Question of the day

puppylove_sugarsteel · July 2014

Watching PInkel at media days made me just shake my head and wonder...How can a coach with a point .58 winning percentage (big12), who has never won the big 12 outright, compete and almost win the SEC championship game, in his second fucking year? Don't get me started on TAMU and their meteoric rise their 1st fucking year in the SEC. We're talking about Mizzou.

Mizzou and A&M were barely better than .500 in their years in the big12 (a 2 - team conference) . They move to the almighty SEC and suddenly become near champions.

Why is it that Bobby Stoops and I are the only men in the country who see the SEC for what it is? A great conference along with the other 4. No better, no worse top to bottom. I argue the pac12 and big10 are better top to bottom. Stoops proved me right last year by undressing the overrated tide (which i hammered home and they'll be worse this year) in a BCS bowl.

Know Bambi ' s excuse? We didn't want to be there. BULLSHIT! Whoever questions me fuck off in advance...you b retarted

Swaye · July 2014

I for one am really shocked to hear you talking about the SEC.

AZDuck · July 2014

SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC

RoadDawg55 · July 2014

Not arguing about the SEC, but Missouri got to the SEC title game because they didn't play Alabama, LSU, or Auburn in the regular season. They also play in the SEC East which was shit last year. Florida and Georgia sucked. South Carolina was decent, but nothing special.

HuskyJW · July 2014

The SEC's top 2 teams are better than everybody else's top 2 teams.....You go down from there though and they are the same as everyone else. 3-12 (or whatever it is) is the same as Pac-12 3-12