Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Leftist Shill denial POTD

13567

Comments

  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    So Hunter is a fucking mess--long known--and the best you and Sean have is that Joe hasn't disowned him.

    I haven't been this outraged since Obama asked for fancy mustard.

    Interesting, because that wasn't the party line when Hunter was being hired for Ukrainian energy companies. Then is was Hunter was a highly qualified attorney who obviously belonged on the BOD
    You'll recall I believed he was simply trading on his last name.
    I recall you saying the laptop was Russian disinformation. And I also recall your silence when Joe claimed there was nothing to the story about Hunter getting paid by Burisma. In fact you ran interference saying shit like "well it's a good thing I'm not voting for Hunter."
    I guess I "ran interference" by pointing out that Joe Biden was the candidate for President. Congrats to you girls for nailing one of his relatives.
    Notice how he didn't touch his Russian "disinformation" lie.
    I notice you didn't prove I ever said that.
    Yeah, it was only the standard talking point being said by the entire MSM and the Rat party including the guy you voted for but you stood strong and resisted using it.
    So you really don't have the receipts. Though you said specifically that you "recall" me saying it.

    What a surprise.
    I really don't care to take the time to look. You said it, I know it and even if I bothered to find it you'd still lie and claim you never really said it.
    Make up your mind, lady. Do you "recall" it or is it just something "standard" that a lot of people said?
    You said it, and now you're lying about it not saying it. Standard MO for you.
    So you're back to your first version of events.

    I don't think I said it. I do remember saying that I wouldn't take John Ratcliffe's word for it. 'Cuz he's a partisan whore is why.
    Who turned out being correct? You said it, and you swallowed this story like the bitch you are.


    Hunter Biden story is Russian disinfo, dozens of former intel officials say
    More than 50 former intelligence officials signed a letter casting doubt on the provenance of a New York Post story on the former vice president's son.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    HHusky said:

    Oh man! If Ratcliffe says it's not disinformation , how could we ever believe otherwise?


    Who ended up being right Dazzler? You or Ratcliff? And why was the story about Hunter and the laptop a "pant load."
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    edited April 2021


    Dazzler - Imagine being tasked with denying every pant load you right wingers go nuts over. We’ve seen this movie before.



    But, but I never called it "Russian disinformation"
  • Bendintheriver
    Bendintheriver Member Posts: 7,009 Standard Supporter

    hardhat said:

    Is this really it? He likes to get high and bang prozzies? That should be legal, wgaf.

    Unauthorized use of the Secret Service is the worst thing in there. Slap on the wrist.

    Are we talking about Gaetz?
    If all Gaetz did was fuck prostitutes then I’ll say the same thing.
    Just so pathetic. A view into the world when rats run everything without checks.

    You suck kobe. The literal worst of the worst following rat there is.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,898
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Oh man! If Ratcliffe says it's not disinformation , how could we ever believe otherwise?


    Who ended up being right Dazzler? You or Ratcliff? And why was the story about Hunter and the laptop a "pant load."
    I never said Ratcliffe lies about everything .
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,898
    SFGbob said:

    Dazzler - Imagine being tasked with denying every pant load you right wingers go nuts over. We’ve seen this movie before.



    But, but I never called it "Russian disinformation"

    Made you look.
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,662
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Oh man! If Ratcliffe says it's not disinformation , how could we ever believe otherwise?


    Who ended up being right Dazzler? You or Ratcliff? And why was the story about Hunter and the laptop a "pant load."
    I never said Ratcliffe lies about everything .
    You do. Faggot
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,069
    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    So Hunter is a fucking mess--long known--and the best you and Sean have is that Joe hasn't disowned him.

    I haven't been this outraged since Obama asked for fancy mustard.

    Interesting, because that wasn't the party line when Hunter was being hired for Ukrainian energy companies. Then is was Hunter was a highly qualified attorney who obviously belonged on the BOD
    You'll recall I believed he was simply trading on his last name.
    I recall you saying the laptop was Russian disinformation. And I also recall your silence when Joe claimed there was nothing to the story about Hunter getting paid by Burisma. In fact you ran interference saying shit like "well it's a good thing I'm not voting for Hunter."
    I guess I "ran interference" by pointing out that Joe Biden was the candidate for President. Congrats to you girls for nailing one of his relatives.

    But Trump's 'relatives'. I was disturbed by the images of girls nailing Biden's relatives though. May have to flag.
    Daddy made his relatives part of his administration and campaign.
    Why would Cho Bai Den do that? Hunter is an earner.

    You don’t take your top revenue producer off the road and put him in an office.

  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,662

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    So Hunter is a fucking mess--long known--and the best you and Sean have is that Joe hasn't disowned him.

    I haven't been this outraged since Obama asked for fancy mustard.

    Interesting, because that wasn't the party line when Hunter was being hired for Ukrainian energy companies. Then is was Hunter was a highly qualified attorney who obviously belonged on the BOD
    You'll recall I believed he was simply trading on his last name.
    I recall you saying the laptop was Russian disinformation. And I also recall your silence when Joe claimed there was nothing to the story about Hunter getting paid by Burisma. In fact you ran interference saying shit like "well it's a good thing I'm not voting for Hunter."
    I guess I "ran interference" by pointing out that Joe Biden was the candidate for President. Congrats to you girls for nailing one of his relatives.

    But Trump's 'relatives'. I was disturbed by the images of girls nailing Biden's relatives though. May have to flag.
    Daddy made his relatives part of his administration and campaign.
    Why would Cho Bai Den do that? Hunter is an earner.

    You don’t take your top revenue producer off the road and put him in an office.

    You are wise and powerful
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,098

    Is this really it? He likes to get high and bang prozzies? That should be legal, wgaf.

    Unauthorized use of the Secret Service is the worst thing in there. Slap on the wrist.

    Today's "I don't like the laws as they are so therefore I don't think that they need to be followed" POTD
  • Blu82
    Blu82 Member Posts: 1,672
    Apparently Hunter has led the life that the Dazzler has so long yearned for.
    Perhaps this explains his mental issue of confusing his parentage along with his inability to distinguish men from women.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,753 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    So Hunter is a fucking mess--long known--and the best you and Sean have is that Joe hasn't disowned him.

    I haven't been this outraged since Obama asked for fancy mustard.

    Interesting, because that wasn't the party line when Hunter was being hired for Ukrainian energy companies. Then is was Hunter was a highly qualified attorney who obviously belonged on the BOD
    You'll recall I believed he was simply trading on his last name.
    I recall you saying the laptop was Russian disinformation. And I also recall your silence when Joe claimed there was nothing to the story about Hunter getting paid by Burisma. In fact you ran interference saying shit like "well it's a good thing I'm not voting for Hunter."
    I guess I "ran interference" by pointing out that Joe Biden was the candidate for President. Congrats to you girls for nailing one of his relatives.

    But Trump's 'relatives'. I was disturbed by the images of girls nailing Biden's relatives though. May have to flag.
    Daddy made his relatives part of his administration and campaign.
    Was Trump the first president to do so?
    Nope. And when Joe makes Hunter one of his White House staffers, you'll have a point.
    He's Joe's punt man that's why Joe takes half the money. Maybe you missed Hunter setting so. You don't believe Hunter now?

    Is arranging Burisma meetings a staff function? Maybe he is getting staff pay.
  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,999
    edited April 2021
    Tequilla said:

    This is what pisses me off ...

    For four years, all I heard was Mean Orange Man was a terrible person and we have to vote for anybody else because he's a terrible person ...

    Worked on really stupid folks...still needed to rig an election to make it work.
  • thechatch
    thechatch Member Posts: 7,226 Standard Supporter
    He looks like he really respects women. Where are the #metoo people?

    Where is feminist Rachel Maddow in all of this?

    Being told to STFU by her ChiCom handlers, would be my guess....
  • thechatch
    thechatch Member Posts: 7,226 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    So Hunter is a fucking mess--long known--and the best you and Sean have is that Joe hasn't disowned him.

    I haven't been this outraged since Obama asked for fancy mustard.

    Interesting, because that wasn't the party line when Hunter was being hired for Ukrainian energy companies. Then is was Hunter was a highly qualified attorney who obviously belonged on the BOD
    You'll recall I believed he was simply trading on his last name.
    I recall you saying the laptop was Russian disinformation. And I also recall your silence when Joe claimed there was nothing to the story about Hunter getting paid by Burisma. In fact you ran interference saying shit like "well it's a good thing I'm not voting for Hunter."
    I guess I "ran interference" by pointing out that Joe Biden was the candidate for President. Congrats to you girls for nailing one of his relatives.
    It was Joe’s decision-making that sent Hunter to Ukraine and China.

    Sending your literal crackhead rapist son to represent your business and political interests in areas of foreign economic and social conflict seems like downright miserable decision-making by diamond Joe, but I’m not the one who almost got kicked out of undergrad for cheating before graduating in the bottom 10% of my law school class, so who am I to judge Biden’s shot-calling here...


  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,069
    "read the book, and you’ll realize that I wasn’t keeping tabs on possessions well for about a four-year period of time"

    Yet the dude is living in a $5.4 Million home in Venice.

    Fuck that shit, you fucking leftist shills.

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,898

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    So Hunter is a fucking mess--long known--and the best you and Sean have is that Joe hasn't disowned him.

    I haven't been this outraged since Obama asked for fancy mustard.

    Interesting, because that wasn't the party line when Hunter was being hired for Ukrainian energy companies. Then is was Hunter was a highly qualified attorney who obviously belonged on the BOD
    You'll recall I believed he was simply trading on his last name.
    I recall you saying the laptop was Russian disinformation. And I also recall your silence when Joe claimed there was nothing to the story about Hunter getting paid by Burisma. In fact you ran interference saying shit like "well it's a good thing I'm not voting for Hunter."
    I guess I "ran interference" by pointing out that Joe Biden was the candidate for President. Congrats to you girls for nailing one of his relatives.

    But Trump's 'relatives'. I was disturbed by the images of girls nailing Biden's relatives though. May have to flag.
    Daddy made his relatives part of his administration and campaign.
    Why would Cho Bai Den do that? Hunter is an earner.

    You don’t take your top revenue producer off the road and put him in an office.

    You gals ever going to provide evidence that Joe got any money out of this? Seems like the Right Wing media would have an incentive to prove that.

    Hunter is an addict and a mess and apparently your star “witness”. An addict who unremarkably tried to justify his own actions.

    NYT provided detailed information and documents on the felonies of the Trump Crime Family. That ultimately led to the resignation of Daddy’s sister from the federal bench.

    Where are your documents?
  • hardhat
    hardhat Member Posts: 8,344
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    So Hunter is a fucking mess--long known--and the best you and Sean have is that Joe hasn't disowned him.

    I haven't been this outraged since Obama asked for fancy mustard.

    Interesting, because that wasn't the party line when Hunter was being hired for Ukrainian energy companies. Then is was Hunter was a highly qualified attorney who obviously belonged on the BOD
    You'll recall I believed he was simply trading on his last name.
    I recall you saying the laptop was Russian disinformation. And I also recall your silence when Joe claimed there was nothing to the story about Hunter getting paid by Burisma. In fact you ran interference saying shit like "well it's a good thing I'm not voting for Hunter."
    I guess I "ran interference" by pointing out that Joe Biden was the candidate for President. Congrats to you girls for nailing one of his relatives.

    But Trump's 'relatives'. I was disturbed by the images of girls nailing Biden's relatives though. May have to flag.
    Daddy made his relatives part of his administration and campaign.
    Why would Cho Bai Den do that? Hunter is an earner.

    You don’t take your top revenue producer off the road and put him in an office.

    You gals ever going to provide evidence that Joe got any money out of this? Seems like the Right Wing media would have an incentive to prove that.

    Hunter is an addict and a mess and apparently your star “witness”. An addict who unremarkably tried to justify his own actions.

    NYT provided detailed information and documents on the felonies of the Trump Crime Family. That ultimately led to the resignation of Daddy’s sister from the federal bench.

    Where are your documents?
    Media didn’t cover it up for the so-called trump crime family. You just proved the point.
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,098
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    So Hunter is a fucking mess--long known--and the best you and Sean have is that Joe hasn't disowned him.

    I haven't been this outraged since Obama asked for fancy mustard.

    Interesting, because that wasn't the party line when Hunter was being hired for Ukrainian energy companies. Then is was Hunter was a highly qualified attorney who obviously belonged on the BOD
    You'll recall I believed he was simply trading on his last name.
    I recall you saying the laptop was Russian disinformation. And I also recall your silence when Joe claimed there was nothing to the story about Hunter getting paid by Burisma. In fact you ran interference saying shit like "well it's a good thing I'm not voting for Hunter."
    I guess I "ran interference" by pointing out that Joe Biden was the candidate for President. Congrats to you girls for nailing one of his relatives.

    But Trump's 'relatives'. I was disturbed by the images of girls nailing Biden's relatives though. May have to flag.
    Daddy made his relatives part of his administration and campaign.
    Why would Cho Bai Den do that? Hunter is an earner.

    You don’t take your top revenue producer off the road and put him in an office.

    You gals ever going to provide evidence that Joe got any money out of this? Seems like the Right Wing media would have an incentive to prove that.

    Hunter is an addict and a mess and apparently your star “witness”. An addict who unremarkably tried to justify his own actions.

    NYT provided detailed information and documents on the felonies of the Trump Crime Family. That ultimately led to the resignation of Daddy’s sister from the federal bench.

    Where are your documents?
    So best case scenario I see for Biden is that Hunter is a security/blackmail risk due to his inability to stay out of compromising positions or situations

    But you’re right ... what does that have to do with Joe

    This focus on comparing Biden against Trump as if that’s the standard is so full of shit ...

    How low of a bar can you get for Biden between now and he resigns his office to Kamala at some point in 2023?
  • hardhat
    hardhat Member Posts: 8,344
    Why keep saying ‘But Trump’ while accusing others of false equivalency. This is all about hypocritical media and willful ignorance.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,898
    Lots of Right Wing news outlets in this country. Why are they “covering up” for Joe?
  • hardhat
    hardhat Member Posts: 8,344
    HHusky said:

    Lots of Right Wing news outlets in this country. Why are they “covering up” for Joe?

    Remember when the Ny Post was locked out of twitter and couldn’t post the laptop story?
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,898
    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    Lots of Right Wing news outlets in this country. Why are they “covering up” for Joe?

    Remember when the Ny Post was locked out of twitter and couldn’t post the laptop story?
    That doesn’t answer the question. NY Post doesn’t have any records of Joe getting a “cut”, so they haven’t been prevented from publishing such records.
  • hardhat
    hardhat Member Posts: 8,344
    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    Lots of Right Wing news outlets in this country. Why are they “covering up” for Joe?

    Remember when the Ny Post was locked out of twitter and couldn’t post the laptop story?
    That doesn’t answer the question. NY Post doesn’t have any records of Joe getting a “cut”, so they haven’t been prevented from publishing such records.
    What does joe getting a cut have to do with the media, big tech, and yiu covering it up? Does that make it OK? And if it’s NO BIG DEAL, why the obfuscation.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,898
    edited April 2021
    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    Lots of Right Wing news outlets in this country. Why are they “covering up” for Joe?

    Remember when the Ny Post was locked out of twitter and couldn’t post the laptop story?
    That doesn’t answer the question. NY Post doesn’t have any records of Joe getting a “cut”, so they haven’t been prevented from publishing such records.
    What does joe getting a cut have to do with the media, big tech, and yiu covering it up? Does that make it OK? And if it’s NO BIG DEAL, why the obfuscation.
    I recognize that there was a desire to prevent sensationalism from potentially deciding the election. Especially with foreign enemies anxious to exploit these stories. The press and big tech had been complicit in spreading bullshit in 2016. They were more paternalistic and cautious in 2020.

  • hardhat
    hardhat Member Posts: 8,344
    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    Lots of Right Wing news outlets in this country. Why are they “covering up” for Joe?

    Remember when the Ny Post was locked out of twitter and couldn’t post the laptop story?
    That doesn’t answer the question. NY Post doesn’t have any records of Joe getting a “cut”, so they haven’t been prevented from publishing such records.
    What does joe getting a cut have to do with the media, big tech, and yiu covering it up? Does that make it OK? And if it’s NO BIG DEAL, why the obfuscation.
    I recognize that there was a desire to prevent sensationalism from potentially deciding the election. Especially with foreign enemies anxious to exploit these stories. The press and big tech had been complicit in spreading bullshit in 2016. They were more paternalistic and cautious in 2020.

    You mean like bountygate and losers and suckers?
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,883 Founders Club
    Hunter says Joe gets a cut but the dumbass H needs PROOF
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,898

    Hunter says Joe gets a cut but the dumbass H needs PROOF

    I’m just gratified to see we agree your “evidence” is this meager.