Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Mail-in ballots and voting machines banned in France
Comments
-
Well you actually wrote a sentence this time. Not a deflection at all. The point was Europe and whether or not we value their opinions. Sure feels like global organizations (UN) and “accords” (Paris) are relevant.RaceBannon said:
You brought up Europe and treaties and other bullshit to deflect from the topicDuckwithabone said:
I’d say sticking to the point of the topic but that’s a lost cause.SFGbob said:
Actually, it's not debatable at all. If it were a "treaty" than the Senate needs to vote on it. What other topics would you like me to school you on?Duckwithabone said:
No I don’t believe it had been voted on. Though it’s debatable whether or not it needs to be voted on. Your point?SFGbob said:
When was the Paris climate "treaty" voted on by the US Senate?Duckwithabone said:
Glad to know you’re on board with the Paris climate treaty, UN, and WHO.NorthwestFresh said:
I’ve literally never said don’t follow Europe, you dunce. What’s with your strawman, other than to enable election fraud in the USA?Duckwithabone said:
Oh so we do follow Europe when it works for your views. Otherwise fuck those guys and their global treaties, pass the freedom fries.NorthwestFresh said:
Clean elections are worth noting. The fact your team is resisting any attempt at election reform as “voter suppression” tells me you’re a fascist piece of shit who is cool with blatant election fraud.Duckwithabone said:I’m confused. Is this one of those times when are supposed to value Europe’s opinion and follow their lead, or not? I thought we weren’t supposed to give a fuck about what Europe does.
Dumb as a rock -
And this means exactly what? Is the UN a USA only organization? Where the UN is located means little to the point here. Thanks for trying.NorthwestFresh said:
The UN has its world HQ in New York. The USA pays for a lot of it.Duckwithabone said:
The UN had various headquarters, several sites around Europe. The WHO is literally not controlled by China. Don’t be purposefully daft.NorthwestFresh said:
The WHO is controlled by China and the UN isn’t located in Europe, so excuse Bonehead for his ignorance.SFGbob said:
When was the Paris climate "treaty" voted on by the US Senate?Duckwithabone said:
Glad to know you’re on board with the Paris climate treaty, UN, and WHO.NorthwestFresh said:
I’ve literally never said don’t follow Europe, you dunce. What’s with your strawman, other than to enable election fraud in the USA?Duckwithabone said:
Oh so we do follow Europe when it works for your views. Otherwise fuck those guys and their global treaties, pass the freedom fries.NorthwestFresh said:
Clean elections are worth noting. The fact your team is resisting any attempt at election reform as “voter suppression” tells me you’re a fascist piece of shit who is cool with blatant election fraud.Duckwithabone said:I’m confused. Is this one of those times when are supposed to value Europe’s opinion and follow their lead, or not? I thought we weren’t supposed to give a fuck about what Europe does.
What a moron.
UN Headquarters in New York City, USA, is home to the General Assembly, Security Council, Economic and Social Council, Trusteeship Council, and much of the UN Secretariat.
Moron
-
He also supports US air strikes in Syria because they could possibly bomb US soldiers Biden is sending to Iraq.RaceBannon said:
You brought up Europe and treaties and other bullshit to deflect from the topicDuckwithabone said:
I’d say sticking to the point of the topic but that’s a lost cause.SFGbob said:
Actually, it's not debatable at all. If it were a "treaty" than the Senate needs to vote on it. What other topics would you like me to school you on?Duckwithabone said:
No I don’t believe it had been voted on. Though it’s debatable whether or not it needs to be voted on. Your point?SFGbob said:
When was the Paris climate "treaty" voted on by the US Senate?Duckwithabone said:
Glad to know you’re on board with the Paris climate treaty, UN, and WHO.NorthwestFresh said:
I’ve literally never said don’t follow Europe, you dunce. What’s with your strawman, other than to enable election fraud in the USA?Duckwithabone said:
Oh so we do follow Europe when it works for your views. Otherwise fuck those guys and their global treaties, pass the freedom fries.NorthwestFresh said:
Clean elections are worth noting. The fact your team is resisting any attempt at election reform as “voter suppression” tells me you’re a fascist piece of shit who is cool with blatant election fraud.Duckwithabone said:I’m confused. Is this one of those times when are supposed to value Europe’s opinion and follow their lead, or not? I thought we weren’t supposed to give a fuck about what Europe does.
Dumb as a rock
Just a few days ago I posted how the Pentagon wants more troops in Iraq for “NATO.”
Nah, it’s Chickenhawk wartime again and troops are being deployed. -
The point wasn't about valuing opinions of anyone. France took an action and the discussion was about that actionDuckwithabone said:
Well you actually wrote a sentence this time. Not a deflection at all. The point was Europe and whether or not we value their opinions. Sure feels like global organizations (UN) and “accords” (Paris) are relevant.RaceBannon said:
You brought up Europe and treaties and other bullshit to deflect from the topicDuckwithabone said:
I’d say sticking to the point of the topic but that’s a lost cause.SFGbob said:
Actually, it's not debatable at all. If it were a "treaty" than the Senate needs to vote on it. What other topics would you like me to school you on?Duckwithabone said:
No I don’t believe it had been voted on. Though it’s debatable whether or not it needs to be voted on. Your point?SFGbob said:
When was the Paris climate "treaty" voted on by the US Senate?Duckwithabone said:
Glad to know you’re on board with the Paris climate treaty, UN, and WHO.NorthwestFresh said:
I’ve literally never said don’t follow Europe, you dunce. What’s with your strawman, other than to enable election fraud in the USA?Duckwithabone said:
Oh so we do follow Europe when it works for your views. Otherwise fuck those guys and their global treaties, pass the freedom fries.NorthwestFresh said:
Clean elections are worth noting. The fact your team is resisting any attempt at election reform as “voter suppression” tells me you’re a fascist piece of shit who is cool with blatant election fraud.Duckwithabone said:I’m confused. Is this one of those times when are supposed to value Europe’s opinion and follow their lead, or not? I thought we weren’t supposed to give a fuck about what Europe does.
Dumb as a rock
Valuing opinions is fag talk. Not surprising
The UN and the Paris accords are inf act, irrelevant. Always. If you would like to discuss them start a thread that will THUD
-
You're the one who went down the "treaty" path my friend.Duckwithabone said:
I’d say sticking to the point of the topic but that’s a lost cause.SFGbob said:
Actually, it's not debatable at all. If it were a "treaty" than the Senate needs to vote on it. What other topics would you like me to school you on?Duckwithabone said:
No I don’t believe it had been voted on. Though it’s debatable whether or not it needs to be voted on. Your point?SFGbob said:
When was the Paris climate "treaty" voted on by the US Senate?Duckwithabone said:
Glad to know you’re on board with the Paris climate treaty, UN, and WHO.NorthwestFresh said:
I’ve literally never said don’t follow Europe, you dunce. What’s with your strawman, other than to enable election fraud in the USA?Duckwithabone said:
Oh so we do follow Europe when it works for your views. Otherwise fuck those guys and their global treaties, pass the freedom fries.NorthwestFresh said:
Clean elections are worth noting. The fact your team is resisting any attempt at election reform as “voter suppression” tells me you’re a fascist piece of shit who is cool with blatant election fraud.Duckwithabone said:I’m confused. Is this one of those times when are supposed to value Europe’s opinion and follow their lead, or not? I thought we weren’t supposed to give a fuck about what Europe does.
-
We are Europeans you ass hole. We are the best of them. Did you learn nothing in school?Duckwithabone said:
Oh so we do follow Europe when it works for your views. Otherwise fuck those guys and their global treaties, pass the freedom fries.NorthwestFresh said:
Clean elections are worth noting. The fact your team is resisting any attempt at election reform as “voter suppression” tells me you’re a fascist piece of shit who is cool with blatant election fraud.Duckwithabone said:I’m confused. Is this one of those times when are supposed to value Europe’s opinion and follow their lead, or not? I thought we weren’t supposed to give a fuck about what Europe does.
What a dick. Move to Uganda asshat, you will then miss what you had. Admit you are a racist, bigoted POS and save us all of your self cleansing bullshit.
FFS.........another self loathing, America hating rat. I am sick of these pussies.
-
Spaniard?MelloDawg said:
Proven citation needed.NorthwestFresh said:
Clean elections are worth noting. The fact your team is resisting any attempt at election reform as “voter suppression” tells me you’re a fascist piece of shit who is cool with blatant election fraud.Duckwithabone said:I’m confused. Is this one of those times when are supposed to value Europe’s opinion and follow their lead, or not? I thought we weren’t supposed to give a fuck about what Europe does.
I wouldn’t worry. Mike Lindell is going to blow it wide open during the discovery phase of his upcoming trial. You will be vindicated. I shall cheer for you, Spaniard. -
Duckwithabone said:
Lol argue semantics when you have no ground to stand on. Correct it’s not an official “treaty” nor does it need to be. We good now, you guys support it now that it’s an accord.NorthwestFresh said:
It’s not a “treaty” if it’s not ratified by the Senate. Hence it being an “accord.”Duckwithabone said:
No I don’t believe it had been voted on. Though it’s debatable whether or not it needs to be voted on. Your point?SFGbob said:
When was the Paris climate "treaty" voted on by the US Senate?Duckwithabone said:
Glad to know you’re on board with the Paris climate treaty, UN, and WHO.NorthwestFresh said:
I’ve literally never said don’t follow Europe, you dunce. What’s with your strawman, other than to enable election fraud in the USA?Duckwithabone said:
Oh so we do follow Europe when it works for your views. Otherwise fuck those guys and their global treaties, pass the freedom fries.NorthwestFresh said:
Clean elections are worth noting. The fact your team is resisting any attempt at election reform as “voter suppression” tells me you’re a fascist piece of shit who is cool with blatant election fraud.Duckwithabone said:I’m confused. Is this one of those times when are supposed to value Europe’s opinion and follow their lead, or not? I thought we weren’t supposed to give a fuck about what Europe does.
Glad to be of help, Rambo.
It’s not semantics. It’s in the Constitution, you goof. If the Senate doesn’t pass it, it’s literally not a “treaty.”Duckwithabone said:
Lol argue semantics when you have no ground to stand on. Correct it’s not an official “treaty” nor does it need to be. We good now, you guys support it now that it’s an accord.NorthwestFresh said:
It’s not a “treaty” if it’s not ratified by the Senate. Hence it being an “accord.”Duckwithabone said:
No I don’t believe it had been voted on. Though it’s debatable whether or not it needs to be voted on. Your point?SFGbob said:
When was the Paris climate "treaty" voted on by the US Senate?Duckwithabone said:
Glad to know you’re on board with the Paris climate treaty, UN, and WHO.NorthwestFresh said:
I’ve literally never said don’t follow Europe, you dunce. What’s with your strawman, other than to enable election fraud in the USA?Duckwithabone said:
Oh so we do follow Europe when it works for your views. Otherwise fuck those guys and their global treaties, pass the freedom fries.NorthwestFresh said:
Clean elections are worth noting. The fact your team is resisting any attempt at election reform as “voter suppression” tells me you’re a fascist piece of shit who is cool with blatant election fraud.Duckwithabone said:I’m confused. Is this one of those times when are supposed to value Europe’s opinion and follow their lead, or not? I thought we weren’t supposed to give a fuck about what Europe does.
Glad to be of help, Rambo.
Come see Duck with a Bonehead destroyed by facts.
“Semantics” are actually literal differences in this case. -
A better response. I’ll connect some dots, I understand some might have got lost. It was a French opinion that mail-in ballots might lead to voter fraud. An opinion they’ve had for decades and were rethinking after they witnessed the huge voter turnout in the US.RaceBannon said:
The point wasn't about valuing opinions of anyone. France took an action and the discussion was about that actionDuckwithabone said:
Well you actually wrote a sentence this time. Not a deflection at all. The point was Europe and whether or not we value their opinions. Sure feels like global organizations (UN) and “accords” (Paris) are relevant.RaceBannon said:
You brought up Europe and treaties and other bullshit to deflect from the topicDuckwithabone said:
I’d say sticking to the point of the topic but that’s a lost cause.SFGbob said:
Actually, it's not debatable at all. If it were a "treaty" than the Senate needs to vote on it. What other topics would you like me to school you on?Duckwithabone said:
No I don’t believe it had been voted on. Though it’s debatable whether or not it needs to be voted on. Your point?SFGbob said:
When was the Paris climate "treaty" voted on by the US Senate?Duckwithabone said:
Glad to know you’re on board with the Paris climate treaty, UN, and WHO.NorthwestFresh said:
I’ve literally never said don’t follow Europe, you dunce. What’s with your strawman, other than to enable election fraud in the USA?Duckwithabone said:
Oh so we do follow Europe when it works for your views. Otherwise fuck those guys and their global treaties, pass the freedom fries.NorthwestFresh said:
Clean elections are worth noting. The fact your team is resisting any attempt at election reform as “voter suppression” tells me you’re a fascist piece of shit who is cool with blatant election fraud.Duckwithabone said:I’m confused. Is this one of those times when are supposed to value Europe’s opinion and follow their lead, or not? I thought we weren’t supposed to give a fuck about what Europe does.
Dumb as a rock
Valuing opinions is fag talk. Not surprising
The UN and the Paris accords are inf act, irrelevant. Always. If you would like to discuss them start a thread that will THUD
Given the derisive attitude toward European opinions in general on this board I found it odd and potentially hypocritical that this particular French opinion was valued. That is all. -
Missing the forest for the trees.NorthwestFresh said:Duckwithabone said:
Lol argue semantics when you have no ground to stand on. Correct it’s not an official “treaty” nor does it need to be. We good now, you guys support it now that it’s an accord.NorthwestFresh said:
It’s not a “treaty” if it’s not ratified by the Senate. Hence it being an “accord.”Duckwithabone said:
No I don’t believe it had been voted on. Though it’s debatable whether or not it needs to be voted on. Your point?SFGbob said:
When was the Paris climate "treaty" voted on by the US Senate?Duckwithabone said:
Glad to know you’re on board with the Paris climate treaty, UN, and WHO.NorthwestFresh said:
I’ve literally never said don’t follow Europe, you dunce. What’s with your strawman, other than to enable election fraud in the USA?Duckwithabone said:
Oh so we do follow Europe when it works for your views. Otherwise fuck those guys and their global treaties, pass the freedom fries.NorthwestFresh said:
Clean elections are worth noting. The fact your team is resisting any attempt at election reform as “voter suppression” tells me you’re a fascist piece of shit who is cool with blatant election fraud.Duckwithabone said:I’m confused. Is this one of those times when are supposed to value Europe’s opinion and follow their lead, or not? I thought we weren’t supposed to give a fuck about what Europe does.
Glad to be of help, Rambo.
It’s not semantics. It’s in the Constitution, you goof. If the Senate doesn’t pass it, it’s literally not a “treaty.”Duckwithabone said:
Lol argue semantics when you have no ground to stand on. Correct it’s not an official “treaty” nor does it need to be. We good now, you guys support it now that it’s an accord.NorthwestFresh said:
It’s not a “treaty” if it’s not ratified by the Senate. Hence it being an “accord.”Duckwithabone said:
No I don’t believe it had been voted on. Though it’s debatable whether or not it needs to be voted on. Your point?SFGbob said:
When was the Paris climate "treaty" voted on by the US Senate?Duckwithabone said:
Glad to know you’re on board with the Paris climate treaty, UN, and WHO.NorthwestFresh said:
I’ve literally never said don’t follow Europe, you dunce. What’s with your strawman, other than to enable election fraud in the USA?Duckwithabone said:
Oh so we do follow Europe when it works for your views. Otherwise fuck those guys and their global treaties, pass the freedom fries.NorthwestFresh said:
Clean elections are worth noting. The fact your team is resisting any attempt at election reform as “voter suppression” tells me you’re a fascist piece of shit who is cool with blatant election fraud.Duckwithabone said:I’m confused. Is this one of those times when are supposed to value Europe’s opinion and follow their lead, or not? I thought we weren’t supposed to give a fuck about what Europe does.
Glad to be of help, Rambo.
Come see Duck with a Bonehead destroyed by facts.
“Semantics” are actually literal differences in this case.
