Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Ahmed haters

2

Comments

  • FireCohenFireCohen Member Posts: 21,823

    Glad he can show off his explosiveness in the pros. He was more of a sleeper cell at Montlake.

    He was a Sunni in Peterman's shit Shiite offense.

    This deserves more chins
  • FireCohenFireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    edited December 2020
    Fucker about to steal gaskins joob
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 22,958
    chuck said:

    We could all see that the key for Ahmed at UW was to get the correct play calls. He wasn't good enough to make a bad play a good one. He wasn't powerful enough to grind out yardage in tight spaces. What he was good at was exploiting a big hole or opening outside the tackles.

    They must be doing a good job blocking and scheming to get him going. As long as he has that he could be a good, dangerous back for a long time.

    This. Thanks. It’s hard to base a living as a running back in the NFL counting on what you describe. So the NFL will likely mean not for long if that’s what he needs to thrive.
  • backthepackbackthepack Member Posts: 19,839
    He was misused at UW. He is an outside zone runner. Now he’s being used correctly he can use his god given gifts
  • HouhuskyHouhusky Member Posts: 5,537

    He was misused at UW. He is an outside zone runner. Now he’s being used correctly he can use his god given gifts

    At UW Ahmed was more soft athlete than actual football player

    The scheme should have used him better, I said it a lot when he was here, but he wasn’t a good college RB

    IDGAF about the nfl, he left early and went Undrafted, if he found a spot where he is used better in line with his abilities or he finally worked on a lot of the things that held him back like his vision, decisiveness, blocking, and pass catching then good on him I guess.
  • chuckchuck Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 10,925 Swaye's Wigwam

    chuck said:

    We could all see that the key for Ahmed at UW was to get the correct play calls. He wasn't good enough to make a bad play a good one. He wasn't powerful enough to grind out yardage in tight spaces. What he was good at was exploiting a big hole or opening outside the tackles.

    They must be doing a good job blocking and scheming to get him going. As long as he has that he could be a good, dangerous back for a long time.

    This. Thanks. It’s hard to base a living as a running back in the NFL counting on what you describe. So the NFL will likely mean not for long if that’s what he needs to thrive.
    Which is what I expect, but he'll buy himself years and $$ every time he has a nice game or stretch of games because he really looks impressive when it's going well.
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 22,958
    Houhusky said:

    He was misused at UW. He is an outside zone runner. Now he’s being used correctly he can use his god given gifts

    At UW Ahmed was more soft athlete than actual football player

    The scheme should have used him better, I said it a lot when he was here, but he wasn’t a good college RB

    IDGAF about the nfl, he left early and went Undrafted, if he found a spot where he is used better in line with his abilities or he finally worked on a lot of the things that held him back like his vision, decisiveness, blocking, and pass catching then good on him I guess.
    @backthepack
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 22,958

    He was misused at UW. He is an outside zone runner. Now he’s being used correctly he can use his god given gifts

    He was soft. Get off your knees for Christ’s sake. It’s embarrassing.
  • backthepackbackthepack Member Posts: 19,839

    He was misused at UW. He is an outside zone runner. Now he’s being used correctly he can use his god given gifts

    He was soft. Get off your knees for Christ’s sake. It’s embarrassing.
    Soft running backs don’t go for 122 yards in the NFL. Hth.
  • Kingdome_UrinalsKingdome_Urinals Member Posts: 2,717

    He was misused at UW. He is an outside zone runner. Now he’s being used correctly he can use his god given gifts

    The college game is filled with RB's who don't need to be "used correctly" but can simply make plays against the generally diluted quality of defensive players relative to that seen in the NFL. (Jermar Jefferson)

    Also, you can't be an RB who just runs "outside zone," you have to be able to go between the tackles, pass protect, and catch the ball. This is not an endorsement of CP's stupid offense, just an observation of football generally, and Salvon often struggled in those facets.

    I'm glad for Ahmed but the tape doesn't lie, he missed a ton of holes at UW, had some good runs, and great games, but he just wasn't as good as Polk, Sankey, or Gaskin.

    The NFL doesn't really run "feature backs" that much anymore, which will suit Salvon's style just fine. He has the quickness and burst to be a solid rotation player and will have some good days.
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 22,958

    He was misused at UW. He is an outside zone runner. Now he’s being used correctly he can use his god given gifts

    He was soft. Get off your knees for Christ’s sake. It’s embarrassing.
    Soft running backs don’t go for 122 yards in the NFL. Hth.
    Apparently, they do. Maybe he's so scared now that it makes him get his ass in gear a little quicker than he did in Pac 12 play.

  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 22,958

    He was misused at UW. He is an outside zone runner. Now he’s being used correctly he can use his god given gifts

    The college game is filled with RB's who don't need to be "used correctly" but can simply make plays against the generally diluted quality of defensive players relative to that seen in the NFL. (Jermar Jefferson)

    Also, you can't be an RB who just runs "outside zone," you have to be able to go between the tackles, pass protect, and catch the ball. This is not an endorsement of CP's stupid offense, just an observation of football generally, and Salvon often struggled in those facets.

    I'm glad for Ahmed but the tape doesn't lie, he missed a ton of holes at UW, had some good runs, and great games, but he just wasn't as good as Polk, Sankey, or Gaskin.

    The NFL doesn't really run "feature backs" that much anymore, which will suit Salvon's style just fine. He has the quickness and burst to be a solid rotation player and will have some good days.
    If he makes a career as an established running back, I will be shocked.

    Nobody hates him. The case has been laid out. BtP never backs down, which he learned from his Daddy Ballz. It was so impossible for him at Washington because Pete and O line, and yet Myles Gaskin, who's smaller and slower top end, and at best as quick, had 4 1,000 yard seasons, didn't go down on first contact, and was money in critical down and distance.

    If you have high standards, that's what you call a good back.

    If you have low standards, you call what Ahmed did at Washington elite.

    That simple.
  • NeGgaPlEaSeNeGgaPlEaSe Member Posts: 5,729
    Sources said:

    Pete’s offense sucked. HTH

    His offensive sucked, his coaches sucked, play calling sucked. Not one offensive player got better. They all regressed over time.
  • FireCohenFireCohen Member Posts: 21,823

    Sources said:

    Pete’s offense sucked. HTH

    His offensive sucked, his coaches sucked, play calling sucked. Not one offensive player got better. They all regressed over time.
    I am glad he is gone
  • QuietcowskeeQuietcowskee Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 3,291 Swaye's Wigwam
    McGrew is gonna be a fucking STAR next year!
  • jecorneljecornel Member Posts: 9,726
    Ahmed hasn’t run soft in the NFL. He looks really good.
Sign In or Register to comment.