Imagine voting for Biden I still feel good about it. How's it go now....If you vote for a racist then you are a ???? Biden can’t be racist, he served as VP for a black guy.
Imagine voting for Biden I still feel good about it. How's it go now....If you vote for a racist then you are a ????
Imagine voting for Biden I still feel good about it.
Imagine voting for Biden
I wanted to catch you assholes before you got the official excuse. This had to hurt their souls. Anybody can tell somebody to fuck on in an anonymous forum. But tell me how you excuse a president that threatens a secretary of state with a criminal charge of some kind if he doesn't "find" some votes, and gives a specific number? Yeah? How?
I wanted to catch you assholes before you got the official excuse. This had to hurt their souls.
I wanted to catch you assholes before you got the official excuse.
I wanted to catch you assholes before you got the official excuse. This had to hurt their souls. Anybody can tell somebody to fuck on in an anonymous forum. But tell me how you excuse a president that threatens a secretary of state with a criminal charge of some kind if he doesn't "find" some votes, and gives a specific number? Yeah? How? Are you seriously This dense?
I know exactly why your entire thread is nothing but an emotional meltdown. You dropped out of Central. It’s understandable why you don’t understand
I know exactly why your entire thread is nothing but an emotional meltdown. You dropped out of Central. It’s understandable why you don’t understand You mean the president does NOT have the sole power to coerce constitutionally?
The ballot-suitcase video has been debunked for literally months
The ballot-suitcase video has been debunked for literally months Have a link to the investigation report? Trump even asked for it in the phone call...Georgia SOS didn’t know how to respond.Liar.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-corrupts/ar-BB1crvZg?item=flights:prg-enterpriseblended-t,1s-ent-microsoft&ocid=entnewsntpA Republican Party based on the idea that power should be wielded whenever possible, and that Congress ought to override the states whenever Congress disagrees, is not in any way a conservative party.The Republican Party became a cult of personality by the time Trump won the presidency. Now we’re seeing crystal clear the costs of that transition.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-corrupts/ar-BB1crvZg?item=flights:prg-enterpriseblended-t,1s-ent-microsoft&ocid=entnewsntpA Republican Party based on the idea that power should be wielded whenever possible, and that Congress ought to override the states whenever Congress disagrees, is not in any way a conservative party.The Republican Party became a cult of personality by the time Trump won the presidency. Now we’re seeing crystal clear the costs of that transition. Uh, a party dedicated to voter fraud is your choice not mine. We are seeing a crystal clear example of this with the dazzer who FEELS that voter ID is racist and so is an honest election.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-corrupts/ar-BB1crvZg?item=flights:prg-enterpriseblended-t,1s-ent-microsoft&ocid=entnewsntpA Republican Party based on the idea that power should be wielded whenever possible, and that Congress ought to override the states whenever Congress disagrees, is not in any way a conservative party.The Republican Party became a cult of personality by the time Trump won the presidency. Now we’re seeing crystal clear the costs of that transition. Uh, a party dedicated to voter fraud is your choice not mine. We are seeing a crystal clear example of this with the dazzer who FEELS that voter ID is racist and so is an honest election. Except there isn’t any evidence of voter fraud, Gasbag. None. Whatsoever.
The ballot-suitcase video has been debunked for literally months Have a link to the investigation report? Trump even asked for it in the phone call...Georgia SOS didn’t know how to respond.Liar. An investigation report that proves something didn't happen? This is known as:Argument from ignorance (from Latin: argumentum ad ignorantiam), also known as appeal to ignorance (in which ignorance represents "a lack of contrary evidence"), is a fallacy in informal logic. It asserts that a proposition is true because it has not yet been proven false or a proposition is false because it has not yet been proven true.Example: HoustonHusky is a fag. If I can't prove that false does it mean it's true?
The ballot-suitcase video has been debunked for literally months Have a link to the investigation report? Trump even asked for it in the phone call...Georgia SOS didn’t know how to respond.Liar. An investigation report that proves something didn't happen? This is known as:Argument from ignorance (from Latin: argumentum ad ignorantiam), also known as appeal to ignorance (in which ignorance represents "a lack of contrary evidence"), is a fallacy in informal logic. It asserts that a proposition is true because it has not yet been proven false or a proposition is false because it has not yet been proven true.Example: HoustonHusky is a fag. If I can't prove that false does it mean it's true? You beat your wife but ok.Thing is, if I didn’t have a video of you beating your wife me saying so doesn’t mean a whole lot. When I have a video of somebody lying about a leak in the building which records prove didn’t happen to clear the room of observers, and then go on to “count” ballots without observers in any form which is against all election laws, much less counting from unidentifiable boxes not in the standard storage location, that is the equivalent of a video of you hitting your wife and gives the accusation a lot more weight.Feel free to try and explain why you were hitting your wife and provide the police report absolving you, but don’t tell me my own eyes are lying to me.Liar.
The ballot-suitcase video has been debunked for literally months Have a link to the investigation report? Trump even asked for it in the phone call...Georgia SOS didn’t know how to respond.Liar. An investigation report that proves something didn't happen? This is known as:Argument from ignorance (from Latin: argumentum ad ignorantiam), also known as appeal to ignorance (in which ignorance represents "a lack of contrary evidence"), is a fallacy in informal logic. It asserts that a proposition is true because it has not yet been proven false or a proposition is false because it has not yet been proven true.Example: HoustonHusky is a fag. If I can't prove that false does it mean it's true? You beat your wife but ok.Thing is, if I didn’t have a video of you beating your wife me saying so doesn’t mean a whole lot. When I have a video of somebody lying about a leak in the building which records prove didn’t happen to clear the room of observers, and then go on to “count” ballots without observers in any form which is against all election laws, much less counting from unidentifiable boxes not in the standard storage location, that is the equivalent of a video of you hitting your wife and gives the accusation a lot more weight.Feel free to try and explain why you were hitting your wife and provide the police report absolving you, but don’t tell me my own eyes are lying to me.Liar. That's a twist of the facts.... if you can't prove fraud nor disprove fraud nothing happened
