Biden DOJ arrest guy who posted voting meme in 2016.
Comments
-
At the very least he won't be convicted. The DOJ is basing his case on the grounds that people were 'blocked' from actually voting. This meme did nothing to block anyone from voting. And as others have pointed out, similar joke/trick memes have been made and shared by people from both sides, so this would open up a massive can of worms.HHusky said:
Fender's remorse is the new test of statutory construction.Fenderbender123 said:
It literally just says 'Hillary' and doesn't give a last name. It also doesn't say anything about what they're voting for, just 'president'. President of what? Not to mention it says to TEXT your vote which should make it obvious even to most children that it's not a real vote for US President. I feel no remorse for anyone who texted their vote to this number instead of filling out an actual ballot, and it seems obvious that this case will be thrown out.TheKobeStopper said:
What’s the joke? -
Please eliminate this douche StalinTheKobeStopper said:Do you guys think it should be legal to disseminate misinformation designed to deprive individuals of their constitutional right to vote?
-
No, keep him.RoadTrip said:
Please eliminate this douche StalinTheKobeStopper said:Do you guys think it should be legal to disseminate misinformation designed to deprive individuals of their constitutional right to vote?
Where else can you make fun of the short bus kids and not get in trouble.
"Are you not entertained?" -
The statute requires a conspiracy. That differentiates it from a lot of the jokes and tricks. But I agree that the actual language of the statute is where the defense can make some hay. There is plenty of evidence of a conspiracy, but a conspiracy to do what exactly?Fenderbender123 said:
At the very least he won't be convicted. The DOJ is basing his case on the grounds that people were 'blocked' from actually voting. This meme did nothing to block anyone from voting. And as others have pointed out, similar joke/trick memes have been made and shared by people from both sides, so this would open up a massive can of worms.HHusky said:
Fender's remorse is the new test of statutory construction.Fenderbender123 said:
It literally just says 'Hillary' and doesn't give a last name. It also doesn't say anything about what they're voting for, just 'president'. President of what? Not to mention it says to TEXT your vote which should make it obvious even to most children that it's not a real vote for US President. I feel no remorse for anyone who texted their vote to this number instead of filling out an actual ballot, and it seems obvious that this case will be thrown out.TheKobeStopper said:
What’s the joke? -
So no caseHHusky said:
The statute requires a conspiracy. That differentiates it from a lot of the jokes and tricks. But I agree that the actual language of the statute is where the defense can make some hay. There is plenty of evidence of a conspiracy, but a conspiracy to do what exactly?Fenderbender123 said:
At the very least he won't be convicted. The DOJ is basing his case on the grounds that people were 'blocked' from actually voting. This meme did nothing to block anyone from voting. And as others have pointed out, similar joke/trick memes have been made and shared by people from both sides, so this would open up a massive can of worms.HHusky said:
Fender's remorse is the new test of statutory construction.Fenderbender123 said:
It literally just says 'Hillary' and doesn't give a last name. It also doesn't say anything about what they're voting for, just 'president'. President of what? Not to mention it says to TEXT your vote which should make it obvious even to most children that it's not a real vote for US President. I feel no remorse for anyone who texted their vote to this number instead of filling out an actual ballot, and it seems obvious that this case will be thrown out.TheKobeStopper said:
What’s the joke?
You don't get paid by the word here -
The why is as important as the outcome. Don't quit your day job.RaceBannon said:
So no caseHHusky said:
The statute requires a conspiracy. That differentiates it from a lot of the jokes and tricks. But I agree that the actual language of the statute is where the defense can make some hay. There is plenty of evidence of a conspiracy, but a conspiracy to do what exactly?Fenderbender123 said:
At the very least he won't be convicted. The DOJ is basing his case on the grounds that people were 'blocked' from actually voting. This meme did nothing to block anyone from voting. And as others have pointed out, similar joke/trick memes have been made and shared by people from both sides, so this would open up a massive can of worms.HHusky said:
Fender's remorse is the new test of statutory construction.Fenderbender123 said:
It literally just says 'Hillary' and doesn't give a last name. It also doesn't say anything about what they're voting for, just 'president'. President of what? Not to mention it says to TEXT your vote which should make it obvious even to most children that it's not a real vote for US President. I feel no remorse for anyone who texted their vote to this number instead of filling out an actual ballot, and it seems obvious that this case will be thrown out.TheKobeStopper said:
What’s the joke?
You don't get paid by the word here -
HHusky said:
So nothing. Again.SFGbob said:
Yeah, Daddy gave Rush a medal is more the Dazzler's kind of winning argument.HHusky said:
18 U.S. Code § 241 is the law.RaceBannon said:
Well that does describe democrat voters but its not against the law anymore than it is for Biden to claim he had a covid planHHusky said:Is tricking the ignorant and gullible into not exercising their votes protected speech?
I don't think the First Amendment is your best argument here.
I agree with you that it would be smarter to argue that the statute wasn't intended to criminalize this conduct.
The First Amendment argument strikes me as a loser.
Agree, that argument made by you was on account of the fact you had nothing. -
So still nothingHHusky said:
The why is as important as the outcome. Don't quit your day job.RaceBannon said:
So no caseHHusky said:
The statute requires a conspiracy. That differentiates it from a lot of the jokes and tricks. But I agree that the actual language of the statute is where the defense can make some hay. There is plenty of evidence of a conspiracy, but a conspiracy to do what exactly?Fenderbender123 said:
At the very least he won't be convicted. The DOJ is basing his case on the grounds that people were 'blocked' from actually voting. This meme did nothing to block anyone from voting. And as others have pointed out, similar joke/trick memes have been made and shared by people from both sides, so this would open up a massive can of worms.HHusky said:
Fender's remorse is the new test of statutory construction.Fenderbender123 said:
It literally just says 'Hillary' and doesn't give a last name. It also doesn't say anything about what they're voting for, just 'president'. President of what? Not to mention it says to TEXT your vote which should make it obvious even to most children that it's not a real vote for US President. I feel no remorse for anyone who texted their vote to this number instead of filling out an actual ballot, and it seems obvious that this case will be thrown out.TheKobeStopper said:
What’s the joke?
You don't get paid by the word here
I do your job better than you -
obviouslyRaceBannon said:
So still nothingHHusky said:
The why is as important as the outcome. Don't quit your day job.RaceBannon said:
So no caseHHusky said:
The statute requires a conspiracy. That differentiates it from a lot of the jokes and tricks. But I agree that the actual language of the statute is where the defense can make some hay. There is plenty of evidence of a conspiracy, but a conspiracy to do what exactly?Fenderbender123 said:
At the very least he won't be convicted. The DOJ is basing his case on the grounds that people were 'blocked' from actually voting. This meme did nothing to block anyone from voting. And as others have pointed out, similar joke/trick memes have been made and shared by people from both sides, so this would open up a massive can of worms.HHusky said:
Fender's remorse is the new test of statutory construction.Fenderbender123 said:
It literally just says 'Hillary' and doesn't give a last name. It also doesn't say anything about what they're voting for, just 'president'. President of what? Not to mention it says to TEXT your vote which should make it obvious even to most children that it's not a real vote for US President. I feel no remorse for anyone who texted their vote to this number instead of filling out an actual ballot, and it seems obvious that this case will be thrown out.TheKobeStopper said:
What’s the joke?
You don't get paid by the word here
I do your job better than you -
Everyone has noticed. I've checked around
-
Legendary Internet forum Dipshit @HHusky posted the statute and read it afterward, so he amended his thoughts on its application. There is no case here other than harassment. Biden’s handlers are on a fast track to completely criminalizing political dissent, from what I used to hear from Rats like Hillary was “patriotic.”
A real Clarence Darrow here, folks. -
"Equity" must be the U of O admitting people who don't read too good.NorthwestFresh said:Legendary Internet forum Dipshit @HHusky posted the statute and read it afterward, so he amended his thoughts on its application. There is no case here other than harassment. Biden’s handlers are on a fast track to completely criminalizing political dissent, from what I used to hear from Rats like Hillary was “patriotic.”
A real Clarence Darrow here, folks. -
Nah, you posted before reading yet again on your statute.HHusky said:
"Equity" must be the U of O admitting people who don't read too good.NorthwestFresh said:Legendary Internet forum Dipshit @HHusky posted the statute and read it afterward, so he amended his thoughts on its application. There is no case here other than harassment. Biden’s handlers are on a fast track to completely criminalizing political dissent, from what I used to hear from Rats like Hillary was “patriotic.”
A real Clarence Darrow here, folks. -
No. But I'm more amused that you think I changed my tune.NorthwestFresh said:
Nah, you posted before reading yet again on your statute.HHusky said:
"Equity" must be the U of O admitting people who don't read too good.NorthwestFresh said:Legendary Internet forum Dipshit @HHusky posted the statute and read it afterward, so he amended his thoughts on its application. There is no case here other than harassment. Biden’s handlers are on a fast track to completely criminalizing political dissent, from what I used to hear from Rats like Hillary was “patriotic.”
A real Clarence Darrow here, folks. -
You did though. It’s in the thread.HHusky said:
No. But I'm more amused that you think I changed my tune.NorthwestFresh said:
Nah, you posted before reading yet again on your statute.HHusky said:
"Equity" must be the U of O admitting people who don't read too good.NorthwestFresh said:Legendary Internet forum Dipshit @HHusky posted the statute and read it afterward, so he amended his thoughts on its application. There is no case here other than harassment. Biden’s handlers are on a fast track to completely criminalizing political dissent, from what I used to hear from Rats like Hillary was “patriotic.”
A real Clarence Darrow here, folks.
“conspiracy”
Dipshit lies repeatedly. -
that makes no sense. sad.NorthwestFresh said:
You did though. It’s in the thread.HHusky said:
No. But I'm more amused that you think I changed my tune.NorthwestFresh said:
Nah, you posted before reading yet again on your statute.HHusky said:
"Equity" must be the U of O admitting people who don't read too good.NorthwestFresh said:Legendary Internet forum Dipshit @HHusky posted the statute and read it afterward, so he amended his thoughts on its application. There is no case here other than harassment. Biden’s handlers are on a fast track to completely criminalizing political dissent, from what I used to hear from Rats like Hillary was “patriotic.”
A real Clarence Darrow here, folks.
“conspiracy”
Dipshit lies repeatedly. -
Thoughts?HHusky said:
that makes no sense. sad.NorthwestFresh said:
You did though. It’s in the thread.HHusky said:
No. But I'm more amused that you think I changed my tune.NorthwestFresh said:
Nah, you posted before reading yet again on your statute.HHusky said:
"Equity" must be the U of O admitting people who don't read too good.NorthwestFresh said:Legendary Internet forum Dipshit @HHusky posted the statute and read it afterward, so he amended his thoughts on its application. There is no case here other than harassment. Biden’s handlers are on a fast track to completely criminalizing political dissent, from what I used to hear from Rats like Hillary was “patriotic.”
A real Clarence Darrow here, folks.
“conspiracy”
Dipshit lies repeatedly.
This is Exhibit A to the judge in pre-trial hearing of the evidence a jury will see on the hypocrisy in this partisan prosecution.
-
“Exhibit A, your honor, someone else also committed this crime. I rest my case.”NorthwestFresh said:
Thoughts?HHusky said:
that makes no sense. sad.NorthwestFresh said:
You did though. It’s in the thread.HHusky said:
No. But I'm more amused that you think I changed my tune.NorthwestFresh said:
Nah, you posted before reading yet again on your statute.HHusky said:
"Equity" must be the U of O admitting people who don't read too good.NorthwestFresh said:Legendary Internet forum Dipshit @HHusky posted the statute and read it afterward, so he amended his thoughts on its application. There is no case here other than harassment. Biden’s handlers are on a fast track to completely criminalizing political dissent, from what I used to hear from Rats like Hillary was “patriotic.”
A real Clarence Darrow here, folks.
“conspiracy”
Dipshit lies repeatedly.
This is Exhibit A to the judge in pre-trial hearing of the evidence a jury will see on the hypocrisy in this partisan prosecution.
You’re basically Lt. Daniel Kaffee. -
And her co-conspirators are . . .?NorthwestFresh said:
Thoughts?HHusky said:
that makes no sense. sad.NorthwestFresh said:
You did though. It’s in the thread.HHusky said:
No. But I'm more amused that you think I changed my tune.NorthwestFresh said:
Nah, you posted before reading yet again on your statute.HHusky said:
"Equity" must be the U of O admitting people who don't read too good.NorthwestFresh said:Legendary Internet forum Dipshit @HHusky posted the statute and read it afterward, so he amended his thoughts on its application. There is no case here other than harassment. Biden’s handlers are on a fast track to completely criminalizing political dissent, from what I used to hear from Rats like Hillary was “patriotic.”
A real Clarence Darrow here, folks.
“conspiracy”
Dipshit lies repeatedly.
This is Exhibit A to the judge in pre-trial hearing of the evidence a jury will see on the hypocrisy in this partisan prosecution. -
Yes - pointing out murders committed by others in your own murder trial is always a terrific defenseTheKobeStopper said:
“Exhibit A, your honor, someone else also committed this crime. I rest my case.”NorthwestFresh said:
Thoughts?HHusky said:
that makes no sense. sad.NorthwestFresh said:
You did though. It’s in the thread.HHusky said:
No. But I'm more amused that you think I changed my tune.NorthwestFresh said:
Nah, you posted before reading yet again on your statute.HHusky said:
"Equity" must be the U of O admitting people who don't read too good.NorthwestFresh said:Legendary Internet forum Dipshit @HHusky posted the statute and read it afterward, so he amended his thoughts on its application. There is no case here other than harassment. Biden’s handlers are on a fast track to completely criminalizing political dissent, from what I used to hear from Rats like Hillary was “patriotic.”
A real Clarence Darrow here, folks.
“conspiracy”
Dipshit lies repeatedly.
This is Exhibit A to the judge in pre-trial hearing of the evidence a jury will see on the hypocrisy in this partisan prosecution.
You’re basically Lt. Daniel Kaffee.
lol -
Just got this text. I gave them all of my bank account info and my SS#.
Good move?
-
Another excellent defense.NorthwestFresh said:Just got this text. I gave them all of my bank account info and my SS#.
Good move?
Good work, good effort. -
Should be easy to determine how many Trump voters texted in their “votes”
Should also be easy to determine if the Trump supporter pulling in the Trump voters, let those Trump votes rot rather than make an effort to get them counted. -
Yeah but conspiracydoogie said:Should be easy to determine how many Trump voters texted in their “votes”
Should also be easy to determine if the Trump supporter pulling in the Trump voters, let those Trump votes rot rather than make an effort to get them counted. -
The statute requires a conspiracy.NorthwestFresh said:
Yeah but conspiracydoogie said:Should be easy to determine how many Trump voters texted in their “votes”
Should also be easy to determine if the Trump supporter pulling in the Trump voters, let those Trump votes rot rather than make an effort to get them counted.
Reading is fundamental. -
Conspiracy? That’s domestic terrorism now if you’re on the Right.HHusky said:
The statute requires a conspiracy.NorthwestFresh said:
Yeah but conspiracydoogie said:Should be easy to determine how many Trump voters texted in their “votes”
Should also be easy to determine if the Trump supporter pulling in the Trump voters, let those Trump votes rot rather than make an effort to get them counted.
Reading is fundamental.
Leftists can coordinate attacks on federal buildings online and you applaud it. -
When precisely did I "applaud" attacks on federal buildings, Boris?NorthwestFresh said:
Conspiracy? That’s domestic terrorism now if you’re on the Right.HHusky said:
The statute requires a conspiracy.NorthwestFresh said:
Yeah but conspiracydoogie said:Should be easy to determine how many Trump voters texted in their “votes”
Should also be easy to determine if the Trump supporter pulling in the Trump voters, let those Trump votes rot rather than make an effort to get them counted.
Reading is fundamental.
Leftists can coordinate attacks on federal buildings online and you applaud it. -
I guess equal protection under the law is out again
Democrats never did like it. Racists -
H is clinging to "others" in his conspiracy theorySFGbob said:Naaaah, there's no war on free speech.
If you're really so fucking stupid that you believed you really could vote via text, should you even have the ability to vote in the first place.
Because the cops said so
Bootlicker -
The charging documents are online, madam. I've read them.RaceBannon said:
H is clinging to "others" in his conspiracy theorySFGbob said:Naaaah, there's no war on free speech.
If you're really so fucking stupid that you believed you really could vote via text, should you even have the ability to vote in the first place.
Because the cops said so
Bootlicker
