Super straight
Comments
-
lulzTheKobeStopper said:As a general rule, if you find yourself agreeing with a meme that started on 4chan, you should probably consider what that says about your position.
What you guys do is find randos saying ridiculous shit, work yourselves into a frenzy and then call some tweet with 12 likes a “culture war”. You are pathetic white male gen x and baby boomers, who were handed everything in life on a silver platter and you now have nothing better to do then pretend you are oppressed.
In terms of mainstream positions on this, no there is nothing wrong with not wanting to have sex with someone that has a penis if you aren’t into penis. However, there are trans women with vaginas and there are trans women that are objectively attractive. If you’re saying you’re not attracted to them, it’s because they belong to a specific group, that’s the definition of bigotry.
Now this is hardly the worst thing in the world. It’s not like Bob believing black people are genetically inferior to other races, it’s not thinking gay people should have to go to conversion therapy, I wouldn’t even say it’s as bad saying “all lives matter”. But it is bigotry.
I don’t think that position makes anyone a monster. This is all really new and I have personally struggled to understand transgenderism so I get it. But if you’re going to really dig your heels in on this, with some 4chan bullshit, then go ahead and start your war over .42% of the population. We know libs love to virtue signaling to people with identities, they’re going to take our side and they already stomped your shit in once. I wouldn’t mind seeing it again. -
Ha ha male tinker bells threatening to kill people. The hits just come on coming folks! Watch out, those fake nails can be sharp!jecornel said:A new term a guy created to say he wouldn’t include trans women in his dating pool gets threats from the TQ community to kill his mom. His tiktok video is awesome. Immediately labeled a transphobe.
https://www.womenarehuman.com/teens-superstraight-hashtag-goes-viral-trans-activists-threaten-to-harm-his-mother/ -
He’s also an economic and renewable energy expert. Remember that.TheKobeStopper said:As a general rule, if you find yourself agreeing with a meme that started on 4chan, you should probably consider what that says about your position.
What you guys do is find randos saying ridiculous shit, work yourselves into a frenzy and then call some tweet with 12 likes a “culture war”. You are pathetic white male gen x and baby boomers, who were handed everything in life on a silver platter and you now have nothing better to do then pretend you are oppressed.
In terms of mainstream positions on this, no there is nothing wrong with not wanting to have sex with someone that has a penis if you aren’t into penis. However, there are trans women with vaginas and there are trans women that are objectively attractive. If you’re saying you’re not attracted to them, it’s because they belong to a specific group, that’s the definition of bigotry.
Now this is hardly the worst thing in the world. It’s not like Bob believing black people are genetically inferior to other races, it’s not thinking gay people should have to go to conversion therapy, I wouldn’t even say it’s as bad saying “all lives matter”. But it is bigotry.
I don’t think that position makes anyone a monster. This is all really new and I have personally struggled to understand transgenderism so I get it. But if you’re going to really dig your heels in on this, with some 4chan bullshit, then go ahead and start your war over .42% of the population. We know libs love to virtue signaling to people with identities, they’re going to take our side and they already stomped your shit in once. I wouldn’t mind seeing it again. -
God, you spout some bullshit at tims. No - I'm not fucking sexually attracted to transgenders - at whatever stage of their transition. That's not bigotry, that's biology.TheKobeStopper said:As a general rule, if you find yourself agreeing with a meme that started on 4chan, you should probably consider what that says about your position.
What you guys do is find randos saying ridiculous shit, work yourselves into a frenzy and then call some tweet with 12 likes a “culture war”. You are pathetic white male gen x and baby boomers, who were handed everything in life on a silver platter and you now have nothing better to do then pretend you are oppressed.
In terms of mainstream positions on this, no there is nothing wrong with not wanting to have sex with someone that has a penis if you aren’t into penis. However, there are trans women with vaginas and there are trans women that are objectively attractive. If you’re saying you’re not attracted to them, it’s because they belong to a specific group, that’s the definition of bigotry.
Now this is hardly the worst thing in the world. It’s not like Bob believing black people are genetically inferior to other races, it’s not thinking gay people should have to go to conversion therapy, I wouldn’t even say it’s as bad saying “all lives matter”. But it is bigotry.
I don’t think that position makes anyone a monster. This is all really new and I have personally struggled to understand transgenderism so I get it. But if you’re going to really dig your heels in on this, with some 4chan bullshit, then go ahead and start your war over .42% of the population. We know libs love to virtue signaling to people with identities, they’re going to take our side and they already stomped your shit in once. I wouldn’t mind seeing it again.
-
Jimmy: What the fuck are you reading?
-
Another Kobe meltdown
-
APAG is the LEAST Critical Thinking person I've ever seen.
A standard-less empty jar waiting to be filled and corrupted with Bullshit. -
In APAG's world acting in accordance with the biological design and predisposition of your body equals "bigotry."TheKobeStopper said:However, there are trans women with vaginas and there are trans women that are objectively attractive. If you’re saying you’re not attracted to them, it’s because they belong to a specific group, that’s the definition of bigotry.
------------
I don’t think that position makes anyone a monster. This is all really new and I have personally struggled to understand transgenderism so I get it. But if you’re going to really dig your heels in on this, with some 4chan bullshit, then go ahead and start your war over .42% of the population. We know libs love to virtue signaling to people with identities, they’re going to take our side and they already stomped your shit in once. I wouldn’t mind seeing it again.
Is there any mystery why APAG is such a lonely, sad and miserable little person?
Hey APAG, Question for ya: What's the primary design and purpose of male/female coitus? -
Throbber: I'm white and I breatheTurdBomber said:
In APAG's world acting in accordance with the biological design and predisposition of your body equals "bigotry."TheKobeStopper said:However, there are trans women with vaginas and there are trans women that are objectively attractive. If you’re saying you’re not attracted to them, it’s because they belong to a specific group, that’s the definition of bigotry.
------------
I don’t think that position makes anyone a monster. This is all really new and I have personally struggled to understand transgenderism so I get it. But if you’re going to really dig your heels in on this, with some 4chan bullshit, then go ahead and start your war over .42% of the population. We know libs love to virtue signaling to people with identities, they’re going to take our side and they already stomped your shit in once. I wouldn’t mind seeing it again.
Is there any mystery why APAG is such a lonely, sad and miserable little person?
Hey APAG, Question for ya: What's the primary design and purpose of male/female coitus?
APAG: BIGOT!!!!
-
I agree with APAG in that, why are weº paying any attention to this?
