Chickenhawk Biden Update: US open to sending troops into Iraq
Comments
-
oregonblitzkrieg said:
Isis and al-Qaeda - American/NWO inventions used to start wars in the Middle East and remove liberties in the West. Executed war criminal John McCain was the leader of ISIS and OBL worked for the CIA.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TOB-bA7_Frc -
I have no issues with NATO as long as the other members pay their fair share. But no, they make the US front the bill and continuously bash said country. Fuck themDuckwithabone said:
Booooorrrrring. US involved with NATO again, big deal. It’s what most of us want.NorthwestFresh said:I had predicted new wars by summer but didn’t expect it this soon.
Halliburton, Raytheon, and the rest of the war machine needs some contracts right now from the Big Guy.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2021/02/18/politics/us-troops-iraq/index.html
US signals it is open to sending more troops to support NATO's mission in Iraq
(CNN) The Pentagon opened the door to the possibility of sending more American troops to the Middle East as part of a newly expanded NATO training mission to support Iraqi forces and ensure that ISIS does not rise again.
"The US is participating in the force generation process for NATO Mission Iraq and will contribute its fair share to this important expanded mission," Pentagon spokesperson Cmdr. Jessica L. McNulty told CNN. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin spoke about the mission with his NATO counterparts during a meeting with defense ministers on Thursday.
Most of the other countries in NATO are entitled little bitches. No wonder liberals love them. -
Lol take a long break from the internet my man. The old days of conspiracies with newspaper clippings were much healthier for people.oregonblitzkrieg said:Isis and al-Qaeda - American/NWO inventions used to start wars in the Middle East and remove liberties in the West. Executed war criminal John McCain was the leader of ISIS and OBL worked for the CIA.
-
I don’t disagree at all with your criticism of NATO and the former guy pushing for change in NATO was one of the few things I sort of agreed on. However that doesn’t mean that we leave NATO completely. You need a seat at the table if you want to push for change.greenblood said:
I have no issues with NATO as long as the other members pay their fair share. But no, they make the US front the bill and continuously bash said country. Fuck themDuckwithabone said:
Booooorrrrring. US involved with NATO again, big deal. It’s what most of us want.NorthwestFresh said:I had predicted new wars by summer but didn’t expect it this soon.
Halliburton, Raytheon, and the rest of the war machine needs some contracts right now from the Big Guy.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2021/02/18/politics/us-troops-iraq/index.html
US signals it is open to sending more troops to support NATO's mission in Iraq
(CNN) The Pentagon opened the door to the possibility of sending more American troops to the Middle East as part of a newly expanded NATO training mission to support Iraqi forces and ensure that ISIS does not rise again.
"The US is participating in the force generation process for NATO Mission Iraq and will contribute its fair share to this important expanded mission," Pentagon spokesperson Cmdr. Jessica L. McNulty told CNN. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin spoke about the mission with his NATO counterparts during a meeting with defense ministers on Thursday.
Most of the other countries in NATO are entitled little bitches. No wonder liberals love them. -
We? know the Obama administration helped arm ISIS, or “ISIL” as Barry insisted on calling them as a show of giving them credibility, under the lie of them being “rebels” against Assad.Duckwithabone said:
Lol take a long break from the internet my man. The old days of conspiracies with newspaper clippings were much healthier for people.oregonblitzkrieg said:Isis and al-Qaeda - American/NWO inventions used to start wars in the Middle East and remove liberties in the West. Executed war criminal John McCain was the leader of ISIS and OBL worked for the CIA.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.newsweek.com/how-isis-got-weapons-us-used-them-take-iraq-syria-748468?amp=1
The Islamic State militant group (ISIS) got its hands on vast supplies of weapons by taking advantage of U.S. weapons transfers that may have violated international agreements between Washington and its allies, according to a new report. -
You have no rhythm.Duckwithabone said:
Lol take a long break from the internet my man. The old days of conspiracies with newspaper clippings were much healthier for people.oregonblitzkrieg said:Isis and al-Qaeda - American/NWO inventions used to start wars in the Middle East and remove liberties in the West. Executed war criminal John McCain was the leader of ISIS and OBL worked for the CIA.
-
White men?PurpleThrobber said:
You have no rhythm.Duckwithabone said:
Lol take a long break from the internet my man. The old days of conspiracies with newspaper clippings were much healthier for people.oregonblitzkrieg said:Isis and al-Qaeda - American/NWO inventions used to start wars in the Middle East and remove liberties in the West. Executed war criminal John McCain was the leader of ISIS and OBL worked for the CIA.
That’s not what . . .
No actually that is what I’m hearing. -
These Biden dick suckers will support anything
-
They are now all-in for the West occupying Iraq again after a basic trial balloon from the Biden administration. No pushback at all from the “anti-war” Chickenhawks @HHusky and @These clowns won’t criticize Biden for anything.RaceBannon said:These Biden dick suckers will support anything
Boner voted for it! -
In 2011 they elected to pull out of Iraq two months early. I was oversaw the units that were training Iraqi military units and we had to scramble to get them out at the beginning of November instead of January. That was an Obama decision, not a Trump decision.Duckwithabone said:
He didn’t have to run on it. He ran on returning competence to the White House and in foreign affairs. Active membership in global organizations such as NATO among others is part of that deal. It’s what was voted for and again, most of us wanted to happen.RaceBannon said:
No it isn'tDuckwithabone said:
Booooorrrrring. US involved with NATO again, big deal. It’s what most of us want.NorthwestFresh said:I had predicted new wars by summer but didn’t expect it this soon.
Halliburton, Raytheon, and the rest of the war machine needs some contracts right now from the Big Guy.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2021/02/18/politics/us-troops-iraq/index.html
US signals it is open to sending more troops to support NATO's mission in Iraq
(CNN) The Pentagon opened the door to the possibility of sending more American troops to the Middle East as part of a newly expanded NATO training mission to support Iraqi forces and ensure that ISIS does not rise again.
"The US is participating in the force generation process for NATO Mission Iraq and will contribute its fair share to this important expanded mission," Pentagon spokesperson Cmdr. Jessica L. McNulty told CNN. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin spoke about the mission with his NATO counterparts during a meeting with defense ministers on Thursday.
Did Biden run on this?
Nope
You're a bootlicker who follows your party line -
Olga, I've never been anti-war. Sometimes you have to be willing to go to war.NorthwestFresh said:
They are now all-in for the West occupying Iraq again after a basic trial balloon from the Biden administration. No pushback at all from the “anti-war” Chickenhawks @HHusky and @These clowns won’t criticize Biden for anything.RaceBannon said:These Biden dick suckers will support anything
Boner voted for it!
My 2004 Presidential vote was entirely premised on W being a better choice to continue the war effort.
You looking for dove? Look in the mirror.
-
To be willing to go to war, you have to take a break from warHHusky said:
Olga, I've never been anti-war. Sometimes you have to be willing to go to war.NorthwestFresh said:
They are now all-in for the West occupying Iraq again after a basic trial balloon from the Biden administration. No pushback at all from the “anti-war” Chickenhawks @HHusky and @These clowns won’t criticize Biden for anything.RaceBannon said:These Biden dick suckers will support anything
Boner voted for it!
My 2004 Presidential vote was entirely premised on W being a better choice to continue the war effort.
You looking for dove? Look in the mirror.
Which your guys haven’t done. -
We haven't got to war. We have got to virtue signaling and money spending with thousands of dead and wounded Americans. War is not having Rules of Engagement on requiring soldiers to take fire before engaging in limited action. War is Dresden and Hiroshima. You think the Taliban fear the Americans? Hell, you can taste the disrespect for the soft and stupid Americans from that shit hole.PurpleThrobber said:
To be willing to go to war, you have to take a break from warHHusky said:
Olga, I've never been anti-war. Sometimes you have to be willing to go to war.NorthwestFresh said:
They are now all-in for the West occupying Iraq again after a basic trial balloon from the Biden administration. No pushback at all from the “anti-war” Chickenhawks @HHusky and @These clowns won’t criticize Biden for anything.RaceBannon said:These Biden dick suckers will support anything
Boner voted for it!
My 2004 Presidential vote was entirely premised on W being a better choice to continue the war effort.
You looking for dove? Look in the mirror.
Which your guys haven’t done. -
But you can’t allow fiscally irresponsible countries like Germany to have seat and pay next to nothing.Duckwithabone said:
I don’t disagree at all with your criticism of NATO and the former guy pushing for change in NATO was one of the few things I sort of agreed on. However that doesn’t mean that we leave NATO completely. You need a seat at the table if you want to push for change.greenblood said:
I have no issues with NATO as long as the other members pay their fair share. But no, they make the US front the bill and continuously bash said country. Fuck themDuckwithabone said:
Booooorrrrring. US involved with NATO again, big deal. It’s what most of us want.NorthwestFresh said:I had predicted new wars by summer but didn’t expect it this soon.
Halliburton, Raytheon, and the rest of the war machine needs some contracts right now from the Big Guy.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2021/02/18/politics/us-troops-iraq/index.html
US signals it is open to sending more troops to support NATO's mission in Iraq
(CNN) The Pentagon opened the door to the possibility of sending more American troops to the Middle East as part of a newly expanded NATO training mission to support Iraqi forces and ensure that ISIS does not rise again.
"The US is participating in the force generation process for NATO Mission Iraq and will contribute its fair share to this important expanded mission," Pentagon spokesperson Cmdr. Jessica L. McNulty told CNN. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin spoke about the mission with his NATO counterparts during a meeting with defense ministers on Thursday.
Most of the other countries in NATO are entitled little bitches. No wonder liberals love them. -
So, it’s only the deaths due to Covid under Trump that trigger you. Got it, thanks!HHusky said:
Olga, I've never been anti-war. Sometimes you have to be willing to go to war.NorthwestFresh said:
They are now all-in for the West occupying Iraq again after a basic trial balloon from the Biden administration. No pushback at all from the “anti-war” Chickenhawks @HHusky and @These clowns won’t criticize Biden for anything.RaceBannon said:These Biden dick suckers will support anything
Boner voted for it!
My 2004 Presidential vote was entirely premised on W being a better choice to continue the war effort.
You looking for dove? Look in the mirror. -
Kurd lives matter.doogie said:
So, it’s only the deaths due to Covid under Trump that trigger you. Got it, thanks!HHusky said:
Olga, I've never been anti-war. Sometimes you have to be willing to go to war.NorthwestFresh said:
They are now all-in for the West occupying Iraq again after a basic trial balloon from the Biden administration. No pushback at all from the “anti-war” Chickenhawks @HHusky and @These clowns won’t criticize Biden for anything.RaceBannon said:These Biden dick suckers will support anything
Boner voted for it!
My 2004 Presidential vote was entirely premised on W being a better choice to continue the war effort.
You looking for dove? Look in the mirror. -
Germany gets more natural gas from Russia than any other country they buy from yet its Trump that is buddies with Putin. Russia just started up work again on NS2 as our? America Last president shuts down work on XL.greenblood said:
But you can’t allow fiscally irresponsible countries like Germany to have seat and pay next to nothing.Duckwithabone said:
I don’t disagree at all with your criticism of NATO and the former guy pushing for change in NATO was one of the few things I sort of agreed on. However that doesn’t mean that we leave NATO completely. You need a seat at the table if you want to push for change.greenblood said:
I have no issues with NATO as long as the other members pay their fair share. But no, they make the US front the bill and continuously bash said country. Fuck themDuckwithabone said:
Booooorrrrring. US involved with NATO again, big deal. It’s what most of us want.NorthwestFresh said:I had predicted new wars by summer but didn’t expect it this soon.
Halliburton, Raytheon, and the rest of the war machine needs some contracts right now from the Big Guy.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2021/02/18/politics/us-troops-iraq/index.html
US signals it is open to sending more troops to support NATO's mission in Iraq
(CNN) The Pentagon opened the door to the possibility of sending more American troops to the Middle East as part of a newly expanded NATO training mission to support Iraqi forces and ensure that ISIS does not rise again.
"The US is participating in the force generation process for NATO Mission Iraq and will contribute its fair share to this important expanded mission," Pentagon spokesperson Cmdr. Jessica L. McNulty told CNN. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin spoke about the mission with his NATO counterparts during a meeting with defense ministers on Thursday.
Most of the other countries in NATO are entitled little bitches. No wonder liberals love them.
-
Like I said, you’re a Chickenhawk.HHusky said:
Olga, I've never been anti-war. Sometimes you have to be willing to go to war.NorthwestFresh said:
They are now all-in for the West occupying Iraq again after a basic trial balloon from the Biden administration. No pushback at all from the “anti-war” Chickenhawks @HHusky and @These clowns won’t criticize Biden for anything.RaceBannon said:These Biden dick suckers will support anything
Boner voted for it!
My 2004 Presidential vote was entirely premised on W being a better choice to continue the war effort.
You looking for dove? Look in the mirror. -
This aged well.Duckwithabone said:
He didn’t have to run on it. He ran on returning competence to the White House and in foreign affairs. Active membership in global organizations such as NATO among others is part of that deal. It’s what was voted for and again, most of us wanted to happen.RaceBannon said:
No it isn'tDuckwithabone said:
Booooorrrrring. US involved with NATO again, big deal. It’s what most of us want.NorthwestFresh said:I had predicted new wars by summer but didn’t expect it this soon.
Halliburton, Raytheon, and the rest of the war machine needs some contracts right now from the Big Guy.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2021/02/18/politics/us-troops-iraq/index.html
US signals it is open to sending more troops to support NATO's mission in Iraq
(CNN) The Pentagon opened the door to the possibility of sending more American troops to the Middle East as part of a newly expanded NATO training mission to support Iraqi forces and ensure that ISIS does not rise again.
"The US is participating in the force generation process for NATO Mission Iraq and will contribute its fair share to this important expanded mission," Pentagon spokesperson Cmdr. Jessica L. McNulty told CNN. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin spoke about the mission with his NATO counterparts during a meeting with defense ministers on Thursday.
Did Biden run on this?
Nope
You're a bootlicker who follows your party line -
The fact that he hasn't posted in well over a year but was active on the site last night tells me that he perhaps realized the error of his vote and feels the shame he should. That, or he is a giant pussy and doesn't want to face the Tug firing squad for his poor choices.hardhat said:
This aged well.Duckwithabone said:
He didn’t have to run on it. He ran on returning competence to the White House and in foreign affairs. Active membership in global organizations such as NATO among others is part of that deal. It’s what was voted for and again, most of us wanted to happen.RaceBannon said:
No it isn'tDuckwithabone said:
Booooorrrrring. US involved with NATO again, big deal. It’s what most of us want.NorthwestFresh said:I had predicted new wars by summer but didn’t expect it this soon.
Halliburton, Raytheon, and the rest of the war machine needs some contracts right now from the Big Guy.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2021/02/18/politics/us-troops-iraq/index.html
US signals it is open to sending more troops to support NATO's mission in Iraq
(CNN) The Pentagon opened the door to the possibility of sending more American troops to the Middle East as part of a newly expanded NATO training mission to support Iraqi forces and ensure that ISIS does not rise again.
"The US is participating in the force generation process for NATO Mission Iraq and will contribute its fair share to this important expanded mission," Pentagon spokesperson Cmdr. Jessica L. McNulty told CNN. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin spoke about the mission with his NATO counterparts during a meeting with defense ministers on Thursday.
Did Biden run on this?
Nope
You're a bootlicker who follows your party line -
I kinda like that NorthwestFresh guy.
What happened to him as he was before my tim there?
-
'Returning competence to the White House'
-
We have a senile old WHITE guy in the WH. I remember when the Left attacked Reagan for far less than this.hardhat said:'Returning competence to the White House'
Now imagine the incompetent moron to his right sitting in the Oval Office.
Brought to you by the BidenBros. The adults. -
Not "just a jobs program?" Go fuck yourself, traitor.HHusky said:We've got interests throughout the world and the military isn't just a jobs program.
-
RIPGrundleStiltzkin said:
I’d like us to actually take the Iraqi oil this time then.HHusky said:We've got interests throughout the world and the military isn't just a jobs program.
-
BumpRaceBannon said:These Biden dick suckers will support anything
-
Mello is impressed and inspired by his messaging.hardhat said:'Returning competence to the White House'
-
-
Once again, we have a start date on the new I-5 bridge? Any new major transportation projects in Washington or Oregon to benefit the middle class as a result of the bill? Not here in Oregon. With the federal and state bureaucracies, nothing is shovel ready and nothing we need gets built.hardhat said:
-
They are making some headway on the 380 here in between north Dallas and Denton but it's fucking annoying and I have to drive it 2 days a week
