Chickenhawk Biden Update: US open to sending troops into Iraq
Comments
-
You people are seriously stupid. Too stupid to even know when you're being mockedDuckwithabone said:
Since when did tighty righties have a problem with politicians using privilege to get out of going to war. McCain was the last actual war veteran who embraced that role in the Republican Party and you all hated him.NorthwestFresh said:RaceBannon said:Biden is a draft dodger
Five asthma deferments for the HBCU football star and world-class life guard/protector of children from CornPop, who was a bad dude. -
But but but but TrumpDuckwithabone said:
Did you have a problem with the former guy increasing the military budget? I don’t like or agree with our reliance on our military industrial complex to keep our economy, even our country as a whole, afloat. But to pretend that Biden is somehow the first or the worst president engaging in this time-honored tradition is pure self-delusion. The former guy did it too, and praised himself when he did.NorthwestFresh said:
Joe doesn’t even want our own oil. Troops will go into Iraq again for one reason. Military contracts for Biden’s biggest donors. Troops don’t arm, feed, and shelter themselves on their own.GrundleStiltzkin said:
I’d like us to actually take the Iraqi oil this time then.HHusky said:We've got interests throughout the world and the military isn't just a jobs program.
-
Also, waddabout the KURDS?!
Is Biden allowing our best allies ever to suffer under Erdogan like that awful Orange Man did? -
"most".Duckwithabone said:
He didn’t have to run on it. He ran on returning competence to the White House and in foreign affairs. Active membership in global organizations such as NATO among others is part of that deal. It’s what was voted for and again, most of us wanted to happen.RaceBannon said:
No it isn'tDuckwithabone said:
Booooorrrrring. US involved with NATO again, big deal. It’s what most of us want.NorthwestFresh said:I had predicted new wars by summer but didn’t expect it this soon.
Halliburton, Raytheon, and the rest of the war machine needs some contracts right now from the Big Guy.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2021/02/18/politics/us-troops-iraq/index.html
US signals it is open to sending more troops to support NATO's mission in Iraq
(CNN) The Pentagon opened the door to the possibility of sending more American troops to the Middle East as part of a newly expanded NATO training mission to support Iraqi forces and ensure that ISIS does not rise again.
"The US is participating in the force generation process for NATO Mission Iraq and will contribute its fair share to this important expanded mission," Pentagon spokesperson Cmdr. Jessica L. McNulty told CNN. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin spoke about the mission with his NATO counterparts during a meeting with defense ministers on Thursday.
Did Biden run on this?
Nope
You're a bootlicker who follows your party line
Define that.
Because 'most' isn't 51%.
-
Empty response as usualRaceBannon said:
You people are seriously stupid. Too stupid to even know when you're being mockedDuckwithabone said:
Since when did tighty righties have a problem with politicians using privilege to get out of going to war. McCain was the last actual war veteran who embraced that role in the Republican Party and you all hated him.NorthwestFresh said:RaceBannon said:Biden is a draft dodger
Five asthma deferments for the HBCU football star and world-class life guard/protector of children from CornPop, who was a bad dude. -
Most is a slightly ambiguous word. Let’s just say a landslide popular vote wants these actions. That’s not to say Biden is beyond criticism. But increasing involvement in NATO is generally not one that Dems will have a problem with.PurpleThrobber said:
"most".Duckwithabone said:
He didn’t have to run on it. He ran on returning competence to the White House and in foreign affairs. Active membership in global organizations such as NATO among others is part of that deal. It’s what was voted for and again, most of us wanted to happen.RaceBannon said:
No it isn'tDuckwithabone said:
Booooorrrrring. US involved with NATO again, big deal. It’s what most of us want.NorthwestFresh said:I had predicted new wars by summer but didn’t expect it this soon.
Halliburton, Raytheon, and the rest of the war machine needs some contracts right now from the Big Guy.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2021/02/18/politics/us-troops-iraq/index.html
US signals it is open to sending more troops to support NATO's mission in Iraq
(CNN) The Pentagon opened the door to the possibility of sending more American troops to the Middle East as part of a newly expanded NATO training mission to support Iraqi forces and ensure that ISIS does not rise again.
"The US is participating in the force generation process for NATO Mission Iraq and will contribute its fair share to this important expanded mission," Pentagon spokesperson Cmdr. Jessica L. McNulty told CNN. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin spoke about the mission with his NATO counterparts during a meeting with defense ministers on Thursday.
Did Biden run on this?
Nope
You're a bootlicker who follows your party line
Define that.
Because 'most' isn't 51%. -
Define 'most'.Duckwithabone said:
Most is a slightly ambiguous word. Let’s just say a landslide popular vote wants these actions. That’s not to say Biden is beyond criticism. But increasing involvement in NATO is generally not one that Dems will have a problem with.PurpleThrobber said:
"most".Duckwithabone said:
He didn’t have to run on it. He ran on returning competence to the White House and in foreign affairs. Active membership in global organizations such as NATO among others is part of that deal. It’s what was voted for and again, most of us wanted to happen.RaceBannon said:
No it isn'tDuckwithabone said:
Booooorrrrring. US involved with NATO again, big deal. It’s what most of us want.NorthwestFresh said:I had predicted new wars by summer but didn’t expect it this soon.
Halliburton, Raytheon, and the rest of the war machine needs some contracts right now from the Big Guy.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2021/02/18/politics/us-troops-iraq/index.html
US signals it is open to sending more troops to support NATO's mission in Iraq
(CNN) The Pentagon opened the door to the possibility of sending more American troops to the Middle East as part of a newly expanded NATO training mission to support Iraqi forces and ensure that ISIS does not rise again.
"The US is participating in the force generation process for NATO Mission Iraq and will contribute its fair share to this important expanded mission," Pentagon spokesperson Cmdr. Jessica L. McNulty told CNN. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin spoke about the mission with his NATO counterparts during a meeting with defense ministers on Thursday.
Did Biden run on this?
Nope
You're a bootlicker who follows your party line
Define that.
Because 'most' isn't 51%.
Because 'most' people don't support 20 years of endless wars. "Most" people don't support enriching military contractors beyond belief.
Biden is a corrupt puppet and deserves everything that gets thrown at him.
-
So the Left is now OK with US troops killing Muslims on their soil because “NATO.”Duckwithabone said:
Most is a slightly ambiguous word. Let’s just say a landslide popular vote wants these actions. That’s not to say Biden is beyond criticism. But increasing involvement in NATO is generally not one that Dems will have a problem with.PurpleThrobber said:
"most".Duckwithabone said:
He didn’t have to run on it. He ran on returning competence to the White House and in foreign affairs. Active membership in global organizations such as NATO among others is part of that deal. It’s what was voted for and again, most of us wanted to happen.RaceBannon said:
No it isn'tDuckwithabone said:
Booooorrrrring. US involved with NATO again, big deal. It’s what most of us want.NorthwestFresh said:I had predicted new wars by summer but didn’t expect it this soon.
Halliburton, Raytheon, and the rest of the war machine needs some contracts right now from the Big Guy.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2021/02/18/politics/us-troops-iraq/index.html
US signals it is open to sending more troops to support NATO's mission in Iraq
(CNN) The Pentagon opened the door to the possibility of sending more American troops to the Middle East as part of a newly expanded NATO training mission to support Iraqi forces and ensure that ISIS does not rise again.
"The US is participating in the force generation process for NATO Mission Iraq and will contribute its fair share to this important expanded mission," Pentagon spokesperson Cmdr. Jessica L. McNulty told CNN. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin spoke about the mission with his NATO counterparts during a meeting with defense ministers on Thursday.
Did Biden run on this?
Nope
You're a bootlicker who follows your party line
Define that.
Because 'most' isn't 51%.
Embarrassing... -
Isis and al-Qaeda - American/NWO inventions used to start wars in the Middle East and remove liberties in the West. Executed war criminal John McCain was the leader of ISIS and OBL worked for the CIA.
-
White men?RaceBannon said:
You people are seriously stupid. Too stupid to even know when you're being mockedDuckwithabone said:
Since when did tighty righties have a problem with politicians using privilege to get out of going to war. McCain was the last actual war veteran who embraced that role in the Republican Party and you all hated him.NorthwestFresh said:RaceBannon said:Biden is a draft dodger
Five asthma deferments for the HBCU football star and world-class life guard/protector of children from CornPop, who was a bad dude.
That's not what I'm hearing.
