Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

An additional $4 Trillion in spending in the past year.

124678

Comments

  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    You’ve had no beef with massive tax reductions. Fiscal conservatives think about BOTH spending and revenue.

    Yes, because my money is really the government's money. Funny how you interest in fiscal responsibility never has anything to do with spending.
    Bumper sticker sloganeering about “my money” doesn’t allow for ANY defensible level of taxation. You’re not a serious person, and no, angry doesn’t qualify.
    This is what the left thinks of your money

    They think its theirs
    I can see no one is going to offer an explanation for where the defensible level of taxation is. If all your money is your money, I guess there should be no taxes at all.

    Maybe the Air Force can have a bake sale. The Army can start a Go Fund Me page.

    Yes, because all the spending is for the Air Force and Army. What's a defensible level of spending Dazzler? Is underwriting SF's spending defensible? How about the Teamster's pension plan?
    Still waiting for you to identify which money isn't your money. You go first.
    Still waiting for you to tell me why unconscionable spending is good because of "austerity" but cutting taxes is bad and has nothing to do with austerity.
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,591 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    You’ve had no beef with massive tax reductions. Fiscal conservatives think about BOTH spending and revenue.

    Yes, because my money is really the government's money. Funny how you interest in fiscal responsibility never has anything to do with spending.
    Bumper sticker sloganeering about “my money” doesn’t allow for ANY defensible level of taxation. You’re not a serious person, and no, angry doesn’t qualify.
    This is what the left thinks of your money

    They think its theirs
    I can see no one is going to offer an explanation for where the defensible level of taxation is. If all your money is your money, I guess there should be no taxes at all.

    Maybe the Air Force can have a bake sale. The Army can start a Go Fund Me page.

    Yes, because all the spending is for the Air Force and Army. What's a defensible level of spending Dazzler? Is underwriting SF's spending defensible? How about the Teamster's pension plan?
    Still waiting for you to identify which money isn't your money. You go first.
    Its all my money

    Now go ahead
    So taxes should be zero.

    Got it.
    Ideally. Yes.

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,363
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    You’ve had no beef with massive tax reductions. Fiscal conservatives think about BOTH spending and revenue.

    Yes, because my money is really the government's money. Funny how you interest in fiscal responsibility never has anything to do with spending.
    Bumper sticker sloganeering about “my money” doesn’t allow for ANY defensible level of taxation. You’re not a serious person, and no, angry doesn’t qualify.
    This is what the left thinks of your money

    They think its theirs
    I can see no one is going to offer an explanation for where the defensible level of taxation is. If all your money is your money, I guess there should be no taxes at all.

    Maybe the Air Force can have a bake sale. The Army can start a Go Fund Me page.

    Yes, because all the spending is for the Air Force and Army. What's a defensible level of spending Dazzler? Is underwriting SF's spending defensible? How about the Teamster's pension plan?
    Still waiting for you to identify which money isn't your money. You go first.
    Still waiting for you to tell me why unconscionable spending is good because of "austerity" but cutting taxes is bad and has nothing to do with austerity.
    I agree with you now. If the government mustn't tax anyone or anything, we shouldn't be spending any amount at all.

    #CuzItsMyMoney
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    You’ve had no beef with massive tax reductions. Fiscal conservatives think about BOTH spending and revenue.

    Yes, because my money is really the government's money. Funny how you interest in fiscal responsibility never has anything to do with spending.
    Bumper sticker sloganeering about “my money” doesn’t allow for ANY defensible level of taxation. You’re not a serious person, and no, angry doesn’t qualify.
    This is what the left thinks of your money

    They think its theirs
    I can see no one is going to offer an explanation for where the defensible level of taxation is. If all your money is your money, I guess there should be no taxes at all.

    Maybe the Air Force can have a bake sale. The Army can start a Go Fund Me page.

    Yes, because all the spending is for the Air Force and Army. What's a defensible level of spending Dazzler? Is underwriting SF's spending defensible? How about the Teamster's pension plan?
    Still waiting for you to identify which money isn't your money. You go first.
    Still waiting for you to tell me why unconscionable spending is good because of "austerity" but cutting taxes is bad and has nothing to do with austerity.
    I agree with you now. If the government mustn't tax anyone or anything, we shouldn't be spending any amount at all.

    #CuzItsMyMoney
    I'm still being taxed plenty asshole. Funny how you defend completely indefensible spending because of "austerity" but when it comes to letting people keep more of the money they have earned, not all of the money, just a little more that they worked for, you have a problem with that kind of stimulus.

    You're a fucking fraud Dazzler.

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,621 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    You’ve had no beef with massive tax reductions. Fiscal conservatives think about BOTH spending and revenue.

    Yes, because my money is really the government's money. Funny how you interest in fiscal responsibility never has anything to do with spending.
    Bumper sticker sloganeering about “my money” doesn’t allow for ANY defensible level of taxation. You’re not a serious person, and no, angry doesn’t qualify.
    This is what the left thinks of your money

    They think its theirs
    I can see no one is going to offer an explanation for where the defensible level of taxation is. If all your money is your money, I guess there should be no taxes at all.

    Maybe the Air Force can have a bake sale. The Army can start a Go Fund Me page.

    Yes, because all the spending is for the Air Force and Army. What's a defensible level of spending Dazzler? Is underwriting SF's spending defensible? How about the Teamster's pension plan?
    Still waiting for you to identify which money isn't your money. You go first.
    Its all my money

    Now go ahead
    So taxes should be zero.

    Got it.
    Are you this stupid in real life? Taxes are set by elected representation. We all pay them. Doesn't make it anyone's money but mine. Just because you are afraid to answer any questions on spending is no reason to go full retard
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,930 Standard Supporter

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    You’ve had no beef with massive tax reductions. Fiscal conservatives think about BOTH spending and revenue.

    Yes, because my money is really the government's money. Funny how you interest in fiscal responsibility never has anything to do with spending.
    Bumper sticker sloganeering about “my money” doesn’t allow for ANY defensible level of taxation. You’re not a serious person, and no, angry doesn’t qualify.
    This is what the left thinks of your money

    They think its theirs
    I can see no one is going to offer an explanation for where the defensible level of taxation is. If all your money is your money, I guess there should be no taxes at all.

    Maybe the Air Force can have a bake sale. The Army can start a Go Fund Me page.

    Yes, because all the spending is for the Air Force and Army. What's a defensible level of spending Dazzler? Is underwriting SF's spending defensible? How about the Teamster's pension plan?
    Still waiting for you to identify which money isn't your money. You go first.
    Its all my money

    Now go ahead
    So taxes should be zero.

    Got it.
    Are you this stupid in real life? Taxes are set by elected representation. We all pay them. Doesn't make it anyone's money but mine. Just because you are afraid to answer any questions on spending is no reason to go full retard
    Full retard is a feature and not a bug to a leftard.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,621 Founders Club
    Wherever could we cut spending??

    The Department of Defense has confirmed in recent memos that sex reassignment surgery could be provided free of cost as part of the military’s medical benefits package following President Joe Biden’s Jan. 25 executive order.

    "America is stronger, at home and around the world, when it is inclusive. The military is no exception," the White House said in a press release announcing the order.

    "This means no one will be separated or discharged, or denied reenlistment, solely on the basis of gender identity," the release continued. "Prospective recruits may serve in their self-identified gender when they have met the appropriate standards for accession into the military services."

    “This revised policy will also ensure all medically necessary transitionrelated care authorized by law is available to all Service members,” wrote Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin in a memo obtained by the Washington Examiner.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,621 Founders Club
    Where we are headed


    https://newsmax.com/world/globaltalk/venezuela-children-of-the-trash/2021/03/10/id/1013308/

    For some children in Venezuela, garbage is the main source of their livelihood.

    This has been the case for several generations of garbage collectors in Venezuela, among them Ronaikel Brito, 16, who, like his mother when she was a child, and before her, her grandmother, looks for something of value every day in a landfill on an arid plain about five hours west of the capital, Caracas. But their work has never been so challenging: The nation’s acute economic crisis coupled with stay-at-home orders prompted by the coronavirus pandemic have reduced trash output, making valuable findings rare.

    “The reality today is that you don’t get as many things as before,” Ronaikel told The Associated Press at the landfill in Pavia, outside the city of Barquisimeto.

    “I go searching to see what I get, but I get almost nothing,” he added, noting that in recent months the children and adults who sift through garbage are spending more time trying to find objects they can sell or food in good enough condition to eat or feed horses, goats or pigs.



    Read more: Venezuelan Children Pick through Garbage for Food, Valuables | Newsmax.com
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188

    Wherever could we cut spending??

    The Department of Defense has confirmed in recent memos that sex reassignment surgery could be provided free of cost as part of the military’s medical benefits package following President Joe Biden’s Jan. 25 executive order.

    "America is stronger, at home and around the world, when it is inclusive. The military is no exception," the White House said in a press release announcing the order.

    "This means no one will be separated or discharged, or denied reenlistment, solely on the basis of gender identity," the release continued. "Prospective recruits may serve in their self-identified gender when they have met the appropriate standards for accession into the military services."

    “This revised policy will also ensure all medically necessary transitionrelated care authorized by law is available to all Service members,” wrote Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin in a memo obtained by the Washington Examiner.

    You can't cut that, austerity!!!!!
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,591 Standard Supporter

    Where we are headed


    https://newsmax.com/world/globaltalk/venezuela-children-of-the-trash/2021/03/10/id/1013308/

    For some children in Venezuela, garbage is the main source of their livelihood.

    This has been the case for several generations of garbage collectors in Venezuela, among them Ronaikel Brito, 16, who, like his mother when she was a child, and before her, her grandmother, looks for something of value every day in a landfill on an arid plain about five hours west of the capital, Caracas. But their work has never been so challenging: The nation’s acute economic crisis coupled with stay-at-home orders prompted by the coronavirus pandemic have reduced trash output, making valuable findings rare.

    “The reality today is that you don’t get as many things as before,” Ronaikel told The Associated Press at the landfill in Pavia, outside the city of Barquisimeto.

    “I go searching to see what I get, but I get almost nothing,” he added, noting that in recent months the children and adults who sift through garbage are spending more time trying to find objects they can sell or food in good enough condition to eat or feed horses, goats or pigs.



    Read more: Venezuelan Children Pick through Garbage for Food, Valuables | Newsmax.com

    But but but Newsmax is your source?!?