A Q for the Wealth Creators
Comments
-
Deontological ethics or deontology is the normative ethical position that judges the morality of an action based on the action's adherence to a rule or rules.[1] It is sometimes described as "duty" or "obligation" or "rule"-based ethics, because rules "bind you to your duty."[2] Deontological ethics is commonly contrasted to consequentialism[3] and virtue ethics. Deontological ethics is also contrasted to pragmatic ethics. In this terminology action is more important than the consequences.
-
I hear ya. The sloshing in gubment bucket is a problem because that bucket has a lot of handles and a lot of holes.AZDuck said:Grundle, I know we disagree on this, but I'm of the belief that more money sloshing around in the economy is good for everyone. Even paying useless fucks like me a government salary is good because I spend most of it and the money continues to slosh around the economy - paying other useless fucks at the liquor stores and massage parlors.
That is the very crux of it. They're all statists. Nothing ever goes away.AZDuck said:Spending goes down as income rises, and Laffer has been disproven. Also, the structures established by government are notoriously difficult to dismantle - part of the reason why every tax-cutting Republican administration has left ruinous deficits in their wake at the national level, and Brownback is about to crash Kansas into the fucking mountain.
-
This thread taught me that Grundle is smarter than he lets on, and I am quite dumb.
-
Thanks for putting in a definition where I only understood half the words. I'm going back to Mom's basement to sulk. Might look at porn as well.AZDuck said:Deontological ethics or deontology is the normative ethical position that judges the morality of an action based on the action's adherence to a rule or rules.[1] It is sometimes described as "duty" or "obligation" or "rule"-based ethics, because rules "bind you to your duty."[2] Deontological ethics is commonly contrasted to consequentialism[3] and virtue ethics. Deontological ethics is also contrasted to pragmatic ethics. In this terminology action is more important than the consequences.
-
Free pub!11!!11 And please, we're all friends in this thread, call me Assneck.Swaye said:This thread taught me that Grundle is smarter than he lets on, and I am quite dumb.
-
This is the primary social mobility in Kansas, amiright? #RedState #Flyover #HillbillySwaye said:
Couple poonts.AZDuck said:Leaving aside the deontological value of the value system you describe, in the real world Kansas is starving its state universities and primary education system. Education is the primary mode of social mobility. So poor and working class Kansan children are losing their opportunity to climb the social ladder.
1) What the fuck is deontoligical? Is it an STD? A dinosaur?2) The lottery is the primary mode of social mobility.
Glad I cleared that up.
-
Moody's? isn't that the ratings service that would take pooled mortgage loans originated on 100% LTV, made to borrowers with no job, no assets and a Sears Credit Card that's 2 years old with a $1,000 limit... and rated them AAA so they could be purchased by pension funds and as legal reserves by Insurance companies??
-
Laffer has been disproven? This should be good.AZDuck said:Grundle, I know we disagree on this, but I'm of the belief that more money sloshing around in the economy is good for everyone. Even paying useless fucks like me a government salary is good because I spend most of it and the money continues to slosh around the economy - paying other useless fucks at the liquor stores and massage parlors.
Spending goes down as income rises, and Laffer has been disproven. Also, the structures established by government are notoriously difficult to dismantle - part of the reason why every tax-cutting Republican administration has left ruinous deficits in their wake at the national level, and Brownback is about to crash Kansas into the fucking mountain.
-
Still better than Mike's source.sarktastic said:
Moody's? isn't that the ratings service that would take pooled mortgage loans originated on 100% LTV, made to borrowers with no job, no assets and a Sears Credit Card that's 2 years old with a $1,000 limit... and rated them AAA so they could be purchased by pension funds and as legal reserves by Insurance companies?? -
PurpleJ said:
Laffer has been disproven? This should be good.AZDuck said:Grundle, I know we disagree on this, but I'm of the belief that more money sloshing around in the economy is good for everyone. Even paying useless fucks like me a government salary is good because I spend most of it and the money continues to slosh around the economy - paying other useless fucks at the liquor stores and massage parlors.
Spending goes down as income rises, and Laffer has been disproven. Also, the structures established by government are notoriously difficult to dismantle - part of the reason why every tax-cutting Republican administration has left ruinous deficits in their wake at the national level, and Brownback is about to crash Kansas into the fucking mountain.
probably not citrus
