Chickenhawk Biden Update: US open to sending troops into Iraq
Comments
-
Olga, I've never been anti-war. Sometimes you have to be willing to go to war.NorthwestFresh said:
They are now all-in for the West occupying Iraq again after a basic trial balloon from the Biden administration. No pushback at all from the “anti-war” Chickenhawks @HHusky and @These clowns won’t criticize Biden for anything.RaceBannon said:These Biden dick suckers will support anything
Boner voted for it!
My 2004 Presidential vote was entirely premised on W being a better choice to continue the war effort.
You looking for dove? Look in the mirror.
-
To be willing to go to war, you have to take a break from warHHusky said:
Olga, I've never been anti-war. Sometimes you have to be willing to go to war.NorthwestFresh said:
They are now all-in for the West occupying Iraq again after a basic trial balloon from the Biden administration. No pushback at all from the “anti-war” Chickenhawks @HHusky and @These clowns won’t criticize Biden for anything.RaceBannon said:These Biden dick suckers will support anything
Boner voted for it!
My 2004 Presidential vote was entirely premised on W being a better choice to continue the war effort.
You looking for dove? Look in the mirror.
Which your guys haven’t done. -
We haven't got to war. We have got to virtue signaling and money spending with thousands of dead and wounded Americans. War is not having Rules of Engagement on requiring soldiers to take fire before engaging in limited action. War is Dresden and Hiroshima. You think the Taliban fear the Americans? Hell, you can taste the disrespect for the soft and stupid Americans from that shit hole.PurpleThrobber said:
To be willing to go to war, you have to take a break from warHHusky said:
Olga, I've never been anti-war. Sometimes you have to be willing to go to war.NorthwestFresh said:
They are now all-in for the West occupying Iraq again after a basic trial balloon from the Biden administration. No pushback at all from the “anti-war” Chickenhawks @HHusky and @These clowns won’t criticize Biden for anything.RaceBannon said:These Biden dick suckers will support anything
Boner voted for it!
My 2004 Presidential vote was entirely premised on W being a better choice to continue the war effort.
You looking for dove? Look in the mirror.
Which your guys haven’t done. -
But you can’t allow fiscally irresponsible countries like Germany to have seat and pay next to nothing.Duckwithabone said:
I don’t disagree at all with your criticism of NATO and the former guy pushing for change in NATO was one of the few things I sort of agreed on. However that doesn’t mean that we leave NATO completely. You need a seat at the table if you want to push for change.greenblood said:
I have no issues with NATO as long as the other members pay their fair share. But no, they make the US front the bill and continuously bash said country. Fuck themDuckwithabone said:
Booooorrrrring. US involved with NATO again, big deal. It’s what most of us want.NorthwestFresh said:I had predicted new wars by summer but didn’t expect it this soon.
Halliburton, Raytheon, and the rest of the war machine needs some contracts right now from the Big Guy.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2021/02/18/politics/us-troops-iraq/index.html
US signals it is open to sending more troops to support NATO's mission in Iraq
(CNN) The Pentagon opened the door to the possibility of sending more American troops to the Middle East as part of a newly expanded NATO training mission to support Iraqi forces and ensure that ISIS does not rise again.
"The US is participating in the force generation process for NATO Mission Iraq and will contribute its fair share to this important expanded mission," Pentagon spokesperson Cmdr. Jessica L. McNulty told CNN. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin spoke about the mission with his NATO counterparts during a meeting with defense ministers on Thursday.
Most of the other countries in NATO are entitled little bitches. No wonder liberals love them. -
So, it’s only the deaths due to Covid under Trump that trigger you. Got it, thanks!HHusky said:
Olga, I've never been anti-war. Sometimes you have to be willing to go to war.NorthwestFresh said:
They are now all-in for the West occupying Iraq again after a basic trial balloon from the Biden administration. No pushback at all from the “anti-war” Chickenhawks @HHusky and @These clowns won’t criticize Biden for anything.RaceBannon said:These Biden dick suckers will support anything
Boner voted for it!
My 2004 Presidential vote was entirely premised on W being a better choice to continue the war effort.
You looking for dove? Look in the mirror. -
Kurd lives matter.doogie said:
So, it’s only the deaths due to Covid under Trump that trigger you. Got it, thanks!HHusky said:
Olga, I've never been anti-war. Sometimes you have to be willing to go to war.NorthwestFresh said:
They are now all-in for the West occupying Iraq again after a basic trial balloon from the Biden administration. No pushback at all from the “anti-war” Chickenhawks @HHusky and @These clowns won’t criticize Biden for anything.RaceBannon said:These Biden dick suckers will support anything
Boner voted for it!
My 2004 Presidential vote was entirely premised on W being a better choice to continue the war effort.
You looking for dove? Look in the mirror. -
Germany gets more natural gas from Russia than any other country they buy from yet its Trump that is buddies with Putin. Russia just started up work again on NS2 as our? America Last president shuts down work on XL.greenblood said:
But you can’t allow fiscally irresponsible countries like Germany to have seat and pay next to nothing.Duckwithabone said:
I don’t disagree at all with your criticism of NATO and the former guy pushing for change in NATO was one of the few things I sort of agreed on. However that doesn’t mean that we leave NATO completely. You need a seat at the table if you want to push for change.greenblood said:
I have no issues with NATO as long as the other members pay their fair share. But no, they make the US front the bill and continuously bash said country. Fuck themDuckwithabone said:
Booooorrrrring. US involved with NATO again, big deal. It’s what most of us want.NorthwestFresh said:I had predicted new wars by summer but didn’t expect it this soon.
Halliburton, Raytheon, and the rest of the war machine needs some contracts right now from the Big Guy.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2021/02/18/politics/us-troops-iraq/index.html
US signals it is open to sending more troops to support NATO's mission in Iraq
(CNN) The Pentagon opened the door to the possibility of sending more American troops to the Middle East as part of a newly expanded NATO training mission to support Iraqi forces and ensure that ISIS does not rise again.
"The US is participating in the force generation process for NATO Mission Iraq and will contribute its fair share to this important expanded mission," Pentagon spokesperson Cmdr. Jessica L. McNulty told CNN. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin spoke about the mission with his NATO counterparts during a meeting with defense ministers on Thursday.
Most of the other countries in NATO are entitled little bitches. No wonder liberals love them.
-
Like I said, you’re a Chickenhawk.HHusky said:
Olga, I've never been anti-war. Sometimes you have to be willing to go to war.NorthwestFresh said:
They are now all-in for the West occupying Iraq again after a basic trial balloon from the Biden administration. No pushback at all from the “anti-war” Chickenhawks @HHusky and @These clowns won’t criticize Biden for anything.RaceBannon said:These Biden dick suckers will support anything
Boner voted for it!
My 2004 Presidential vote was entirely premised on W being a better choice to continue the war effort.
You looking for dove? Look in the mirror. -
This aged well.Duckwithabone said:
He didn’t have to run on it. He ran on returning competence to the White House and in foreign affairs. Active membership in global organizations such as NATO among others is part of that deal. It’s what was voted for and again, most of us wanted to happen.RaceBannon said:
No it isn'tDuckwithabone said:
Booooorrrrring. US involved with NATO again, big deal. It’s what most of us want.NorthwestFresh said:I had predicted new wars by summer but didn’t expect it this soon.
Halliburton, Raytheon, and the rest of the war machine needs some contracts right now from the Big Guy.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2021/02/18/politics/us-troops-iraq/index.html
US signals it is open to sending more troops to support NATO's mission in Iraq
(CNN) The Pentagon opened the door to the possibility of sending more American troops to the Middle East as part of a newly expanded NATO training mission to support Iraqi forces and ensure that ISIS does not rise again.
"The US is participating in the force generation process for NATO Mission Iraq and will contribute its fair share to this important expanded mission," Pentagon spokesperson Cmdr. Jessica L. McNulty told CNN. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin spoke about the mission with his NATO counterparts during a meeting with defense ministers on Thursday.
Did Biden run on this?
Nope
You're a bootlicker who follows your party line -
The fact that he hasn't posted in well over a year but was active on the site last night tells me that he perhaps realized the error of his vote and feels the shame he should. That, or he is a giant pussy and doesn't want to face the Tug firing squad for his poor choices.hardhat said:
This aged well.Duckwithabone said:
He didn’t have to run on it. He ran on returning competence to the White House and in foreign affairs. Active membership in global organizations such as NATO among others is part of that deal. It’s what was voted for and again, most of us wanted to happen.RaceBannon said:
No it isn'tDuckwithabone said:
Booooorrrrring. US involved with NATO again, big deal. It’s what most of us want.NorthwestFresh said:I had predicted new wars by summer but didn’t expect it this soon.
Halliburton, Raytheon, and the rest of the war machine needs some contracts right now from the Big Guy.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2021/02/18/politics/us-troops-iraq/index.html
US signals it is open to sending more troops to support NATO's mission in Iraq
(CNN) The Pentagon opened the door to the possibility of sending more American troops to the Middle East as part of a newly expanded NATO training mission to support Iraqi forces and ensure that ISIS does not rise again.
"The US is participating in the force generation process for NATO Mission Iraq and will contribute its fair share to this important expanded mission," Pentagon spokesperson Cmdr. Jessica L. McNulty told CNN. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin spoke about the mission with his NATO counterparts during a meeting with defense ministers on Thursday.
Did Biden run on this?
Nope
You're a bootlicker who follows your party line
