I’m confused. Is this one of those times when are supposed to value Europe’s opinion and follow their lead, or not? I thought we weren’t supposed to give a fuck about what Europe does.
Clean elections are worth noting. The fact your team is resisting any attempt at election reform as “voter suppression” tells me you’re a fascist piece of shit who is cool with blatant election fraud.
Oh so we do follow Europe when it works for your views. Otherwise fuck those guys and their global treaties, pass the freedom fries.
I’ve literally never said don’t follow Europe, you dunce. What’s with your strawman, other than to enable election fraud in the USA?
Glad to know you’re on board with the Paris climate treaty, UN, and WHO.
When was the Paris climate "treaty" voted on by the US Senate?
No I don’t believe it had been voted on. Though it’s debatable whether or not it needs to be voted on. Your point?
Actually, it's not debatable at all. If it were a "treaty" than the Senate needs to vote on it. What other topics would you like me to school you on?
I’d say sticking to the point of the topic but that’s a lost cause.
You brought up Europe and treaties and other bullshit to deflect from the topic
Dumb as a rock
Well you actually wrote a sentence this time. Not a deflection at all. The point was Europe and whether or not we value their opinions. Sure feels like global organizations (UN) and “accords” (Paris) are relevant.
The point wasn't about valuing opinions of anyone. France took an action and the discussion was about that action
Valuing opinions is fag talk. Not surprising
The UN and the Paris accords are inf act, irrelevant. Always. If you would like to discuss them start a thread that will THUD
A better response. I’ll connect some dots, I understand some might have got lost. It was a French opinion that mail-in ballots might lead to voter fraud. An opinion they’ve had for decades and were rethinking after they witnessed the huge voter turnout in the US.
Given the derisive attitude toward European opinions in general on this board I found it odd and potentially hypocritical that this particular French opinion was valued. That is all.
We just saw mail ins help steal an election. They did too.
I’m confused. Is this one of those times when are supposed to value Europe’s opinion and follow their lead, or not? I thought we weren’t supposed to give a fuck about what Europe does.
People who know the difference between right and wrong don't struggle like you on these questions.
I’m confused. Is this one of those times when are supposed to value Europe’s opinion and follow their lead, or not? I thought we weren’t supposed to give a fuck about what Europe does.
Clean elections are worth noting. The fact your team is resisting any attempt at election reform as “voter suppression” tells me you’re a fascist piece of shit who is cool with blatant election fraud.
Oh so we do follow Europe when it works for your views. Otherwise fuck those guys and their global treaties, pass the freedom fries.
I’ve literally never said don’t follow Europe, you dunce. What’s with your strawman, other than to enable election fraud in the USA?
Glad to know you’re on board with the Paris climate treaty, UN, and WHO.
When was the Paris climate "treaty" voted on by the US Senate?
No I don’t believe it had been voted on. Though it’s debatable whether or not it needs to be voted on. Your point?
Actually, it's not debatable at all. If it were a "treaty" than the Senate needs to vote on it. What other topics would you like me to school you on?
I’d say sticking to the point of the topic but that’s a lost cause.
You brought up Europe and treaties and other bullshit to deflect from the topic
Dumb as a rock
Well you actually wrote a sentence this time. Not a deflection at all. The point was Europe and whether or not we value their opinions. Sure feels like global organizations (UN) and “accords” (Paris) are relevant.
The point wasn't about valuing opinions of anyone. France took an action and the discussion was about that action
Valuing opinions is fag talk. Not surprising
The UN and the Paris accords are inf act, irrelevant. Always. If you would like to discuss them start a thread that will THUD
A better response. I’ll connect some dots, I understand some might have got lost. It was a French opinion that mail-in ballots might lead to voter fraud. An opinion they’ve had for decades and were rethinking after they witnessed the huge voter turnout in the US.
Given the derisive attitude toward European opinions in general on this board I found it odd and potentially hypocritical that this particular French opinion was valued. That is all.
We just saw mail ins help steal an election. They did too.
Nah...but again, join America whenever you’re ready to move forward.
I’m confused. Is this one of those times when are supposed to value Europe’s opinion and follow their lead, or not? I thought we weren’t supposed to give a fuck about what Europe does.
Clean elections are worth noting. The fact your team is resisting any attempt at election reform as “voter suppression” tells me you’re a fascist piece of shit who is cool with blatant election fraud.
Oh so we do follow Europe when it works for your views. Otherwise fuck those guys and their global treaties, pass the freedom fries.
I’ve literally never said don’t follow Europe, you dunce. What’s with your strawman, other than to enable election fraud in the USA?
Glad to know you’re on board with the Paris climate treaty, UN, and WHO.
When was the Paris climate "treaty" voted on by the US Senate?
No I don’t believe it had been voted on. Though it’s debatable whether or not it needs to be voted on. Your point?
Actually, it's not debatable at all. If it were a "treaty" than the Senate needs to vote on it. What other topics would you like me to school you on?
I’d say sticking to the point of the topic but that’s a lost cause.
You brought up Europe and treaties and other bullshit to deflect from the topic
Dumb as a rock
Well you actually wrote a sentence this time. Not a deflection at all. The point was Europe and whether or not we value their opinions. Sure feels like global organizations (UN) and “accords” (Paris) are relevant.
The point wasn't about valuing opinions of anyone. France took an action and the discussion was about that action
Valuing opinions is fag talk. Not surprising
The UN and the Paris accords are inf act, irrelevant. Always. If you would like to discuss them start a thread that will THUD
A better response. I’ll connect some dots, I understand some might have got lost. It was a French opinion that mail-in ballots might lead to voter fraud. An opinion they’ve had for decades and were rethinking after they witnessed the huge voter turnout in the US.
Given the derisive attitude toward European opinions in general on this board I found it odd and potentially hypocritical that this particular French opinion was valued. That is all.
We just saw mail ins help steal an election. They did too.
Nah...but again, join America whenever you’re ready to move forward.
I’m confused. Is this one of those times when are supposed to value Europe’s opinion and follow their lead, or not? I thought we weren’t supposed to give a fuck about what Europe does.
Clean elections are worth noting. The fact your team is resisting any attempt at election reform as “voter suppression” tells me you’re a fascist piece of shit who is cool with blatant election fraud.
Oh so we do follow Europe when it works for your views. Otherwise fuck those guys and their global treaties, pass the freedom fries.
I’ve literally never said don’t follow Europe, you dunce. What’s with your strawman, other than to enable election fraud in the USA?
Glad to know you’re on board with the Paris climate treaty, UN, and WHO.
When was the Paris climate "treaty" voted on by the US Senate?
No I don’t believe it had been voted on. Though it’s debatable whether or not it needs to be voted on. Your point?
Actually, it's not debatable at all. If it were a "treaty" than the Senate needs to vote on it. What other topics would you like me to school you on?
I’d say sticking to the point of the topic but that’s a lost cause.
You brought up Europe and treaties and other bullshit to deflect from the topic
Dumb as a rock
Well you actually wrote a sentence this time. Not a deflection at all. The point was Europe and whether or not we value their opinions. Sure feels like global organizations (UN) and “accords” (Paris) are relevant.
The point wasn't about valuing opinions of anyone. France took an action and the discussion was about that action
Valuing opinions is fag talk. Not surprising
The UN and the Paris accords are inf act, irrelevant. Always. If you would like to discuss them start a thread that will THUD
A better response. I’ll connect some dots, I understand some might have got lost. It was a French opinion that mail-in ballots might lead to voter fraud. An opinion they’ve had for decades and were rethinking after they witnessed the huge voter turnout in the US.
Given the derisive attitude toward European opinions in general on this board I found it odd and potentially hypocritical that this particular French opinion was valued. That is all.
We just saw mail ins help steal an election. They did too.
Nah...but again, join America whenever you’re ready to move forward.
Leave for the socialist paradise of your choice. Otherwise shits gonna get ugly fast.
I’m confused. Is this one of those times when are supposed to value Europe’s opinion and follow their lead, or not? I thought we weren’t supposed to give a fuck about what Europe does.
Clean elections are worth noting. The fact your team is resisting any attempt at election reform as “voter suppression” tells me you’re a fascist piece of shit who is cool with blatant election fraud.
Oh so we do follow Europe when it works for your views. Otherwise fuck those guys and their global treaties, pass the freedom fries.
I’ve literally never said don’t follow Europe, you dunce. What’s with your strawman, other than to enable election fraud in the USA?
Glad to know you’re on board with the Paris climate treaty, UN, and WHO.
When was the Paris climate "treaty" voted on by the US Senate?
No I don’t believe it had been voted on. Though it’s debatable whether or not it needs to be voted on. Your point?
Actually, it's not debatable at all. If it were a "treaty" than the Senate needs to vote on it. What other topics would you like me to school you on?
I’d say sticking to the point of the topic but that’s a lost cause.
You brought up Europe and treaties and other bullshit to deflect from the topic
Dumb as a rock
Well you actually wrote a sentence this time. Not a deflection at all. The point was Europe and whether or not we value their opinions. Sure feels like global organizations (UN) and “accords” (Paris) are relevant.
The point wasn't about valuing opinions of anyone. France took an action and the discussion was about that action
Valuing opinions is fag talk. Not surprising
The UN and the Paris accords are inf act, irrelevant. Always. If you would like to discuss them start a thread that will THUD
A better response. I’ll connect some dots, I understand some might have got lost. It was a French opinion that mail-in ballots might lead to voter fraud. An opinion they’ve had for decades and were rethinking after they witnessed the huge voter turnout in the US.
Given the derisive attitude toward European opinions in general on this board I found it odd and potentially hypocritical that this particular French opinion was valued. That is all.
We just saw mail ins help steal an election. They did too.
Nah...but again, join America whenever you’re ready to move forward.
Voter fraud isn’t moving forward. Why would you want to change the system? You got away with stealing a presidential election by having operatives ready in swing states and ballots hidden in suitcases.
I’m confused. Is this one of those times when are supposed to value Europe’s opinion and follow their lead, or not? I thought we weren’t supposed to give a fuck about what Europe does.
I don't have my roster handy, so I need to wait for OBK to chime on what squad Marcon belongs to.
Seriously. @obk, can you put out a depth chart for us?
Comments