Mail-in ballots and voting machines banned in France
Comments
-
We just saw mail ins help steal an election. They did too.Duckwithabone said:
A better response. I’ll connect some dots, I understand some might have got lost. It was a French opinion that mail-in ballots might lead to voter fraud. An opinion they’ve had for decades and were rethinking after they witnessed the huge voter turnout in the US.RaceBannon said:
The point wasn't about valuing opinions of anyone. France took an action and the discussion was about that actionDuckwithabone said:
Well you actually wrote a sentence this time. Not a deflection at all. The point was Europe and whether or not we value their opinions. Sure feels like global organizations (UN) and “accords” (Paris) are relevant.RaceBannon said:
You brought up Europe and treaties and other bullshit to deflect from the topicDuckwithabone said:
I’d say sticking to the point of the topic but that’s a lost cause.SFGbob said:
Actually, it's not debatable at all. If it were a "treaty" than the Senate needs to vote on it. What other topics would you like me to school you on?Duckwithabone said:
No I don’t believe it had been voted on. Though it’s debatable whether or not it needs to be voted on. Your point?SFGbob said:
When was the Paris climate "treaty" voted on by the US Senate?Duckwithabone said:
Glad to know you’re on board with the Paris climate treaty, UN, and WHO.NorthwestFresh said:
I’ve literally never said don’t follow Europe, you dunce. What’s with your strawman, other than to enable election fraud in the USA?Duckwithabone said:
Oh so we do follow Europe when it works for your views. Otherwise fuck those guys and their global treaties, pass the freedom fries.NorthwestFresh said:
Clean elections are worth noting. The fact your team is resisting any attempt at election reform as “voter suppression” tells me you’re a fascist piece of shit who is cool with blatant election fraud.Duckwithabone said:I’m confused. Is this one of those times when are supposed to value Europe’s opinion and follow their lead, or not? I thought we weren’t supposed to give a fuck about what Europe does.
Dumb as a rock
Valuing opinions is fag talk. Not surprising
The UN and the Paris accords are inf act, irrelevant. Always. If you would like to discuss them start a thread that will THUD
Given the derisive attitude toward European opinions in general on this board I found it odd and potentially hypocritical that this particular French opinion was valued. That is all.
-
People who know the difference between right and wrong don't struggle like you on these questions.Duckwithabone said:I’m confused. Is this one of those times when are supposed to value Europe’s opinion and follow their lead, or not? I thought we weren’t supposed to give a fuck about what Europe does.
-
Nah...but again, join America whenever you’re ready to move forward.Sledog said:
We just saw mail ins help steal an election. They did too.Duckwithabone said:
A better response. I’ll connect some dots, I understand some might have got lost. It was a French opinion that mail-in ballots might lead to voter fraud. An opinion they’ve had for decades and were rethinking after they witnessed the huge voter turnout in the US.RaceBannon said:
The point wasn't about valuing opinions of anyone. France took an action and the discussion was about that actionDuckwithabone said:
Well you actually wrote a sentence this time. Not a deflection at all. The point was Europe and whether or not we value their opinions. Sure feels like global organizations (UN) and “accords” (Paris) are relevant.RaceBannon said:
You brought up Europe and treaties and other bullshit to deflect from the topicDuckwithabone said:
I’d say sticking to the point of the topic but that’s a lost cause.SFGbob said:
Actually, it's not debatable at all. If it were a "treaty" than the Senate needs to vote on it. What other topics would you like me to school you on?Duckwithabone said:
No I don’t believe it had been voted on. Though it’s debatable whether or not it needs to be voted on. Your point?SFGbob said:
When was the Paris climate "treaty" voted on by the US Senate?Duckwithabone said:
Glad to know you’re on board with the Paris climate treaty, UN, and WHO.NorthwestFresh said:
I’ve literally never said don’t follow Europe, you dunce. What’s with your strawman, other than to enable election fraud in the USA?Duckwithabone said:
Oh so we do follow Europe when it works for your views. Otherwise fuck those guys and their global treaties, pass the freedom fries.NorthwestFresh said:
Clean elections are worth noting. The fact your team is resisting any attempt at election reform as “voter suppression” tells me you’re a fascist piece of shit who is cool with blatant election fraud.Duckwithabone said:I’m confused. Is this one of those times when are supposed to value Europe’s opinion and follow their lead, or not? I thought we weren’t supposed to give a fuck about what Europe does.
Dumb as a rock
Valuing opinions is fag talk. Not surprising
The UN and the Paris accords are inf act, irrelevant. Always. If you would like to discuss them start a thread that will THUD
Given the derisive attitude toward European opinions in general on this board I found it odd and potentially hypocritical that this particular French opinion was valued. That is all. -
MelloDawg said:
Nah...but again, join America whenever you’re ready to move forward.Sledog said:
We just saw mail ins help steal an election. They did too.Duckwithabone said:
A better response. I’ll connect some dots, I understand some might have got lost. It was a French opinion that mail-in ballots might lead to voter fraud. An opinion they’ve had for decades and were rethinking after they witnessed the huge voter turnout in the US.RaceBannon said:
The point wasn't about valuing opinions of anyone. France took an action and the discussion was about that actionDuckwithabone said:
Well you actually wrote a sentence this time. Not a deflection at all. The point was Europe and whether or not we value their opinions. Sure feels like global organizations (UN) and “accords” (Paris) are relevant.RaceBannon said:
You brought up Europe and treaties and other bullshit to deflect from the topicDuckwithabone said:
I’d say sticking to the point of the topic but that’s a lost cause.SFGbob said:
Actually, it's not debatable at all. If it were a "treaty" than the Senate needs to vote on it. What other topics would you like me to school you on?Duckwithabone said:
No I don’t believe it had been voted on. Though it’s debatable whether or not it needs to be voted on. Your point?SFGbob said:
When was the Paris climate "treaty" voted on by the US Senate?Duckwithabone said:
Glad to know you’re on board with the Paris climate treaty, UN, and WHO.NorthwestFresh said:
I’ve literally never said don’t follow Europe, you dunce. What’s with your strawman, other than to enable election fraud in the USA?Duckwithabone said:
Oh so we do follow Europe when it works for your views. Otherwise fuck those guys and their global treaties, pass the freedom fries.NorthwestFresh said:
Clean elections are worth noting. The fact your team is resisting any attempt at election reform as “voter suppression” tells me you’re a fascist piece of shit who is cool with blatant election fraud.Duckwithabone said:I’m confused. Is this one of those times when are supposed to value Europe’s opinion and follow their lead, or not? I thought we weren’t supposed to give a fuck about what Europe does.
Dumb as a rock
Valuing opinions is fag talk. Not surprising
The UN and the Paris accords are inf act, irrelevant. Always. If you would like to discuss them start a thread that will THUD
Given the derisive attitude toward European opinions in general on this board I found it odd and potentially hypocritical that this particular French opinion was valued. That is all.
-
Leave for the socialist paradise of your choice. Otherwise shits gonna get ugly fast.MelloDawg said:
Nah...but again, join America whenever you’re ready to move forward.Sledog said:
We just saw mail ins help steal an election. They did too.Duckwithabone said:
A better response. I’ll connect some dots, I understand some might have got lost. It was a French opinion that mail-in ballots might lead to voter fraud. An opinion they’ve had for decades and were rethinking after they witnessed the huge voter turnout in the US.RaceBannon said:
The point wasn't about valuing opinions of anyone. France took an action and the discussion was about that actionDuckwithabone said:
Well you actually wrote a sentence this time. Not a deflection at all. The point was Europe and whether or not we value their opinions. Sure feels like global organizations (UN) and “accords” (Paris) are relevant.RaceBannon said:
You brought up Europe and treaties and other bullshit to deflect from the topicDuckwithabone said:
I’d say sticking to the point of the topic but that’s a lost cause.SFGbob said:
Actually, it's not debatable at all. If it were a "treaty" than the Senate needs to vote on it. What other topics would you like me to school you on?Duckwithabone said:
No I don’t believe it had been voted on. Though it’s debatable whether or not it needs to be voted on. Your point?SFGbob said:
When was the Paris climate "treaty" voted on by the US Senate?Duckwithabone said:
Glad to know you’re on board with the Paris climate treaty, UN, and WHO.NorthwestFresh said:
I’ve literally never said don’t follow Europe, you dunce. What’s with your strawman, other than to enable election fraud in the USA?Duckwithabone said:
Oh so we do follow Europe when it works for your views. Otherwise fuck those guys and their global treaties, pass the freedom fries.NorthwestFresh said:
Clean elections are worth noting. The fact your team is resisting any attempt at election reform as “voter suppression” tells me you’re a fascist piece of shit who is cool with blatant election fraud.Duckwithabone said:I’m confused. Is this one of those times when are supposed to value Europe’s opinion and follow their lead, or not? I thought we weren’t supposed to give a fuck about what Europe does.
Dumb as a rock
Valuing opinions is fag talk. Not surprising
The UN and the Paris accords are inf act, irrelevant. Always. If you would like to discuss them start a thread that will THUD
Given the derisive attitude toward European opinions in general on this board I found it odd and potentially hypocritical that this particular French opinion was valued. That is all. -
Voter fraud isn’t moving forward. Why would you want to change the system? You got away with stealing a presidential election by having operatives ready in swing states and ballots hidden in suitcases.MelloDawg said:
Nah...but again, join America whenever you’re ready to move forward.Sledog said:
We just saw mail ins help steal an election. They did too.Duckwithabone said:
A better response. I’ll connect some dots, I understand some might have got lost. It was a French opinion that mail-in ballots might lead to voter fraud. An opinion they’ve had for decades and were rethinking after they witnessed the huge voter turnout in the US.RaceBannon said:
The point wasn't about valuing opinions of anyone. France took an action and the discussion was about that actionDuckwithabone said:
Well you actually wrote a sentence this time. Not a deflection at all. The point was Europe and whether or not we value their opinions. Sure feels like global organizations (UN) and “accords” (Paris) are relevant.RaceBannon said:
You brought up Europe and treaties and other bullshit to deflect from the topicDuckwithabone said:
I’d say sticking to the point of the topic but that’s a lost cause.SFGbob said:
Actually, it's not debatable at all. If it were a "treaty" than the Senate needs to vote on it. What other topics would you like me to school you on?Duckwithabone said:
No I don’t believe it had been voted on. Though it’s debatable whether or not it needs to be voted on. Your point?SFGbob said:
When was the Paris climate "treaty" voted on by the US Senate?Duckwithabone said:
Glad to know you’re on board with the Paris climate treaty, UN, and WHO.NorthwestFresh said:
I’ve literally never said don’t follow Europe, you dunce. What’s with your strawman, other than to enable election fraud in the USA?Duckwithabone said:
Oh so we do follow Europe when it works for your views. Otherwise fuck those guys and their global treaties, pass the freedom fries.NorthwestFresh said:
Clean elections are worth noting. The fact your team is resisting any attempt at election reform as “voter suppression” tells me you’re a fascist piece of shit who is cool with blatant election fraud.Duckwithabone said:I’m confused. Is this one of those times when are supposed to value Europe’s opinion and follow their lead, or not? I thought we weren’t supposed to give a fuck about what Europe does.
Dumb as a rock
Valuing opinions is fag talk. Not surprising
The UN and the Paris accords are inf act, irrelevant. Always. If you would like to discuss them start a thread that will THUD
Given the derisive attitude toward European opinions in general on this board I found it odd and potentially hypocritical that this particular French opinion was valued. That is all. -
Seriously. @obk, can you put out a depth chart for us?PurpleThrobber said:
I don't have my roster handy, so I need to wait for OBK to chime on what squad Marcon belongs to.Duckwithabone said:I’m confused. Is this one of those times when are supposed to value Europe’s opinion and follow their lead, or not? I thought we weren’t supposed to give a fuck about what Europe does.
-
Emmanuel Macron has been arrested and executed. However, you will still see him on TV for awhile.
-
This is the kind of insider information those fags over on the finance board are missing out on.oregonblitzkrieg said:Emmanuel Macron has been arrested and executed. However, you will still see him on TV for awhile.
-
@creepycougPurpleThrobber said:
This is the kind of insider information those fags over on the finance board are missing out on.oregonblitzkrieg said:Emmanuel Macron has been arrested and executed. However, you will still see him on TV for awhile.