information.
This shit is over. Fuck the fear mongerers.
a) you catch it
b) you get INFECTED with it, and
c) you cannot be treated with long ago FDA approved therapeutic drugs widely available on the market for the past 50 years, because you're obese, sickly, immunocompromised, or drug-resistant.
Basically, 98.7% of you will be fine, even if you catch the Indian variant.
So we really, really need to shut this shit the fuck down now!! -
Not staked on the beach at low tide?oregonblitzkrieg said:@LoneStar5gCog LOVES the Wuhan Lab Leak lie, fucker believes the Covid 5g terrorists are going to get away with murder. That's not going to happen though. Those that forcibly brought 5g to the world will be answering for their crimes at Nuremburg Part 2, and are going to hang until dead, be shot by firing squad, or guillotined.
-
-
So glad I deplatformed myself and said FUCK OFF to Twatter. Bunch of hypocritical liberal fucks.doogie said:
