The eyes of Texas are upon you
Comments
-
SCOTUS did not throw it out. Fake News truly is the Enemy of the People. Look it how it makes a simpleton like @AOG thinks he’s smart when the reality is he’s embarrassing himself.AOG said:
The PA lawsuit was that the state violated the Constitution ("broke the law"). SCOTUS threw that out. In one sentence.RaceBannon said:
The states broke the lawAOG said:
Partly this is the same crap the Supremes just threw out, that PA pushed the limits of law by allowing for a lot of mail in votes. Imagine if you were a judge. Would you really completely defame yourself for all history by throwing out Biden's win for Trump on the grounds that in the year of a pandemic governments made it easy to vote by mail? You have to have SOME brains to see this issue.RaceBannon said:This is really the only thing out there that has even a ghost of a chance because the states clearly did not follow the law in changing the rules for the election in the 4 states. But the law is for the little people. I suspect that it won't even get heard because if they hear it they really need to rule in favor of Texas.
Sounds like even you realize
The wonders of the pandemic. Fuck off -
The injunction was denied meaning the judge did not think it would succeed. That sounds tantamount to throwing it out, "won't succeed."NorthwestFresh said:
SCOTUS did not throw it out. Fake News truly is the Enemy of the People. Look it how it makes a simpleton like @AOG thinks he’s smart when the reality is he’s embarrassing himself.AOG said:
The PA lawsuit was that the state violated the Constitution ("broke the law"). SCOTUS threw that out. In one sentence.RaceBannon said:
The states broke the lawAOG said:
Partly this is the same crap the Supremes just threw out, that PA pushed the limits of law by allowing for a lot of mail in votes. Imagine if you were a judge. Would you really completely defame yourself for all history by throwing out Biden's win for Trump on the grounds that in the year of a pandemic governments made it easy to vote by mail? You have to have SOME brains to see this issue.RaceBannon said:This is really the only thing out there that has even a ghost of a chance because the states clearly did not follow the law in changing the rules for the election in the 4 states. But the law is for the little people. I suspect that it won't even get heard because if they hear it they really need to rule in favor of Texas.
Sounds like even you realize
The wonders of the pandemic. Fuck off -
They want them all in the Supreme court. Who cares about states. This is how you get there. Where exactly did you go to school? You don't know shit.AOG said:Supreme Court threw out the PA case a moment ago
this was that crackpot "Frankenstein" case thrown out with prejudice by the local judge -
Rocket man. Please show us where the constitution is null and void during (fake) pandemics.AOG said:
Partly this is the same crap the Supremes just threw out, that PA pushed the limits of law by allowing for a lot of mail in votes. Imagine if you were a judge. Would you really completely defame yourself for all history by throwing out Biden's win for Trump on the grounds that in the year of a pandemic governments made it easy to vote by mail? You have to have SOME brains to see this issue.RaceBannon said:This is really the only thing out there that has even a ghost of a chance because the states clearly did not follow the law in changing the rules for the election in the 4 states. But the law is for the little people. I suspect that it won't even get heard because if they hear it they really need to rule in favor of Texas.
-
If you start talking about Pennsylvania in the Texas thread its a tell
There is a process to change election laws and it isn't done by one man rule
Texas has standing because a federal election effects us all
They probably won't hear it but your deflection and bullshit speaks volumes -
-
-
SECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSECSledog said: -
If you show that prevailing world circumstances don't affect legal judgmentsSledog said:
Rocket man. Please show us where the constitution is null and void during (fake) pandemics.AOG said:
Partly this is the same crap the Supremes just threw out, that PA pushed the limits of law by allowing for a lot of mail in votes. Imagine if you were a judge. Would you really completely defame yourself for all history by throwing out Biden's win for Trump on the grounds that in the year of a pandemic governments made it easy to vote by mail? You have to have SOME brains to see this issue.RaceBannon said:This is really the only thing out there that has even a ghost of a chance because the states clearly did not follow the law in changing the rules for the election in the 4 states. But the law is for the little people. I suspect that it won't even get heard because if they hear it they really need to rule in favor of Texas.
-
IncredibleAOG said:
If you show that prevailing world circumstances don't affect legal judgmentsSledog said:
Rocket man. Please show us where the constitution is null and void during (fake) pandemics.AOG said:
Partly this is the same crap the Supremes just threw out, that PA pushed the limits of law by allowing for a lot of mail in votes. Imagine if you were a judge. Would you really completely defame yourself for all history by throwing out Biden's win for Trump on the grounds that in the year of a pandemic governments made it easy to vote by mail? You have to have SOME brains to see this issue.RaceBannon said:This is really the only thing out there that has even a ghost of a chance because the states clearly did not follow the law in changing the rules for the election in the 4 states. But the law is for the little people. I suspect that it won't even get heard because if they hear it they really need to rule in favor of Texas.
