Ahmed haters
Comments
-
This deserves more chinsPurpleThrobber said:
He was a Sunni in Peterman'sPurpleBaze said:Glad he can show off his explosiveness in the pros. He was more of a sleeper cell at Montlake.
shitShiite offense.
-
Fucker about to steal gaskins joob
-
This. Thanks. It’s hard to base a living as a running back in the NFL counting on what you describe. So the NFL will likely mean not for long if that’s what he needs to thrive.chuck said:We could all see that the key for Ahmed at UW was to get the correct play calls. He wasn't good enough to make a bad play a good one. He wasn't powerful enough to grind out yardage in tight spaces. What he was good at was exploiting a big hole or opening outside the tackles.
They must be doing a good job blocking and scheming to get him going. As long as he has that he could be a good, dangerous back for a long time. -
He was misused at UW. He is an outside zone runner. Now he’s being used correctly he can use his god given gifts
-
At UW Ahmed was more soft athlete than actual football playerbackthepack said:He was misused at UW. He is an outside zone runner. Now he’s being used correctly he can use his god given gifts
The scheme should have used him better, I said it a lot when he was here, but he wasn’t a good college RB
IDGAF about the nfl, he left early and went Undrafted, if he found a spot where he is used better in line with his abilities or he finally worked on a lot of the things that held him back like his vision, decisiveness, blocking, and pass catching then good on him I guess. -
Which is what I expect, but he'll buy himself years and $$ every time he has a nice game or stretch of games because he really looks impressive when it's going well.creepycoug said:
This. Thanks. It’s hard to base a living as a running back in the NFL counting on what you describe. So the NFL will likely mean not for long if that’s what he needs to thrive.chuck said:We could all see that the key for Ahmed at UW was to get the correct play calls. He wasn't good enough to make a bad play a good one. He wasn't powerful enough to grind out yardage in tight spaces. What he was good at was exploiting a big hole or opening outside the tackles.
They must be doing a good job blocking and scheming to get him going. As long as he has that he could be a good, dangerous back for a long time. -
It wasn’t a putrid OL and like a Creep said, Gaskin did it 4 straight years.backthepack said:
He was a 1,000 yard back running behind a putrid offensive line! Quit moving the goalposts old man!creepycoug said:
HOF.backthepack said:@creepycoug is shaking and vomiting!
If he has a career, and it's a bit early for that, let's revisit. Until then, he sucked like a donkey at UW. Maybe he just didn't care and wanted to save himself for the NFL. Sounds like your kinda guy Fudgie.
Chris Polk has three 1,000 yard season behind a putrid OL. Ahmed’s was above average. -
@backthepackHouhusky said:
At UW Ahmed was more soft athlete than actual football playerbackthepack said:He was misused at UW. He is an outside zone runner. Now he’s being used correctly he can use his god given gifts
The scheme should have used him better, I said it a lot when he was here, but he wasn’t a good college RB
IDGAF about the nfl, he left early and went Undrafted, if he found a spot where he is used better in line with his abilities or he finally worked on a lot of the things that held him back like his vision, decisiveness, blocking, and pass catching then good on him I guess. -
He was soft. Get off your knees for Christ’s sake. It’s embarrassing.backthepack said:He was misused at UW. He is an outside zone runner. Now he’s being used correctly he can use his god given gifts
-
Soft running backs don’t go for 122 yards in the NFL. Hth.creepycoug said:
He was soft. Get off your knees for Christ’s sake. It’s embarrassing.backthepack said:He was misused at UW. He is an outside zone runner. Now he’s being used correctly he can use his god given gifts
