Rationalizations from Trumptards wanted

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-corrupts/ar-BB1crvZg?item=flights:prg-enterpriseblended-t,1s-ent-microsoft&ocid=entnewsntp

A Republican Party based on the idea that power should be wielded whenever possible, and that Congress ought to override the states whenever Congress disagrees, is not in any way a conservative party.

The Republican Party became a cult of personality by the time Trump won the presidency. Now we’re seeing crystal clear the costs of that transition.

HHusky said:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-corrupts/ar-BB1crvZg?item=flights:prg-enterpriseblended-t,1s-ent-microsoft&ocid=entnewsntp

A Republican Party based on the idea that power should be wielded whenever possible, and that Congress ought to override the states whenever Congress disagrees, is not in any way a conservative party.

The Republican Party became a cult of personality by the time Trump won the presidency. Now we’re seeing crystal clear the costs of that transition.

Uh, a party dedicated to voter fraud is your choice not mine. We are seeing a crystal clear example of this with the dazzer who FEELS that voter ID is racist and so is an honest election.

AOG said:

HoustonHusky said:

AOG said:

The ballot-suitcase video has been debunked for literally months

Have a link to the investigation report? Trump even asked for it in the phone call...Georgia SOS didn’t know how to respond.

Liar.

An investigation report that proves something didn't happen? This is known as:

Argument from ignorance (from Latin: argumentum ad ignorantiam), also known as appeal to ignorance (in which ignorance represents "a lack of contrary evidence"), is a fallacy in informal logic. It asserts that a proposition is true because it has not yet been proven false or a proposition is false because it has not yet been proven true.

Example: HoustonHusky is a fag. If I can't prove that false does it mean it's true?

You beat your wife but ok.

Thing is, if I didn’t have a video of you beating your wife me saying so doesn’t mean a whole lot. When I have a video of somebody lying about a leak in the building which records prove didn’t happen to clear the room of observers, and then go on to “count” ballots without observers in any form which is against all election laws, much less counting from unidentifiable boxes not in the standard storage location, that is the equivalent of a video of you hitting your wife and gives the accusation a lot more weight.

Feel free to try and explain why you were hitting your wife and provide the police report absolving you, but don’t tell me my own eyes are lying to me.

Liar.

AOG said:

HoustonHusky said:

AOG said:

HoustonHusky said:

AOG said:

The ballot-suitcase video has been debunked for literally months

Have a link to the investigation report? Trump even asked for it in the phone call...Georgia SOS didn’t know how to respond.

Liar.

An investigation report that proves something didn't happen? This is known as:

Argument from ignorance (from Latin: argumentum ad ignorantiam), also known as appeal to ignorance (in which ignorance represents "a lack of contrary evidence"), is a fallacy in informal logic. It asserts that a proposition is true because it has not yet been proven false or a proposition is false because it has not yet been proven true.

Example: HoustonHusky is a fag. If I can't prove that false does it mean it's true?

You beat your wife but ok.

Thing is, if I didn’t have a video of you beating your wife me saying so doesn’t mean a whole lot. When I have a video of somebody lying about a leak in the building which records prove didn’t happen to clear the room of observers, and then go on to “count” ballots without observers in any form which is against all election laws, much less counting from unidentifiable boxes not in the standard storage location, that is the equivalent of a video of you hitting your wife and gives the accusation a lot more weight.

Feel free to try and explain why you were hitting your wife and provide the police report absolving you, but don’t tell me my own eyes are lying to me.

Liar.

That's a twist of the facts.... if you can't prove fraud nor disprove fraud nothing happened

There is a video showing election laws being broken as I previously specified...you didn’t contradict a single thing I said because you can’t.

You claimed that video has been disproven...I asked for the link to the report explaining/disproving it. You can’t provide that either.

Because you are a liar.