Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Rationalizations from Trumptards wanted

2456

Comments

  • AOG
    AOG Member Posts: 2,647
    edited January 2021
    NorthwestFresh said:

    AOG said:

    NorthwestFresh said:

    AOG said:

    TheKobeStopper said:

    AOG said:

    I wanted to catch you assholes before you got the official excuse.

    This had to hurt their souls.
    Anybody can tell somebody to fuck on in an anonymous forum. But tell me how you excuse a president that threatens a secretary of state with a criminal charge of some kind if he doesn't "find" some votes, and gives a specific number? Yeah? How?
    How did he threaten him with a criminal charge? Use your words.
    Listen -- Trump said he was "notifying" him that what he's doing is a crime (paraphrased! -- that what it is though)
    That’s not threatening him and Trump can’t prosecute anyone.

    You’re lying, which is no surprise.
    Seriously, Trump can use the implied threat since he appoints the director of the DOJ. Trump is making a threat. Whether he can follow through may be in doubt, but we know Barr went along with Trump's plans. Why would Raf... not assume he was the next target? Trump is using his position of power over the DOJ (which he has clearly now demonstrated) as a threat.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • insinceredawg
    insinceredawg Member Posts: 5,117
    NorthwestFresh said:

    AOG said:

    I'll check back in an hour once the conservative elites cook up an excuse.

    I already commented. I find nothing wrong with it and would like to know the full context, but we know that won’t happen.

    The President didn’t threaten anyone with jail, so you’re making it up. If you’re going to lie about it, you don’t deserve anything other than derision.
    Of course you don't. Trump could fuck your wife and daughter and you'd still be on here gargling his orange cock.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    AOG said:

    NorthwestFresh said:

    AOG said:

    NorthwestFresh said:

    AOG said:

    TheKobeStopper said:

    AOG said:

    I wanted to catch you assholes before you got the official excuse.

    This had to hurt their souls.
    Anybody can tell somebody to fuck on in an anonymous forum. But tell me how you excuse a president that threatens a secretary of state with a criminal charge of some kind if he doesn't "find" some votes, and gives a specific number? Yeah? How?
    How did he threaten him with a criminal charge? Use your words.
    Listen -- Trump said he was "notifying" him that what he's doing is a crime (paraphrased! -- that what it is though)
    That’s not threatening him and Trump can’t prosecute anyone.

    You’re lying, which is no surprise.
    Seriously, Trump can use the implied threat since he appoints the director of the DOJ. Trump is making a threat. Whether he can follow through may be in doubt, but we know Barr went along with Trump's plans. Why would Raf... not assume he was the next target? Trump is using his position of power over the DOJ (which he has clearly now demonstrated) as a threat.
    “Implied threat” is the “he didn’t say it but he meant it” mind-reading I’ve come to expect from Leftists.

    You lied. Admit it.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AOG
    AOG Member Posts: 2,647
    NorthwestFresh said:

    AOG said:

    NorthwestFresh said:

    AOG said:

    NorthwestFresh said:

    AOG said:

    TheKobeStopper said:

    AOG said:

    I wanted to catch you assholes before you got the official excuse.

    This had to hurt their souls.
    Anybody can tell somebody to fuck on in an anonymous forum. But tell me how you excuse a president that threatens a secretary of state with a criminal charge of some kind if he doesn't "find" some votes, and gives a specific number? Yeah? How?
    How did he threaten him with a criminal charge? Use your words.
    Listen -- Trump said he was "notifying" him that what he's doing is a crime (paraphrased! -- that what it is though)
    That’s not threatening him and Trump can’t prosecute anyone.

    You’re lying, which is no surprise.
    Seriously, Trump can use the implied threat since he appoints the director of the DOJ. Trump is making a threat. Whether he can follow through may be in doubt, but we know Barr went along with Trump's plans. Why would Raf... not assume he was the next target? Trump is using his position of power over the DOJ (which he has clearly now demonstrated) as a threat.
    “Implied threat” is the “he didn’t say it but he meant it” mind-reading I’ve come to expect from Leftists.

    You lied. Admit it.
    weak. Trump "notified" him of what might happen, and Trump pulls the strings at the DOJ.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    insinceredawg said:

    NorthwestFresh said:

    AOG said:

    I'll check back in an hour once the conservative elites cook up an excuse.

    I already commented. I find nothing wrong with it and would like to know the full context, but we know that won’t happen.

    The President didn’t threaten anyone with jail, so you’re making it up. If you’re going to lie about it, you don’t deserve anything other than derision.
    Of course you don't. Trump could fuck your wife and daughter and you'd still be on here gargling his orange cock.

    You have the weirdest sex fantasies. Fantasizing about a man molesting my daughter is fucking disgusting, you pervert.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    AOG said:

    NorthwestFresh said:

    AOG said:

    NorthwestFresh said:

    AOG said:

    NorthwestFresh said:

    AOG said:

    TheKobeStopper said:

    AOG said:

    I wanted to catch you assholes before you got the official excuse.

    This had to hurt their souls.
    Anybody can tell somebody to fuck on in an anonymous forum. But tell me how you excuse a president that threatens a secretary of state with a criminal charge of some kind if he doesn't "find" some votes, and gives a specific number? Yeah? How?
    How did he threaten him with a criminal charge? Use your words.
    Listen -- Trump said he was "notifying" him that what he's doing is a crime (paraphrased! -- that what it is though)
    That’s not threatening him and Trump can’t prosecute anyone.

    You’re lying, which is no surprise.
    Seriously, Trump can use the implied threat since he appoints the director of the DOJ. Trump is making a threat. Whether he can follow through may be in doubt, but we know Barr went along with Trump's plans. Why would Raf... not assume he was the next target? Trump is using his position of power over the DOJ (which he has clearly now demonstrated) as a threat.
    “Implied threat” is the “he didn’t say it but he meant it” mind-reading I’ve come to expect from Leftists.

    You lied. Admit it.
    weak. Trump "notified" him of what might happen, and Trump pulls the strings at the DOJ.
    “Trump pulls the strings at the DOJ.”

    He also didn’t threaten anyone.

    Could you post without lying? Is it possible for you? I think you can post without a lie. Try it.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    Of course you don't. Trump could fuck your wife and daughter and you'd still be on here gargling his orange cock.

    Is every Leftist here a lonely freak with child molesting And cock-sucking fantasies?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • insinceredawg
    insinceredawg Member Posts: 5,117
    NorthwestFresh said:

    Of course you don't. Trump could fuck your wife and daughter and you'd still be on here gargling his orange cock.

    Is every Leftist here a lonely freak with child molesting And cock-sucking fantasies?

    You didn't deny my statement so I'll take that as a yes, Trump has free rein on all the women in the NorthwestFresh household.

    Ask your good buddy Lady B about cock sucking fantasies on here.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,999
    edited January 2021
    TheKobeStopper said:

    RaceBannon said:

    TheKobeStopper said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Imagine voting for Biden

    I still feel good about it.
    How's it go now....

    If you vote for a racist then you are a ????
    Biden can’t be racist, he served as VP for a black guy.
    Biden did call Obama the first “clean” African-American candidate...
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    insinceredawg said:

    NorthwestFresh said:

    Of course you don't. Trump could fuck your wife and daughter and you'd still be on here gargling his orange cock.

    Is every Leftist here a lonely freak with child molesting And cock-sucking fantasies?

    You didn't deny my statement so I'll take that as a yes, Trump has free rein on all the women in the NorthwestFresh household.

    Ask your good buddy Lady B about cock sucking fantasies on here.
    insinceredawg said:

    NorthwestFresh said:

    Of course you don't. Trump could fuck your wife and daughter and you'd still be on here gargling his orange cock.

    Is every Leftist here a lonely freak with child molesting And cock-sucking fantasies?

    You didn't deny my statement so I'll take that as a yes, Trump has free rein on all the women in the NorthwestFresh household.

    Ask your good buddy Lady B about cock sucking fantasies on here.
    His perverted fantasy continues. Dude hasn’t been laid ever is my guess, so he shares his sick perversions thinking they are normal.

    Dumb and lonely is a sad way to live.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,725 Founders Club
    TheKobeStopper said:

    RaceBannon said:

    TheKobeStopper said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Imagine voting for Biden

    I still feel good about it.
    How's it go now....

    If you vote for a racist then you are a ????
    Biden can’t be racist, he served as VP for a black guy.
    Friends bracelet jpeg
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072
    AOG said:

    TheKobeStopper said:

    AOG said:

    I wanted to catch you assholes before you got the official excuse.

    This had to hurt their souls.
    Anybody can tell somebody to fuck on in an anonymous forum. But tell me how you excuse a president that threatens a secretary of state with a criminal charge of some kind if he doesn't "find" some votes, and gives a specific number? Yeah? How?
    Are you seriously This dense?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AOG
    AOG Member Posts: 2,647
    doogie said:

    AOG said:

    TheKobeStopper said:

    AOG said:

    I wanted to catch you assholes before you got the official excuse.

    This had to hurt their souls.
    Anybody can tell somebody to fuck on in an anonymous forum. But tell me how you excuse a president that threatens a secretary of state with a criminal charge of some kind if he doesn't "find" some votes, and gives a specific number? Yeah? How?
    Are you seriously This dense?
    I said I wanted your rationalization because you don't know what to say yet.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AOG
    AOG Member Posts: 2,647
    doogie said:

    I know exactly why your entire thread is nothing but an emotional meltdown.

    You dropped out of Central. It’s understandable why you don’t understand

    You mean the president does NOT have the sole power to coerce constitutionally?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072
    AOG said:

    doogie said:

    I know exactly why your entire thread is nothing but an emotional meltdown.

    You dropped out of Central. It’s understandable why you don’t understand

    You mean the president does NOT have the sole power to coerce constitutionally?
    I gave this a Not your best effort

    Apologies in advance if it was
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AOG
    AOG Member Posts: 2,647
    The ballot-suitcase video has been debunked for literally months
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    AOG said:

    The ballot-suitcase video has been debunked for literally months

    How? Why did they kick everyone out and then pull out literal suitcases of votes?

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,999
    AOG said:

    The ballot-suitcase video has been debunked for literally months

    Have a link to the investigation report? Trump even asked for it in the phone call...Georgia SOS didn’t know how to respond.

    Liar.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072
    Whatever it takes
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,883
    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-corrupts/ar-BB1crvZg?item=flights:prg-enterpriseblended-t,1s-ent-microsoft&ocid=entnewsntp

    A Republican Party based on the idea that power should be wielded whenever possible, and that Congress ought to override the states whenever Congress disagrees, is not in any way a conservative party.

    The Republican Party became a cult of personality by the time Trump won the presidency. Now we’re seeing crystal clear the costs of that transition.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AOG
    AOG Member Posts: 2,647
    edited January 2021
    HoustonHusky said:

    AOG said:

    The ballot-suitcase video has been debunked for literally months

    Have a link to the investigation report? Trump even asked for it in the phone call...Georgia SOS didn’t know how to respond.

    Liar.
    An investigation report that proves something didn't happen? This is known as:

    Argument from ignorance (from Latin: argumentum ad ignorantiam), also known as appeal to ignorance (in which ignorance represents "a lack of contrary evidence"), is a fallacy in informal logic. It asserts that a proposition is true because it has not yet been proven false or a proposition is false because it has not yet been proven true.

    Example: HoustonHusky is a fag. If I can't prove that false does it mean it's true?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,541 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-corrupts/ar-BB1crvZg?item=flights:prg-enterpriseblended-t,1s-ent-microsoft&ocid=entnewsntp

    A Republican Party based on the idea that power should be wielded whenever possible, and that Congress ought to override the states whenever Congress disagrees, is not in any way a conservative party.

    The Republican Party became a cult of personality by the time Trump won the presidency. Now we’re seeing crystal clear the costs of that transition.

    Uh, a party dedicated to voter fraud is your choice not mine. We are seeing a crystal clear example of this with the dazzer who FEELS that voter ID is racist and so is an honest election.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,883
    WestlinnDuck said:

    HHusky said:

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-corrupts/ar-BB1crvZg?item=flights:prg-enterpriseblended-t,1s-ent-microsoft&ocid=entnewsntp

    A Republican Party based on the idea that power should be wielded whenever possible, and that Congress ought to override the states whenever Congress disagrees, is not in any way a conservative party.

    The Republican Party became a cult of personality by the time Trump won the presidency. Now we’re seeing crystal clear the costs of that transition.

    Uh, a party dedicated to voter fraud is your choice not mine. We are seeing a crystal clear example of this with the dazzer who FEELS that voter ID is racist and so is an honest election.
    Except there isn’t any evidence of voter fraud, Gasbag. None. Whatsoever.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • insinceredawg
    insinceredawg Member Posts: 5,117
    HHusky said:

    WestlinnDuck said:

    HHusky said:

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-corrupts/ar-BB1crvZg?item=flights:prg-enterpriseblended-t,1s-ent-microsoft&ocid=entnewsntp

    A Republican Party based on the idea that power should be wielded whenever possible, and that Congress ought to override the states whenever Congress disagrees, is not in any way a conservative party.

    The Republican Party became a cult of personality by the time Trump won the presidency. Now we’re seeing crystal clear the costs of that transition.

    Uh, a party dedicated to voter fraud is your choice not mine. We are seeing a crystal clear example of this with the dazzer who FEELS that voter ID is racist and so is an honest election.
    Except there isn’t any evidence of voter fraud, Gasbag. None. Whatsoever.
    There is evidence.......of Trump supporters committing fraud.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,999
    edited January 2021
    AOG said:

    HoustonHusky said:

    AOG said:

    The ballot-suitcase video has been debunked for literally months

    Have a link to the investigation report? Trump even asked for it in the phone call...Georgia SOS didn’t know how to respond.

    Liar.
    An investigation report that proves something didn't happen? This is known as:

    Argument from ignorance (from Latin: argumentum ad ignorantiam), also known as appeal to ignorance (in which ignorance represents "a lack of contrary evidence"), is a fallacy in informal logic. It asserts that a proposition is true because it has not yet been proven false or a proposition is false because it has not yet been proven true.

    Example: HoustonHusky is a fag. If I can't prove that false does it mean it's true?
    You beat your wife but ok.

    Thing is, if I didn’t have a video of you beating your wife me saying so doesn’t mean a whole lot. When I have a video of somebody lying about a leak in the building which records prove didn’t happen to clear the room of observers, and then go on to “count” ballots without observers in any form which is against all election laws, much less counting from unidentifiable boxes not in the standard storage location, that is the equivalent of a video of you hitting your wife and gives the accusation a lot more weight.

    Feel free to try and explain why you were hitting your wife and provide the police report absolving you, but don’t tell me my own eyes are lying to me.

    Liar.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AOG
    AOG Member Posts: 2,647
    HoustonHusky said:

    AOG said:

    HoustonHusky said:

    AOG said:

    The ballot-suitcase video has been debunked for literally months

    Have a link to the investigation report? Trump even asked for it in the phone call...Georgia SOS didn’t know how to respond.

    Liar.
    An investigation report that proves something didn't happen? This is known as:

    Argument from ignorance (from Latin: argumentum ad ignorantiam), also known as appeal to ignorance (in which ignorance represents "a lack of contrary evidence"), is a fallacy in informal logic. It asserts that a proposition is true because it has not yet been proven false or a proposition is false because it has not yet been proven true.

    Example: HoustonHusky is a fag. If I can't prove that false does it mean it's true?
    You beat your wife but ok.

    Thing is, if I didn’t have a video of you beating your wife me saying so doesn’t mean a whole lot. When I have a video of somebody lying about a leak in the building which records prove didn’t happen to clear the room of observers, and then go on to “count” ballots without observers in any form which is against all election laws, much less counting from unidentifiable boxes not in the standard storage location, that is the equivalent of a video of you hitting your wife and gives the accusation a lot more weight.

    Feel free to try and explain why you were hitting your wife and provide the police report absolving you, but don’t tell me my own eyes are lying to me.

    Liar.
    That's a twist of the facts.... if you can't prove fraud nor disprove fraud nothing happened
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,999
    AOG said:

    HoustonHusky said:

    AOG said:

    HoustonHusky said:

    AOG said:

    The ballot-suitcase video has been debunked for literally months

    Have a link to the investigation report? Trump even asked for it in the phone call...Georgia SOS didn’t know how to respond.

    Liar.
    An investigation report that proves something didn't happen? This is known as:

    Argument from ignorance (from Latin: argumentum ad ignorantiam), also known as appeal to ignorance (in which ignorance represents "a lack of contrary evidence"), is a fallacy in informal logic. It asserts that a proposition is true because it has not yet been proven false or a proposition is false because it has not yet been proven true.

    Example: HoustonHusky is a fag. If I can't prove that false does it mean it's true?
    You beat your wife but ok.

    Thing is, if I didn’t have a video of you beating your wife me saying so doesn’t mean a whole lot. When I have a video of somebody lying about a leak in the building which records prove didn’t happen to clear the room of observers, and then go on to “count” ballots without observers in any form which is against all election laws, much less counting from unidentifiable boxes not in the standard storage location, that is the equivalent of a video of you hitting your wife and gives the accusation a lot more weight.

    Feel free to try and explain why you were hitting your wife and provide the police report absolving you, but don’t tell me my own eyes are lying to me.

    Liar.
    That's a twist of the facts.... if you can't prove fraud nor disprove fraud nothing happened
    There is a video showing election laws being broken as I previously specified...you didn’t contradict a single thing I said because you can’t.

    You claimed that video has been disproven...I asked for the link to the report explaining/disproving it. You can’t provide that either.

    Because you are a liar.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter